Telecoaching Improves Positive Pressure Ventilation Performance During Simulated Neonatal Resuscitations.

Introduction: Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is a critical skill for neonatal resuscitation. We hypothesized that telecoaching would improve PPV performance in neonatal providers during simulated neonatal resuscitations. Setting: Level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Methods: This prospective crossover study included 14 experienced NICU nurses and respiratory therapists who performed PPV on a mannequin that recorded parameters of ventilation efficiency. Participants were randomized to practice independently (control) or with live feedback from a remote facilitator through audiovisual connection (intervention) and then switched to the opposite group. Participants' mask leak percentage, ventilation rates, and pressure delivery were analyzed. Results: The primary outcome of mask leak percentage was significantly increased in the telecoaching group (19% [interquartile range {IQR} 14-59.25] vs. 100% [IQR 88-100] leak, p = 0.0001). The secondary outcome of peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) delivery was also increased (median 27.6 [IQR 23.5-34.7] vs. 23.3 [IQR 19.1-32.8] cmH2O, p < 0.001). Differences in ventilation rates were not statistically significant (55 vs. 58 breaths/min, p = 0.51). Conclusion: Participants demonstrated better PPV performance during telecoaching with less mask leak. The intervention group also had higher measured peak inspiratory pressures. Telecoaching may be a feasible method to provide real-time feedback to health care providers during simulated neonatal resuscitations. Hypothesis: Neonatal providers who receive telecoaching during simulated resuscitations will perform PPV more effectively than those who do not receive telecoaching.

Decreasing radiographs in neonates through targeted quality improvement interventions.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to decrease radiograph use for monitoring placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and endotracheal tubes (ETT) in neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) by 20% from November 2017 to November 2018. STUDY DESIGN: We carried out three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles: (1) implementation of a radiograph protocol emphasizing ideal patient positioning, standard radiograph views and frequency, (2) standardizing ETT depth using the NRP guidelines, and (3) implementation of an institution specific ETT depth guideline. RESULTS: The pre-intervention radiographs per PICC day was 0.86 versus a post-intervention value of 0.46 (P = 0.004). The pre-intervention radiographs per ETT day was 1.45 versus a post-intervention value of 1.07 (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our multidisciplinary NICU team performed a QI project, which resulted in more than a 20% decrease in the number of radiographs used for monitoring placement of PICCs and ETTs.

Point-of-care ultrasound for peripherally inserted central catheter monitoring: a pilot study.

Objective To assess the feasibility and accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in monitoring peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) location in neonates by non-radiologist physicians. Methods A prospective cohort study compared PICC localization by ultrasound in neonates with a recent radiograph. The ultrasound exam was performed using a standardized protocol with 13-6 MHz linear and 8-4 MHz phased array transducers by a neonatal-perinatal fellow who was blinded to PICC location on the radiograph. Results Of the 30 neonates included, 96.6% (n = 29) were preterm, with 63.3% (n = 19) weighing <1500 g. Nighty-four percent (n = 94) of ultrasound scans matched the radiograph report. The protocol had a sensitivity of 0.97, specificity of 0.66 and positive predictive value of 0.98. Conclusion Limited ultrasound exams to monitor PICC position in neonates using a standardized protocol by non-radiologist physicians are feasible and accurate in a single ultrasound user. Further study in multiple providers is needed before widespread use.

Limited Ultrasound Protocol for Upper Extremity Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Monitoring: A Pilot Study in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether a limited ultrasound (US) scanning protocol to monitor the upper extremity peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) location in neonates is feasible for experienced US operators. METHODS: A radiologist, who was blinded to the PICC location on chest radiography, performed 14 US scans on 11 neonates with upper extremity PICCs. A US machine with 13-6-MHz linear and 8-4-MHz phased array transducers was used for the examinations. RESULTS: The study population included 54% (n = 6) preterm infants, with 72% (n = 8) weighing less than 1500 g. The US location of the PICC was the same as the chest radiographic report in all 14 scans. A subclavicular long-axis view of the anterior chest visualized all PICCs in the subclavian or brachiocephalic veins. A parasternal long-axis right ventricular inflow view was able to visualize PICCs in the superior vena cava (SVC), and a subcostal long-axis view evaluated PICCs in the lower SVC and heart. The scanning time was location dependent: less than 5 minutes for PICCs in the brachiocephalic or subclavian vein and 5 to 10 minutes for PICCs in the SVC or heart. There were no desaturations below 90%, increases in the fraction of inspired oxygen need, or hypotension episodes during scanning. CONCLUSIONS: A limited US scanning protocol to determine the upper extremity PICC location is feasible. Our protocol needs to be tested in neonatal providers before further dissemination.

Virtual Antenatal Encounter and Standardized Simulation Assessment (VANESSA): Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal counseling at the limits of newborn viability involves sensitive interactions between neonatal providers and families. Empathetic discussions are currently learned through practice in times of high stress. Decision aids may help improve provider communication but have not been universally adopted. Virtual standardized patients are increasingly recognized as a modality for education, but prenatal counseling simulations have not been described. To be valuable as a tool, a virtual patient would need to accurately portray emotions and elicit a realistic response from the provider. OBJECTIVE: To determine if neonatal providers can accurately identify a standardized virtual prenatal patient's emotional states and examine the frequency of empathic responses to statements made by the patient. METHODS: A panel of Neonatologists, Simulation Specialists, and Ethicists developed a dialogue and identified empathic responses. Virtual Antenatal Encounter and Standardized Simulation Assessment (VANESSA), a screen-based simulation of a woman at 23 weeks gestation, was capable of displaying anger, fear, sadness, and happiness through animations. Twenty-four neonatal providers, including a subgroup with an ethics interest, were asked to identify VANESSA's emotions 28 times, respond to statements, and answer open-ended questions. The emotions were displayed in different formats: without dialogue, with text dialogue, and with audio dialogue. Participants completed a post-encounter survey describing demographics and experience. Data were reported using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data from open ended questions (eg, "What would you do?") were examined using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Half of our participants had over 10 years of clinical experience. Most participants reported using medical research (18/23, 78%) and mortality calculators (17/23, 74%). Only the ethics-interested subgroup (10/23, 43%) listed counseling literature (7/10, 70%). Of 672 attempts, participants accurately identified VANESSA's emotions 77.8% (523/672) of the time, and most (14/23, 61%) reported that they were confident in identifying these emotions. The ethics interest group was more likely to choose empathic responses (P=.002). Participants rated VANESSA as easy to use (22/23, 96%) and reported that she had realistic dialogue (15/23, 65%). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study shows that a prenatal counseling simulation is feasible and can yield useful data on prenatal counseling communication. Our participants showed a high rate of emotion recognition and empathy in their responses.