Effect of Luseogliflozin, a Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor, and Dipeptidyl-Peptidase 4 Inhibitors on the Quality-of-Life and Treatment Satisfaction of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Subanalysis of a Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized-Controlled Trial (J-SELECT Study).

INTRODUCTION: The effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) on quality of life (QOL) and treatment satisfaction have not been directly compared. This sub-analysis of a randomized-controlled trial with an SGLT2i, luseogliflozin, and DPP-4is compared their effects on QOL and treatment satisfaction of patients. METHODS: This study recruited 623 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were drug-naïve or treated with antidiabetic agents other than SGLT2is and DPP-4is. The patients were randomized into luseogliflozin or DPP-4i group and followed for 52 weeks. This sub-analysis assessed QOL and treatment satisfaction using Oral Hypoglycemic Agent Questionnaire (OHA-Q) version 2 in the drug-naïve subgroup who were drug-naïve at baseline and with monotherapy with luseogliflozin or DPP-4i throughout the observation period (256 patients) at 24 and 52 weeks and in the add-on subgroup who were treated with OHAs other than SGLT2is and DPP-4is (204 patients) at baseline, 24 and 52 weeks. RESULTS: In the drug-naïve subgroup, total (50.8 ± 8.2 in luseogliflozin group and 53.1 ± 10.0 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.048) and somatic symptom scores (22.4 ± 5.0 in luseogliflozin group and 24.4 ± 5.8 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.005) at 52 weeks (but not at 24 weeks) were significantly higher in DPP-4i group than in luseogliflozin group. In add-on subgroup, changes in total (3.3 ± 7.8 in luseogliflozin group and 0.9 ± 7.6 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.030) and treatment convenience (1.2 ± 3.9 in luseogliflozin group and - 0.6 ± 4.2 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.002) from baseline to 24 weeks (but not at 52 weeks) were significantly greater in luseogliflozin group than in DPP-4i group. The QOL related to safety or glycemic control was comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should pay attention to side effects of SGLT2is to maintain the patients' QOL when SGLT2is are initiated or added-on. Add-on of luseogliflozin increased patients' QOL more than DPP-4is. Considering patients' QOL and treatment satisfaction is important for selecting SGLT2is or DPP-4is. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000030128 and jRCTs031180241.

Overall Efficacy and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Luseogliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl-Peptidase 4 Inhibitors: Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized-Controlled Trial (J-SELECT study).

INTRODUCTION: Evidence of a direct comparison between dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) remains lacking, and no clear treatment strategy or rationale has been established using these drugs. This study aimed to compare the overall efficacy and safety of DPP-4is and the SGLT2i luseogliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Patients with T2DM who had not used antidiabetic agents or who had used antidiabetic agents other than SGLT2is and DPP-4is were enrolled in the study after written informed consent had been obtained. The enrolled patients were subsequently randomly assigned to either the luseogliflozin or DPP-4i group and followed up for 52 weeks. The primary (composite) endpoint was the proportion of patients who showed improvement in ≥ 3 endpoints among the following five endpoints from baseline to week 52: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), weight, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), systolic blood pressure, and pulse rate. RESULTS: A total of 623 patients were enrolled in the study and subsequently randomized to either the luseogliflozin or DPP-4i groups. The proportion of patients who showed improvement in ≥ 3 endpoints at week 52 was significantly higher in the luseogliflozin group (58.9%) than in the DPP-4i group (35.0%) (p < 0.001). When stratified by body mass index (BMI) (< 25 or ≥ 25 kg/m2) or age (< 65 or ≥ 65 years), regardless of BMI or age, the proportion of patients who achieved the composite endpoint was significantly higher in the luseogliflozin group than in the DPP-4i group. Hepatic function and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol were also significantly improved in the luseogliflozin group compared with the DPP-4i group. The frequency of non-serious/serious adverse events did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed the overall efficacy of luseogliflozin compared with DPP-4is over the mid/long term, regardless of BMI or age. The results suggest the importance of assessing multiple aspects regarding the effects of diabetes management. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs031180241.

Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A focus on hypoglycemia.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To investigate the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with a focus on hypoglycemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who started sitagliptin therapy and were followed for 52 weeks were enrolled in the Impact of Sitagliptin on Diabetes Mellitus in Japanese Elderly Patients study. The frequency of hypoglycemia and knowledge of hypoglycemia were analyzed using a questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 5,130 patients (aged 73.8 ± 6.1 years) were analyzed. A significant reduction in glycated hemoglobin (-0.7 ± 1.1%, P < 0.001) and glycoalbumin levels (-2.2 ± 3.8%, P < 0.001) was observed at week 52. The percentage of patients with hypoglycemia did not increase from the baseline (3.3%) to week 52 (2.8%) of sitagliptin administration. Hypoglycemia incidence was significantly higher for combination therapy with insulin (odds ratio 17.75, P < 0.001) or sulfonylurea (odds ratio 2.22, P < 0.001). The increase in sitagliptin dose for combination therapy with antidiabetic drug(s) increased the percentage of patients with hypoglycemia (5.6% in sitagliptin increased subgroup, 2.4% in sitagliptin maintained subgroup, P < 0.01). The awareness of hypoglycemia symptoms and attitude to carry glucose as a countermeasure to prevent hypoglycemia increased during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Sitagliptin did not increase the percentage of patients with hypoglycemia among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, hypoglycemia occurred more frequently in add-on therapy to sulfonylurea or when the sitagliptin dose was increased in combination therapy, showing that sitagliptin should be used with caution.

Effects of the N/L-type calcium channel blocker cilnidipine on nephropathy and uric acid metabolism in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease (J-CIRCLE study).

This study assessed the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) and uric acid metabolism in 70 hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease in whom urinary ACR had remained ≥30 mg/g under the treatment of the L-type calcium channel blocker amlodipine. Three months after switching to the N/L-type calcium channel blocker cilnidipine, blood pressure (BP) did not change; however, urinary ACR significantly decreased with cilnidipine. Serum uric acid levels showed no significant change. In cases where uric acid production had been high (urinary uric acid/creatinine ratio ≥0.5), the urinary uric acid/creatinine ratio decreased significantly after cilnidipine treatment, suggesting that cilnidipine can suppress excessive uric acid formation. These results suggest that switching from amlodipine to cilnidipine results in a significant reduction in urinary ACR as well as significant reduction in uric acid production. Thus, cilnidipine is more useful than amlodipine in improving albuminuria and uric acid metabolism in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease.