Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 29(12): 1273-1287, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31669106

RESUMEN

AIMS: Dietary pattern (DP) analysis has emerged as a holistic method to understand the effects of food intake on health outcomes. Though dietary intake has been associated with cardiovascular disease, the association of DPs and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), a robust early marker of cardiovascular disease progression has not been comprehensively investigated. This study systematically explores the association of a posteriori and a priori DPs and CIMT. DATA SYNTHESIS: Through a systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science, twenty studies that derived DPs using a posteriori or a priori methods with CIMT as an outcome were included. Four cross-sectional studies and 1 cohort paper reported a statistically significant association between increased consumption of 'unhealthy' foods (i.e processed meat, soda drinks and refined grain) and increased CIMT. While four cross-sectional studies reported a statistically significant association of DPs characterized by increased consumption of 'healthy' foods (i.e fruit and vegetables, fish) and decreased CIMT. DPs derived from each study varied depending on derivation method, study design and use of dietary data collection method. CONCLUSION: Findings from this review are generally supportive of a trend between DPs with higher consumption of 'healthy' foods and lower consumption of 'unhealthy' foods and decreased CIMT; however, the association was largely not statistically significant. Evidence was overwhelmingly heterogeneous due to differences seen in DPs based on location and culture, sample characteristics and adjustment for confounders. Long-term prospective observational and interventional studies with standardized sample selection and dietary data collection are needed to significantly establish the role of DPs on CIMT.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Grosor Intima-Media Carotídeo , Dieta Saludable , Dieta , Conducta Alimentaria , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/prevención & control , Dieta/efectos adversos , Dieta Mediterránea , Enfoques Dietéticos para Detener la Hipertensión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Nutritivo , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevención Primaria , Pronóstico , Factores Protectores , Ingesta Diaria Recomendada , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Clin Obes ; 6(6): 365-375, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27869360

RESUMEN

The ratio between fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) has been used to discriminate individual differences in body composition and improve prediction of metabolic risk. Here, we evaluated whether the use of a visceral adipose tissue-to-fat-free mass index (VAT:FFMI) ratio was a better predictor of metabolic risk than a fat mass index to fat-free mass index (FMI:FFMI) ratio. This is a cross-sectional study including 3441 adult participants (age range 18-81; men/women: 977/2464). FM and FFM were measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis and VAT by ultrasonography. A continuous metabolic risk Z score and harmonised international criteria were used to define cumulative metabolic risk and metabolic syndrome (MetS), respectively. Multivariate logistic and linear regression models were used to test associations between body composition indexes and metabolic risk. In unadjusted models, VAT:FFMI was a better predictor of MetS (OR 8.03, 95%CI 6.69-9.65) compared to FMI:FFMI (OR 2.91, 95%CI 2.45-3.46). However, the strength of association of VAT:FFMI and FMI:FFMI became comparable when models were adjusted for age, gender, clinical and sociodemographic factors (OR 4.06, 95%CI 3.31-4.97; OR 4.25, 95%CI 3.42-5.27, respectively). A similar pattern was observed for the association of the two indexes with the metabolic risk Z score (VAT:FFMI: unadjusted b = 0.69 ± 0.03, adjusted b = 0.36 ± 0.03; FMI:FFMI: unadjusted b = 0.28 ± 0.028, adjusted b = 0.38 ± 0.02). Our results suggest that there is no real advantage in using either VAT:FFMI or FMI:FFMI ratios as a predictor of metabolic risk in adults. However, these results warrant confirmation in longitudinal studies.


Asunto(s)
Composición Corporal , Síndrome Metabólico/fisiopatología , Músculo Esquelético/metabolismo , Obesidad/fisiopatología , Sarcopenia/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios Transversales , Impedancia Eléctrica , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólico/epidemiología , Síndrome Metabólico/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Fenotipo , Sarcopenia/epidemiología , Sarcopenia/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA