RESUMEN
Approximately 10% of all colorectal cancer is estimated to be due to an inherited predisposition. Identification of a germline pathogenic variant can aid in treatment, screening, and surveillance and help stratify familial cancer risks based on gene-specific cancer associations. The APC gene contributes to a small percentage of hereditary colon cancer, with most pathogenic APC variants causing familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. However, one specific variant in APC called p.I1307K, found in approximately 10% of Ashkenazi Jewish individuals, is associated with a moderate risk for colon cancer, but not polyposis. Heterozygous carriers of one p.I1307K variant are well documented in the literature, and guidelines recommend earlier and more frequent colonoscopies. Conversely, reports of homozygous carriers of 2 p.I1307K variants are limited, and guidelines for medical management are lacking. This case series describes 4 homozygous p.I1307K patients of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry identified in cancer genetics clinics. Case 1 is a 73-year-old pancreatic cancer patient with a family history of melanoma and colon cancer. Case 2 is a 62-year-old patient with a personal history of 4 adenomatous colorectal polyps and a family history of breast, pancreatic, colon, and prostate cancers. Case 3 is a 52-year-old patient with a personal history of early-onset breast cancer and uveal melanoma and a family history of breast, prostate, and stomach cancers. Case 4 is a 70-year-old patient with a personal history of gallbladder adenocarcinoma and a family history of breast cancer. These cases exhibit wide phenotypic variability and contribute to the limited reports of homozygous p.I1307K variant carriers.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Survivorship care plans (SCPs) summarize patients' treatment and act as an education and communication tool between oncologists and primary care providers (PCPs). But creation and delivery of SCPs are challenging, labor intensive, and costly. The University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center (UNM CCC) treats a poor, rural, and minority patient population, and our purpose was to implement and evaluate a process to create and deliver SCPs to patients and PCPs. METHODS: Providers placed an electronic SCP order, basic information was imported, and staff compiled treatment details. Flagged SCPs were then ready for delivery, providers approved of and delivered the SCP at the next encounter, and the SCP was sent to the PCP. RESULTS: By April 2020, 283 SCPs were ordered, 241 (85.2%) were created by the designated staff, and 97 (34.2%) were given to patients after definitive therapy for breast cancer (59.1%), gynecological cancers (10.8%), prostate cancer (7.4%), colorectal cancer (5.1%), and lymphomas (4.8%). Of 97 SCPs eligible to be sent to PCPs, 75 (77.3%) were mailed or sent via EMR. Of the 41 (48.9%) SCPs sent via mail or fax, only 8 (8.3%) were received and 5 (5.2%) integrated. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that SCPs can be delivered to patients in a poor, rural, and minority patient population but that PCP receipt and integration of SCPs are poor. Future efforts need to ensure that an oncologist to PCP education and communication tool is able reach and be integrated by PCPs.
