RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Informal home care is prevalent among Mexican American stroke survivors, but data on the impact on caregivers are not available. The aim was to assess ethnic differences in informal stroke caregiving and caregiver outcomes at 90 days poststroke. METHODS: Informal caregivers were recruited from the population-based Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi Project (2019-2023), conducted in a bi-ethnic community in Texas. Caregivers of community-dwelling stroke survivors who were not cognitively impaired and not employed by a formal caregiving agency were interviewed. Interviews included sociodemographics, dyad characteristics, Modified Caregiver Strain Index (range 0-26, higher more positive), Positive Aspects of Caregiving scale (range, 5-45, higher more), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (range, 0-30, higher worse), and PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)-10 physical (range, 16.2-67.7, higher better) and mental health (range, 21.2-67.6, higher better) summary scores. Stroke survivor data was from interviews and medical records. Propensity score methods were used to balance caregiver and patient factors among Mexican American and Non-Hispanic White caregivers by fitting a model with ethnicity of caregiver as the outcome and predictors being caregiver sociodemographics, patient-caregiver dyad characteristics, and patient sociodemographics and functional disability. Propensity scores were included as a covariate in regression models, considering the association between ethnicity and outcomes. RESULTS: Mexican American caregivers were younger, more likely female, and more likely a child of the stroke survivor than Non-Hispanic White caregivers. Mexican American caregiver ethnicity was associated with less caregiver strain (ß, -1.87 [95% CI, -3.51 to -0.22]) and depressive symptoms (ß, -2.02 [95% CI, -3.41 to -0.64]) and more favorable mental health (ß, 4.90 [95% CI, 2.49-7.31]) and positive aspects of caregiving (ß, 3.29 [95% CI, 1.35-5.23]) but not associated with physical health. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the mechanisms behind more favorable caregiver outcomes in Mexican American people may aid in the design of culturally sensitive interventions to improve both caregiver and stroke survivor outcomes, potentially across all race and ethnic groups.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Americanos Mexicanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidadores/psicología , Americanos Mexicanos/psicología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etnología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/enfermería , Accidente Cerebrovascular/psicología , Texas/epidemiología , BlancoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stroke survivors believe neighborhood resources such as community centers are beneficial; however, little is known about the influence of these resources on stroke outcomes. We evaluated whether residing in neighborhoods with greater resource density is associated with favorable post-stroke outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included Mexican American and non-Hispanic White stroke survivors from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi project (2009-2019). The exposure was density of neighborhood resources (eg, community centers, restaurants, stores) within a residential census tract at stroke onset. Outcomes included time to death and recurrence, and at 3 months following stroke: disability (activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living), cognition (Modified Mini-Mental State Exam), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8), and quality of life (abbreviated Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale). We fit multivariable Cox regression and mixed linear models. We considered interactions with stroke severity, ethnicity, and sex. Among 1786 stroke survivors, median age was 64 years (interquartile range, 56-73), 55% men, and 62% Mexican American. Resource density was not associated with death, recurrence, or depression. Greater resource density (75th versus 25th percentile) was associated with more favorable cognition (Modified Mini-Mental State Exam mean difference=0.838, 95% CI=0.092, 1.584) and among moderate-severe stroke survivors, with more favorable functioning (activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living=-0.156 [95% CI, -0.284 to 0.027]) and quality of life (abbreviated Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale=0.194 [95% CI, 0.029-0.359]). CONCLUSIONS: We observed associations between greater resource density and cognition overall and with functioning and quality of life among moderate-severe stroke survivors. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and determine if neighborhood resources may be a tool for recovery.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Calidad de Vida , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cognición , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicología , Americanos Mexicanos , Características del Vecindario , Recurrencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/psicología , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Texas/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , BlancoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to delineate 21-year sex-specific trends in recurrence and postrecurrence mortality. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2020, first-ever ischemic stroke (IS) patients, ascertained from the population-based BASIC (Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi) project in South Texas, were followed for recurrent stroke and all-cause mortality until December 31, 2020. Multivariable regression models with an interaction between calendar year and sex were used to estimate sex-specific trends and sex differences in recurrence and postrecurrence mortality. RESULTS: Of the 6,057 IS patients (median age = 69 years, 49.8% women), 654 (10.8%) had a recurrence and 399 (47.7%) had postrecurrence mortality during 5 years of follow-up. In 2000, women had 2.5% higher albeit non-statistically significant 5-year risk of recurrence than men in absolute scale. With the trend declining in women by 7.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = -10.8 to -4.5%) and in men by 3.6% (95% CI = -6.5% to -0.7%), the risk at the end of the study period was 1.5% (95% CI = -0.3% to 3.6%) lower among women than men. For postrecurrence mortality, the risk was 10.2% lower among women in 2000, but the sex difference was 3.3% by the end of the period, which was due to a larger overall increase in the risk among women than men over the entire time period. INTERPRETATION: The declines in recurrent stroke suggest successful secondary stroke prevention, especially in women. However, the continued high postrecurrence mortality among both sexes at the end of study period emphasizes the need for ongoing interventions to improve prognosis in those who have had recurrent cerebrovascular events. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:332-342.
Asunto(s)
Recurrencia , Caracteres Sexuales , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Texas/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores Sexuales , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: After stroke, Mexican American (MA) individuals have worse 90-day neurological, functional, cognitive, and quality of life outcomes and a higher prevalence of poststroke depression compared with non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals. MA individuals receive more help through informal, unpaid caregiving than NHW individuals. We examined ethnic differences in needs identified by MA and NHW stroke caregivers. METHODS: Caregivers were identified from the population-based BASIC study (Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi) in Nueces County, Texas from October 2019 to November 2021. Responses to the Caregiver Needs and Concerns Checklist were collected at 90-day poststroke to assess caregiver needs. Using the cross-sectional sample, prevalence scores and bivariate analyses were used to examine ethnic differences between Caregiver Needs and Concerns Checklist items. Linear regression was used to examine adjusted associations of ethnicity with the total average needs for each domain. Models were adjusted for patient and caregiver age and sex, caregiver education level, and employment status, patient insurance status, prestroke function, cognitive status, language, and functional outcome at 90 days, intensity and duration of caregiving, presence of other caregivers (paid/unpaid), and cohabitation of patient and caregiver. RESULTS: A total of 287 were approached, and 186 stroke caregivers were included with a median age of 54.2 years and 80.1% being women caregivers: 74.3% MA and 25.7% NHW individuals. MA caregivers had significantly lower education (
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study examines the associations of ethnicity, caregiver burden, familism, and physical and mental health among Mexican Americans (MAs) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs). METHODS: We recruited adults 65+ years with possible cognitive impairment (using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score<26), and their caregivers living in Nueces County, Texas. We used weighted path analysis to test effects of ethnicity, familism, and caregiver burden on caregiver's mental and physical health. RESULTS: 516 caregivers and care-receivers participated. MA caregivers were younger, more likely female, and less educated compared to NHWs. Increased caregiver burden was associated with worse mental (B = -0.53; p < .001) and physical health (B = -0.15; p = .002). Familism was associated with lower burden (B = -0.14; p = .001). MA caregivers had stronger familism scores (B = 0.49; p < .001). DISCUSSION: Increased burden is associated with worse caregiver mental and physical health. MA caregivers had stronger familism resulting in better health. Findings can contribute to early identification, intervention, and coordination of services to help reduce caregiver burden.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: A college degree is required to enter medical school in the United States. A remarkably high percentage of students entering college have pre-medical aspirations but relatively few end up as medical students. As an "applied science", education about medicine is usually thought to be beyond the purview of a liberal arts curriculum. Students therefore receive little education about a medical career, or information about the many alternative careers in health science. Instead, they take courses for Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) preparation and medical school application prerequisites in biology, chemistry, physics, and math. These classes give them little insight into a real medical career. The current report considers this mismatch between student needs in health science and available resources in colleges across the United States. METHODS: A Collective Case Series framework was used to obtain qualitative data. Key informant interviews were requested from a convenience sample of representatives from 20 colleges, with six colleges providing extensive data. Three institutions collected data specifically on students who matriculated college interested in a career as a physician. RESULTS: At these schools, one-half to one-quarter of students who said they were interested in medicine at the beginning of college ended up not applying to medical school. At each of the six schools, we saw a wide range of generally sparse academic and professional advising involvement and a very limited number of classes that discussed concepts directly related to careers in health science. CONCLUSIONS: Looking at this data, we provide a novel conceptual model as a potential testable solution to the problem of an underexposed and unprepared student population interested in medicine. This includes a brief series of courses intended to inform students about what a career in medicine would fully entail to help foster core competencies of empathy, compassion and resilience.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Escolaridad , Prueba de Admisión Académica , Facultades de Medicina , Selección de ProfesiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: During acute hospitalizations, physicians often focus on the stroke patient and not family who may be traumatized by this sudden change to their loved one. We investigated long-term psychological distress among family surrogate decision makers for Mexican American (MA) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) severe stroke patients. Previous work in other diseases suggested worse psychological outcomes in MA than NHW caregivers. METHODS: This was a population-based, prospective cohort study in Nueces County, TX. Stroke patient participants and their surrogate decision makers were enrolled soon after any stroke between April, 2016, and October, 2020, if surrogates had made decisions about life-sustaining treatments. Surrogates completed validated measures of posttraumatic stress, National Stressful Events Survey for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Short Scale; anxiety, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7; and depression, Patient Health Questionnaire-8 at discharge, 3, 6, and 12 months. Ethnic differences were assessed with multilevel linear mixed models, sequentially adjusted for prespecified patient and surrogate demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical covariates. RESULTS: There were 301 family surrogates for 241 severe stroke patients. The mean follow-up was 315 days. High scores on measures of psychological distress ranged between 17% and 28% of surrogates. One or more high levels of the psychological outcomes were found in 17%-43% of surrogates; 2 or more were found in 12%-27%; and all 3 were found in 5%-16% of surrogates. All psychological outcomes were worse among MAs on unadjusted analyses. In fully adjusted models, posttraumatic stress remained worse among MAs (0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.56); ethnic differences were attenuated and no longer significant in the final model for anxiety (0.59, 95% CI -0.55 to 1.74) and depression (0.97, 95% CI -0.25 to 2.19). The trajectory for depression did differ by ethnicity (interaction p = 0.03), with depression score improving more rapidly over time among NHWs than MAs. Advance care plans did not seem to confound any ethnic differences. DISCUSSION: Psychological distress is common among family surrogate decision makers in the year after stroke and may be worse among MAs. Efforts are needed to support family members of all ethnic groups after severe stroke.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Distrés Psicológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Toma de Decisiones , Etnicidad , Americanos Mexicanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Blanco , Cuidadores/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with severe stroke often rely on surrogate decision-makers for life-sustaining treatment decisions. We investigated ethnic differences between Mexican Americans (MAs) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals in surrogate reports of physician quality of communication and shared decision-making from the OASIS study (Outcomes Among Surrogate Decision Makers in Stroke) project. METHODS: Patients had ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage in Nueces County, TX. Surrogates self-identified as being involved in decisions about do-not-resuscitate orders, brain surgery, ventilator, feeding tube, or hospice/comfort care. Surrogate reports of physician quality of communication (scale score, range from 0 to 10) and shared decision-making (CollaboRATE scale score, binary score 1 versus 0) were compared by ethnicity with linear or logistic regression using generalized estimating equations, adjusted for prespecified demographics, clinical factors, and confounders. RESULTS: Between April 2016 and September 2020, 320 surrogates for 257 patients with stroke enrolled (MA, 158; NHW, 85; and other, 14). Overall quality of communication score was better among surrogates of MA patients than NHW individuals after adjustment for demographics, stroke severity, and patient survival though the ethnic difference was attenuated (ß, 0.47 [95% CI, -0.17 to 1.12]; P=0.15) after adjustment for trust in the medical profession and frequency of personal prayer. High CollaboRATE scale scores were more common among surrogates of MA patients than NHW individuals (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.04-2.95]). This association persisted after adjustment for demographic and clinical factors though there was an interaction between patient age and ethnicity (P=0.04), suggesting that this difference was primarily in older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Surrogate decision-makers of MA patients generally reported better outcomes on validated measures of quality of communication and shared decision-making than NHW individuals. Further study of outcomes among diverse populations of stroke surrogate decision-makers may help to identify sources of strength and resiliency that may be broadly applicable.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Anciano , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Hemorragia Cerebral , Órdenes de Resucitación , TexasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Standard measures of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) that rely on count data may not sufficiently capture SDB severity or reflect downstream consequences of SDB. We hypothesized that novel metrics derived from pulse rate, oxygen saturation, and nasal pressure would be associated with stroke outcomes. PATIENTS/METHODS: Shortly after ischemic stroke, participants in a population-based study were offered ApneaLink Plus testing. Signal analysis was used to generate 166 metrics from the nasal pressure cannula and finger probe, categorized as: autonomic (based on pulse rate variability), oximetry-derived, nasal pressure-derived, and mixed oxygen and nasal pressure-derived measures. Three-month outcome assessments included functional and cognitive outcomes and stroke recurrence. Tobit regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations between each sleep apnea metric and the three outcomes, unadjusted and adjusted for multiple potential confounders. Models were adjusted for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Of the 530 participants, the median age was 65 (IQR: 57, 73), 49 % were female, and 64 % were Mexican American. Without covariate adjustment, 23 of 166 variables were associated with functional outcome, 43 were associated with cognitive outcome, and 1 was associated with stroke recurrence. After adjustment, 7 mixed, oximetry, or nasal pressure-based metrics and 1 autonomic metric were associated with functional outcome, but none was associated with cognitive outcome or stroke recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Many novel metrics of SDB were associated with important stroke outcomes, and 8 novel metrics were associated with functional outcome in adjusted models. This raises hypotheses about pathways by which SDB may negatively impact stroke outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Oximetría , OxígenoRESUMEN
The neighborhoods where individuals reside shape environmental exposures, access to resources, and opportunities. The inequitable distribution of resources and opportunities across neighborhoods perpetuates and exacerbates cardiovascular health inequities. Thus, interventions that address the neighborhood environment could reduce the inequitable burden of cardiovascular disease in disenfranchised populations. The objective of this scientific statement is to provide a roadmap illustrating how current knowledge regarding the effects of neighborhoods on cardiovascular disease can be used to develop and implement effective interventions to improve cardiovascular health at the population, health system, community, and individual levels. PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov were used to identify observational studies and interventions examining or targeting neighborhood conditions in relation to cardiovascular health. The scientific statement summarizes how neighborhoods have been incorporated into the actions of health care systems, interventions in community settings, and policies and interventions that involve modifying the neighborhood environment. This scientific statement presents promising findings that can be expanded and implemented more broadly and identifies methodological challenges in designing studies to evaluate important neighborhood-related policies and interventions. Last, this scientific statement offers recommendations for areas that merit further research to promote a deeper understanding of the contributions of neighborhoods to cardiovascular health and health inequities and to stimulate the development of more effective interventions.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Humanos , American Heart Association , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Atención a la Salud , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Características de la ResidenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify barriers to surrogate decision-maker application of patient values on life-sustaining treatments after stroke in Mexican American (MA) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews with stroke patient surrogate decision-makers completed approximately 6 months after hospitalization. RESULTS: Forty-two family surrogate decision-makers participated (median age: 54.5 years; female: 83%; patients were MA [60%] and NHW [36%], and 50% were deceased at the time of the interview). We identified three primary barriers to surrogates' applications of patient values and preferences when making decisions on life-sustaining treatments: (1) a minority of surrogates had no prior discussion of what the patient would want in the event of a serious medical illness, (2) surrogates struggled to apply prior known values and preferences to the actual decisions made, and (3) surrogates felt guilt or burden, often even in the setting of some knowledge of patient values or preferences. The first two barriers were seen to a similar degree in MA and NHW participants, though guilt or burden was reported more commonly among MA (28%) than NHW (13%) participants. Maintaining patient independence (e.g., ability to live at home, avoid a nursing home, make their own decisions) was the most important priority for decision-making for both MA and NHW participants; however, MA participants were more likely to list spending time with family as an important priority (24% vs. 7%). CONCLUSIONS: Stroke surrogate decision-makers may benefit from (1) continued efforts to make advance care planning more common and more relevant, (2) assistance in how to apply their knowledge of patient values to actual treatment decisions, and (3) psychosocial support to reduce emotional burden. Barriers to surrogate application of patient values were generally similar in MA and NHW participants, though the possibility of greater guilt or burden among MA surrogates warrants further investigation and confirmation.
Asunto(s)
Planificación Anticipada de Atención , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Toma de Decisiones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little information is available on the prevalence of cognitive impairment in Mexican American persons. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in those 65 years and older among Mexican American and non-Hispanic white individuals in a community. METHODS: This was a population-based cohort study in Nueces County, Texas, USA. Participants were recruited using a random housing sample. The Harmonized Cognitive Assessment (HCAP) participant and informant protocol was performed after Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) screening. An algorithm was used to sort participants into diagnostic categories: no cognitive impairment, MCI, or dementia. Logistic regression determined the association of ethnicity with MCI and dementia controlling for age, gender, and education. RESULTS: 1,901 participants completed the MoCA and 547 the HCAP. Mexican Americans were younger and had less educational attainment than non-Hispanic whites. Overall, dementia prevalence was 11.6% (95% CI 9.2-14.0) and MCI prevalence was 21.2% (95% CI 17.5-24.8). After adjusting for age, gender, and education level, there was no significant ethnic difference in the odds of dementia or MCI. Those with ≤11 compared with ≥16 years of education had much higher dementia [ORâ=â4.9 (95% CI 2.2-11.1)] and MCI risk [ORâ=â3.5 (95% CI 1.6-7.5)]. CONCLUSIONS: Dementia and MCI prevalence were high in both Mexican American and non-Hispanic white populations. Mexican American persons had double the odds of mild cognitive impairment and this was attenuated when age and educational attainment were considered. Educational attainment was a potent predictor of cognitive impairment.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Demencia , Humanos , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/epidemiología , Americanos Mexicanos , Blanco , Anciano , Texas/epidemiología , EscolaridadRESUMEN
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on informal caregiving was examined in a Mexican American (MA) and Non-Hispanic White (NHW) population-based cohort. 395 participants age > 65 years were recruited via door-to-door and phone recruitment as part of the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi-Cognitive (BASIC-C) project. Both recipients and caregivers answered questions regarding the recipient's health and the COVID-19 pandemic. 15% of caregivers saw their caregiving recipient less than before the pandemic and 18% saw their recipient more than before. 55% of caregivers reported a slight to severe impact of the pandemic on their caregiving, and 45% reported no impact. For most caregivers, their caregiving role did not change markedly during the pandemic. MA and NHW caregivers had similar survey responses.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health has advocated for improved minority participation in clinical research, including clinical trials and observational epidemiologic studies since 1993. An understanding of Mexican Americans (MAs) participation in clinical research is important for tailoring recruitment strategies and enrollment techniques for MAs. However, contemporary data on MA participation in observational clinical stroke studies are rare. We examined differences between Mexican Americans (MAs) and non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) participation in a population-based stroke study. METHODS: We included 3,594 first ever stroke patients (57.7% MAs, 48.7% women, median [IQR] age 68 [58-79]) from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi Project, 2009-2020 in Texas, USA, who were approached and invited to participate in a structured baseline interview. We defined participation as completing a baseline interview by patient or proxy. We used log-binomial models adjusting for prespecified potential confounders to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) of participation comparing MAs with NHWs. We tested interactions of ethnicity with age or sex to examine potential effect modification in the ethnic differences in participation. We also included an interaction between year and ethnicity to examine ethnic-specific temporal trends in participation. RESULTS: Baseline participation was 77.0% in MAs and 64.2% in NHWs (Prevalence Ratio [PR] 1.20; 95% CI, 1.14-1.25). The ethnic difference remained after multivariable adjustment (1.17; 1.12-1.23), with no evidence of significant effect modification by age or sex (Pinteraction by age = 0.68, Pinteraction by sex = 0.83). Participation increased over time for both ethnic groups (Ptrend < 0.0001), but the differences in participation between MAs and NHWs remained significantly different throughout the 11-year time period. CONCLUSION: MAs were persistently more likely to participate in a population-based stroke study in a predominantly MA community despite limited outreach efforts towards MAs during study enrollment. This finding holds hope for future research studies to be inclusive of the MA population.
Asunto(s)
Estudios Clínicos como Asunto , Americanos Mexicanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Blanco , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Etnicidad , Americanos Mexicanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etnología , Texas/epidemiología , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca , Estudios Clínicos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Selección de Paciente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Higher neighborhood socioeconomic status has been favorably associated with stroke outcomes. This may be due to these areas having more beneficial resources such as recreational centers. We aimed to determine if neighborhood density of recreation centers is favorably associated with stroke outcomes. METHODS: We conducted analyses of data from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi project, a cohort of stroke survivors ≥45 years of age residing in Nueces County, TX (2009-2020). We included non-Hispanic White and Mexican American incident stroke survivors, who were not institutionalized prestroke and completed baseline and follow-up assessments (N=1392). We calculated the density of fitness and recreational sports centers within their residential census tract during the year of their stroke. Outcomes included function (self-ratings on activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living), cognition (modified mini-mental state exam), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8), and quality of life (abbreviated Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale). We fit confounder-adjusted gamma-distributed mixed generalized linear models with a log link for each outcome and considered interaction with stroke severity. RESULTS: On average, participants were 65 years old, 53% male, and 63% Mexican American. Median recreational centers were 1.60 per square mile (interquartile range, 0.41-3.06). Among moderate-severe stroke survivors, greater density of recreation centers (75th versus 25th percentile) was associated with more favorable function and possibly quality of life (activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living, 4.8% change [95% CI, -0.11% to -9.27%]; Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale, 3.7% change [95% CI, -0.7% to 8.2%]). Minimal nonsignificant differences were observed among the overall stroke population and those with mild stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of recreation centers may be beneficial for poststroke function and quality of life among those with moderate-severe stroke. If further research confirms recreation centers to be beneficial, this could inform rehabilitation following stroke.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Calidad de Vida , Tramo Censal , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , RecreaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We studied racial differences in post-stroke outcomes using a prospective, population-based cohort of stroke survivors as part of the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi (BASIC) project. METHODS: Neurologic (NIHSS, range of 0-42, higher scores are worse), functional (ADLs/IADLs, range 1-4, higher scores are worse), and cognitive (3MSE, range 0-100, higher scores are better) outcomes were measured 90 days after stroke. Cox proportional hazards and negative binomial linear regression models were used to examine the associations between race and 90-day all-cause mortality and NIHSS, respectively, whereas linear regression was used for ADLs/IADLs and 3MSE scores. Covariates included demographics, initial NIHSS, comorbidities, prior stroke history, tPA treatment status, pre-stroke disability, and pre-stroke cognition. The mortality model was also adjusted for DNR status. RESULTS: At 90 days post-stroke, Black American individuals (BAs) (n = 122) had a median (IQR) NIHSS of 2 (1,6) compared to NIHSS of 1 (0,3) in non-Hispanic White American individuals (NHWs) (nâ¯=â¯795). BAs had a median (IQR) ADL/IADL score of 2.41 (1.50, 3.39) compared to 2.00 (1.27, 2.95) in NHWs. BAs scored a median of 84 (75, 92) on the 3MSE compared to NHWs' score of 91.5 (83, 96). Death occurred in 23 (8%) of BAs and 268 (15%) of NHWs within 90 days among those who participated in baseline. After adjustment for covariates, functional outcomes at 90 days were worse in BAs compared to NHWs, with 15.8% (95% CI=5.2, 26.4) greater limitations in ADLs/IADLs and 43.9% (95% CI=12.0, 84.9) greater severity of stroke symptoms. Cognition at 90 days was 6.5% (95% CI=2.4, 10.6) lower in BAs compared to NHWs. BAs had a 35.4% lower (95% CI=-9.8, 61.9) hazard rate of mortality than NHWs. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective, population-based community sample, BAs had worse neurologic, functional and cognitive outcomes at 90 days compared to NHWs. Future research should investigate how social determinants of health including structural racism, neighborhood factors and access to preventive and recovery services influences these racial disparities.
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular , Blanco , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Negro o Afroamericano , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend that older patients (65+) with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early-stage dementia receive similar guideline-concordant care after cardiovascular disease (CVD) events as those with normal cognition (NC). However, older patients with MCI and dementia receive less care for CVD and other conditions than those with NC. Whether physician recommendations for guideline-concordant treatments after two common CVD events, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute ischemic stroke (stroke), differ between older patients with NC, MCI, and early-stage dementia is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To test the influence of patient cognitive status (NC, MCI, early-stage dementia) on physicians' recommendations for guideline-concordant treatments for AMI and stroke. DESIGN: We conducted two parallel, randomized survey studies for AMI and stroke in the US using clinical vignettes where the hypothetical patient's cognitive status was randomized between physicians. PARTICIPANTS: The study included cardiologists, neurologists, and generalists who care for most patients hospitalized for AMI and stroke. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite quality score representing the number of five guideline-concordant treatments physicians recommended for a hypothetical patient after AMI or stroke. KEY RESULTS: 1,031 physicians completed the study (58.5% response rate). Of 1,031 respondents, 980 physicians had complete information. After adjusting for physician factors, physicians recommended similar treatments after AMI and stroke in hypothetical patients with pre-existing MCI (adjusted ratio of expected composite quality score, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.94, 1.02]; P = 0.36) as hypothetical patients with NC. Physicians recommended fewer treatments to hypothetical patients with pre-existing early-stage dementia than to hypothetical patients with NC (adjusted ratio of expected composite quality score, 0.90 [0.86, 0.94]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In these randomized survey studies, physicians recommended fewer guideline-concordant AMI and stroke treatments to hypothetical patients with early-stage dementia than those with NC. We did not find evidence that physicians recommend fewer treatments to hypothetical patients with MCI than those with NC.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Demencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Infarto del Miocardio , Médicos , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Cognición , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Demencia/epidemiología , Demencia/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize change in sleep-disordered breathing severity in the year following stroke, overall, and by ethnicity, within the population-based Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi Project. METHODS: First-ever ischemic strokes (n=414) were ascertained by active and passive surveillance and validated by stroke-trained physicians. Patients with stroke were invited to participate in portable sleep apnea testing (ApneaLink Plus) at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months poststroke. Sleep-disordered breathing severity was assessed by the respiratory event index (apneas and hypopneas/hour of recording). The component obstructive apnea index and central apnea index were also assessed. Time and ethnicity effects on outcomes, as well as ethnic differences in time effects, were analyzed using generalized estimating equations with multivariable adjustment for confounding factors. RESULTS: Mean age (n=414) was 63.9 years (SD=10.9); 68.4% were Mexican American. Baseline mean respiratory event index, obstructive apnea index, and central apnea index were 21.3 (SD=16.6), 8.6 (SD=11.5), and 1.5 (SD=3.2), respectively. There was no time effect on respiratory event index (P=0.35) but obstructive apnea index increased over time (P<0.01). Averaged over follow-up, respiratory event index and obstructive apnea index were significantly higher in Mexican American than non-Hispanic White persons. No ethnic difference in the time effect was found for either outcome. For central apnea index, there was an ethnicity-time interaction (P=0.01) such that central apnea index increased in non-Hispanic White but did not change in Mexican American persons. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep-disordered breathing severity was significant and stable for most individuals in the year after stroke. These results do not confirm previous reports of diminishing sleep-disordered breathing severity over time after stroke and would support early assessment and treatment where indicated.
Asunto(s)
Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño , Apnea Central del Sueño , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/diagnóstico , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/epidemiología , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/etiología , EtnicidadRESUMEN
Importance: Acute stroke treatment rates in the US lag behind those in other high-income nations. Objective: To assess whether a hospital emergency department (ED) and community intervention was associated with an increased proportion of patients with stroke receiving thrombolysis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nonrandomized controlled trial of the Stroke Ready intervention took place in Flint, Michigan, from October 2017 to March 2020. Participants included adults living in the community. Data analysis was completed from July 2022 to May 2023. Intervention: Stroke Ready combined implementation science and community-based participatory research approaches. Acute stroke care was optimized in a safety-net ED, and then a community-wide, theory-based health behavior intervention, including peer-led workshops, mailers, and social media, was conducted. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prespecified primary outcome was the proportion of patients hospitalized with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack from Flint who received thrombolysis before and after the intervention. The association between thrombolysis and the Stroke Ready combined intervention, including the ED and community components, was estimated using logistic regression models, clustering at the hospital level and adjusting for time and stroke type. In prespecified secondary analyses, the ED and community intervention were explored separately, adjusting for hospital, time, and stroke type. Results: In total, 5970 people received in-person stroke preparedness workshops, corresponding to 9.7% of the adult population in Flint. There were 3327 ischemic stroke and TIA visits (1848 women [55.6%]; 1747 Black individuals [52.5%]; mean [SD] age, 67.8 [14.5] years) among patients from Flint seen in the relevant EDs, including 2305 in the preintervention period from July 2010 to September 2017 and 1022 in the postintervention period from October 2017 to March 2020. The proportion of thrombolysis usage increased from 4% in 2010 to 14% in 2020. The combined Stroke Ready intervention was not associated with thrombolysis use (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% CI, 0.74-1.70; P = .58). The ED component was associated with an increase in thrombolysis use (adjusted OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.04-2.56; P = .03), but the community component was not (adjusted OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96-1.01; P = .30). Conclusions and Relevance: This nonrandomized controlled trial found that a multilevel ED and community stroke preparedness intervention was not associated with increased thrombolysis treatments. The ED intervention was associated with increased thrombolysis usage, suggesting that implementation strategies in partnership with safety-net hospitals may increase thrombolysis usage. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT036455900.
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Michigan/epidemiología , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Incidencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Terapia TrombolíticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Individuals with Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease-related dementias may lose the ability to drive safely as their disease progresses. Little is known about driving prevalence in older Latinx and non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals. We investigated the prevalence of driving status among individuals with cognitive impairment in a population-based cohort. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of the cohort BASIC-Cognitive study in a community of Mexican American (MA) and NHW individuals in South Texas. Participants scored ≤25 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), indicating a likelihood of cognitive impairment. Current driving status was assessed by the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol informant interview. Logistic regression was used to assess driving versus non-driving adjusted for pre-specified covariates. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare NHW and MA differences in driving outcomes from the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) questions for evaluating driving risk in dementia. RESULTS: There were 635 participants, 77.0 mean age, 62.4% women, and 17.3 mean MoCA. Of these, 360 (61.4%) were current drivers with 250 of 411 (60.8%) MA participants driving, and 121 of 190 (63.70%) NHW participants driving (p = 0.50). In fully adjusted models age, sex, cognitive impairment, language preference, and Activities of Daily Living scores were significant predictors for the likelihood of driving (p < 0.0001). Severity of cognitive impairment was inversely associated with odds of driving, but this relationship was not found in those preferring Spanish language for interviews. Around one-third of all caregivers had concerns about their care-recipient driving. There were no significant differences in MA and NHW driving habits and outcomes from the AAN questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants with cognitive impairment were currently driving. This is a cause for concern for many caregivers. There were no significant ethnic driving differences. Associations with current driving in cognitively impaired persons require further research.