Effects of Statin Plus Ezetimibe on Coronary Plaques in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Sub-Analysis of PRECISE-IVUS Trial.

AIM: Coronary plaque regression is weak in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). We evaluated whether dual lipid-lowering therapy (DLLT) with ezetimibe and atorvastatin attenuates coronary plaques in ACS patients with DM. METHODS: The prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter PRECISE-IVUS (Plaque Regression with Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitor or Synthesis Inhibitor Evaluated by Intravascular Ultrasound) trial assigned 246 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to DLLT or atorvastatin monotherapy and evaluated IVUS-derived changes in percent atheroma volume (ΔPAV), at baseline and 9-12-month follow-up, in 126 ACS cases, including 25 DM patients. The atorvastatin dose was up-titrated to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ＜70 mg/dL. RESULTS: In DM patients, the monotherapy group (n=13) and the DLLT group (n=12) showed a similar prevalence of coronary risks and baseline lipid profiles. During the study, the change in LDL-C level was similar between DM and non-DM patients. Compared with non-DM patients, DM patients showed weaker regression of ΔPAV by DLLT than those who underwent monotherapy (DM: -2.77±3.47% vs. -0.77±2.51%, P=0.11; non-DM: -2.01±3.36% vs. -0.08±2.66%, P=0.008). The change in LDL-C level was not correlated with ΔPAV in non-DM patients, but there was significant correlation between the change in LDL-C level and ΔPAV in DM patients (r=0.52, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: ACS patients with DM showed weaker coronary plaque regression than their counterparts. A significant correlation between the change in LDL-C level and ΔPAV in DM patients suggested that more intensive lipid-lowering therapy is required in ACS patients with DM.

Amyloid A amyloidosis in a patient with Caplan's syndrome, with special reference to genetic predisposition.

Secondary amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis, which is a disorder of protein conformation and metabolism, is an important serious complication of inflammatory diseases, especially rheumatoid arthritis (RA). AA amyloidosis develops when AA fibrils, which are derived from the acute-phase reactant, serum amyloid AA (SAA) protein, in the circulation, are deposited in organs and cause systemic organ dysfunction. Caplan's syndrome, or rheumatoid pneumoconiosis, is a rare type of lung disease in which individuals suffering from RA develop lung nodules that are associated with occupational exposure to silica and coal dust. Confirmation of diagnosing as Caplan's syndrome requires the patient's occupational history, imaging studies, and serology. A 72-year-old male, working as a tunnel construction worker for 38 years, with RA who had both chronic cardiac and renal dysfunction was referred to our hospital. He received a diagnosis of pneumoconiosis about 20 years ago, after which he was also diagnosed with RA. So far we performed medical English literature searches on the combination of Caplan's syndrome with AA amyloidosis; there were no articles in relation to such association. Although RA is one of the most common underlying diseases that occur with AA amyloidosis, our report here is the first description of a case of Caplan's syndrome associated with AA amyloidosis. In this report, we provide details about this rare disease occurring with AA amyloidosis and discuss on the possible pathogenesis of AA amyloidosis from a genetic point of aetiological view.

Impact of statin-ezetimibe combination on coronary atheroma plaque in patients with and without chronic kidney disease - Sub-analysis of PRECISE-IVUS trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) deteriorates the prognosis of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Because coronary artery disease (CAD) is the major cause of death in CKD patients, cardiovascular risk reduction has been clinically important in CKD. We hypothesized intensive lipid-lowering with statin/ezetimibe attenuated coronary atherosclerotic development even in patients with CKD. METHODS: In the prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter PRECISE-IVUS trial, 246 patients undergoing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI were randomly assigned to receive atorvastatin/ezetimibe combination or atorvastatin alone (the dosage of atorvastatin was up-titrated to achieve the level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 70 mg/dL). Serial volumetric IVUS findings obtained at baseline and 9-12 month follow-up to quantify the coronary plaque response in 202 patients were compared stratified by the presence or absence of CKD. RESULTS: CKD was observed in 52 patients (26%) among 202 enrolled patients. Compared with the non-CKD group, the CKD group was significantly older (71.5 ±â€¯8.6 years vs. 64.4 ±â€¯9.6 years, P < 0.001) with similar prevalence of comorbid coronary risk factors and lipid profiles. Similar to the non-CKD group (-1.4 [-2.8 to -0.1]% vs. -0.2 [-1.7 to 1.0]%, P = 0.002), the atorvastatin/ezetimibe combination significantly reduced ∆PAV compared with atorvastatin alone even in the CKD group (-2.6 [-5.6 to -0.4]% vs. -0.9 [-2.4 to 0.2]%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: As with non-CKD, intensive lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin/ezetimibe demonstrated stronger coronary plaque regression effect even in patients with CKD compared with atorvastatin monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01043380 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Study on the Effect of Irbesartan on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence in Kumamoto: Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Trial (SILK study).

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest that angiotensin II-receptor blockers can influence atrial remodeling and may prevent atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, we hypothesized that irbesartan may prevent the recurrence of AF following either catheter ablation or electrical cardioversion of AF. METHODS: Study on the Effect of Irbesartan on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence in Kumamoto (SILK study) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, and open-label comparative evaluation of the effects of irbesartan and amlodipine on AF recurrence in hypertensive patients with AF who are scheduled to undergo catheter ablation or electrical cardioversion of AF. The primary end point was either AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. AF/AT recurrence was evaluated for 6 months using 24-h Holter electrocardiogram and portable electrocardiogram. The secondary endpoints included the change in blood pressure, the interval from the procedure to the first AF/AT recurrence, cardiovascular events, left atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and changes in the biomarkers [brain natriuretic polypeptide (BNP), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), urinary albumin/creatinine]. RESULTS: The study enrolled 98 patients (irbesartan; n=47, amlodipine; n=51). The recurrence of AF/AT was observed in 8 patients (17.0%) in the irbesartan group and in 10 patients (19.6%) in the amlodipine group. There was no significant difference in the AF/AT recurrence between the irbesartan and amlodipine groups. Blood pressure decreased similarly in both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups as regards to the interval from the procedure to the first AF/AT recurrence, occurrence of cardiovascular events, changes in LAD and LVEF. BNP and urinary albumin/creatinine significantly decreased similarly in both groups, but no significant difference was found in hs-CRP between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive patients with AF, treatment with irbesartan did not have any advantage over amlodipine in the reduction of AF/AT recurrence after catheter ablation or electrical cardioversion.

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery backup.

BACKGROUND: Based on the 2011 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guideline, it is recommended that PCI should be performed at hospital with onsite cardiac surgery. But, data suggest that there is no significant difference in clinical outcomes following primary or elective PCI between the two groups. We examined the impact of with or without onsite cardiac surgery on clinical outcomes following PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: From August 2008 to March 2011, subjects (n=3241) were enrolled from the Kumamoto Intervention Conference Study (KICS). Patients were assigned to two groups treated in hospitals with (n=2764) or without (n=477) onsite cardiac surgery. Clinical events were followed up for 12 months. Primary endpoint was in-hospital death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. And we monitored in-hospital events, non-cardiovascular deaths, bleeding complications, revascularizations, and emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There was no overall significant difference in primary endpoint between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery [ACS, 7.6% vs. 8.0%, p=0.737; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 10.4% vs. 7.5%, p=0.200]. There was also no significant difference when events in primary endpoint were considered separately. In other events, revascularization was more frequently seen in hospitals with onsite surgery (ACS, 20.0% vs. 13.0%, p<0.001; STEMI, 21.9% vs. 14.5%, p=0.009). We performed propensity score matching analysis to correct for the disparate patient numbers between the two groups, and there was also no significant difference for primary endpoint (ACS, 8.6% vs. 7.5%, p=0.547; STEMI, 11.2% vs. 7.5%, p=0.210). CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in clinical outcomes following PCI for ACS between hospitals with and without onsite cardiac surgery backup in Japan.

Lipid profile associated with coronary plaque regression in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Subanalysis of PRECISE-IVUS trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although dual low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapy (DLLT) with statin-ezetimibe combination showed clinical benefit in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) confirming "the lower, the better," the underlying mechanisms of DLLT are still unknown. METHODS: PRECISE-IVUS trial evaluated the effects of DLLT on IVUS-derived coronary atherosclerosis and lipid profile, compared with atorvastatin monotherapy, quantifying the coronary plaque response in 100 ACS patients. We explored the potential predictors of plaque regression. RESULTS: Lower total cholesterol, LDL-C, triglyceride, remnant-like particles cholesterol, and stronger reduction of small dense LDL-C and cholesterol absorption markers were observed in patients with plaque regression compared to those with progression. Multivariate analysis revealed that achieved LDL-C was the strongest predictor for coronary plaque regression (95% CI: 0.944-1.000, p = 0.05), followed by age (95% CI: 0.994-1.096, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Incremental LDL-C lowering by DLLT was associated with stronger coronary plaque regression, reconfirming that lowering LDL-C to levels below previous targets provided additional clinical benefit.

Synergistic effect of ezetimibe addition on coronary atheroma regression in patients with prior statin therapy: Subanalysis of PRECISE-IVUS trial.

BACKGROUND: The IMPROVE-IT trial showed that the clinical benefit of statin/ezetimibe combination appeared to be pronounced in patients with prior statin therapy. We hypothesized that the antiatherosclerotic effect of atorvastatin/ezetimibe combination was pronounced in patients with statin pretreatment. METHODS: In the prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter PRECISE-IVUS trial, 246 patients undergoing intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to atorvastatin/ezetimibe combination or atorvastatin alone. The dosage of atorvastatin was uptitrated with a treatment goal of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to below 70 mg/dl in both groups. Serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound was performed at baseline and 9-12 month follow-up to quantify the coronary plaque response in 202 patients. We compared the intravascular ultrasound endpoints in all subjects, stratified by the presence or absence of statin pretreatment. RESULTS: The baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (100.7 ± 23.1 mg/dl vs. 116.4 ± 25.9 mg/dl, p < 0.001) and lathosterol (55 (38 to 87)) µg/100 mg total cholesterol vs. 97 (57 to 149) µg/100 mg total cholesterol, p < 0.001) was significantly lower, and campesterol/lathosterol ratio (3.9 (2.4 to 7.4) vs. 2.6 (1.5 to 4.1), p < 0.001) was significantly increased in patients with statin pretreatment. Contrary to the patients without statin pretreatment (-1.3 (-3.1 to -0.1)% vs. -0.9 (-2.3 to 0.9)%, p = 0.12), the atorvastatin/ezetimibe combination showed a significantly stronger reduction in delta percent atheroma volume, compared with atorvastatin alone, in patients with statin pretreatment (-1.8 (-3.6 to -0.3)% vs. -0.1 (-1.6 to 0.8)%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Compensatory increase in cholesterol absorption observed in statin-treated patients might attenuate the inhibitory effects of statins on coronary plaque progression. A low-dose statin/ezetimibe combination might be a promising option in statin-hyporesponder.

Impact of Dual Lipid-Lowering Strategy With Ezetimibe and Atorvastatin on Coronary Plaque Regression in Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Multicenter Randomized Controlled PRECISE-IVUS Trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite standard statin therapy, a majority of patients retain a high "residual risk" of cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ezetimibe plus atorvastatin versus atorvastatin monotherapy on the lipid profile and coronary atherosclerosis in Japanese patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: This trial was a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Eligible patients who underwent PCI were randomly assigned to atorvastatin alone or atorvastatin plus ezetimibe (10 mg) daily. Atorvastatin was uptitrated with a treatment goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dl. Serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound was performed at baseline and again at 9 to 12 months to quantify the coronary plaque response in 202 patients. RESULTS: The combination of atorvastatin/ezetimibe resulted in lower levels of LDL-C than atorvastatin monotherapy (63.2 ± 16.3 mg/dl vs. 73.3 ± 20.3 mg/dl; p < 0.001). For the absolute change in percent atheroma volume (PAV), the mean difference between the 2 groups (-1.538%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.079% to 0.003%) did not exceed the pre-defined noninferiority margin of 3%, but the absolute change in PAV did show superiority for the dual lipid-lowering strategy (-1.4%; 95% CI: -3.4% to -0.1% vs. -0.3%; 95% CI: -1.9% to 0.9% with atorvastatin alone; p = 0.001). For PAV, a significantly greater percentage of patients who received atorvastatin/ezetimibe showed coronary plaque regression (78% vs. 58%; p = 0.004). Both strategies had acceptable side effect profiles, with a low incidence of laboratory abnormalities and cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard statin monotherapy, the combination of statin plus ezetimibe showed greater coronary plaque regression, which might be attributed to cholesterol absorption inhibition-induced aggressive lipid lowering. (Plaque Regression With Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitor or Synthesis Inhibitor Evaluated by Intravascular Ultrasound [PRECISE-IVUS]; NCT01043380).

Differential Effects of Strong and Regular Statins on the Clinical Outcome of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Following Coronary Stent Implantation　- The Kumamoto Intervention Conference Study (KICS) Registry.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of different statins on the clinical outcomes of Japanese patients with coronary stent implants. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 5,801 consecutive patients (males, 4,160; age, 69.7±11.1 years, mean±SD) who underwent stent implantation between April 2008 and March 2011. They were treated with a strong statin (n=3,042, 52%, atorvastatin, pitavastatin, or rosuvastatin), a regular statin (n=1,082, 19%, pravastatin, simvastatin, or fluvastatin) or no statin (n=1,677, 29%). The patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were divided into mild-to-moderate CKD (30≤eGFR<60, n=1,956) and severe CKD (eGFR <30, n=559). Primary endpoints included cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction, including stent thrombosis and ischemic stroke. The clinical outcome for the primary endpoint in mild-to-moderate CKD patients treated with a strong statin (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.81; P=0.005) was significantly lower than in those on no statins, but that in the patients treated with a regular statin was not (P=0.160). The clinical outcome for the primary endpoint in severe CKD patients treated with a strong or regular statin was no different than not being on statin therapy (P=0.446, P=0.194, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild-to-moderate CKD, only strong statins were associated with lower risk compared with no statin, but regular statins were not. It is possible that taking a strong statin from the early stage of CKD is useful for suppression of cardiovascular events.

Plaque REgression with Cholesterol absorption Inhibitor or Synthesis inhibitor Evaluated by IntraVascular UltraSound (PRECISE-IVUS Trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although the positive association between achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level and the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been confirmed by randomized studies with statins, many patients remain at high residual risk of events suggesting the necessity of novel pharmacologic strategies. The combination of ezetimibe/statin produces greater reductions in LDL-C compared to statin monotherapy. PURPOSE: The Plaque REgression with Cholesterol absorption Inhibitor or Synthesis inhibitor Evaluated by IntraVascular UltraSound (PRECISE-IVUS) trial was aimed at evaluating the effects of ezetimibe addition to atorvastatin, compared with atorvastatin monotherapy, on coronary plaque regression and change in lipid profile in patients with CAD. METHODS: The study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. The eligible patients undergoing IVUS-guided percutaneous coronary intervention will be randomly assigned to receive either atorvastatin alone or atorvastatin plus ezetimibe (10 mg) daily using a web-based randomization software. The dosage of atorvastatin will be increased by titration within the usual dose range with a treatment goal of lowering LDL-C below 70 mg/dL based on consecutive measures of LDL-C at follow-up visits. IVUS will be performed at baseline and 9-12 months follow-up time point at participating cardiovascular centers. The primary endpoint will be the nominal change in percent coronary atheroma volume measured by volumetric IVUS analysis. CONCLUSION: PRECISE-IVUS will assess whether the efficacy of combination of ezetimibe/atorvastatin is noninferior to atorvastatin monotherapy for coronary plaque reduction, and will translate into increased clinical benefit of dual lipid-lowering strategy in a Japanese population.

Electrophysiologic characteristics of verapamil-sensitive atrial tachycardia originating from the atrioventricular annulus.

We examined the electrophysiologic characteristics and mechanisms of verapamil-sensitive atrial tachycardia (AT) originating from the atrioventricular (AV) annulus in 18 patients. AT originated from the AV node vicinity (AV nodal AT, 10 patients) and the area distant from the AV node (non-AV nodal AT, 8 patients). There was no significant difference in the tachycardia cycle length between AV nodal and non-AV nodal AT. For both types of AT, tachycardia was inducible by atrial extrastimulation with an inverse relation between the coupling and the postpacing intervals. A single extrastimulus delivered from the earliest atrial activation site reset both ATs with an inverse relation between the coupling interval and return cycle. Also no significant difference was observed in the percentage of the excitable gap to tachycardia cycle length between AV nodal and non-AV nodal AT. Concealed entrainment was observed by rapid atrial pacing delivered from the earliest atrial activation site for both ATs. These findings suggest that these ATs are due to reentry. Intravenous administration of verapamil (2.5 to 5 mg) and adenosine triphosphate (5 mg) terminated AT in all patients. AT was successfully ablated at the earliest atrial activation site in all patients. It was shown that this form of AT in which a calcium channel-dependent substrate is involved arises not only from the vicinity of the AV node but also along the AV annulus with common electrophysiologic characteristics. These suggest the presence of a distinct entity of tachycardia more appropriately classified as verapamil-sensitive AV annular AT.