Effects of the selective alpha 1a-adrenoceptor antagonist silodosin on ECGs of healthy men in a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and moxifloxacin-controlled study.

In order to determine the effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of silodosin on QT interval, healthy men (N = 186; aged 18-45 years) were randomized to receive silodosin (8 or 24 mg) or placebo for 5 days or moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control, known to prolong QT) once on day 5. At baseline and on day 5, five ECGs were recorded 0.25 h before dosing and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 23.5 h after dosing. Adjusted mean differences (analysis of covariance) between silodosin and placebo in the change in individual heart rate-corrected QTc (QTcI) from baseline to day 5 were <5 ms at all times (all 90% confidence interval (CI) upper limits <10 ms). The QTcI difference for moxifloxacin compared with placebo often exceeded 5 ms, establishing assay sensitivity. For silodosin, no statistically or clinically significant correlation was seen between plasma concentration and QTcI, and no clinically important effects on heart rate, PR segment, QRS complex, or morphologic ECG data were observed.

Evaluation and management of cardiac safety using the electrocardiogram in oncology clinical trials: focus on cardiac repolarization (QTc interval).

Non-antiarrhythmic drugs have been reported to prolong the QTc interval and induce potentially fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmias. An increasing number of drugs that are used for treating malignancies are no exception. Therefore, both oncologists and regulators expect sponsors of oncology drugs to evaluate, during the development of the drugs, their effects on the electrocardiogram (ECG), particularly on the QTc interval. In the case of agents that cannot be administered to healthy volunteers, the primary approach is to carry out an intense ECG evaluation, employing robust ECG recordings, during early-phase clinical trials, together with characterization of the concentration-QTc interval relationship, and follow this up with an appropriate intensity of ECG monitoring in the later phases of development. This article describes the broad principles of these approaches, including recommendations for exclusion criteria (relative to baseline QTc interval and to cardiac comorbidity); it also describes methods for conducting ECG monitoring and a proposed scheme for the management of any QTc-related effects that may emerge.

Cardiac repolarization and the safety of new drugs defined by electrocardiography.

A compelling assessment of both short- and long-term cardiac safety is increasingly emphasized before regulatory marketing approval. In that context, cardiac adverse effects that were otherwise unexpected become manifest when large numbers of subjects are treated after market approval, many of whom take multiple medications, have co-morbidities, and are subject to other conditions that were not represented in the original clinical trial population. Since 2005, dedicated, robust, and well-controlled electrocardiogram (ECG) trials are required, usually conducted in Phase II, to define the cardiac risk of a new therapy before large-scale Phase III trials are conducted or marketing is approved.

Evaluation of the effect on cardiac repolarization (QTc interval) of oncologic drugs.

The 12-lead electrocardiograph (ECG) is the standard safety measurement used in clinical trials to identify drug-induced cardiac adverse effects. Drug-induced prolongation of the QTc interval (the measure of cardiac repolarization change), when excessive and in conjunction with the right risk factors, can degenerate into a polymorphic ventricular tachycardia called torsades de pointes and has become a new focus for new drug development. The assessment of an ECG in clinical practice using machine-defined QTc duration is intrinsically unreliable. Current regulatory concepts have focused on the need for measuring ECG intervals using manual techniques using digital processing in a central ECG laboratory. The QT interval is subject to a large degree of spontaneous variability requiring attention to basic clinical trial design issues such as sample size (use as large a cohort as possible), frequency of measurements taken (at least three to six ECGs at baseline and at many time points on therapy with pharmacokinetic samples if possible), and their accuracy. Since most oncologic products are cytotoxic, a Thorough or Dedicated ECG Trial cannot be conducted and in the usual trail, especially in phase I, all changes seen on the ECG will be attributed to the new oncology drug. For most nononcologic drugs, there is regulatory guidance on how much an effect on QTc duration might be related to the risk of cardiac toxicity. For oncology products, the central tendency magnitude and proportion of outliers needs to be well defined to construct a label if the risk-benefit analysis leads to marketing approval. Clinical cardiac findings such as syncope, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and other cardiac effects will be important in this analysis.

Effects of supratherapeutic doses of ebastine and terfenadine on the QT interval.

AIMS: The objective of this study was to compare the effects of high doses of ebastine with terfenadine and placebo on QTc. METHODS: Thirty-two subjects were randomly assigned to four treatments (ebastine 60 mg x day(-1), ebastine 100 mg x day(-1), terfenadine 360 mg x day(-1), placebo) administered for 7 days. Serial ECGs were performed at baseline and day 7 of each period. QT interval was analysed using both Bazett (QTcB) and Fridericia (QTcF) corrections. RESULTS: Ebastine 60 mg (+ 3.7 ms) did not cause a statistically significant change in QTcB compared with placebo (+ 1.4 ms). The mean QTcB for ebastine 100 mg was increased by + 10.3 ms which was significantly greater than placebo but was significantly less (P < 0.05) than with terfenadine 360 mg (+ 18.0 ms). There were no statistically significant differences in QTcF between ebastine 60 mg (-3.2 ms) or ebastine 100 mg (1.5 ms) and placebo (-2.1 ms); although terfenadine caused a 14.1 ms increase which was significantly different from the other three treatments. The increase in QTcB with ebastine most likely resulted from overcorrection of the small drug-induced increase in heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Ebastine at doses up to five times the recommended therapeutic dose did not cause clinically relevant changes in QTc interval.

Cardiac effects of ebastine and other antihistamines in humans.

The electrocardiographic effects of ebastine and its active metabolite, carebastine, have been studied alone and in relevant drug-interaction studies in various patient populations. The overall cardiac tolerability of ebastine is excellent. In ebastine dose-ranging studies in adults and children, there were no meaningful dose-related changes in the QTc interval. At high doses of ebastine (5 to 10 times the recommended dose), a modest 10.3 msec increase in QTc was observed. Recommended doses of ebastine had no meaningful effect on QTc in the elderly or in patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency. Interaction studies involving ebastine with ketoconazole revealed a significant increase in the serum ebastine concentration and in the elimination half-life of ebastine, with a modest 18.1 msec increase in QTc (approximately 10 msec above ketoconazole alone) and a plateau QTc-ebastine relationship at higher ebastine levels. Similar, though more minor, QTc findings were observed during coadministration of ebastine with erythromycin. No QTc effects were noted when ebastine was administered with theophylline, and the QTc was similar when ebastine was administered with or without food. These findings indicate that ebastine is well tolerated and, in contrast to terfenadine and astemizole, has no clinically meaningful effect on the QTc interval even at high serum concentrations. As with other 'safe' antihistamines, which have shown similar modest increases in QTc when coadministered with ketoconazole, caution should be exercised when administering ebastine to patients having the long QT syndrome or hypokalaemia, and in patients receiving azole antifungals or macrolide antibacterials.

The effect of terfenadine on the cardiac pharmacodynamics of sparfloxacin.

This double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the effect of concomitant administration of terfenadine and sparfloxacin on the electrocardiographic (ECG) QT(c) interval in healthy volunteers, before the removal of terfenadine from the market. Eighty-eight men (aged 18 to 49 years, weighing 60.0 to 98.6 kg) with no clinically relevant ECG abnormalities received placebo, sparfloxacin (400 mg on day 1, 200 mg daily on days 2-4), terfenadine (60 mg BID), or the combination of sparfloxacin and terfenadine. After each dose, serial blood samples and ECG measurements were collected to determine sparfloxacin pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variables. The area under the concentration-time curve and maximum concentration for sparfloxacin were approximately 16% less on day 4 compared with day 1, reflecting the higher plasma level after the 400-mg loading dose compared with that after the maintenance dose of 200 mg daily. Concomitant administration of terfenadine had no effect on these pharmacokinetic variables. When compared with the placebo-adjusted increases in QTc interval in the sparfloxacin (19 milliseconds on day 1 and 14 milliseconds on day 4) and terfenadine (2 milliseconds on day 1 and 7 milliseconds on day 4) treatment groups, the placebo-adjusted increases in QTc interval in the volunteers treated with the combination of sparfloxacin and terfenadine (18 milliseconds on day 1 and 22 milliseconds on day 4) were considered to be additive (no statistically significant interaction). Thus there are no apparent pharmacokinetic or dynamic QTc interactions between terfenadine and sparfloxacin. However, sparfloxacin should be administered with caution to patients receiving concomitant medications known to prolong the QTc interval.

The cardiac pharmacodynamics of therapeutic doses of sparfloxacin.

This double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study assessed the cardiac safety of sparfloxacin (as measured by the effect on corrected QT [QTc] interval) at the extremes of the expected therapeutic dosage range. Ninety healthy adult male volunteers with no clinically relevant electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities received either placebo or 1 of 3 sparfloxacin regimens consisting of a loading dose on day 1 followed by 3 days of daily dosing at half the loading dose (200/100 mg, 400/200 mg, or 800/400 mg). After each dose, serial blood samples and ECG measurements were obtained to determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variables for sparfloxacin. Increases in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) for each dosing interval and in the maximum concentration (Cmax) on days 1 and 4 were dose proportional. The steady-state (day-4) values were 6% to 16% lower than the day-1 values. At steady state, the time to C ranged from 2.5 to 3.9 hours across all doses and days studied. The half-life ranged from 18.7 to 20.3 hours. Increases in the placebo-adjusted mean change and mean maximum change in QTc interval were dose related. The placebo-adjusted increases on day 1 were 9, 16, and 28 milliseconds after receipt of the 200/100-mg, 400/200-mg, and 800/400-mg regimens, respectively. The corresponding increases on day 4 were 7, 12, and 26 milliseconds. The placebo-adjusted changes in QTc interval also showed a linear relationship with the AUC0-24 and Cmax of sparfloxacin. In the majority of volunteers (>90%), these increases were within the normal range for the QTc interval (< or = 460 milliseconds).

A review of the cardiac systemic side-effects of antihistamines: ebastine.

The cardiac safety of ebastine, a long-acting, non-sedating antihistamine, has been thoroughly assessed in phase I-III clinical studies. Ebastine alone at the recommended doses of 10 mg and 20 mg has no clinically relevant effect on QTc interval in adults and in special patient populations (elderly, children or subjects with hepatic or renal impairment). Ebastine administered at 60 and 100 mg/day (3-5 times the maximum recommended dose) for 1 week had statistically significantly smaller effects (3.7 and 10.3 msec, respectively) on the QTc interval than terfenadine (18 msec) at three times the recommended dose (360 mg/day). The mean QTc interval prolongation observed with ebastine 100 mg/day was small and not clinically meaningful, although the results were statistically significant vs. placebo. The effect of ebastine 60 mg/day was not statistically different from placebo. Steady-state drug interaction studies demonstrated that the co-administration of ebastine 20 mg with ketoconazole or erythromycin produced significant increases in systemic exposure for ebastine, which were accompanied by small increases in QTc (approximately 10 msec above ketoconazole or erythromycin alone). Results from individual studies suggest that, when coadministered with ketoconazole, ebastine produces similar changes in QTc interval measurements compared to loratadine and cetirizine. Pooled data from clinical efficacy trials of ebastine 1-30 mg/day administered for 2-3 weeks showed no clinically relevant cardiac effects as assessed by serial electrocardiographs and Holter monitoring. The overall cardiac safety profile based on currently available information suggests that ebastine, like loratadine and cetirizine, has a lower potential for causing adverse cardiovascular effects than terfenadine.

Effect of single ascending, supratherapeutic doses of sparfloxacin on cardiac repolarization (QTc interval).

This double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in healthy adult male and female volunteers with no clinically relevant baseline electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities to assess the cardiac tolerability margin of sparfloxacin (as measured by the effect on QTc interval) under conditions of potential overdose at up to 4 times the usual therapeutic loading dose. The 23 enrolled volunteers received a sequence of single doses of sparfloxacin (400, 800, 1200, and 1600 mg), 1 dose in each of 4 study periods. Six volunteers received placebo during each period. A 14-day washout separated the periods. Serial blood samples and ECG measurements were collected in each period to determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of sparfloxacin. The area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) exhibited dose proportionality. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) after the 1200- and 1600-mg doses was lower than would be expected for a linear dose relationship. This was also the case with the mean increase and mean maximum increase in QTc interval. Increases in the QTc interval correlated well with Cmax but not with AUC0-infinity. The time to reach Cmax showed a slight tendency to increase with dose, as did the terminal elimination half-life. Changes in QTc-interval dispersion were similar for both placebo recipients and sparfloxacin-treated volunteers and were of no clinical consequence. At supratherapeutic doses, the extent of sparfloxacin's absorption (AUC0-infinity) was dose independent; however, the rate of absorption was dose dependent, with Cmax increasing substantially less than proportionally to the administered dose. This limited the Cmax of sparfloxacin at supratherapeutic doses and thus the increase in QTc interval. Rechallenge demonstrated that only 2 of 8 subjects had the same degree of QTc-interval prolongation, emphasizing the marked variability in the QTc interval.

Lack of effect of azelastine and ketoconazole coadministration on electrocardiographic parameters in healthy volunteers.

Azelastine, an antihistamine with additional pharmacologic properties, was evaluated for a possible influence on pharmacokinetic and electrocardiographic parameters due to its coadministration with CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole (200 mg every 12 hrs). Twelve volunteers entered this three-period, open-label study. Electrocardiographic parameters (PR, QRS and QTc intervals and U-wave morphology) were monitored after 14 days of azelastine HCl (4.4 mg every 12 hrs), after 7 days of either azelastine/ketoconazole or azelastine/placebo, and after a 21-day washout period, which was then followed by a 7-day administration of ketoconazole alone. None of the treatments resulted in meaningful alterations of electrocardiographic variables. Pharmacokinetic parameters could not be estimated because ketoconazole metabolites interfered with azelastine assay procedures. In vitro tests with human liver microsomes were used to characterize azelastine's inhibition spectrum. Azelastine did not inhibit CYP3A4 activity but it did inhibit CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 activity with Ki values exceeding maximum plasma concentration by 120 to 800-fold. Therefore, in vitro tests and the absence of electrocardiographic effects suggests azelastine can be safely administered with CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Oral bropirimine immunotherapy of carcinoma in situ of the bladder: results of a phase II trial.

OBJECTIVES: Bropirimine is an orally administered immunostimulant that has been shown to have activity against carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the bladder. To further assess this potential activity, bropirimine was administered to 42 patients for bladder CIS in a Phase II trial. METHODS: Patients were treated with bropirimine 3.0 g/day by mouth for 3 consecutive days each week up to 1 year. Cystoscopy with biopsies and bladder wash cytology were performed quarterly. RESULTS: Twenty (61%) of 33 evaluable patients converted malignant biopsies and bladder wash cytology to negative, including 6 (50%) of 12 who failed prior bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy, 14 (67%) of 21 who had not received prior BCG therapy, and 12 (80%) of 15 with primary CIS. Median response duration exceeds 21 months. Four of the 20 responders did have a papillary tumor recurrence at 3 to 15 months, all Stage Ta or T1. Mild toxicity (grade I or II) suggestive to interferon induction or administration occurred in one third of patients. Headache, transient hepatic enzyme elevations, skin rash, and arthralgias each occurred in 5% to 14% of the patients, with nausea or emesis in 21%. Grade 1 tachycardia/palpitations or chest pain each were noted in 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Oral bropirimine can induce remission of bladder CIS with acceptable toxicity at 3.0 g/day. Bropirimine may be a valuable alternative to cystectomy for some failures of BCG therapy and may have the potential to replace BCG as front-line therapy because of its ease of administration.

Systemic concentrations of salbutamol and HFA-134a after inhalation of salbutamol sulfate in a chlorofluorocarbon-free system.

The objective of this study was to determine if salbutamol was absorbed from a new salbutamol sulfate chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free metered-dose inhaler (MDI). Measurement of HFA-134a, the CFC-free propellant, was included to provide proof of delivery of this MDI. Eight healthy men received two inhalations (90 micrograms salbutamol base equivalents per inhalation ex adapter) from the CFC-free inhaler (MDI A) in period 1 and from a reference CFC inhaler (MDI V) in period 2. Eight postdose samples were collected for the determination of salbutamol serum levels over a 4-h period. Salbutamol levels were not quantifiable in most samples. Four subjects given MDI A and two given MDI V had a few transient salbutamol levels, which occurred in the first hour after dosing, within a narrow range of 1-2 ng/ml and close to the lower limit of detection (1 ng/ml). No pharmacokinetic analyses were possible. Blood samples were also collected after MDI A for propellant quantitation. HFA-134a levels were seen in all subjects, verifying absorption. We conclude that the transient salbutamol serum levels can be attributed to the two-inhalation dose and not to either propellant system.

Overview of electrocardiographic and cardiovascular safety data for sparfloxacin. Sparfloxacin Safety Group.

During the preclinical development of sparfloxacin, prolongation of the electrocardiographic QT interval was observed in dogs. Subsequently, the effect of sparfloxacin on the QTc interval in man was studied in Phase I studies in healthy volunteers. An independent Safety Board was established to evaluate the electrocardiograms, provide an assessment of the clinical consequences of prolongation of the QT interval, and advise on the design of current and future studies. Results of Phase I and Phase III studies have been consistent and indicate that the increase in QTc interval associated with sparfloxacin is moderate (3% on average) and that patients with renal or hepatic impairment are not at increased risk. Few serious adverse cardiovascular events have been reported during post-marketing surveillance of sparfloxacin and all have occurred in patients with an underlying cardiac condition.

Dose-response relation between terfenadine (Seldane) and the QTc interval on the scalar electrocardiogram: distinguishing a drug effect from spontaneous variability.

The primary goal of this investigation was to describe the effect of terfenadine on the QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) of the scalar electrocardiogram (ECG). The design was double-blind, four-period crossover, dose escalation, which involved 28 normal healthy volunteers and 28 patients with stable cardiovascular disease. At baseline, the normal subjects had a mean QTc interval of 407 msec, whereas the patients with cardiovascular disease had a mean QTc interval of 417 msec (p<0.01). The largest increase in mean QTc on terfenadine was 24 msec in a normal subject and 28 msec in a patient with cardiovascular disease. The longest average QTc observed was 449 msec and 501 msec in any normal subject and patient with cardiovascular disease, respectively. Compared to baseline, terfenadine 60 mg twice daily is associated with a QTc increase of 6 msec in normal subjects and a 12 msec increase in patients with cardiovascular disease (p<0.01 vs baseline; p>0.05 when the two populations were compared). Although the QTc increase from baseline are statistically significant, the magnitude of the spontaneous variability in QTc in the same patients is much greater. Because 40 ECGs were obtained while taking placebo in each participant, the spontaneous variability in QTc interval with placebo was also described. Only one of the 28 normal subjects had a mean baseline QTc=440 msec, yet 14 of the 28 normal subjects had at lease one of the 40 placebo ECGs with a QTc=440 msec. The 28 patients with cardiovascular disease had a mean QTc at baseline of 417 msec; yet 20 of 28 had at lease one ECG on placebo with a QTc interval = 440 msec. On the average, the QTc fluctuated 56 msec in each patient during placebo administration. From the observed placebo variability, we calculated that an increase in QTc of=35 msec while receiving drug therapy is likely to represent a drug effect at the 95% confidence interval.

Prediction of cardiac death in patients with a very low ejection fraction after myocardial infarction: a Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) study.

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) database was analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards regression model to predict the mortality of patients with very poor left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction < or = .20). Predictors of total death or cardiac arrest were (relative risk), QRS duration (1.10/10 msec increase), coronary artery bypass grafting (0.38), basal heart rate (1.26/10 min-1 increase), diastolic blood pressure (0.79/10 mm Hg increase), diabetes mellitus (1.59), EF (0.94/1 U increase), and ease of suppression (the ability to suppress ambient ventricular ectopy on the lowest dose of the first randomly chosen CAST drug) (0.64). Predictors of arrhythmic death or arrhythmic cardiac arrest included thrombolysis (0.44), coronary artery bypass grafting (0.38), diuretic use (1.71), heart rate (1.21/10 min-1 increase), calcium channel blocker use (1.69), and QRS duration (1.10/10 msec increase). Thus easily measurable clinical and laboratory variables help predict prognosis in this clinically important subgroup. The pathophysiologic basis for and the clinical implications of the ease of ventricular arrhythmia suppression correlating with prognosis requires further study.

Effects of food on the bioequivalence of different verapamil sustained-release formulations.

Previously, clinical studies comparing generic and reference formulations of sustained-release (SR) verapamil tablets revealed significant increases in the PR interval in subjects given the generic formulation in the presence of food. To determine the mechanisms underlying these differences in pharmacodynamics, the present analyses examined the pharmacokinetics of these formulations in the presence and absence of food. After single or multiple doses in fasting subjects, AUCs, Cmaxs, and tmaxs were similar, suggesting that these formulations were bioequivalent in the fasted state. However, the generic formulation exhibited a higher AUC(0-6) in fed subjects, suggesting that this formulation may be absorbed more rapidly than the reference formulation when given with food. Analysis of AUC(0-6) showed that 34% of the subjects receiving the generic formulation exhibited rapid absorption, compared with only 8% receiving the reference formulation. Significant increases in the PR interval were seen in nine fed subjects receiving the generic formulation compared with two receiving the reference formulation. Similarly, three fed subjects receiving the generic drug who were rapid absorbers exhibited first-degree heart block, whereas this conduction disturbance was seen in only one fed subject receiving the reference formulation. Thus, increased conduction disturbances seen in subjects given the generic formulation with a meal likely reflect more rapid absorption of this formulation in the presence of food, resulting in an increase in the ratio of more potent to less potent enantiomers of verapamil in the systemic circulation.

New insights into the definition and meaning of proarrhythmia during initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy from the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial and its pilot study. The CAST and CAPS Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to determine the characteristics of worsening ventricular arrhythmia during antiarrhythmic drug titration. BACKGROUND: Proarrhythmia is an evolving concept in cardiology. Its definition, incidence and clinical significance in various patient settings require refinement. METHODS: The impact of early proarrhythmia was analyzed in 3,840 patients in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST). RESULTS: Drug therapy did not affect the incidence of new, sustained but nonfatal ventricular tachycardia (placebo 0.5%, active drug 0.4%). Nevertheless, there was a threefold increase in arrhythmic death (placebo 0.5% vs. active drug 1.6%). The incidence of increased ventricular premature depolarizations was equivalent (3% to 5%) for the three study drugs and indistinguishable from that seen with placebo. Patients with increased ventricular premature depolarizations on the first drug tested had fewer at baseline (65 +/- 94 vs. 137 +/- 260 per hour; mean +/- SD) (p < 0.01). When increased ventricular premature depolarizations occurred with the first drug, they were much more likely also to be present with the second drug (for example, 42% vs. 5%, p < 0.001). Increased ventricular premature depolarizations during initiation of therapy independently predicted increased risk of subsequent arrhythmic death (independent relative risk 2.34, p = 0.0053) in the absence of continued antiarrhythmic drug therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of early worsening of arrhythmia in the present study was low. In the absence of placebo control, the incidence of proarrhythmia will be overestimated. Increased ventricular premature depolarizations had characteristics that suggest they often represent spontaneous variability rather than proarrhythmia. The main finding is that markedly increased ventricular premature depolarizations during drug titration predict long-term increased risk of arrhythmic death in this patient population despite absence of long-term antiarrhythmic drug therapy.