Jawline Sharp Contouring With Hybrid Filler.

BACKGROUND: Having a well-defined jawline is a sign of youth and attractiveness among both men and women. Soft tissue fillers, such as calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) and hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers, offer nonsurgical alternatives for rejuvenating the lower face and enhancing the jawline. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of a premixed combination of HA with cohesive polydensified matrix technology (CPM, Belotero Intense, CPM-I) and CaHA to create a sharply defined jawline. METHODS: A total of 126 patients were enrolled in the study and treated with a premixed combination of CPM-I and CaHA using a retrograde fanning injection technique with cannulas. The injection volumes and product ratios were customized according to the patients' needs. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 75 females and 51 males. The average injected volume of premixed CaHA:CPM-I was 5.83 mL. In the majority of patients, a 1:1 syringe ratio of CaHA:CPM-I was applied (n = 81, 64.2%). No adverse events were reported during the 6-month follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The hybrid filler approach investigated in this study shows promise for achieving well-defined, long-lasting jawline contours. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Temporary Delayed Hypersensitivity Reaction to Botulinum Toxin-A After COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: The occurrence of a hypersensitivity reaction with the injection of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in cosmetic use is a rare complication. We report the largest case series of temporary delayed hypersensitivity reaction (DHR) with BTX-A following COVID-19 vaccination and the first cases to incobotulinum toxin A (incoBTX-A). METHODS: A retrospective multicentric case series of patients who developed a DHR to BTX-A after COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated with BTX-A injections for the management of facial rhytids. The age range was between 29 and 45 years. Ten (83.3%) were female. Ten (83.3%) patients received incoBTX-A, and two received onabotulinum toxin A (onaBTX-A). All patients had COVID-19 vaccination (mRNA vaccine) between 1 and 7 months before. Within an average time of 24 h after BTX-A injection, all patients developed progressive facial swelling and erythema that were more prominent at the injection points. Intradermal allergic tests to BTX-A were performed in six (50%) patients, and the results were all negative. Adequate clinical control was achieved with systemic corticosteroids and antihistamines. After 1 year with no further vaccination, a new BTX-A treatment (provocation test) was performed in all patients with no secondary effects. CONCLUSION: Previous COVID-19 vaccination and the absence of new adverse events with further BTX-A injections suggest a temporary DHR. Clinicians should be aware of the importance of immunization history and its potential post-vaccine immunogenic effects with BTX-A. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Hand Rejuvenation with Customizable Hybrid Fillers: Premixed Calcium Hydroxyapatite and Hyaluronic Acid.

INTRODUCTION: Hand aging is a prevalent concern characterized by the atrophy of local soft tissues and increased visibility of vessels and tendons. Hyaluronic acid (HA) and calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) are well-established treatments for addressing this issue. While hybrid filler containing HA and CaHA has been proposed for facial rejuvenation, studies investigating its efficacy for hand rejuvenation are lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of a premixed hybrid filler containing calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) and hyaluronic acid (HA) for hand rejuvenation. METHODS: A prospective, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted. The control arm (CA) received conventional subdermal treatment with CaHA at a 1:1 dilution. The intervention arm (IA) underwent hybrid treatment, consisting of CaHA at a 1:1 dilution combined with 1 ml of low-density HA. Evaluation was performed subjectively using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) and the Manchester Hand Grading System (MHGS), and objectively using cutometry, corneometry, and ultrasound. RESULTS: Both the CA and the IA exhibited high rates of patient satisfaction and satisfaction as assessed by blinded evaluators. Although numerical superiority was observed in the IA, no statistical difference was found between the two groups. Significant improvements in hydration, elasticity, and skin thickness were observed in both arms, with no discernible difference between them. Greater ultrasound echogenicity was noted in the IA, which, as indicated by existing literature, may suggest enhanced biostimulation. No adverse effects were reported in either arm. CONCLUSION: Premixed filler containing HA and CaHA for hand rejuvenation appears to be a safe and effective approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Role of Hyperbaric Oxygen in Filler-Induced Vascular Occlusion.

INTRODUCTION: The rising incidence of filler-induced vascular complications in the context of aesthetic procedures necessitates a thorough assessment of therapeutic options. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has emerged as a potential intervention for filler-induced vascular occlusion (FIVO), although optimal dosing and timing remain undefined. METHODS: This review explores the pathophysiology of FIVO and elucidates HBOT's multifaceted role in salvaging ischemic tissue. The physical and biochemical mechanisms of HBOT, including its vasodilatory, anti-spasmodic, and anti-inflammatory effects, are examined. RESULTS: HBOT serves as an adjunctive therapy in FIVO management, emphasizing timely intervention, adherence to specific pressures (two atmosphere absolute), and session durations (60 minutes) to optimize efficacy and minimize complications. While existing HBOT protocols for compromised grafts provide insights, standardized guidelines for FIVO are lacking. CONCLUSION: HBOT enhances tissue oxygenation, modulates reactive oxygen species, and influences angiogenesis and hypoxia response. However, it does not replace key treatment protocols for filler vascular complications. Further research and standardized protocols are warranted to define HBOT's definitive role in mitigating filler-induced vascular complications. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Updated Filler Emergency Kit: Next-Generation Emergency Solution.

INTRODUCTION: The rising popularity of facial filler injections has corresponded with an increase in reported complications. While a filler emergency kit was previously introduced, advancements in the field have highlighted certain limitations, prompting the development of the updated filler emergency kit (UFEK). METHODS: The authors conducted literature research up to February 2023, focusing on PubMed and open web searches for articles referred to filler emergent complications: vascular occlusion, blindness and anaphylaxis. Approximately 1200 articles were obtained from PubMed and other sources, and 45 articles were reviewed. RESULTS: The developed UFEK protocol delineates specific interventions meticulously tailored to address diverse emergent scenarios linked to soft tissue fillers complications. This protocol emphasizes the urgent requirement for timely and personalized interventions. CONCLUSION: The UFEK offers a standardized, comprehensive and effective approach. This work contributes to the responsible and informed progression of the field of aesthetic medicine, providing more value and safety, both for clinicians and patients. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Desarrollo y resultados de un nuevo programa de trasplante de páncreas en España: la visión del cirujano / Development and results of a novel pancreas transplant program in Spain: the surgeon's point of view

INTRODUCCIÓN: El trasplante simultáneo de páncreas-riñón se encuentra indicado para pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 y enfermedad renal terminal. Los resultados son excelentes aunque el número de procedimientos parece ser un factor que afecta a la supervivencia de paciente e injerto estando en relación con la morbilidad quirúrgica, derivada de complicaciones pancreáticas. el objetivo del estudio es describir el desarrollo de un nuevo programa y exponer los resultados en un centro con un volumen bajo de trasplantes. MÉTODOS: Analizamos 53 trasplantes simultáneos de páncreas-riñón, en un período de 7 años (2009-2016), con una mediana de seguimiento de 39 meses. RESULTADOS: Dos pacientes han fallecido, uno tras parada cardíaca en postoperatorio y otro tras accidente de tráfico complicado con una neumonía. Entre los 51 pacientes vivos se han perdido 2 injertos, uno por un rechazo crónico tras cuatro años del trasplante y otro por trombosis arterial a los 20 días del mismo, motivo, este último, de la única trasplantectomía realizada. En diez pacientes se han realizado una o más reintervenciones: pancreatitis (n=3), oclusión intestinal (n=4), trombosis arterial (n=1), fístula con peritonitis (n=1) y hemoperitoneo (n=1). La supervivencia del paciente y del injerto a 1, 3, y 5 años fue del 98, 95 y 95% y del 96, 93 y 89%, respectivamente. Conclusiones Los resultados muestran que un nuevo programa de trasplante pancreático puede conseguir resultados similares a los de grupos con mayor volumen y experiencia. Una adecuada selección de donantes y receptores, una técnica homogénea y el aprendizaje con grupos expertos garantizan estos resultados

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes and end-stage chronic renal disease is widely performed. However, the rate of surgical morbidity from pancreatic complications remains high. The aim of this study was to describe the development and results of a new program, from the point of view of the pancreatic surgeon. METHODS: We analyzed 53 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations performed over a period of seven years (2009-2016), with a median follow up of 39 months (range: 1-86 months). RESULTS: Out of the total of this series, two patients died: one patient because of cardiac arrest immediately after surgery; and another patient due to traffic accident, complicated by pneumonia. Among the 51 living patients, two grafts were lost: one due to chronic rejection four years after transplantation; and the other due to arterial thrombosis 20 days after transplantation (the only case requiring transplantectomy). In ten patients, one or more re-operations were necessary due to the following: graft pancreatitis (n=4), small intestinal obstruction (n=4), arterial thrombosis (n=1), fistula (n=1) and hemoperitoneum (n=1). Overall patient and graft survival rates after 1, 3 and 5 years were 98, 95 and 95% and 96, 93 and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that the results of a new pancreas transplant program, which relies on the previous experience of other groups, do not demonstrate a learning curve. Adequate surgeon education and training, as well as the proper use of standardized techniques, should ensure optimal results

Development and results of a novel pancreas transplant program in Spain: the surgeon's point of view. / Desarrollo y resultados de un nuevo programa de trasplante de páncreas en España: la visión del cirujano.

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes and end-stage chronic renal disease is widely performed. However, the rate of surgical morbidity from pancreatic complications remains high. The aim of this study was to describe the development and results of a new program, from the point of view of the pancreatic surgeon. METHODS: We analyzed 53 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations performed over a period of seven years (2009-2016), with a median follow up of 39 months (range: 1-86 months). RESULTS: Out of the total of this series, two patients died: one patient because of cardiac arrest immediately after surgery; and another patient due to traffic accident, complicated by pneumonia. Among the 51 living patients, two grafts were lost: one due to chronic rejection four years after transplantation; and the other due to arterial thrombosis 20 days after transplantation (the only case requiring transplantectomy). In ten patients, one or more re-operations were necessary due to the following: graft pancreatitis (n=4), small intestinal obstruction (n=4), arterial thrombosis (n=1), fistula (n=1) and hemoperitoneum (n=1). Overall patient and graft survival rates after 1, 3 and 5 years were 98, 95 and 95% and 96, 93 and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that the results of a new pancreas transplant program, which relies on the previous experience of other groups, do not demonstrate a learning curve. Adequate surgeon education and training, as well as the proper use of standardized techniques, should ensure optimal results.