DRY NEEDLING IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS MEETING CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR SUBACROMIAL PAIN SYNDROME: A CASE SERIES.

BACKGROUND: Physical therapy interventions of exercise and manual therapy provide benefit in treatment of subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS). Dry needling is an emerging technique for treating musculoskeletal conditions; however, conflicting investigative evidence exists regarding the use of dry needling for SAPS. PURPOSE: The purpose of this case series was to describe the use of dry needling, in conjunction with exercise, as a management strategy for patients meeting clinical diagnostic criteria of SAPS and to observe the short- and intermediate-term effects of dry needling with therapeutic exercise in this population. A secondary purpose was to describe a framework of clinical reasoning to guide the pragmatic application of dry needling and exercise in clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: Twenty-five patients met criteria for SAPS and provided informed consent. Patients received examination-based dry needling for the first two visits with exercises added beginning at the third treatment session to help distinguish treatment effects. The primary outcome measure used in this study was the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Q-DASH) survey assessed at their third clinical visit, at four-weeks after starting intervention and again at a three-month follow up visit. RESULTS: On the Q-DASH survey 21 of 24 patients reported improvement at the third visit (range 4.5 to 38.6 points) and 19 of 22 reported improvement at the 3-month follow-up (range 0.1-54.5 points) relative to baseline. Sixteen of 24 patients at the third visit and 19 of 22 patients at the 3-month follow-up reported Global Rating of Changes scores of +3 or greater. CONCLUSION: This case series provides insight to the observed short- and intermediate-term effects of dry needling combined with exercise for SAPS. Additionally, it discusses the framework of clinical reasoning when applying this intervention. The results are encouraging for dry needling as an adjunct to exercise for treating patients with SAPS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 4.

Systematic Clinical Reasoning in Physical Therapy (SCRIPT): Tool for the Purposeful Practice of Clinical Reasoning in Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy.

Background and Purpose: Clinical reasoning is essential to physical therapist practice. Solid clinical reasoning processes may lead to greater understanding of the patient condition, early diagnostic hypothesis development, and well-tolerated examination and intervention strategies, as well as mitigate the risk of diagnostic error. However, the complex and often subconscious nature of clinical reasoning can impede the development of this skill. Protracted tools have been published to help guide self-reflection on clinical reasoning but might not be feasible in typical clinical settings. Case Description: This case illustrates how the Systematic Clinical Reasoning in Physical Therapy (SCRIPT) tool can be used to guide the clinical reasoning process and prompt a physical therapist to search the literature to answer a clinical question and facilitate formal mentorship sessions in postprofessional physical therapist training programs. Outcomes: The SCRIPT tool enabled the mentee to generate appropriate hypotheses, plan the examination, query the literature to answer a clinical question, establish a physical therapist diagnosis, and design an effective treatment plan. The SCRIPT tool also facilitated the mentee's clinical reasoning and provided the mentor insight into the mentee's clinical reasoning. The reliability and validity of the SCRIPT tool have not been formally studied. Discussion: Clinical mentorship is a cornerstone of postprofessional training programs and intended to develop advanced clinical reasoning skills. However, clinical reasoning is often subconscious and, therefore, a challenging skill to develop. The use of a tool such as the SCRIPT may facilitate developing clinical reasoning skills by providing a systematic approach to data gathering and making clinical judgments to bring clinical reasoning to the conscious level, facilitate self-reflection, and make a mentored physical therapist's thought processes explicit to his or her clinical mentor.