Which patients do we need to consider augmentation of muscle active potentials regarding transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials monitoring before spine surgery?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) are the current trend and are important in preventing intraoperative neurological deficits. Post-tetanic Tc-MEPs (p-MEP) can augment the amplitudes of compound muscle active potentials (CMAPs), especially in the case of insufficient conventional Tc-MEPs (c-MEP). PURPOSE: To retrospectively investigate pre- and intraoperative factors necessitating p-MEP monitoring and to examine changes in the success rates of baseline Tc-MEP monitoring before and after tetanic stimulation in patients with such factors. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients (n=184) who underwent spinal surgery with Tc-MEP monitoring in our department between August 2020 and July 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES: Manual muscle testing (MMT) scores were calculated to identify patients with preoperative motor deficits. c-MEP and p-MEP amplitudes were recorded from the defined muscles. METHODS: We compared preoperative and intraoperative factors between the c-MEP and p-MEP groups (study 1). In cases where the factors were identified, we investigated the success rate of the baseline MEP measurement of each muscle before and after tetanic stimulation (study 2). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven patients were included. Of those, 87 showed sufficient CMAPs with c-MEP. Meanwhile, 70 needed p-MEP because of insufficient CMAPs. In univariate analysis, cervical/thoracic surgery (p<.001), preoperative MMT 3 or below (p=.009), shorter duration of illness (p=.037), previous cerebrovascular disease (p=.014), and dialysis (p=.031) were significantly associated with p-MEP group. Preoperative MMT 3 or below was the only factor requiring p-MEP (odds ratio, 3.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-8.73, p=.014) in multivariate analysis. In the p-MEP group, 24 patients had preoperative motor deficits; 16 patients with complete data were included in the analysis (study 2). The success rates of MEP monitoring before and after tetanic stimulation of the entire lower-extremity muscles were 42.7 and 57.3%, respectively (p<.001). The success rates for each muscle before and after tetanic stimulation were abductor pollicis brevis: 81.3% and 96.9%, tibialis anterior: 34.4% and 50.0%, gastrocnemius: 25% and 40.6%, and abductor hallucis: 68.8% and 81.3%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in success rates for any of the muscles. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with preoperative MMT 3 or below highly needed p-MEP. The success rate of baseline MEP monitoring increased with tetanic stimulation, even in patients with preoperative motor deficits. We believe that p-MEP monitoring can result in reliable CMAP recording, especially in cases of preoperative motor deficits with MMT scores of 3 or below.

Reliability of the Risser+ grade for assessment of bone maturity in pediatric scoliosis cases: Investigation using standing and supine whole-spine radiograph.

BACKGROUND: Although several radiography-based systems for assessing skeletal maturity are available to clinicians, the classical Risser grading system remains a clinical gold standard. For scoliosis follow-up, a standing whole-spine radiograph is usually used. However, in our clinical practice, we have occasionally encountered cases in which ossification of the iliac crest is seen differently in the standing and supine whole-spine radiography. Here, we aimed to clarify the reliability of the Risser+ grading system for supine versus standing position radiographs. METHODS: This study recruited patients with all types of scoliosis who had been radiographed in both the standing and supine positions. We retrospectively evaluated the Risser+ grade of standing and supine whole-spine radiographs taken consecutively. Kappa statistics were computed to investigate the agreement between standing and supine Risser+ grades for this study. RESULTS: We evaluated 111 patients (age: 12.6 ± 2.0; male-to-female = 23:88). The Kappa value for the standing and supine Risser+ grade systems was 0.74. The degree of agreement between the two positions for each Risser+ grade revealed high agreement for grades 0 and 5 in all cases, whereas grades 2 and 3 had low agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was substantial agreement between the Risser+ grades assigned to standing and supine position radiographs. However, disagreement was observed between standing and supine position radiographs assigned Risser+ grades of 2 or 3. Therefore, we have found a wide range in the visibility of iliac apophysis ossification of the iliac depending on the posture, and there are limitations in assessing bone maturity using the Risser+ grade alone. Clinicians should use other evaluation systems, in addition to the Risser+ system, to achieve a more accurate bone maturity assessment, especially for cases with standing position radiographs assigned Risser grades of 2 or 3.

The clinical role of preoperative fulcrum-bending and supine side-bending radiographs on the prediction of curve correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: Preoperative curve assessment is important in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Our objective is to clarify the role of side-bending radiographs (SBR) and fulcrum-bending radiographs (FBR) in predicting postoperative Cobb angle in nonstructural and structural curves. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients with AIS who underwent correction surgery were included. The Cobb angles of structural and nonstructural curves were determined. Cobb angles were measured based on pre- and postoperative standing anteroposterior radiographs of the whole spine. The Cobb angles of SBR and FBR were measured preoperatively. The difference between the Cobb angle at each bending and the preoperative Cobb angle was defined as the predicted correction angle, whereas the difference between the preoperative Cobb angle and postoperative Cobb angle was defined as the surgical correction angle. The correction index was calculated by dividing the surgical correction angle by the predicted correction angle. The difference between the predicted correction angle and surgical correction angle was defined as the prediction error. We compared SBR and FBR for both structural and nonstructural curves in these terms. RESULTS: For both curves, the predicted correction angle of FBR was significantly higher than that of SBR, and the correction index of FBR was significantly lower than that of SBR. Patients with a correction index close to 1 and small prediction error had undergone FBR in the structural curve and SBR in the nonstructural curve. CONCLUSION: FBR is predictive of postoperative correction angle of the structural curve, whereas SBR is predictive of postoperative correction angle of the nonstructural curve.

Central sensitization adversely affects quality of recovery following lumbar decompression surgery.

BACKGROUND: Central sensitization (CS) is defined as increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system to normal or subthreshold afferent input. The CS phenomenon is caused by continuous, intense nociceptor inputs triggering a prolonged but reversible increase in the excitability and synaptic efficacy of neurons in the central nociceptive pathway. Most patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) experience symptoms for more than three months; therefore, it is possible that CS is associated with postoperative symptoms of LSS. The aim of this study was to clarify the influence of CS in patients who underwent surgery for LSS. METHODS: We used the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) to evaluate CS preoperatively. Clinical and neurological symptoms were assessed before surgery and three months after surgery using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOA-BPEQ) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). To evaluate the correlation between the preoperative CSI score and each parameter of the JOA-BPEQ before and three months after surgery, a Pearson correlation coefficient was used. We also evaluated the correlation between preoperative CSI and improvement scores for each parameter of the JOA-BPEQ for surgery. Similarly, the ODI was assessed. RESULTS: This study included 118 patients. After surgery, the parameters of lumbar function disorder, social life function disorder, and mental health disorder revealed a statistically significant relationship (r = -0.289, -0.0354, and -0.493, respectively). There was no significant correlation between CSI and improvement scores of the JOA-BPEQ. The ODI assessment after surgery revealed a statistically significant relationship (r = 0.344). There was no significant correlation between the CSI and ODI improvement scores. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the severity of the CSI influenced the postoperative outcomes, and that surgical treatment improved the symptoms of LSS regardless of the occurrence of CS preoperatively.

Severe complication subsequent to surgical site infection after cervical laminoplasty: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSI) following spinal surgery can result in serious complications. Although early detection and intensive care are essential to minimize possible sequelae, more than one surgical intervention is required to alleviate the infection in some cases. CASE PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old man with long-standing Parkinson's disease (PD) developed SSIs after cervical laminoplasty. Despite surgical debridement and irrigation, his neurological status worsened severely and anterior infectious involvement at the C4-5 level was identified by magnetic resonance imaging. He underwent another urgent surgery for anterior debridement and iliac bone grafting. His laboratory results gradually normalized with antibiotic therapy, and his neurological status improved. One year after surgery, he was ambulatory with walker assistance. However, his right hand remained difficult to control with significant sensory loss and numbness. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first case of SSI that extended rapidly to the anterior side despite immediate and intensive treatment in a patient with PD after laminoplasty. During SSI treatment, meticulous observation should be performed to check for exacerbations.

Accessory Anterolateral Talar Facet Syndrome After Treatment of Neglected Fracture of the Lateral Process of the Talus: A Case Report.

Fracture of the lateral process of the talus has often been missed or confused with lateral ankle sprain, and this can lead to long-term untreated cases of nonunion, malunion, and subtalar joint osteoarthritis. In a review of the published data, accessory anterolateral talar facet syndrome was not found after treatment of nonunion of the lateral process of the talus fracture. This report presents the case of a 40-year-old male snowboard instructor who suffered from a neglected fracture of the lateral process of the talus and was treated with open reduction using an iliac autogenous bone graft. Subsequently, partial resection of the anterior aspect of the process was required to treat the impingement syndrome that developed secondary to the united but enlarged lateral process. The patient resumed his activities a year after the second operation. We describe the consequences of misdiagnosis of the lateral process of the talus and its management.