RESUMEN
Highly purified cannabidiol (CBD) has demonstrated efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome in randomized, double-blind, add-on, controlled phase 3 trials. It is important to consider the possibility of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Here, we review six trials of CBD (Epidiolex/Epidyolex; 100 mg/mL oral solution) in healthy volunteers or patients with epilepsy, which investigated potential interactions between CBD and enzymes involved in drug metabolism of common antiseizure drugs (ASDs). CBD did not affect CYP3A4 activity. Induction of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 led to small reductions in exposure to CBD and its major metabolites. Inhibition of CYP3A4 activity did not affect CBD exposure and caused small increases in exposure to CBD metabolites. Inhibition of CYP2C19 activity led to a small increase in exposure to CBD and small decreases in exposure to CBD metabolites. One potentially clinically important DDI was identified: combination of CBD and clobazam (CLB) did not affect CBD or CLB exposure, but increased exposure to major metabolites of both compounds. Reduction of CLB dose may be considered if adverse reactions known to occur with CLB are experienced when it is coadministered with CBD. There was a small increase of exposure to stiripentol (STP) when coadministered with CBD. STP had no effect on CBD exposure but led to minor decreases in exposure to CBD metabolites. Combination of CBD and valproate (VPA) did not cause clinically important changes in the pharmacokinetics of either drug, or 2-propyl-4-pentenoic acid. Concomitant VPA caused small increases in exposure to CBD metabolites. Dose adjustments are not likely to be necessary when CBD is combined with STP or VPA. The safety results from these trials were consistent with the known safety profile of CBD. These trials indicate an overall low potential for DDIs between CBD and other ASDs, except for CLB.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Cannabidiol/uso terapéutico , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/metabolismo , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/metabolismo , Epilepsias Mioclónicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Cannabidiol/metabolismo , Cannabidiol/farmacocinética , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Clobazam/farmacocinética , Clobazam/uso terapéutico , Inductores del Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/farmacología , Inhibidores del Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/farmacología , Inductores del Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/farmacología , Inhibidores del Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/farmacología , Dioxolanos/farmacocinética , Dioxolanos/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ácidos Grasos Monoinsaturados/metabolismo , Humanos , Ácido Valproico/farmacocinética , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
We investigated the effects of cannabidiol (CBD; 21-day maintenance dose) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of clobazam (CLB) and monitored the safety of CBD (or placebo) plus CLB in 20 patients with uncontrolled epilepsy on stable doses of CLB. Blood samples collected until 24 hours postdose were evaluated by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters of CLB and major metabolite N-desmethylclobazam (N-CLB), valproic acid, stiripentol, levetiracetam, topiramate, plant-derived highly purified CBD (Epidiolex in the United States; 100 mg/mL oral solution) and its major metabolites were derived using noncompartmental analysis. There was no evidence of a drug-drug interaction (DDI) between CBD and CLB: geometric mean ratio (GMR) of day 33:day 1 CLB was 1.0 (90%CI, 0.8-1.2) for Cmax and 1.1 (90%CI, 0.9-1.2) for AUCtau . There was a significant DDI between CBD and N-CLB: the GMR of day 33:day 1 N-CLB was 2.2 (90%CI, 1.4-3.5) for Cmax and 2.6 (90%CI, 2.0-3.6) for AUCtau . Placebo had no effect on CLB or N-CLB; CBD had no effect on levetiracetam. Data were insufficient regarding DDIs with other antiepileptic drugs. The safety profile of CBD (20 mg/kg/day) with CLB was acceptable; all but 1 adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate. One serious AE (seizure cluster) led to CBD discontinuation. One patient withdrew after intolerable AEs. Although there was no evidence of a CBD and CLB DDI, there was a significant DDI between CBD and N-CLB. The safety profile of GW Pharmaceuticals' CBD formulation with CLB was consistent with other GW-sponsored trials.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Cannabidiol/farmacocinética , Clobazam/farmacocinética , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/sangre , Cannabidiol/administración & dosificación , Cannabidiol/efectos adversos , Cannabidiol/sangre , Clobazam/administración & dosificación , Clobazam/efectos adversos , Clobazam/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Epilepsia/sangre , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of cannabidiol (CBD) with and without concomitant clobazam (CLB) was evaluated in stratified analyses of four large randomized controlled trials, two in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and two in Dravet syndrome. METHODS: Each trial of CBD (Epidiolex® in the US; Epidyolex® in the EU; 10 and 20 mg/kg/day) was evaluated by CLB use. The treatment ratio was analyzed using negative binomial regression for changes in seizure frequency and logistic regression for the 50% responder rate, where the principle analysis combined both indications and CBD doses in a stratified meta-analysis. Pharmacokinetic data were examined for an exposure/response relationship based on CLB presence/absence. Safety data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The meta-analysis favored CBD vs. placebo regardless of CLB use. The treatment ratio (95% CI) of CBD over placebo for the average reduction in seizure frequency was 0.59 (0.52, 0.68; P < .0001) with CLB and 0.85 (0.73, 0.98; P = .0226) without CLB, and the 50% responder rate odds ratio (95% CI) was 2.51 (1.69, 3.71; P < .0001) with CLB and 2.40 (1.38, 4.16; P = .0020) without CLB. Adverse events (AEs) related to somnolence, rash, pneumonia, or aggression were more common in patients with concomitant CLB. There was a significant exposure/response relationship for CBD and its active metabolite. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate CBD is efficacious with and without CLB, but do not exclude the possibility of a synergistic effect associated with the combination of agents. The safety and tolerability profile of CBD without CLB show a lower rate of certain AEs than with CLB.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Cannabidiol/administración & dosificación , Clobazam/administración & dosificación , Epilepsias Mioclónicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut/tratamiento farmacológico , Cannabidiol/efectos adversos , Clobazam/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epilepsias Mioclónicas/complicaciones , Humanos , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut/complicaciones , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Convulsiones/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In recent randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trials, highly purified cannabidiol demonstrated efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome. It is anticipated that antiepileptic drugs such as stiripentol and valproate will be administered concomitantly with cannabidiol. OBJECTIVES: This trial evaluated the effect of cannabidiol on steady-state pharmacokinetics of stiripentol or valproate in patients with epilepsy, and the safety and tolerability of cannabidiol. METHODS: This phase II, two-arm, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial recruited male and female patients with epilepsy aged 16-55 years. Patients receiving a stable dose of stiripentol or valproate were randomized 4:1 to receive concomitant double-blind cannabidiol or placebo. Patients received plant-derived, highly purified cannabidiol medicine (Epidiolex® in the USA; Epidyolex® in the EU; 100 mg/mL oral solution) at a dose of 20 mg/kg/day from day 12 to 26, following a 10-day dose-escalation period. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic evaluations were collected on days 1 and 26 before stiripentol/valproate dosing and up to 12 h postdose. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 35 patients were recruited to the stiripentol arm (n = 14) or the valproate arm (n = 21). Both the safety and the pharmacokinetic populations of the stiripentol arm comprised 14 patients (2 placebo; 12 cannabidiol). The safety population of the valproate arm comprised 20 patients (4 placebo; 16 cannabidiol; one withdrew before receiving treatment); the pharmacokinetic population comprised 15 patients (3 placebo; 12 cannabidiol). Concomitant cannabidiol led to a small increase in stiripentol exposure (17% increase in maximum observed plasma concentration [Cmax]; 30% increase in area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval [AUCtau]). Concomitant cannabidiol also had little effect on valproate exposure (13% decrease in Cmax; 17% decrease in AUCtau) or its metabolite, 2-propyl-4-pentenoic acid (4-ene-VPA) (23% decrease in Cmax; 30% decrease in AUCtau). All changes in exposure are expressed as the dose-normalized geometric mean (CV%) day 26 to day 1 ratio. The most common AE was diarrhea; most AEs were mild. Two patients discontinued cannabidiol because of serious AEs (rash [n = 1] in the stiripentol arm; hypertransaminasemia [n = 1] in the valproate arm). A separate in vitro study investigated the bidirectional effect of cannabidiol, or its metabolite 7-carboxy-cannabidiol, on valproate plasma protein binding; no change in plasma protein binding was observed for either compound. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical relevance of the increase in stiripentol exposure is unknown; patients receiving cannabidiol and stiripentol concomitantly should be monitored for adverse reactions as individual patient responses may vary. Coadministration of cannabidiol did not affect the pharmacokinetics of valproate or its metabolite, 4-ene-VPA, in adult patients with epilepsy. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of cannabidiol at a dose of 20 mg/kg/day. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02607891.
Asunto(s)
Cannabidiol/administración & dosificación , Dioxolanos/administración & dosificación , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Valproico/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Área Bajo la Curva , Cannabidiol/efectos adversos , Cannabidiol/farmacología , Dioxolanos/farmacocinética , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Valproico/farmacocinética , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of single oral 750-mg doses of a plant-derived pharmaceutical formulation of highly purified cannabidiol (CBD; Epidiolex in the USA and Epidyolex in Europe; 100-mg/mL oral solution) were assessed in healthy adults following a high-fat/calorie meal (n = 15), a low-fat/calorie meal (n = 14), whole milk (n = 15), or alcohol (n = 14), relative to the fasted state (n = 29). METHODS: Blood samples were collected until 96 hours postdose in each period and evaluated by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters (maximum observed plasma concentration [Cmax ], area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last observed quantifiable concentration, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity [AUC0-∞ ], and time to maximum plasma concentration [tmax ]) of CBD and its major metabolites were derived using noncompartmental analysis. RESULTS: CBD exposure increased by 3.8-fold for AUC0-∞ and 5.2-fold for Cmax when CBD was administered with a high-fat/calorie meal versus fasted. To a lesser extent, a low-fat/calorie meal enhanced CBD exposure versus fasted with a 2.7-fold increase in AUC0-∞ and a 3.8-fold increase in Cmax . Similarly, when dosed with whole milk, CBD exposure increased versus fasted by 2.4-fold for AUC0-∞ and 3.1-fold for Cmax . Modest elevations in CBD exposure occurred when it was dosed with alcohol: 1.6-fold for AUC0-∞ and 1.9-fold for Cmax . No clinically relevant effect of any test condition on CBD tmax or t½ versus the fasted state was apparent. The same trend was seen for the CBD metabolites, except that 7-carboxy-cannabidiol tmax was considerably longer when CBD was administered with alcohol (14 vs 4 hours fasted). Inter- and intrasubject variability in PK parameters was moderate to high during the trial. SIGNIFICANCE: CBD and metabolite exposures were most affected by a high-fat/calorie meal. CBD exposures also increased with a low-fat/calorie meal, whole milk, or alcohol, but to a lesser extent. CBD was tolerated, and there were no severe or serious adverse events during the trial.
Asunto(s)
Bebidas Alcohólicas , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Cannabidiol/farmacocinética , Comidas , Leche , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Área Bajo la Curva , Disponibilidad Biológica , Biotransformación , Cannabidiol/efectos adversos , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Estudios Cruzados , Grasas de la Dieta , Ingestión de Energía , Femenino , Interacciones Alimento-Droga , Semivida , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: As patients who receive cannabidiol (CBD) may have co-existing renal morbidities, it is important to understand whether dose adjustments are necessary to mitigate the risk of exposure-related toxicity. This study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of CBD in patients with renal impairment. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics and safety of a single oral 200 mg dose of a plant-derived pharmaceutical formulation of highly purified CBD in oral solution (Epidiolex® in the USA; 100 mg/mL) were assessed in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment (n = 8/group) relative to matched subjects with normal renal function (n = 8). Blood samples were collected until 48 h post-dose and evaluated by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Analysis of variance was used to compare primary pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum measured plasma concentration [Cmax], oral clearance of drug from plasma [CL/F], renal clearance [CLR], area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC] from time zero to last measurable concentration [AUCt], and AUC from time zero to infinity [AUC∞]); descriptive analysis was used for secondary pharmacokinetic parameters (time to Cmax [tmax], terminal [elimination] half-life [t½], cumulative amount excreted from time zero to the last quantifiable sample [Aelast], and fraction of the systemically available drug excreted into the urine [fe]). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in Cmax, AUCt, AUC∞, or tmax values between subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment and subjects with normal renal function for CBD or its major metabolites, 7-carboxy-CBD (7-COOH-CBD) and 7-hydroxy-CBD (7-OH-CBD), and minor metabolite, 6-hydroxy-CBD (6-OH-CBD); geometric mean ratio for Cmax values ranged from 0.68 to 1.35. No differences were observed for other secondary parameters (Aelast and fe). CBD, 7-COOH-CBD, 7-OH-CBD, and 6-OH-CBD were highly protein bound (> 90%); binding was similar in all subject groups. Urine analysis for CBD recorded no appreciable amount, and thus no urinary pharmacokinetic parameters could be derived. Adverse events (AEs) affected two subjects; all five AEs were mild in severity and resolved during the trial. There were no serious AEs or discontinuations due to AEs. Laboratory, physical examination, vital sign, and 12-lead electrocardiogram findings were not clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Renal impairment had no effect on the metabolism of CBD after a single oral 200 mg dose. CBD was generally well tolerated in subjects with varying degrees of renal function. REGISTRATION: European Union Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) no. 2015-002122-39.
Asunto(s)
Cannabidiol , Insuficiencia Renal , Anciano , Área Bajo la Curva , Cannabidiol/farmacocinética , Cromatografía Liquida , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
The pharmacokinetics and safety of a single oral dose of 200-mg plant-derived pharmaceutical formulation of highly purified cannabidiol (CBD) in oral solution (Epidiolex in the United States; 100 mg/mL) were assessed in subjects with mild to severe hepatic impairment (n = 8 each for mild and moderate, n = 6 for severe) relative to matched subjects with normal hepatic function (n = 8). Blood samples were collected until 48 hours after dosing and evaluated by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters (primarily maximum measured plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time t, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, time to maximum plasma concentration, and terminal half-life) of CBD and its major metabolites were derived using non-compartmental analysis. CBD was rapidly absorbed in all groups independent of hepatic function (median time to maximum plasma concentration, 2-2.8 hours). Exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) to total CBD slightly increased in subjects with mild hepatic impairment (geometric mean ratio [GMR], 1.48; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-2.41). However, there were clinically relevant increases in subjects with moderate (GMR, 2.45; 90%CI, 1.50-4.01) and severe (GMR, 5.15; 90%CI, 2.94-9.00) hepatic impairment, relative to subjects with normal hepatic function. Exposure to the CBD metabolites (6-hydroxy-CBD and 7-hydroxy-CBD) also increased in subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment, but to a lesser extent than the parent drug. The 7-carboxy-CBD metabolite exposure was lower in subjects with severe hepatic impairment when compared with subjects with normal liver function. These findings indicate that dose modification is necessary in patients with moderate and severe hepatic impairment, and a lower starting dose and slower titration are necessary based on benefit-risk. CBD was well tolerated, and there were no serious adverse events reported during the trial.
Asunto(s)
Cannabidiol/farmacocinética , Hepatopatías/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Cannabidiol/efectos adversos , Cannabidiol/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Hígado/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Page 1065, Discussion, Single and Multiple Dose CBD PK, column 2 - the equation that read.
RESUMEN
GW Pharmaceuticals' formulation of highly purified cannabidiol oral solution is approved in the United States for seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndromes in patients aged ≥2 years, for which clobazam, stiripentol, and valproate are commonly used antiepileptic drugs. This open-label, fixed-sequence, drug-drug interaction, healthy volunteer trial investigated the impact of cannabidiol on steady-state pharmacokinetics of clobazam (and N-desmethylclobazam), stiripentol, and valproate; the reciprocal effect of clobazam, stiripentol, and valproate on cannabidiol and its major metabolites (7-hydroxy-cannabidiol [7-OH-CBD] and 7-carboxy-cannabidiol [7-COOH-CBD]); and cannabidiol safety and tolerability when coadministered with each antiepileptic drug. Concomitant cannabidiol had little effect on clobazam exposure (maximum concentration [Cmax ] and area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 1.2-fold), N-desmethylclobazam exposure increased (Cmax and AUC, 3.4-fold), stiripentol exposure increased slightly (Cmax , 1.3-fold; AUC, 1.6-fold), while no clinically relevant effect on valproate exposure was observed. Concomitant clobazam with cannabidiol increased 7-OH-CBD exposure (Cmax , 1.7-fold; AUC, 1.5-fold), without notable 7-COOH-CBD or cannabidiol increases. Stiripentol decreased 7-OH-CBD exposure by 29% and 7-COOH-CBD exposure by 13%. There was no effect of valproate on cannabidiol or its metabolites. Cannabidiol was moderately well tolerated, with similar incidences of adverse events reported when coadministered with clobazam, stiripentol, or valproate. There were no deaths, serious adverse events, pregnancies, or other clinically significant safety findings.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/farmacocinética , Cannabidiol/efectos adversos , Clobazam/farmacocinética , Dioxolanos/farmacocinética , Ácido Valproico/farmacocinética , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Anticonvulsivantes/sangre , Cannabidiol/administración & dosificación , Cannabidiol/farmacocinética , Clobazam/administración & dosificación , Clobazam/sangre , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Dioxolanos/administración & dosificación , Dioxolanos/sangre , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Genotipo , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Ácido Valproico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Valproico/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A formal single ascending and multiple dose pharmacokinetic (PK) trial of cannabidiol (CBD) oral solution was required to determine the safety and tolerability of CBD, the maximum tolerated dose, and to examine the effect of food on CBD PK parameters. OBJECTIVE: This trial assessed the safety, tolerability and PK of CBD oral solution in healthy adult volunteers, as well as the effect of food on CBD PK parameters. METHODS: The study consisted of three arms: single ascending dose (1500, 3000, 4500 or 6000 mg CBD [n = 6 per group]/placebo [n = 8; 2 per CBD dose group]), multiple dose (750 or 1500 mg CBD [n = 9 per group]/placebo [n = 6; 3 per CBD dose group] twice daily), and food effect (1500 mg CBD single dose [n = 12]). All subjects completed all trial arms and were analyzed as planned. RESULTS: CBD was generally well tolerated. Diarrhea, nausea, headache, and somnolence were the most common adverse events (AEs) across all trial arms, with an increased incidence of some gastrointestinal and nervous system disorder AEs (most notably diarrhea and headache) apparent in subjects taking CBD compared with placebo. All AEs were of mild or moderate severity; none were severe or serious. There were no deaths or discontinuations in the trial. After single oral doses, CBD appeared rapidly in plasma; time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was approximately 4-5 h. The major circulating metabolite was 7-carboxy-CBD, then parent CBD, 7-hydroxy-CBD (active metabolite), and 6-hydroxy-CBD (a relatively minor metabolite). Plasma exposure to CBD [maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time t (AUCt)] increased in a less than dose-proportional manner (Cmax slope 0.73; AUCt slope 0.64). Oral clearance of CBD was high (1111-1909 L/h) and apparent volume of distribution was large (20,963-42,849 L). CBD reached steady state after approximately 2 days, with moderate accumulation (1.8- to 2.6-fold) after 750 and 1500 mg CBD twice daily. After 7 days, a twofold increase in CBD dose resulted in 1.6- and 1.9-fold increases in geometric mean Cmax and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over a dosing interval (AUCτ), respectively. CBD elimination was multiphasic; the terminal elimination half-life was approximately 60 h after 750 and 1500 mg CBD twice daily; and effective half-life estimates ranged from 10 to 17 h. Cmax was 541.2 ng/mL and AUCτ was 3236 ng·h/mL after 1500 mg CBD twice daily. A high-fat meal increased CBD plasma exposure (Cmax and AUCt) by 4.85- and 4.2-fold, respectively; there was no effect of food on tmax or terminal half-life. CONCLUSION: CBD was generally well tolerated. Most AEs were mild in severity; none were severe or serious. The safety and PK profile support twice-daily administration of CBD.
Asunto(s)
Cannabidiol/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Cannabidiol/efectos adversos , Cannabidiol/farmacocinética , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Interacciones Alimento-Droga , Semivida , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and preliminary pharmacokinetics of a pharmaceutical formulation of purified cannabidiol (CBD) in children with Dravet syndrome. METHODS: Patients aged 4-10 years were randomized 4:1 to CBD (5, 10, or 20 mg/kg/d) or placebo taken twice daily. The double-blind trial comprised 4-week baseline, 3-week treatment (including titration), 10-day taper, and 4-week follow-up periods. Completers could continue in an open-label extension. Multiple pharmacokinetic blood samples were taken on the first day of dosing and at end of treatment for measurement of CBD, its metabolites 6-OH-CBD, 7-OH-CBD, and 7-COOH-CBD, and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs; clobazam and metabolite N-desmethylclobazam [N-CLB], valproate, levetiracetam, topiramate, and stiripentol). Safety assessments were clinical laboratory tests, physical examinations, vital signs, ECGs, adverse events (AEs), seizure frequency, and suicidality. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were randomized (10, 8, and 9 to the 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg/d CBD groups, and 7 to placebo); 32 (94%) completed treatment. Exposure to CBD and its metabolites was dose-proportional (AUC0-t). CBD did not affect concomitant AED levels, apart from an increase in N-CLB (except in patients taking stiripentol). The most common AEs on CBD were pyrexia, somnolence, decreased appetite, sedation, vomiting, ataxia, and abnormal behavior. Six patients taking CBD and valproate developed elevated transaminases; none met criteria for drug-induced liver injury and all recovered. No other clinically relevant safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to CBD and its metabolites increased proportionally with dose. An interaction with N-CLB was observed, likely related to CBD inhibition of cytochrome P450 subtype 2C19. CBD resulted in more AEs than placebo but was generally well-tolerated. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for children with Dravet syndrome, CBD resulted in more AEs than placebo but was generally well-tolerated.