Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther ; 377(2): 232-241, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622770

RESUMEN

This study evaluated a battery of pain-stimulated, pain-depressed, and pain-independent behaviors for preclinical pharmacological assessment of candidate analgesics in mice. Intraperitoneal injection of dilute lactic acid (IP acid) served as an acute visceral noxious stimulus to produce four pain-related behaviors in male and female ICR mice: stimulation of 1) stretching, 2) facial grimace, 3) depression of rearing, and 4) depression of nesting. Additionally, nesting and locomotion in the absence of the noxious stimulus were used to assess pain-independent drug effects. These six behaviors were used to compare effects of two mechanistically distinct but clinically effective positive controls (ketoprofen and oxycodone) and two negative controls that are not clinically approved as analgesics but produce either general motor depression (diazepam) or motor stimulation (amphetamine). We predicted that analgesics would alleviate all IP acid effects at doses that did not alter pain-independent behaviors, whereas negative controls would not. Consistent with this prediction, ketoprofen (0.1-32 mg/kg) produced the expected analgesic profile, whereas oxycodone (0.32-3.2 mg/kg) alleviated all IP acid effects except depression of rearing at doses lower than those that altered pain-independent behaviors. For the negative controls, diazepam (1-10 mg/kg) failed to block IP acid-induced depression of either rearing or nesting and only decreased IP acid-stimulated behaviors at doses that also decreased pain-independent behaviors. Amphetamine (0.32-3.2 mg/kg) alleviated all IP acid effects but only at doses that also stimulated locomotion. These results support utility of this model as a framework to evaluate candidate-analgesic effects in a battery of complementary pain-stimulated, pain-depressed, and pain-independent behavioral endpoints. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Preclinical assays of pain and analgesia often yield false-positive effects with candidate analgesics. This study used two positive-control analgesics (ketoprofen, oxycodone) and two active negative controls (diazepam, amphetamine) to validate a strategy for distinguishing analgesics from nonanalgesics by profiling drug effects in a battery of complementary pain-stimulated, pain-depressed, and pain-independent behaviors in male and female mice.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/toxicidad , Conducta Animal , Movimiento , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Anfetamina/administración & dosificación , Anfetamina/uso terapéutico , Anfetamina/toxicidad , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Animales , Diazepam/administración & dosificación , Diazepam/uso terapéutico , Diazepam/toxicidad , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/normas , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Femenino , Cetoprofeno/administración & dosificación , Cetoprofeno/uso terapéutico , Cetoprofeno/toxicidad , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos ICR , Nivel sin Efectos Adversos Observados , Oxicodona/administración & dosificación , Oxicodona/uso terapéutico , Oxicodona/toxicidad
2.
Pharmacol Rev ; 72(2): 527-557, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32205338

RESUMEN

Tobacco use is a persistent public health issue. It kills up to half its users and is the cause of nearly 90% of all lung cancers. The main psychoactive component of tobacco is nicotine, primarily responsible for its abuse-related effects. Accordingly, most pharmacotherapies for smoking cessation target nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), nicotine's major site of action in the brain. The goal of the current review is twofold: first, to provide a brief overview of the most commonly used behavioral procedures for evaluating smoking cessation pharmacotherapies and an introduction to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of nicotine important for consideration in the development of new pharmacotherapies; and second, to discuss current and potential future pharmacological interventions aimed at decreasing tobacco use. Attention will focus on the potential for allosteric modulators of nAChRs to offer an improvement over currently approved pharmacotherapies. Additionally, given increasing public concern for the potential health consequences of using electronic nicotine delivery systems, which allow users to inhale aerosolized solutions as an alternative to smoking tobacco, an effort will be made throughout this review to address the implications of this relatively new form of nicotine delivery, specifically as it relates to smoking cessation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Despite decades of research that have vastly improved our understanding of nicotine and its effects on the body, only a handful of pharmacotherapies have been successfully developed for use in smoking cessation. Thus, investigation of alternative pharmacological strategies for treating tobacco use disorder remains active; allosteric modulators of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors represent one class of compounds currently under development for this purpose.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Nicotínicos/farmacología , Antagonistas Nicotínicos/uso terapéutico , Tabaquismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Humanos , Nicotina/farmacocinética , Receptores Nicotínicos/metabolismo , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Tabaquismo/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA