A Scoping Review of the Oral Microbiome in Preterm Infants.

The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the oral microbiome composition in preterm infants, sampling and collection methods, as well as exposures associated with oral microbiome composition and health implications. We conducted a scoping review of the literature using the Arskey and O'Malley framework. We identified a total of 13 articles which met our inclusion criteria and purpose of this scoping review. Articles included in this review compared the oral microbiome in preterm infants to term infants, examined alterations to the oral microbiome over time, compared the oral microbiome to different body site microbiomes, and explored associations with clinically relevant covariates and outcomes. Exposures associated with the diversity and composition of the oral microbiome in preterm infants included delivery mode, oral feeding, oropharyngeal care, skin-to-skin care, and antibiotics. Day of life and birth weight were also associated with oral microbiome composition. The oral microbiome may be associated with the composition of the tracheal and gut microbiomes, likely due to their proximity. Alpha and beta diversity findings varied across studies as well as the relative abundance of taxa. This is likely due to the different sampling techniques and timing of collection, as well as the wide range of infant clinical characteristics. Multiple factors may influence the composition of the oral microbiome in preterm infants. However, given the heterogeneity of sampling techniques and results within this review, the evidence is not conclusive on the development as well as short- and long-term implications of the oral microbiome in preterm infants and needs to be explored in future research studies. KEY POINTS: · Day of life is a critical factor in oral microbiome development in preterm infants.. · The oral microbiome may be associated with tracheal and gut microbiome colonization.. · Future research should examine sampling methodology for examining the oral microbiome.. · Future research should explore associations with the oral microbiome and adverse health outcomes..

Oral Care in Critically Ill Infants and the Potential Effect on Infant Health: An Integrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit are at risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia and abnormal oral colonization. Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for oral care in critically ill adults is associated with improved short- and long-term health outcomes. However, oral care guidelines for critically ill infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit have not been established, possibly increasing their risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia and other health complications. OBJECTIVE: To describe and summarize the evidence regarding oral care for critically ill infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit and to identify gaps needing further investigation. METHODS: The MEDLINE (through PubMed) and CINAHL databases were searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of oral care on oral colonization, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and health outcomes of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. RESULTS: This review of 5 studies yielded evidence that oral care may promote a more commensal oral and endotracheal tube aspirate microbiome. It may also reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia and length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit. However, the paucity of research regarding oral care in this population and differences in oral care procedures, elements used, and timing greatly limit any possible conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: Oral care in critically ill infants may be especially important because of their suppressed immunity and physiological immaturity. Further appropriately powered studies that control for potential covariates, monitor for adverse events, and use recommended definitions of ventilator-associated pneumonia are needed to make clinical recommendations.

Small volume vacuum phlebotomy tubes: a controlled before-and-after study of a patient blood management initiative in an Australian adult intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) undergo multiple blood tests. Small volume vacuum phlebotomy tubes (SVTs) provide an important blood conservation measure. SVTs reduce summative blood loss and may reduce odds of transfusion. We aimed to determine whether low volume blood sampling using SVTs for routine diagnostic purposes translates to decreased fall in haemoglobin concentration, and examine downstream effects on anaemia and need for transfusion during ICU admission. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A single-centre, controlled before-and-after study, evaluating a unit-wide changeover from conventional volume vacuum phlebotomy tubes (CVTs) to SVTs on April 2015. All ICU patients admitted for > 48 hours during the 12 months before and after the intervention were included in multivariate and univariate analysis. Groups were stratified into short admissions (2-7 days) and long admissions (> 7 days). RESULTS: A total of 318 patients were analysed. For short admissions, SVTs decreased fall in haemoglobin concentration (unstandardized coefficient, -6.7; P = 0.001) and episodes of severe anaemia (odds ratio, 0.37, P = 0.02). There were no changes to haemoglobin concentration in long admissions. No effects on need for transfusion were observed (short admissions, P = 0.05; long admissions, P = 0.11). SVTs reduced daily sampling volumes by 50% with no increase in laboratory error (short admissions, P = 0.61; long admissions, P = 0.98). A moderate correlation existed between blood draws and fall in haemoglobin concentration (short admissions, r = 0.5; long admissions, r = 0.32). CONCLUSION: SVTs reduce sampling volume without increasing laboratory error. Follow-on effects include reduced fall in haemoglobin concentration and severe anaemia. These correlations are absent in long admissions.