Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 1063-1075, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39105626

RESUMEN

AIMS: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes severe lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in infants and adults. While the clinical burden was recently estimated in adults in Germany, little is known about the economic burden. To fill this gap, this study aimed to assess hospital and outpatient healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs of RSV infections in adults in Germany. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study on nationwide, representative, anonymized claims data (2015-2018), we identified patients ≥18 years with ICD-10-GM-codes specific to RSV ("RSV-specific"). To increase sensitivity, patients with unspecified LRTIs (including unspecified bronchitis, bronchiolitis, bronchopneumonia, and pneumonia) during RSV seasons were also included as cases potentially caused by RSV ("RSV-possible"). RSV-related HRU (hospital days, ICU and ventilation treatment, drug dispensation) and direct costs were estimated per episode. Excess costs per episode and for follow-up periods were compared to a matched control cohort. All outcomes were reported per healthcare sector and stratified by age and risk groups as well as disease severity (ICU admission/ventilation). RESULTS: Direct inpatient and outpatient mean episode costs were 3,473€ and 82€, respectively, with substantially higher costs for severe cases requiring intensive care and/or ventilation (10,801€). Direct costs for RSV-specific cases were higher than for RSV-possible cases (inpatients: 6,247€ vs. 3,450€; outpatients: 127€ vs. 82€). Moreover, costs were significantly higher for RSV patients than for controls and increased over time (inpatients: 5,140€ per episode vs 10,093€ per year; outpatients: 46€ per quarter vs 114€ per year). LIMITATIONS: While the number of RSV-specific cases was low, inclusion of seasonal LRTI cases likely increased the sensitivity to detect RSV cases and allowed a better estimation of the total costs of RSV. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of RSV-LRTI in adults in Germany is substantial, persists long-term, and is particularly high in the elderly. This highlights the need for cost-effective prevention measures.


Asunto(s)
Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Humanos , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/economía , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/epidemiología , Alemania , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Costo de Enfermedad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 2024 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39140604

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Germany, several biologic therapies are available for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, with the option of exceeding recommended dosages if standard dosing does not achieve a satisfactory treatment response. OBJECTIVES: To examine dose escalation in patients with biologic-treated psoriasis and associated cost development for German statutory health insurance (SHI). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, non-interventional cohort study using German SHI health claims data from 2016 to 2021. Adult patients initiating biologic treatment were included in drug-specific cohorts. The odds for dose escalation, defined as the exceedance of the individually received daily dose over the maintenance dose recommended by the European product information, was compared between cohorts using multivariate logistic regression. The impact of dose escalation on SHI expenditures was analyzed with a generalized linear model. RESULTS: The relative frequency of dose escalation varied between cohorts (range 1.1% [risankizumab] to 42.9% [infliximab]). Compared to risankizumab-treated patients, the odds for dose escalation were statistically significantly (p < 0.05) higher in patients treated with all other biologic drugs except tildrakizumab. Patients with dose escalation during the maintenance phase accrued on average €6,473 more in direct healthcare costs to the SHI over a one-year period compared to those without dose escalation, with statistical significance (p < 0.05) after controlling for differences in covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients treated with other biologics, dose escalation during the maintenance phase was lowest among risankizumab-treated patients. Dose escalation was associated with higher costs and thus a higher economic burden for the German SHI.

3.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) ; 14(6): 1575-1585, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787476

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Plaque psoriasis is a common, often debilitating, chronic autoimmune inflammatory skin disease. Moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis can be treated with biologics such as anti-interleukin and anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies. We aimed to investigate treatment discontinuation among patients with psoriasis who initiated biologic treatment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, non-interventional cohort study based on anonymized claims data from the German statutory health insurance which covered the years from 2016 to 2021. We included adult patients with psoriasis who initiated biologic treatment in drug-specific cohorts. Over a 365-day follow-up period, we assessed the frequencies and the time until treatment discontinuation for different biologics. Differences in discontinuation rates were compared using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 2565 patients with psoriasis who initiated treatment with secukinumab (n = 612), adalimumab (n = 454), guselkumab (n = 354), ixekizumab (n = 259), ustekinumab (n = 241), tildrakizumab (n = 205), brodalumab (n = 166), risankizumab (n = 145), etanercept (n = 91), certolizumab (n = 29), and infliximab (n = 9) were included. A total of 1290 patients (50.29%) discontinued treatment during the follow-up period, ranging from 30.34% (risankizumab) to 69.23% (etanercept). Median time until discontinuation of treatment ranged from 102 days (etanercept) to 208 days (risankizumab). Once the biologic treatment was discontinued, 45.05% of patients restarted the treatment with the same agent, 23.10% of patients switched to another biologic, and 31.86% received no further biologic agent. Compared to patients treated with risankizumab, the treatment discontinuation rate was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in patients treated with the other biologics except ustekinumab (p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Further research should explore reasons leading to treatment discontinuation in order to support treatment choices for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

4.
J Glaucoma ; 33(8): 549-558, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38752785

RESUMEN

PRCIS: Based on a large administrative database of German claims data, our study provides current estimates of the prevalence and incidence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) in Germany and describes selected outcomes for prevalent patients with POAG. PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence and incidence of POAG in Germany, to describe the patient population in terms of comorbidity burden, routine care, and overall healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs, and to describe treatment patterns over time in patients undergoing relevant laser procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on anonymized German claims data, we carried out a retrospective, noninterventional study covering calendar years 2016-2021. RESULTS: For the adult German population (≥18 y), we estimated a POAG 1-year prevalence of 1.70% and a 1-year incidence of 0.17% in 2018; both increased with age, peaking in 80- to 89-year-olds. Prevalence and incidence were lower in 2020 (1.65% and 0.16%, respectively), the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Most patients solely received topical treatment. Most surgically treated patients underwent laser trabeculoplasty, followed by laser iridotomy, trabeculectomy, and filtration operations with implant. In patients undergoing laser trabeculoplasty, the treatment regimen was nearly unchanged in the second year after, compared with 2 years before the procedure. Multimorbidity was commonly observed; 75.5% of patients had arterial hypertension and 50.0% had disorders of lipoprotein metabolism and other lipidemias, compared with 60.1% and 39.2%, respectively, in an age- and sex-matched control sample. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides insights into epidemiology and routine care of POAG in Germany and HCRU in prevalent patients. There was little change in treatment regimens in patients who underwent laser trabeculoplasty, 2 years after the procedure. Most patients were multimorbid highlighting the need for comprehensive care.


Asunto(s)
Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto , Humanos , Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto/epidemiología , Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto/terapia , Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto/cirugía , Alemania/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prevalencia , Incidencia , Adulto , Trabeculectomía , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Bases de Datos Factuales , SARS-CoV-2 , Terapia por Láser
5.
Psychiatr Prax ; 50(2): 67-79, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36170874

RESUMEN

Digital health applications (DiGA) delivered as psychosocial therapeutic interventions entail a huge potential through their proven medical benefit or patient-relevant structure and process improvements. Their usage as first-line or concomitant therapy is refunded by the German health insurances. Therefore, the digital health applications have to pass a complex evidence process as requested by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Services. The present article aimed at critically evaluating the available evidence of the permanently registered DiGA using the Critically Appraised Topic method. In conclusion, all studies fulfil at least two thirds of the evaluation criteria, implying that the overall evidence is of sufficient quality.


Asunto(s)
Aplicaciones Móviles , Psiquiatría , Humanos , Alemania
6.
Prev Med Rep ; 28: 101861, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35757576

RESUMEN

In Germany, there is little real-world evidence on physicians' choice of oral anticoagulants (OACs). Our study aimed at assessing preferences for and prescribing patterns of treatment options for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in clinical practice in Germany. We conducted a nationwide quantitative online survey among office-based physicians in Germany. Physicians were asked about their preference for and use of treatment options as well as factors influencing their choice of a specific OAC. A total of n = 953 physicians was surveyed in September and October 2020 (general physicians: 36.0%; internists: 37.3%; cardiologists: 23.7%; neurologists: 10.5%; multiple specialties possible). Preference and use were highest for non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs); followed by vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Most preferred OACs were apixaban (39.3%), rivaroxaban (28.5%) and edoxaban (14.7%). Most used OACs were apixaban (24.3%), rivaroxaban (21.2%) and phenprocoumon (21.4%). NOACs were preferred more often than used (85.6% > 68.6%). VKAs were preferred less often than used (9.6% < 23.5%). OAC attributes and patient characteristics related to efficacy and safety, as well as patients' kidney function were most important when selecting a specific OAC. Federal and regional governance instruments likely influenced treatment decision-making. We found a high divergence between preferences for and use of available treatment options in clinical practice. Further exploration of the importance of OAC attributes, patient characteristics as well as federal and regional governance instruments for physicians' choice of a specific OAC may help to further optimize the healthcare of patients with atrial fibrillation in the long-term.

7.
BMJ Open ; 11(2): e042818, 2021 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33558354

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend lifestyle intervention in chronic ischaemic heart disease (CIHD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, evidence from randomised controlled trials is scarce in patients with combined entities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Lifestyle Intervention in Chronic Ischaemic Heart Disease and Type 2 Diabetes (LeIKD) trial is a prospective, multicentre study that will randomise (1:1) patients with CIHD (ICD-10: I20-I25) and T2DM (ICD-10: E11) from one health insurance company into a lifestyle intervention (LS) or usual care (UC). Active LS consists of an individual combined exercise programme of strength and endurance training and nutritional counselling with regular feedback for 6 months. Intervention is supported by telemedicine. Follow-up without individualised feedback will continue for 6 months. The study aims to investigate whether an individualised telemedical supported LS intervention is superior to UC in improving cardiovascular risk factors, physical activity, quality of life, health literacy, major cardiovascular events and health economics in patients with both CIHD and T2DM. Primary endpoint is the change in HbA1c from baseline to 6 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the ethics committee of the Technical University of Munich (registration number: 144/18-S) and at each study site. The study will be conducted according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, and results will be published in articles and reports. It is funded by the Federal Joint Committee (www.innovationsfonds.g-ba.de), reference number 01NVF17015, which has no impact on data collection, analysis or interpretation. Dissemination is independent of the funding source. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT03835923. German registry for clinical studies (DRKS): DRKS00015140.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Isquemia Miocárdica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA