A phase 1/2 study of NS-87/CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin liposome) in Japanese patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia.

OBJECTIVES: NS-87/CPX-351 is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin. NS-87/CPX-351 exerts antileukemic action by maintaining a synergistic molar ratio of cytarabine to daunorubicin of 5:1 within the liposome while in circulation. Patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which includes therapy-related AML and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), have poorer outcomes than those with other AML. METHODOLOGY: This open-label phase 1/2 (P1/2) study was conducted in 47 Japanese patients aged 60-75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk AML to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of NS-87/CPX-351. RESULTS: In the 6 patients enrolled in the P1 portion, no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported, and 100 units/m2 during the induction cycle was found to be acceptable. Cytarabine and daunorubicin had a long half-life in the terminal phase (32.8 and 28.7 h, respectively). In the 35 patients enrolled in the P2 portion, composite complete remission (CRc; defined as complete remission [CR] or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]) was achieved in 60.0% (90% CI: 44.7-74.0) of the patients. Adverse events due to NS-87/CPX-351 were well tolerated. OUTCOMES: NS-87/CPX-351 can be considered as a frontline treatment option for Japanese patients with high-risk AML.

A phase II randomized study evaluating azacitidine versus conventional care regimens in newly diagnosed elderly Japanese patients with unfavorable acute myeloid leukemia.

A multicenter phase II study was conducted in 44 elderly (≥ 65 years) Japanese patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to evaluate whether azacitidine is also effective and feasible in Japanese AML patients. The 28 patients with AML with poor-risk cytogenetics and/or myelodysplasia-related changes (unfavorable AML) were randomly assigned to receive either azacitidine or conventional care regimens (CCR), and the other 16 patients without unfavorable AML received azacitidine alone. The primary endpoint was overall survival. At the median follow-up of 29 months, among the 26 evaluable patients with unfavorable AML, the median survival time (MST) of patients who received azacitidine (N = 14) was 9.6 months and that of patients who received CCR (N = 12) was 5.3 months (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.31-1.69; log-rank P = 0.459). The MST of all 29 patients who received azacytidine, including the 15 evaluable patients without unfavorable AML, was 12.4 months. Adverse events of azacitidine were manageable and consistent with its established safety profile. Azacitidine tended to prolong survival in newly diagnosed elderly Japanese patients with AML, and was feasible as a front-line therapy for elderly AML patients.