RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the positivity rate of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) testing among universal, hearing-targeted CMV testing (HT-cCMV) and delayed targeted dried blood spot (DBS) testing newborn screening programs, and to examine the characteristics of successful HT-cCMV testing programs. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective survey of birth hospitals performing early CMV testing. SETTING: Multiple institutions. METHODS: Birth hospitals participating in the National Institutes of Health ValEAR clinical trial were surveyed to determine the rates of cCMV positivity associated with 3 different testing approaches: universal testing, HT-cCMV, and DBS testing. A mixed methods model was created to determine associations between successful HT-cCMV screening and specific screening protocols. RESULTS: Eighty-two birth hospitals were surveyed from February 2019 to December 2021. Seven thousand six hundred seventy infants underwent universal screening, 9017 infants HT-cCMV and 535 infants delayed DBS testing. The rates of cCMV positivity were 0.5%, 1.5%, and 7.3%, respectively. The positivity rate for universal CMV screening was less during the COVID-19 pandemic than that reported prior to the pandemic. There were no statistically significant drops in positivity for any approach during the pandemic. For HT-cCMV testing, unique order sets and rigorous posttesting protocols were associated with successful screening programs. CONCLUSION: Rates of cCMV positivity differed among the 3 approaches. The rates are comparable to cohort studies reported in the literature. Universal CMV prevalence decreased during the pandemic but not significantly. Institutions with specific order set for CMV testing where the primary care physician orders the test and the nurse facilitates the testing process exhibited higher rates of HT-cCMV testing.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Tamizaje Neonatal , Humanos , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/congénito , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/epidemiología , Tamizaje Neonatal/métodos , Recién Nacido , Estudios Prospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Pruebas con Sangre Seca , Femenino , MasculinoRESUMEN
AIM: Current clinical and laboratory diagnostics for neonatal infection are inadequate. An infant's systemic inflammatory response may be identified earlier than clinical suspicion by a computerized algorithm (RALIS) incorporating multiple vital signs (VS). We tested the ability of RALIS to detect late onset infection (LOI) earlier than clinically suspected. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of infants enrolled in a birth cohort study at Prentice Women's Hospital. VS data (heart rate, respirations, temperature, desaturation, bradycardia) were extracted from electronic records of 73 premature infants (born ≤28 weeks' gestation; survived first month). RALIS generated a continuous output for the first 28 days of life. A score ≥5 for 6 h triggered an alert. The time of RALIS alert to time of clinical suspicion of infection (time culture sent) was measured for each episode of suspected and/or confirmed LOI. RESULTS: Among the 73 infants followed with RALIS, there were 34 episodes of culture-positive LOI, seven culture-negative but treated episodes, and 13 false-positive culture (untreated) episodes. Twenty-five infants had no culture-positive or treated sepsis events during the observation period. There was a positive linear association between alert and culture (ß=0.88, P<0.001). Mean absolute time difference between alert and culture was 59.4 h before culture. Sensitivity and specificity of RALIS for LOI were 0.82 and 0.44. CONCLUSION: The RALIS algorithm is a sensitive indicator for early detection of infection in preterm infants. Further modifications to improve the specificity of the algorithm are needed prior to application of VS modeling to patient antibiotic treatment decisions.