Methoxpropamine (MXPr) in powder, urine and hair samples: Analytical characterization and metabolite identification of a new threat.

Methoxpropamine (MXPr) is an arylcyclohexylamine dissociative drug with structural similarities with 3-MeO-PCE, ketamine and deschloroketamine. MXPr was identified for the first time in Europe in October 2019 in Denmark and is considered a new psychoactive substance. We undertook the molecular identification and characterization of MXPr in urine, hair and powder samples. We used a combination of several analytical methods: liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), infra-red spectroscopy (IR) and liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). The second objective was to explore the metabolism of MXPr in silico and in vitro. To detect characteristic metabolites that prove MXPr consumption by urine analysis, pooled human liver microsome (pHLM) assays were performed and evaluated using liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QToF-MS). A software algorithm (Unifi®) was used to predict in silico biotransformations of MXPr. Three metabolites were identified in the in vitro studies including N-despropyl(nor)MXPr, O-desmethyl MXPr and dihydroMXPr. Most of these phase II metabolites were confirmed to be present in urine and hair samples collected from an MXPr consumer. This is the first report of the identification of MXPr in France with analytical findings. This study highlights the challenge of identifying new psychoactive substances (NPS) when they are missing from compound libraries and if a standard is not available. The use of various complementary analytical methods combined with HRMS offers a promising approach for the molecular characterization of NPS.

[Introduction of an anticholinesterase drug in the context of myasthenia, in a severe asthmatic patient]. / Introduction d'un anticholinestérasique dans le contexte d'une myasthénie, chez une patiente asthmatique sévère.

Association of asthma with myasthenia gravis presents a twofold peculiarity. First, as dyspnea characterizes both conditions, diagnostic orientation is difficult. Second, from a therapeutic standpoint, the initiation of anticholinesterase treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach due to possible contraindication for asthma. We report on the case of a patient monitored for severe asthma and treated with biotherapy, and also monitored for myasthenia gravis, and treated with anticholinesterase.

The determinants of dyspnoea evaluated by the mMRC scale: The French Palomb cohort.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Dyspnoea is a major symptom in COPD patients, but the determinants that could be associated with a higher dyspnoea mMRC score in COPD patients remain unclear. Our research aimed to study the determinants of dyspnoea at the threshold of 1, 2, 3 and 4 mMRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Diagnosis of COPD was made using spirometry with post-bronchodilator FEV1FVC<70%. An online questionnaire has been employed by pulmonologists to recruit COPD patients. The following variables were collected: age, gender, BMI, FEV1, RV, IC, TLC, FRC, mMRC, frequency of exacerbations and comorbidities. The LASSO was used to select the variables associated with the mMRC dyspnoea scale in a subgroup (who had no missing IC, RV and FRC values) of 421 COPD patients defined by the previously mentioned variables. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred and sevety-three patients (65.3% males, average age=66±10, 38% current smokers) were included. Dyspnoea was correlated with a low FEV1 and with the number of exacerbations in the past 12 months. Multivariate analysis showed that the determinants of dyspnoea(mMRC≥2) are: FEV1: OR=3.71[2.86-4.82]; anxiety: OR=2.52[1.82-3.47]; cough: OR=1.94[1.57-2.40]; bronchiectasis: OR=1.84[1.03-3.29]; age: OR=1.80[1.45-2.24]; hyperinflation (RV/TLC): OR=1.68[1.34-2.11]; ischemic cardiopathy: OR=1.63[1.22-2.18]; hypertension: OR=1.52[1.21-1.91]; exacerbations (≥2): OR=1.41[1.10-1.81]; women: OR=1.39[1.10-1.74] and overweight: OR=1.33[1.06-1.67]. The subgroup analysis showed that: FEV1: OR=3.47[1.96-6.12]; exacerbations (≥2) OR=2.31[1.33-4.17] and hyperinflation (IC/TLC) OR=0.57[0.35-0.85] were associated with higher dyspnoea (mMRC≥2). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that dyspnoea is related to the severity of airflow limitation, gender, exacerbations, comorbidities and hyperinflation.

Suitability of infrared spectroscopy for drug checking in harm reduction centres.

Drug checking is a service for people who use drugs that includes product analysis and an individual interview including results feedback and harm reduction counselling. It uses different analytical methods but few studies demonstrate their value in current practice. The main objective of this work is to compare the analytical performance of IR spectroscopy to laboratory reference method in the context of drug checking in a harm reduction centre. The secondary objectives are to carry out a description of the people who use drugs requesting a product analysis, and to compare the assumed compositions of products purchased with their real compositions. During 2018, all requests for drug testing analysis were included for on-site analysis by IR spectrometry in a harm reduction center and verified by the reference method (UPLC-HRMS) at Bordeaux University Hospital Center. Socioeconomic and product data were also collected. One hundred and thirty-six samples were collected. The results obtained with IR and UPLC-HRMS were compared. IR spectrometry results did not match with reference method in 8 % (n=11) of cases, corresponding to blotters, cannabis and some psychoactive substances present in mixture or in small quantities. Among the products collected, only 5.1 % (n=7) did not correspond to the declared product, either alone or with adulterants. The IR spectrometer allows a simple and rapid detection of at least one molecule, most often the one of interest. However, it is limited to powder and tablet type matrices and is not suitable for blotters, cannabis, mixed or low content substances for which high resolution mass spectrometry remains the reference method.

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the management of COVID-19: Much kerfuffle but little evidence.

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are drugs that have shown in vitro activity on the replication of certain coronaviruses. In the context of the SARS-Cov-2 epidemic, the virus responsible for the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), these two drugs have been proposed as possible treatments. The results of the first clinical studies evaluating the effect of hydroxychloroquine do not support any efficacy of this drug in patients with COVID-19, due to major methodological weaknesses. Yet, these preliminary studies have aroused considerable media interest, raising fears of massive and uncontrolled use. In the absence of evidence of clinical benefits, the main risk is of exposing patients unnecessarily to the well-known adverse effects of hydroxychloroquine, with a possibly increased risk in the specific setting of COVID-19. In addition, widespread use outside of any recommendation risks compromising the completion of good quality clinical trials. The chloroquine hype, fueled by low-quality studies and media announcements, has yielded to the implementation of more than 150 studies worldwide. This represents a waste of resources and a loss of opportunity for other drugs to be properly evaluated. In the context of emergency, rigorous trials are more than ever needed in order to have, as soon as possible, reliable data on drugs that are possibly effective against the disease. Meanwhile, serious adverse drug reactions have been reported in patients with COVID-19 receiving hydroxychloroquine, justifying to limit its prescription, and to perform suitable cardiac and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Death related to nicotine replacement therapy: A case report.

Transdermal nicotine patches and nicotine tablets are widely used for substitution therapies after cessation of smoking. Toxic concentrations of nicotine and cotinine, its main metabolite, are rarely reported, either in cases of misuse or in a fatal context. We report here a rare fatal case due to massive exposure to nicotine replacement therapy. A 41-year-old man was found dead by his cellmate with 7 nicotine patches on the body. There were 14 nicotine patches (21 mg) and 5 empty blisters of nicotine tablets (Nicopass® 1.5 mg) in the bin. External, internal, and histological examinations revealed asphyxia syndrome. Toxicological analyses indicated lethal concentrations of nicotine and cotinine in femoral (2239 and 1230 ng/mL) and cardiac blood (1344 and 1090 ng/mL). Screening for ethanol, drugs, and illicit drugs revealed therapeutic concentrations of cyamemazine, lormetazepam, nordiazepam, oxazepam, and buprenorphine and its metabolite. THC and its metabolites were also detected, reflecting use of cannabis. The findings highlight the risk of nicotine poisoning in persons using nicotine patches. This case emphasises the importance of carrying out complete toxicological analyses to prevent other instances of nicotine poisoning from being overlooked.

Acute Methiopropamine Intoxication After "Synthacaine" Consumption.

Use of methiopropamine (MPA), a synthetic metamfetamine analog, has been detected since 2011 in Europe, but there is limited information on its acute toxicity. A 30-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department in a confused state, with paranoid delusion, auditory and visual hallucinatory experiences, and incoherent speech following the use of "synthacaine" (a slang term derived from "synthetic" and "cocaine"). Toxicological screening for pharmaceuticals and drugs of abuse by liquid chromatography-diode-array detector, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) detected MPA, which was subsequently quantified by a specific LC-MS-MS method. Of note, 13 h after presentation to the emergency department, the plasma concentration of MPA was 14 ng/mL. This case report confirms the toxicity of MPA and the need for toxicological analysis to confirm the substance actually ingested by users of new psychoactive substances.

Relationships between pazopanib exposure and clinical safety and efficacy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pazopanib, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)/platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)/c-Kit, is approved in locally advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Data from trials in advanced solid tumours and advanced/metastatic RCC were used to explore the relationships between plasma pazopanib concentrations and biomarker changes, safety, and efficacy. Initially, the relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters and increased blood pressure were investigated, followed by analysis of steady-state trough concentration (Cτ) and sVEGFR2, safety, progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and tumour shrinkage. Efficacy/safety end points were compared at Cτ decile boundaries. RESULTS: Strong correlation between increased blood pressure and Cτ was observed (r(2)=0.91), whereas weak correlation was observed between Cτ and decline from baseline in sVEGFR2 (r(2)=0.27). Cτ threshold of >20.5 µg ml(-1) was associated with improved efficacy (PFS, P<0.004; tumour shrinkage, P<0.001), but there was no appreciable benefit in absolute PFS or tumour shrinkage from Cτ >20.5 µg ml(-1). However, the association of Cτ with certain adverse events, particularly hand-foot syndrome, was continuous over the entire Cτ range. CONCLUSIONS: The threshold concentration for efficacy overlaps with concentrations at which toxicity occurs, although some toxicities increase over the entire Cτ range. Monitoring Cτ may optimise systemic exposure to improve clinical benefit and decrease the risk of certain adverse events.

Observational study in severe asthmatic patients after discontinuation of omalizumab for good asthma control.

INTRODUCTION: Severe persistent asthma represents a major and costly public health issue. There is evidence that long-term treatment with omalizumab might have disease-modifying activity but data on the consequences of discontinuing treatment after a positive response are limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate-in real-life prescribing conditions-what happens when omalizumab is discontinued in patients with severe, persistent allergic asthma who have responded well to omalizumab treatment. METHODS: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective study to establish the time to loss of asthma control after the discontinuation of courses of omalizumab treatment of varying duration. RESULTS: 24 lung specialists reviewed data from 61 responder patients who had discontinued omalizumab after a mean duration of 22.7 ± 13.1 [range: 2.5; 59.5] months of treatment. Loss of asthma control was documented in 34 patients (55.7%) with a median interval between discontinuation and loss of control of 13.0 months (mean 20.4 ± 2.6 [95% CI: 8.3-28.1]). No correlation was detected between time to loss of control and duration of treatment, although control tended to be sustained for longer in patients whose response had been classified as "excellent" as opposed to "good" (median: 17.0 vs. 12.8 months; NS). DISCUSSION: The discontinuation of omalizumab was not associated with any rebound effect or exacerbation of the disease, and control was sustained throughout the follow-up period of at least 6 months in nearly half of all patients, including all of those who had been treated for 3.5 years or more. After the reintroduction of omalizumab, 4 out of 20 patients did not respond again.

A dose-escalating phase I of imatinib mesylate with fixed dose of metronomic cyclophosphamide in targeted solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical findings suggest that imatinib mesylate (IM) and metronomic cyclophosphamide (MC) combination provides synergistic antiangiogenic activity on both pericytes and endothelial cells. METHODS: We have designed a 3+3 dose-escalating phase I trial with a fixed dose of MC (50 mg two times daily) plus IM (400 mg per day; 300 and 400 mg two times daily). Enrolled patients had IM- and sutininib-refractory advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) (n=17), chordoma (n=7) and mucosal melanoma (n=2). Dose-limiting toxicities were monitored for the first 6 weeks. Progression-free survival (PFS) and response assessment are based on RECIST 1.0 guidelines. Pharmacokinetics of IM were measured before and after exposure to MC. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Fourteen patients of the expanded cohort received 400 mg two times daily of IM with MC. Apart from a case of possibly related acute leukaemia occurring after 4 years of treatment, we did not see unexpected toxicity. No drug-drug pharmacokinetic interaction was observed. There was no objective response. We have observed long-lasting stable disease in chordoma patients (median PFS=10.2 months; range, 4.2-18+) and short-term stable disease in heavily GIST pretreated patients (median PFS=2.3 months; range, 2.1-6.6). CONCLUSION: This combination is feasible and may warrant further exploration in refractory GIST or chordoma patients.

Treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors in patients over 75 years old: clinical and pharmacological implications.

Data about the patterns of care and the specific outcome of elderly patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are almost nonexistent. Between 2001 and 2009, 44 patients ≥75 years old with advanced GISTs started first-line imatinib (400 mg/day) in seven participating institutions. Clinical data were collected by reviewing medical records and were entered in a comprehensive database. During the same period, 160 patients with advanced GIST (136 patients <75 years old, 24 patients ≥75 years old) had access to an imatinib blood level testing program. Imatinib plasma concentration (patient dose 400 mg/day) tests were centralized in a single laboratory. Median age was 78 years old (range 75-86). Thirty-six patients (82 %) experienced at least one adverse event (Table 2). Drug-related adverse events were mainly of grades 1 and 2 and were medically manageable. Permanent dose reduction (200-300 mg/day) was required for 20 patients (45.5 %) and was significantly more frequent for patients with performance status (PS) ≥2: 33.5 versus 8.5 %, p = 0.04. Eight patients (18 %) required imatinib interruption for intolerance. Median PFS was 34.4 months (95 % CI 11.5-57.4) (Fig. 1). Median overall survival (OS) was 50.3 months (95 % CI 37-63.5). Performance status <2 was the sole pre-therapeutic factor associated with improved OS. No correlation was found between comorbidities and tolerance or outcome. Imatinib trough plasma concentrations increase with age, although this correlation did not reach statistical significance. First-line imatinib is a feasible and effective treatment in patients with advanced GISTs ≥75 years. Aging seems to have only a moderate impact on imatinib pharmacokinetics. Overall survival is similar to that of younger patients. Comorbidities did not result in increased incidence of toxicity. Careful follow-up regarding tolerance issues should be considered in elderly patients with poor PS.

Rapid mobilization of cytotoxic lymphocytes induced by dasatinib therapy.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have potent effects on malignant cells, and they also target kinases in normal cells, which may have therapeutic implications. Using a collection of 55 leukemia patients treated with TKI therapy (chronic myeloid leukemia, n=47; acute lymphoblastic leukemia, n=8), we found that dasatinib, a second-generation broad-spectrum TKI, induced a rapid, dose-dependent and substantial mobilization of non-leukemic lymphocytes and monocytes in blood peaking 1-2 h after an oral intake and the blood counts closely mirrored drug plasma concentration. A preferential mobilization was observed for natural killer (NK), NK T, B and γδ+ T cells. Mobilization was coupled with a more effective transmigration of leukocytes through an endothelial cell layer and improved cytotoxicity of NK cells. Platelet numbers decreased markedly after the drug intake in a proportion of patients. Similar effects on blood cell dynamics and function were not observed with any other TKI (imatinib, nilotinib and bosutinib). Thus, dasatinib induces a unique, rapid mobilization and activation of cytotoxic, extravasation-competent lymphocytes, which may not only enhance antileukemia immune responses but can also be causally related to the side-effect profile of the drug (pleural effusions, thrombocytopenia).

Analysis of allergen immunotherapy studies shows increased clinical efficacy in highly symptomatic patients.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) efficacy in the treatment for seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SAR) symptoms is challenging. Allergen immunotherapy differs from symptomatic therapy in that while symptomatic therapy treats patients after symptoms appear and aims to reduce symptoms, AIT is administered before symptoms are present and aims to prevent them. Thus, clinical studies of AIT can neither establish baseline symptom levels nor limit the enrolment of patients to those with the most severe symptoms. Allergen immunotherapy treatment effects are therefore diluted by patients with low symptoms for a particular pollen season. The objective of this analysis was to assess the effect possible to achieve with AIT in the groups of patients presenting the most severe allergic symptoms. METHODS: Study centres were grouped into tertiles categorized according to symptom severity scores observed in the placebo patients in each centre (low, middle and high tertiles). The difference observed in the average score in each tertile in active vs placebo-treated patients was assessed. This allowed an estimation of the efficacy that could be achieved in patients from sites where symptoms were high during the pollen season. RESULTS: An increased treatment effect was observed in the most severe patients and was independent of the study analysed and symptom score used. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a tertile approach to analyse efficacy in AIT in SAR clinical studies can give a more accurate assessment of potential clinical benefit.

Omalizumab reduces oral corticosteroid use in patients with severe allergic asthma: real-life data.

BACKGROUND: Long-term oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy is associated with significant burden on patients and healthcare resources; treatments that may help reduce their use are important to improve asthma management. METHODS: French and German clinicians prescribing omalizumab for >16 weeks to patients with severe persistent allergic asthma collected OCS use data. OCS use was recorded at baseline and at a non-specific time point beyond 16 weeks from initiation of omalizumab. The number of asthma exacerbations (FEV(1) < 60% of personal best, requiring OCS burst and unscheduled doctor/emergency visit or hospitalization) and asthma-related hospitalizations during the 12-months prior to omalizumab treatment and during the observation period were also recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 346 patients were treated with omalizumab for >16 weeks. Of these, 166 (48.0%) were receiving maintenance OCS (France, n = 64; Germany, n = 102). Following omalizumab therapy, 84 (50.6%) patients on OCS at baseline reduced/stopped OCS dose at the time of data collection; 34 (20.5%) stopped and 50 (30.1%) reduced OCS. In all patients receiving maintenance OCS at baseline, mean reduction from baseline in daily OCS dose was 29.6% (7.1 mg prednisolone). In patients who reduced/stopped maintenance OCS, mean reduction from baseline in daily OCS dose was 74.3% (15.4 mg prednisolone). Reductions in exacerbations and hospitalizations were observed from the 12-months prior to baseline in patients at the time of data collection, irrespective of change in OCS dose. CONCLUSION: European real-life experience demonstrates the OCS-sparing potential of omalizumab in some patients with severe allergic (IgE-mediated) asthma.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic correlation and blood-level testing in imatinib therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.

Imatinib is the current standard of care in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), inducing durable responses and prolonged progression-free survival. However, plasma exposure to the drug from a given dosing regimen can vary widely among patients. Reasons for this may include incomplete adherence, intrinsic variations in the metabolism of imatinib, and drug-drug interactions. Data from two recent studies have shown a correlation between imatinib trough plasma concentration and clinical response, leading to suggestions that maintaining imatinib blood concentrations above approximately 1000 ng/ml might be associated with improved outcomes. In patients who do not respond as well as expected to initial imatinib treatment, measurement of trough plasma concentration could assist with decisions about whether to increase the dose. Blood-level testing may also be helpful in other clinical scenarios: for example, when poor adherence is suspected, adverse reactions are unusually severe, or there is a possible drug-drug interaction. Further work is required to confirm prospectively the link between imatinib plasma concentrations and response, and to define effective trough concentrations in different patient populations. However, based on the current data, imatinib blood-level testing seems to be a useful aid when making clinical decisions in CML.

The prognostic impact of psychotropic drugs in intentional drug overdose.

INTRODUCTION: Psychotropic drugs belong to the drugs most frequently involved in intentional drug overdose (IDO). Few studies have explored their prognostic impact during hospitalisation for IDO. METHODS: In order to assess which types of psychotropic drugs ingested during IDOs were associated with an increased morbidity, a cohort study included 1,974 patients consecutively hospitalised for IDO. IDOs were categorised as serious if associated with one of the following criteria: death, hospitalisation longer than 48 h, respiratory support, vasopressive drugs, cardiac massage or dialysis. RESULTS: Nearly all the patients ingested psychotropic medications during the IDO (88.4%), most often benzodiazepines (71.6%). Serious IDO was associated with tricyclics (OR 5.7; 95% CI 3.3-9.8), lithium (OR 4.3; 95% CI 1.6-11.6), carbamates (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.8-4), anticonvulsants (OR 2.4: 95% CI 1.4-4.3), first-generation antipsychotics (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.7-3.5) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.3). DISCUSSION: Some drugs may be dangerous because of low toxic doses; hence, prescriptions of short duration may be recommended. Moreover, for safety reasons, prescribers may prefer SSRIs to tricyclics and benzodiazepines to carbamates or phenothiazines.