RESUMEN
Recent trends indicate a concerning increase in early-onset atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) among younger individuals (age < 55 in men and <65 in women). These findings highlight the pathobiology of ASCVD as a disease process that begins early in life and underscores the need for more tailored screening methods and preventive strategies. Increasing attention has been placed on the growing burden of traditional cardiometabolic risk factors in young individuals while also recognizing unique factors that mediate risk of premature atherosclerosis in this demographic such as substance use, socioeconomic disparities, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and chronic inflammatory states that contribute to the increasing incidence of early ASCVD. Additionally, mounting evidence has pointed out significant disparities in the diagnosis and management of early ASCVD and cardiovascular outcomes based on sex and race. Moving toward a more personalized approach, emerging data and technological developments using diverse tools such as polygenic risk scores and coronary artery calcium scans have shown potential in earlier detection of ASCVD risk. Thus, we review current evidence on causal risk factors that drive the increase in early ASCVD and highlight emerging tools to improve ASCVD risk assessment in young individuals.
RESUMEN
Importance: Adjuvant therapies are often approved based on improvements in disease-, progression-, or relapse-free survival (ie, an event). An important estimate in adjuvant therapies is the cost per event averted. Objective: To characterize the costs per event averted of anticancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between January 2018 and March 2022. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, all approvals were reviewed from the FDA website. Approvals selected for the analysis needed to be drawn from randomized trials involving anticancer drugs studied in the adjuvant treatment of solid tumors. Treatments of nonsolid tumors; nonrandomized, noncontrolled trials; and unpublished trials were excluded. Approvals between January 2018 and March 2022 were included, and 11 trials met inclusion criteria. The monthly costs of each agent were abstracted from the Micromedex RED BOOK database. All variables included in calculations were derived from the original trial publication. Information abstracted for each approval included the name of the drug approved, name of the trial, primary end point, dosing regimen in the trial, median duration of treatment, tumor type, monthly costs per drug, and the number needed to treat for the primary end point. Data were analyzed in March 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The cost per event averted for each agent studied in each clinical trial; the monthly cost of each drug, the cost per patient for each drug, the primary clinical end point studied in each trial; the study's design and setting. Results: A total of 11 approvals were included in the study. From January 2018 to March 2022, all approvals were based on a surrogate end point as the primary end point, with no trials demonstrating, to date, an overall survival benefit. The median cost per event averted of drugs in the adjuvant setting was $1â¯610â¯000 (range, $820â¯000 to $2â¯640â¯000). The median cost of a complete adjuvant treatment was $158â¯000 per patient. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, anticancer agents in the adjuvant setting were approved based on disease-, progression-, event-, or relapse-free survival. Costs per event averted were high. These findings suggest that these drugs may not achieve wide or global use unless their efficacy improves or their prices decrease.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Aprobación de Drogas , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
Type II uterine tumors often present with very large, necrotic tumor burden in the uterus that leads to dilation and effacement of the cervix. In patients with this presentation, conventional hysterectomy poses a much greater challenge as the ureters are composed of the mass of the tumor and are at an increased risk for injury. Given this surgical challenge, many of these patients may begin with neoadjuvant chemo-radiation. However, these treatment modalities are associated with significant toxicity and negatively impact patient quality of life. Therefore, we describe a minimally invasive robotic surgical approach that aims to optimize quality of life without sacrificing prognosis. Outcomes of 4 patients are presented.
Asunto(s)
Tumor Mulleriano Mixto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Neoplasias Uterinas , Endometrio/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía , Tumor Mulleriano Mixto/patología , Tumor Mulleriano Mixto/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugíaRESUMEN
Historically, the gold standard for treating acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD) has been aggressive medical therapy to achieve optimal heart rate and blood pressure control. However, recent data have demonstrated that a significant proportion of patients with medically managed acute uncomplicated TBAD have late aorta-related complications, such as aneurysmal degeneration, that increase mortality and often necessitate surgical intervention. In this review, the authors review existing literature on uncomplicated TBAD and highlight contemporary surgical and medical strategies to manage this condition. Looking ahead, efforts are underway to identify and characterize a high-risk subgroup of acute uncomplicated TBAD patients who may benefit from early intervention.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/terapia , Disección Aórtica/terapia , Algoritmos , Disección Aórtica/clasificación , Disección Aórtica/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/clasificación , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/complicaciones , HumanosRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to identify those complications for which patients with adverse cardiac events are at risk within the 30-day postoperative period following treatment oforthopaedic trauma cases. This was a retrospective cohort study of orthopaedic trauma patients in the United States between 2006 and 2013. A total of 56,336 patients meeting any one of 89 CPT codes in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were used. The main outcome measure was myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest within the 30-day postoperative period. Patients experiencing adverse cardiac events were at a significantly higher risk to have also developed deep surgical site infection, pneumonia, the need for reintubation, pulmonary emboli, a failure to wean off of ventilation, chronic and acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, stroke, deep venous thrombosis, sepsis, and shock. Cardiac complications in orthopaedic trauma patients are relatively uncommon (1.3%); however, cardiac complications are associated with greater risks of other complications, including pneumonia, stroke, and urinary tract infection. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 27(3):198-202, 2018).
Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal , Masculino , Neumonía/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/epidemiología , Choque/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Desconexión del VentiladorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ankle fracture is one of the most common injuries treated by orthopaedic surgeons, and its incidence is only expected to rise with an aging population. It is also associated with often costly complications, yet there is little literature on risk factors, especially modifiable ones, driving these complications. The aim of this study is to reveal whether inpatient treatment after ankle fracture is associated with higher incidence of postoperative complications. As the USA moves towards a bundled payment healthcare system, it is imperative that orthopaedists maximize patient outcome and quality of care while also reducing overall costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to compare complication rates between inpatient and outpatient treatment of ankle fracture. We collected patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications from both groups, then compared treatments using a multinomial logistic regression model. RESULTS: We identified 7383 patients, with 2630 (36%) in the outpatient and 2630 (36%) in the inpatient group. Of these, 104 (4.0%) inpatients compared with 52 (2.0%) outpatients developed a complication (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Inpatients developed major complications including deep wound infection and pulmonary embolism, as well as minor complications such as pneumonia and urinary tract infection, at significantly greater rates. As reimbursement models begin to incorporate value-based care, orthopaedic surgeons need to be aware of factors associated with increased incidence of postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III retrospective comparative study.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Tobillo/epidemiología , Fracturas de Tobillo/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine whether postoperative cardiac complications following orthopaedic trauma treatment are associated with longer lengths of stay. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. We analyzed orthopaedic trauma patients in the United States for whom data was collected in the ACS-NSQIP database between the years of 2006 and 2013. The patient population included 56,217 orthopaedic trauma patients meeting any 1 of the 89 CPT codes selected in the ACS-NSQIP database. The main outcome measure was hospital length of stay following orthopaedic trauma treatment. RESULT: Of the 56,217 orthopaedic trauma patients, 749 (1.3%) developed postoperative adverse cardiac events. There was a significant difference in total length of stay (p < 0.001): patients with cardiac complications on average stayed 10.6 days compared to 5.2 days for patients who did not experience such cardiac complications. This amounted to a difference of $24,316 in total hospital costs. Through multiple linear regression modeling controlling for multiple patient and surgical factors, the presence of cardiac complications significantly added 1.5 days in total hospital stay (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic trauma patients sustaining postoperative cardiac events have significantly longer hospital lengths of stay when compared to those who do not develop cardiac complications. This difference amounts to significantly higher health care costs.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Length of stay (LOS) is a major driver of cost and quality of care. A bundled payment system makes it essential for orthopaedic surgeons to understand factors that increase a patient's LOS. Yet, minimal data regarding predictors of LOS currently exist. Using the ACS-NSQIP database, this is the first study to identify risk factors for increased LOS for orthopaedic trauma patients and create a personalized LOS calculator. METHODS: All orthopaedic trauma surgery between 2006 and 2013 were identified from the ACS-NSQIP database using CPT codes. Patient demographics, pre-operative comorbidities, anatomic location of injury, and post-operative in-hospital complications were collected. To control for individual patient comorbidities, a negative binomial regression model evaluated hospital LOS after surgery. Betas (ß), were determined for each pre-operative patient characteristic. We selected significant predictors of LOS (p < 0.05) using backwards stepwise elimination. RESULTS: 49,778 orthopaedic trauma patients were included in the analysis. Deep incisional surgical site infections and superficial surgical site infections were associated with the greatest percent change in predicted LOS (ß = 1.2760 and 1.2473, respectively; p < 0.0001 for both). A post-operative LOS risk calculator was developed based on the formula: [Formula: see text]. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing a large prospective cohort of orthopaedic trauma patients, we created the first personalized LOS calculator based on pre-operative comorbidities, post-operative complications and location of surgery. Future work may assess the use of this calculator and attempt to validate its utility as an accurate model. To improve the quality measures of hospitals, orthopaedists must employ such predictive tools to optimize care and better manage resources.