Comparison of Efficacy of Pressure Controlled vs. Traditional Manual Mask Ventilation for Newborn Resuscitation - A Simulation-Based Pilot Randomized Control Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine efficacy of non-invasive positive pressure face mask ventilation using a ventilator device (NIPPmV) for achieving early effective ventilation compared to that by self-inflating bag (SIB) or T- piece resuscitator (TPR). METHODS: The authors video recorded 33 trained resuscitators using NIPPmV (provided using ventilator device), SIB [a 500 ml silicone SIB without a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) valve] and a TPR. Using a continuous pressure recording system and a neonatal manikin, the authors evaluated the efficacy of the ventilation to achieve early effective ventilation during 30 s of ventilation. The primary outcome was time to achieve effective chest rise. Secondary outcomes were peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), ventilation rate and the need to perform ventilation corrective steps during positive pressure ventilation (PPV) among the devices. RESULTS: Total 99 videos were recorded. The time(s) taken to achieve the first chest rise was significantly lesser in NIPPmV group compared to SIB and TPR (3.0 ± 1.7 vs. 3.7 ± 1.9 vs. 7.5 ± 5.4, respectively, p <0.001). The mean PIP delivered by NIPPmV compared to SIB & TPR (19.8 ± 1.6 vs. 35.6 ± 7.4 vs. 17.8 ± 2.0 cm H20 respectively; p <0.001) was more accurate with preset PIP. Ventilation, in terms of breath rate, was observed to be controlled more accurately with NIPPmV compared to SIB & TPR (50 vs. 42 vs. 33 per min respectively; p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The non-invasive positive pressure face mask ventilation using a ventilator (NIPPmV) resulted in achieving early, effective and consistent ventilation.

Once-a-Day Ceftriaxone-Amikacin Combination as Empiric Antibiotic Therapy to Enable Outpatient Management of Febrile Neutropenia in Children-16-Year Experience from a Single Institute.

Shailesh KanvindeBackground To enable outpatient department (OPD) management of febrile neutropenia (FN), we used once-a-day (OD) ceftriaxone-amikacin (CFT-AMK) as empiric antibiotic therapy. Our experience over 16-year period is presented. Methods This was a retrospective study conducted from January2002 to December2017. Inclusion criteria were <18 years of age, undergoing cancer chemotherapy, and having FN. Exclusion criteria were FN after palliative chemotherapy, bone marrow transplantation, or at diagnosis of malignancy. Empiric CFT-AMK was used in all, except those having respiratory distress, hypotension, altered sensorium, paralytic ileus, or clinical evidence of peritonitis. Admission criteria were age <1 year, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy, poor performance status, need for blood transfusions, convenience, insurance, or persistent fever >48 to 72 hours after CFT-AMK. Outcomes analyzed were response (defervescence within 48-72 hours), OPD management, antibiotic upgrade, and mortality. AML diagnosis, >7 days to absolute neutrophil count >0.5 × 10 9 /L, poor performance status, and malignancy not in remission were considered high-risk FN criteria. Results CFT-AMK was given in 877/952 (92.2%) FN episodes. Seventy-six percent had hematolymphoid malignancies. Response, antibiotic upgrade, and mortality were seen in 85.7 and 65.5% ( p < 0.0001), 15 and 45.5% ( p < 0.0001), and 0 and 2% ( p = 0.003) of low- and high-risk patients, respectively. Treatment was started in OPD in 52%, of which 21.6% required subsequent admission. Of those initially admitted, early discharge (hospital stay < 5 days) was possible in 24.6%. Forty-one percent episodes were managed entirely on OPD. Overall, 80% of low-risk and 42% of high-risk episodes received treatment wholly or partially on OPD. Conclusion Our results show empiric OD CFT-AMK allows OPD management for most of the low-risk and a proportion of high-risk FN following chemotherapy in children, without compromising clinical outcomes.

Calciphylaxis in a renal transplant recipient with normal graft function: A case report and review of literature.

Calciphylaxis, also known as calcific uremic arteriolopathy, is a rare, life-threatening complication of end-stage renal disease. However, it may also occur in patients without renal failure, the nonuremic calciphylaxis. Most patients present with painful skin ulcers. Delayed diagnosis can lead to sepsis-related morbidity and mortality. Aberrations in calcium, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone physiology are common and biopsy is diagnostic. Early diagnosis and correction of vascular and metabolic aberrations may assist in healing as may the use of sodium thiosulfate and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. We report on successful treatment of a case of calciphylaxis in a renal transplant recipient with normal allograft function.

Psychosocial Factors in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients at a Tertiary Hospital in Australia.

Aim. This study seeks to review the psychosocial factors affecting patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) from a tertiary hospital in Australia. Methods. We audited patients with ESKD, referred to social work services from January 2012 to December 2014. All patients underwent psychosocial assessments by one, full-time renal social worker. Patient demographics, cumulative social issues, and subsequent interventions were recorded directly into a database. Results. Of the 244 patients referred, the majority were >60 years (58.6%), male (60.7%), born in Australia (62.3%), on haemodialysis (51.6%), and reliant on government financial assistance (88%). Adjustment issues (41%), financial concerns (38.5%), domestic assistance (35.2%), and treatment nonadherence (21.3%) were the predominant reasons for social work consultation. Younger age, referral prior to start of dialysis, and unemployment were significant independent predictors of increased risk of adjustment issues (p = 0.004, <0.001, and =0.018, resp.). Independent risk factors for treatment nonadherence included age and financial and employment status (p = 0.041, 0.052, and 0.008, resp.). Conclusion. Psychosocial and demographic factors were associated with treatment nonadherence and adjustment difficulties. Additional social work support and counselling, in addition to financial assistance from government and nongovernment agencies, may help to improve adjustment to the diagnosis and treatment plans as patients approach ESKD.

Acute kidney injury in critically ill children: Risk factors and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and is associated with poor outcome. We conducted the present study to determine the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of AKI in the PICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected data retrospectively from case records of children admitted to the PICU during one year. We defined and classified AKI according to modified pRIFLE criteria. We used multivariate logistic regression to determine risk factors of AKI and association of AKI with mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: Of the 252 children included in the study, 103 (40.9%) children developed AKI. Of these 103 patients with AKI, 39 (37.9%) patients reached pRIFLE max of Risk, 37 (35.9%) patients reached Injury, and 27 (26.2%) had Failure. Mean Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM III) score at admission was higher in patients with AKI than in controls (P < 0.001).

A novel paraboloid intracorporeal lithotripter: computer aided design analysis and in vitro comparison with holmium laser for large renal calculi.

PURPOSE: An intracorporeal lithotripsy probe tip was designed with a paraboloid shaped tip and compared with holmium laser for stone pulverization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The paraboloid tip concept was developed and designed using computer aided design (CAD), fabricated, and patented. CAD analysis and in vitro comparison (with laser) of pulverization and propulsion dynamics were performed in an underwater hands-free bench arrangement using phantom stones. SPSS analysis for different energy cohorts was performed. RESULTS: CAD analysis: At "point contact" with the tip, the paraboloid lithotripter generated 3590 bars at generator settings of 4 bars. During "follow-up impacts," the tip pressure exponentially decreased (graduated tip pressure) and the lateral/centrifugal forces increased, converting the probe into a side-firing energy source. Bench analysis: At point contact, the paraboloid lithotripter at 2, 3, and 4 bars was comparable to that of a 6, 10, and 15 W laser, respectively (P<0.005). The paraboloid lithotripter showed a statistically significant advantage in breaking the phantoms, as against a laser that always bored through the phantom. Stone propulsion was comparable within all energy cohorts (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The paraboloid lithotripter generates highly focused impact force with low propulsion, at point contact. As stone pulverization progresses, the tip forces exponentially decrease and the probe converts into a lateral firing energy source resulting in pulverization into larger fragments. Thus, the paraboloid lithotripter has all the advantages of laser at point contact and advantages of pneumatic lithotripter at follow-up hits, akin to being a bimodal energy source.

In vitro assessment of a novel spearheaded pneumatic intracorporeal lithotriptor.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracorporeal lithotripsy is an important modality used for stone pulverization. To improve the pulverization properties of intracorporeal lithotriptors, a novel intracorporeal "spearheaded lithotriptor" was designed by our institute. It was compared in vitro with the conventional lithotriptor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pulverization and propulsion dynamics were evaluated at various pressure settings on an in vitro bench arrangement with phantom stones. Lateral displacement during pulverization was also compared. RESULTS: The spearheaded lithotriptor had a better first hit (P<0.001) and follow-up hit dynamics (P<0.01). Stone propulsion and lateral displacement were low for the spearheaded lithotriptor at all pressure settings (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The spearheaded lithotriptor improved stone pulverization without increasing the risk of stone migration. Further clinical evaluation of this novel probe is necessary.

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus for chronic renal allograft dysfunction: a systematic review of the evidence.

BACKGROUND: Conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus has been used as a strategy to improve deteriorating renal allograft function but the efficacy and safety of this intervention is unknown. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of studies that involved conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus in kidney transplantation. The search yielded five randomized trials (n=1,040 patients) and 25 nonrandomized studies (n=977 patients). RESULTS: In the randomized trials, conversion to sirolimus improved short-term creatinine clearance (weighted mean difference 6.4 mL/min; 95% CI 1.9 to 11.0) compared to controls. In the nonrandomized studies, renal function improved or stabilized in 66% (95% CI 61% to 72%), creatinine clearance improved (weighted mean change 5.7 mL/min; 95% CI 1.4 to 10.1), cholesterol increased (weighted mean change 20.8 mg/dL; 95% CI 11.2 to 30.4) and triglycerides increased (weighted mean change 40.1 mg/dL; 95% CI 18.6 to 61.7). Sirolimus was discontinued by 28% of patients (95% CI 0 to 59%) in the randomized trials and 17% (95% CI 12 to 22%) in the nonrandomized trials. CONCLUSION: Conversion to sirolimus is associated with an improvement in short-term renal function. However, given the discontinuation rate and potential side effects, adequately powered randomized trials with longer follow-up of hard outcomes are needed to determine whether this strategy leads to a lasting benefit in the clinical care of transplant recipients.

Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy in kidney transplantation: a systematic review of randomized trials.

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal has been used as a strategy to improve renal allograft function, however, it also carries risk of acute rejection. We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials that involved CNI withdrawal from a sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. The search strategy yielded six trials (n = 1047 patients) reported in eight publications. CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy, was associated with an increased risk of acute rejection (risk difference, 6%; 95% CI 2-10%, p = 0.002) but a higher creatinine clearance (mean difference, 7.49 mL/min; 95% CI 5.08-9.89 mL/min, p < 0.00001) at 1 year compared to continued CNI and sirolimus therapy. Graft loss (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI 0.46-1.64, p = 0.66) and death (relative risk, 0.88; CI 0.40-1.96, p = 0.76) were similar in both groups at 1 year. Hypertension was significantly reduced in the CNI withdrawal group (relative risk, 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.78, p = 0.0006). CNI withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy is associated with an increased risk of acute rejection in the short term with a significant improvement in renal function and a reduction in hypertension. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if these changes will result in a significant improvement in patient and graft survival.