Superior functional outcome following reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to hemiarthroplasty for displaced three and four-part fractures in patients 65 and older: Results from a prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial - The Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty or Reverse Polarity Arthoplasty (SHeRPA) trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute unreconstructible 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures can be treated with hemiarthroplasty or reverse polarity shoulder arthroplasty. Randomized trials using implants from multiple different companies or uncemented implants have found superior results with reverse polarity arthroplasty. AIMS: This study aims to determine whether cemented reverse polarity arthroplasty produces a superior outcome compared to cemented hemiarthroplasty using one implant system in patients aged 65 years and over at 12 months follow-up as measured with the Constant score. METHODS: A prospective patient and assessor blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted of shoulder hemiarthroplasty or reverse polarity arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years and older with acute 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fracture not amenable to osteosynthesis. The primary outcome was the Constant score at 12 months with total follow-up to 24 months. Block randomization by site was undertaken using random number generation and sealed envelopes. Power analysis indicated that 17 patients were required in each arm to achieve 80% power with an alpha-value of 5%. Secondary outcome measures were the difference in the mean Constant Score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score and EQ5D-5L up to two years; differences in complication rate at one and two years; differences in revision and implant failure at one and two years. RESULTS: 18 patients were randomized to hemiarthroplasty and 18 to reverse polarity arthroplasty across 4 sites. The primary outcome as measured by the Constant score at 12 months was better in the reverse polarity shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) group (Mean 51.1, s.d. 14.9) compared to the hemiarthroplasty (HA) group (mean 35.0, s.d. 13.5) (p=0.004). No significant difference was reported at 24 months but this may be due to high rates of attrition (22%). The mean EQ-5D-5L patient rated health status score was significantly higher in the RSA group compared to the HA group at 12 months. One hemiarthroplasty was revised due to implant uncoupling and one reverse polarity shoulder replacement was revised due to instability. No other complications were recorded. DISCUSSION: Treatment of unreconstructible 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures with reverse polarity shoulder arthroplasty results in a superior outcome compared to shoulder hemiarthroplasty at 12 months measured with the Constant score with no increased risk of failure up to 24 months in patients age 65 years and over. High attrition rates are observed in this older population due to cognitive decline and death from other causes.

Clinical outcome of wedged glenoid reconstruction in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritic retroverted glenoid: a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Background: Glenoid retroversion and humeral head subluxation is a progressive disorder due to abnormal force coupling and increased contact force. In situ placement of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) components in this scenario results in edge loading, progressive subluxation, and early failure. Wedged glenoid components have been demonstrated to improve glenohumeral alignment, but have not been correlated with mid-term clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients undergoing TSA using a wedged all-polyethylene glenoid component for retroverted glenoid deformity were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Preoperative planning computed tomography was routinely performed and compared to postoperative correction on radiographic evaluation. Evidence of loosening was correlated to prospectively collect clinical outcome using patient-reported outcome measures. A matched group of neutrally aligned glenohumeral joints undergoing anatomic TSA was used to compare improvement in clinical outcomes. Results: Over a 5-year period, 17 patients with mean age 60 (range 43-81, standard deviation 10.5) were identified with a mean preoperative neoglenoid retroversion of 16.7° (standard deviation 4.5). At a mean follow-up of 43.8 months (range 27-60), no revision surgeries were undertaken. Improvement in the Oxford Shoulder Score was 18 points (P < .0001). The mean improvement was compared to a matched control group demonstrating a comparable magnitude of improvement of 20.4 points. Conclusion: Wedged polyethylene components for Walch B2-type glenoids in TSA yield acceptable correction of the joint line, excellent clinical outcomes, and survivorship is maintained in the short term. The clinical and radiological outcome demonstrated similar improvement to that seen in A type deformities.

Can Shoulder Impairments Be Classified From 3-Dimensional Kinematics Using Inertial Sensors?

Inertial sensors may help clinicians to assess patients' movement and potentially support clinical decision making. Our aim was to determine whether shoulder range of motion during movement tasks measured using inertial sensors is capable of accurately discriminating between patients with different shoulder problems. Inertial sensors were used to measure 3-dimensional shoulder motion during 6 tasks of 37 patients on the waiting list for shoulder surgery. Discriminant function analysis was used to identify whether the range of motion of different tasks could classify patients with different shoulder problems. The discriminant function analysis could correctly classify 91.9% of patients into one of the 3 diagnostic groups based. The tasks that associated a patient with a particular diagnostic group were the following: subacromial decompression: abduction, rotator cuff repair of tears ≤5 cm: flexion and rotator cuff repair of tears >5 cm: combing hair, abduction, and horizontal abduction-adduction. The discriminant function analysis showed that range of motion measured by inertial sensors can correctly classify patients and could be used as a screening tool to support surgery planning.

Clinical and radiologic outcomes of Lima ProMade custom 3D-printed glenoid components in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: a minimum 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to report the clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients undergoing primary or revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using custom 3D-printed components to manage severe glenoid bone loss with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Following ethical approval, patients were identified and invited to participate. Inclusion criteria were (1) severe glenoid bone loss necessitating the need for custom implants and (2) patients with definitive glenoid and humeral components implanted more than 2 years prior. Included patients underwent clinical assessment using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH). Radiographic assessment included anteroposterior and axial projections. Patients were invited to attend a computed tomography (CT) scan to confirm osseointegration. Statistical analysis used descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation [SD]) and paired t test for parametric data. RESULTS: Eleven patients declined to participate. Five patients were deceased prior to study commencement, leaving 42 remaining patients in this analysis. Three patients had revision surgery before the 2-year follow-up; of these, 2 retained their custom glenoid components. Mean follow-up was 31.6 months from surgery (range 24-52 months). All 4 scores improved: OSS from a mean 15 (SD 8.4) to 36 (SD 12) (P < .001), Constant-Murley score from a mean 15 (SD 11.2) to 52 (SD 20.1) (P < .001), QuickDASH from a mean 70 (SD 21) to 31 (SD 24.8) (P = .004), and the ASES score from a mean 22 (SD 17.8) to 71 (SD 23.3) (P = .007). Radiologic evaluation demonstrated good osseointegration in all but 1 included patient. CONCLUSION: The utility of custom 3D-printed components for managing severe glenoid bone loss in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty yields significant clinical improvements in this complex cohort. Large complex glenoid bone defects can be managed successfully with custom 3D-printed glenoid components.

Survivorship of Allologous Structural Bone Graft at a Minimum of 2 Years When Used to Address Significant Glenoid Bone Loss in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Computed Tomographic and Clinical Review.

Background: This study assesses outcomes in revision shoulder replacements where the glenoid bone loss was managed using a structural allograft (donated femoral head) in combination with a trabecular titanium (TT) implant. Methods: We contacted patients who had undergone revision shoulder arthroplasty using the Lima Axioma TT metal-backed glenoid with an allologous bone graft as a composite who were over 2 years since surgery. Patients underwent computerd tomography evaluation, clinical review, and scoring preoperatively, at 6 months and the latest follow-up. Results: Fifteen patients were included with a mean age of 59 (33-76). The average follow-up period was 40.5 months (24-51). 80% showed satisfactory bone graft incorporation and peg integration at the latest follow-up. Three had signs of significant bone graft resorption, although in 2 patients the pegs were still soundly fixed in the host bone. Clinically all patients showed a statistically significant improvement in pain relief, movement, and function. No unusual complications were reported. Conclusion: Results show femoral head structural allograft in combination with TT metal-backed glenoid baseplate is a viable option for revision total shoulder replacement in the context of massive glenoid bone loss. We do, however, acknowledge that this resorption rate is higher than in other reported series where autograft is used.

The Shoulder Lever Test - Technical Tip for Instability Assessment in Large Shoulders.

Introduction: The classical shoulder tests for instability of the glenohumeral joint are the load and shift and drawer tests. Here, the humeral head is gripped between fingers and thumb to assess translation. This can be challenging to perform accurately in obese individuals and muscular athletes. Technical Tip: The shoulder and upper arm is utilized as a Class 3 lever. By fixing the patient's elbow (fulcrum) and applying translational force on the humerus (force), the instability at the glenohumeral joint (load) can be accurately judged. The mechanical advantage of a Class 3 lever is utilized to generate maximal displacement at the glenohumeral joint by applying minimal translational force at the humerus. The translation can be graded with the modified Hawkins scale. Conclusion: The shoulder lever test obviates the need to grip the humeral head in obese and well-built individuals to accurately judge the translation at the glenohumeral joint, improving the clinical yield.

Assessing the required glenoid peg penetration in native scapula when bone graft is used during primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Aims: Achieving purchase in native glenoid bone is essential for the stability of the glenoid baseplate when bone graft is used to address bone loss in both primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty procedures. The aim of this study is to assess the required depth of the baseplate peg in native bone when bone graft is used to result in satisfactory integration. Patients and methods: The CT scans of patients who underwent either primary or revision arthroplasty procedures with bone graft using the SMR Axioma Trabecular Titanium (TT) Metal Backed glenoid system were assessed. We measured the depth of the glenoid peg in native glenoid bone. Measurements were taken by two authors separately. Results: The scans of 53 patients (mean age 68 years) with a minimum follow-up of two years were reviewed. Implants included 12 anatomical and 41 reverse geometry prostheses. There were 17 primaries and 36 revisions: hemiarthroplasties (20) total (14) and reverse (2) implants. Bone grafts were from humeral head (15), iliac crest (34) and allograft (4). The mean depths were 8.8 mm (first assessor) and 9.10 mm (second assessor). The glenoid peg violated the glenoid vault in 32 patients and this did not adversely affect the outcome. There were three failures of implants all of which were aseptic failures and had peg penetration of less than 6 mm. Conclusions: The mean depth of glenoid peg in native bone was 9 mm (variation between 0.2 and 0.52 mm at 95% confidence interval). Aseptic loosening was seen with peg penetration less than 6 mm in native bone. Glenoid vault violation was not associated with loosening.

The role of biodegradable spacer implantation under local anesthesia for patients with massive rotator cuff tears and significant medical comorbidities.

Background: Massive rotator cuff tears are common, and the incidence increases with age. They are a challenging problem to deal with as many are irreparable. While there are a host of surgical options available, these can be prolonged procedures requiring general anesthesia and thus not suitable for elderly patients or those with significant medical comorbidities. In this study, we evaluate the role of a biodegradable balloon inserted under local anesthetic for a series of patients with massive cuff tears and significant medical comorbidities. Methods: A prospective pilot study was performed on a series of patients between June 2018 and April 2019. Demographic data, as well as preoperative and postoperative clinical data including Subjective Shoulder Value and Oxford Shoulder Scores, were obtained. Results: Four patients with magnetic resonance imaging-proven massive rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus were treated with an InSpace balloon under local anesthesia. All were of American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 4 and had exhausted nonoperative treatment. The mean Oxford Shoulder Score improved from a preoperative baseline of 17.25 (range 6-25) to a peak of 25.75 (range 15-34) at the 6-week postoperative mark before declining to 13.67 (range 6-23) at the final follow-up of 6 months. Subjective Shoulder Values also improved initially from a mean of 31.25 (range of 20-40) to a peak of 58.75 (range of 50-70) before reducing to 36.67 (range of 30-50) at the final follow-up of 6 months. Conclusion: We have described the safety and early benefit from the use of a biodegradable balloon spacer inserted under local anesthetic as a management option for patients with massive rotator cuff tears, who may be unfit for other extensive reconstruction options, particularly for short-term pain relief as significant long-term gains were not demonstrated.

Shoulder hydrodilatation for primary, post-traumatic and post-operative adhesive capsulitis.

BACKGROUND: Adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) is characterised by pain and loss of range of motion of the glenohumeral joint. It can be present as primary (idiopathic) or secondary to surgery, trauma or other conditions that restrict the use of the shoulder joint. Various treatment options have been adopted including physiotherapy, manipulation under anaesthetic, hydrodilatation and arthroscopic or open capsular release but the optimal form of management remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to assess the clinical outcome of glenohumeral hydrodilatation in three cohorts of patients with different aetiologies with adhesive capsulitis. STUDY DESIGN & METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of patient who underwent hydrodilatation for adhesive capsulitis between 2013 and 2015. The procedure was performed by a specialist musculoskeletal radiologist under radiological guidance. The injection consisted of steroids, local anaesthetics and NaCl solution with a target volume around 35 mL. Our outcome measures were range of motion, and pre- and post-operative pain. Patients were divided into three groups based on the presumed cause of their stiffness: idiopathic, post-traumatic and post-surgical. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty patients were included, with a mean age of 59 years (range: 20-79). Of these, 180 had idiopathic primary adhesive capsulitis (27 were diabetic), 23 were post-traumatic, and 20 following surgical procedures. Thirty-four required further intervention following initial hydrodilatation with 8 undergoing repeat hydrodilatation, and 26 requiring arthroscopic capsular release. The diabetic group accounted for 16 capsular releases and 4 repeat procedures, while the idiopathic group accounted for 9 and 4, respectively. One patient required capsular release in the surgical group. An improvement was recorded in ROM in all groups with mean abduction improving from 59° to 110°, flexion from 50° to 120° and external rotation from 20° to 50°. With regards to pain, the majority showed an improvement from severe or moderate pain to no or mild pain. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that hydrodilatation resulted in an improvement in all outcome measures, with only a small number of patients, especially those with diabetes, needing further procedures or showing no improvement in range of motion and pain. There was no difference between the post-traumatic and post-surgical groups.

Measuring outcomes in rotator cuff disorders.

Measuring the outcome of treatment for rotator cuff disorders has evolved over the last three decades. Objective surgeon-derived outcomes such as clinical examination findings and imaging of the rotator cuff have the limitation of marginalising the patients perception of their condition. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) have evolved and become popular in an attempt to demonstrate meaningful outcome data. There are a large number in use today and as a result, the heterogeneity of scores used across the literature can make comparison difficult. Patient reported outcome scores can be general health related quality of life scores, joint-specific and disease specific. Qualitative outcomes are also being used now, and these help us to better understand the context of quantitative research scores. In this article, we provide an overview of the outcome measures used in rotator cuff disorders.

Management of rotator cuff tears - Key historical landmarks.

The management of rotator cuff pathology has developed over hundreds of years. In this article, we take a journey from the early days, in order to understand how we have reached our modern-day practice. Initially our understanding of rotator cuff pathology was based on cadaveric anatomical findings and this has enhanced over the years by the development of radiological and surgical techniques. We discuss the historical debates over the pathogenesis of cuff dysfunction. This work describes the landmark publications by several clinicians who have made important contributions to our understanding of rotator cuff pathology and its management. We follow the trends of surgical management of rotator cuff tears, traditionally performed via an open technique, to an exponential rise in arthroscopic surgery in recent years. As new techniques emerge, a review of the historical rise and fall of techniques is a reminder for us to remain vigilant of surgical indications and rigorous outcome analysis.

Superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears: A literature review and specialist practice report.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence continues to confirm the effectiveness of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) in relieving pain and improving function in an irreparable cuff deficient shoulder. This paper presents an up-to-date literature review on SCRand a tertiary referral unit experience in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Data was prospectively collected on patients undergoing SCR for irreparable rotator cuff tears using a dermal allograft. Patients with already established arthritis were excluded. The first 49 consecutive cases performed by 3 surgeons over 3 years (including their learning curve) with average follow-up of 19 months (range 3-37 months) were analysed. The outcomes assessed were re-operation rates, patient satisfaction and complications. The study group was analysed to identify the factors predicting outcomes. RESULTS: The average age of the cohort was 56 years. The re-operation rate in this group was 12.2% with each of these 6 patients subsequently undergoing a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Forty (82%) patients were satisfied with the outcome of the procedure with 35 (72%) of them showing complete pain relief, 5 (10%) having dull aches and clicks and the remaining 9 (18%) unsatisfied due to pain. There was no difference in satisfaction rates between different age groups (p > 0.05). The pre-operative factors associated with poor outcomes included patients with multiple previous surgeries on the same shoulder (p = 0.02) and teres minor atrophy or tear (p = 0.03). The other factors that showed a trend towards inferior outcomes (but not statistically significant) included patients with degenerative tears, symptoms of longer duration (>24 months) and subscapularis tear/atrophy. No serious adverse effects such as graft rejection, infection or neuro-vascular injury were observed. CONCLUSION: Early results of superior capsular reconstruction are promising and may offer an answer to a challenging group of patients with symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears. It is likely that the relatively low re-operation rates can be further improved by considering the negative prognostic factors in defining indications for surgery.

The biomechanics of the rotator cuff in health and disease - A narrative review.

The rotator cuff has an important role in the stability and function of the glenohumeral joint. It is a complex anatomic structure commonly affected by injury such as tendinopathy and cuff tears. The rotator cuff helps to provide a stabilising effect to the shoulder joint by compressing the humeral head against the glenoid cavity via the concavity compression mechanism. To appreciate the function of the cuff it is imperative to understand the normal biomechanics of the cuff as well as the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of cuff disease. The shoulder joint offers a wide range of motion due to the variety of rotational moments the cuff muscles are able to provide. In order for the joint to remain stable, the cuff creates a force couple around the glenohumeral joint with coordinated activation of adjacent muscles, which work together to contain the otherwise intrinsically unstable glenohumeral joint and prevent proximal migration of the humerus. Once this muscular balance is lost, increased translations or subluxation of the humeral head may result, leading to changes in the magnitude and direction of the joint reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint. These mechanical changes may then result in a number of clinical presentations of shoulder dysfunction, disease and pain. This narrative review aims to highlight the importance of functional rotator cuff biomechanics whilst assessing the kinetics and kinematics of the shoulder joint, as well as exploring the various factors involved in cuff disease.

Trends in rotator cuff surgery: Research through the decades.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to analyse the most cited articles in rotator cuff surgery and identify trends in topics by decade to see which areas may still need further investigation. METHODS: Journal Citation Index was searched to find articles using the search terms pertaining to "rotator cuff repair". All articles were ranked according to most cited, and then further analysed to find most cited articles in each decade. Articles were grouped into topics to find themes for each decade. RESULTS: All the most cited articles were published in 6 orthopaedic journals. Only 4 of the top 30 citations provided level I evidence. Each decade's most cited articles seemed to fit into a broad topic, with platelet-rich plasma and biologic augmentation being prominent in the last decade. CONCLUSION: There are still many unanswered questions in rotator cuff surgery, but this may be because success of certain treatment options are highly dependent on patient selection. Despite growing numbers of articles being published on rotator cuff repairs, the level of evidence remains low. Larger, collaborative projects may help in answering the common dilemmas that still face shoulder surgeons.

Survivorship of autologous structural bone graft at a minimum of 2 years when used to address significant glenoid bone loss in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty: a computed tomographic and clinical review.

BACKGROUND: Severe glenoid bone loss remains a challenge in patients requiring shoulder arthroplasty and often requires autogenous bone grafting. The purpose of this study was to assess the integrity of the bone graft at 2 years in a series of primary and revision shoulder replacements where glenoid bone loss was managed using a structural autograft (humeral head or iliac crest bone graft) in combination with a trabecular titanium (TT) implant. METHODS: Ethical approval was sought, and the study has a portfolio study status by the NIHR (17/YH/0318). We contacted patients who had primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty with Lima Axioma TT metal-back glenoid with autologous bone graft and were more than 2 years since their operation. All eligible patients underwent computed tomographic evaluation, clinical review, and scoring. Early failures of composite fixation and patients who had revision procedures were excluded (2 patients). RESULTS: Forty-one patients (43 shoulders) with a mean age of 65 years (range 33-85 years) were reviewed. There were 24 women and 17 men. The average follow-up period was 40 months (range 24-59 months). Primary arthroplasty was performed in 24 shoulders, whereas 19 shoulders had revision arthroplasty. Twenty-five shoulders had reverse shoulder replacement and 18 had anatomic shoulder replacement. Twenty-four shoulders had graft taken from the humeral head, and 19 had iliac crest bone graft, reflecting the number of revisions. We used Wrightington classification for porous metal implant and bone graft incorporation. Satisfactory bone graft incorporation (>50%) was seen in 40 shoulders, and only 3 patients had <50% graft incorporation. The scans at 2 years or later showed no significant deterioration in the bone graft from the early postoperative scans. Average forward elevation improved from 50° (preoperative) to 98° (range 35°-150°). The mean improvement in mean Oxford Shoulder Score was 16 (preoperative, 15; postoperative, 31) and the mean improvement in Constant score improvement was 36 (preoperative, 12; postoperative, 48). The mean postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score was 64 (range 30-85). CONCLUSION: The use of TT in conjunction with autologous bone graft provides a reliable method of addressing glenoid bone defects in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty. This graft-trabecular metal composite has been shown to integrate well and remain largely unchanged over a 2-year period. A stable baseplate is essential in difficult primary and revision arthroplasty situations. The stability of this construct in our series is reflected in the satisfactory outcomes.

An OrthoRadiological review of superior capsularreconstruction in the shoulder.

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) is an emerging surgical technique used to treat patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. In this procedure, a graft is attached between the superior glenoid and the greater tuberosity, with the aim of optimising glenohumeral joint function and stability. Pre-operative radiological evaluation of patients having such cuff tears is crucial for appropriate patient selection. Such imaging is particularly useful for the assessment of the cuff tear size and location, muscle wasting, fatty infiltration and the presence of any glenohumeral joint arthritis. In addition, post-operative imaging is useful in assessing graft integrity, with specific patterns of graft failure now being recognised on imaging. This article will discuss the indications and contraindications for this procedure, and review the biomechanical concepts of SCR in improving glenohumeral joint stability and restoring the force couples around the joint. The radiological appearances of the intact graft and the various patterns of graft failure will be illustrated, along with various radiological examples.

The Effect of Type of Femoral Component Fixation on Mortality and Morbidity after Hip Hemiarthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hip hemiarthroplasty is a well-established treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture, although debate exists over whether cemented or uncemented fixation is superior. Uncemented prostheses have typically been used in younger, healthier patients and cemented prostheses in older patients with less-stable bone. Also, earlier research has suggested that bone cement has cytotoxic effects and may trigger cardiovascular and respiratory adverse events. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare morbidity and mortality rates after cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched seven medical databases for randomized clinical trials and observational studies. We compared cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), as well as measures of postoperative pain, mortality, and complications. Data were extracted and pooled as risk ratios or standardized mean difference with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals in a meta-analysis model. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 34 studies (12 randomized trials and 22 observational studies), with a total of 42,411 patients. In the pooled estimate, cemented hemiarthroplasty was associated with less risk of postoperative pain than uncemented hemiarthroplasty. There were no significant differences between groups regarding HHS or rates of postoperative mortality, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, acute cardiac arrhythmia, or deep venous thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: While we found that cemented hemiarthroplasty results in less postoperative pain than uncemented hemiarthroplasty in older patients with femoral neck fracture, the lack of significant differences in functional hip scores, mortality, and complications was surprising. Further high-level research is needed.

Working through the COVID-19 outbreak: Rapid review and recommendations for MSK and allied heath personnel.

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has caused the world to undergo unprecedented change in a short space of time. This disease has devastated the economy, infringed personal freedom, and has taken a toll on healthcare systems worldwide. This review aims to highlight aspects of this pandemic with a specific emphasis on musculoskeletal work within the secondary care setting.