RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The hemoglobin value to trigger red blood cell (RBC) transfusion for patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is controversial. Previous guidelines recommended transfusing to a normal hemoglobin, but recent studies suggest more RBC transfusions are associated with increased adverse outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is implementation of different institutional RBC transfusion thresholds for patients receiving VV-ECMO associated with changes in RBC utilization and patient outcomes? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of patients receiving VV-ECMO using segmented regression to test associations between implementation of institutional transfusion thresholds and trends in RBC utilization. Associations with secondary outcomes, including in-hospital survival, were also assessed. RESULTS: The study included 229 patients: 91 in the "no threshold (NT)" cohort, 48 in the "hemoglobin <8 g/dL (<8 g/dL)" cohort and 90 in the "hemoglobin <7 g/dL (<7 g/dL)" cohort. Despite a decrease in RBC/ECMO day following implementation of different thresholds, (mean +/- SD; 0.6 +/- 1.0 in the NT cohort, 0.3 +/- 0.8 in the <8 g/dL cohort, and 0.3 +/- 1.1 in the <7 g/dL cohort, p < 0.001), segmented regression showed no association between implementation of transfusion thresholds and changes in trends in RBC/ECMO day. We observed an increased hazard of death in the NT cohort compared to the <8 g/dL cohort (aHR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.12-3.88), and in the <7 g/dL cohort compared to the <8g/dL cohort (aHR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.02-3.62). There was no difference in the hazard of death between the NT and <7 g/dL cohorts (aHR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.69-1.69). INTERPRETATION: We observed a decrease in RBC/ECMO day over time, but changes were not associated temporally with implementation of transfusion thresholds. A transfusion threshold of hemoglobin <8 g/dL was associated with a lower hazard of death, but these findings are limited by study methodology. Further research is needed investigating optimal RBC transfusion practices for patients supported with VV-ECMO.
RESUMEN
Background: Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) is often utilized in guided bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions. R-EBUS probe positioning has been shown to correlate with diagnostic yield, but overall diagnostic yield with this technology has been inconsistent across the published literature. Currently there is no standardization for R-EBUS image interpretation, which may result in variability in grading concentricity of lesions and subsequently procedure performance. This was a survey-based study evaluating variability among practicing pulmonologists in R-EBUS image interpretation. Methods: R-EBUS images from peripheral bronchoscopy cases were sent to 10 practicing Interventional Pulmonologists at two different time points (baseline and 3 months). Participants were asked to grade the images as concentric, eccentric, or no image. Cohen's Kappa-coefficient was calculated for inter- and intra-observer variability. Results: A total of 100 R-EBUS images were included in the survey. There was 100% participation with complete survey responses from all 10 participants. Overall kappa-statistic for inter-observer variability for Survey 1 and 2 was 0.496 and 0.477 respectively. Overall kappa-statistic for intra-observer variability between the two surveys was 0.803. Conclusions: There is significant variability between pulmonologists when characterizing R-EBUS images. However, there is strong intra-rater agreement from each participant between surveys. A standardized approach and grading system for radial EBUS patterns may improve inter-observer variability in order to optimize our clinical use and research efforts in the field.