Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis in patients with irritable bowel syndrome on a low FODMAP diet: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a low fermentable oligo-, di- and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet on the nutritional status and body composition, abdominal symptoms, quality of life, anxiety/depression and sleep quality of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: Consecutive patients were given a low FODMAP diet for 8 weeks. At baseline and after 8 weeks, blood tests were taken to evaluate nutritional status and a bioelectrical impedance analysis was performed to assess body composition. Anthropometric data, IBS Symptom Severity Score, results of a bowel habits questionnaire, Bristol Stool Chart classification, SF36, Hamilton Depression Anxiety Scale outcome and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index were also recorded. During the 8-week diet period, the patients were phoned periodically by the nutritionist to verify their compliance. RESULTS: Twenty-six IBS patients with a mean age of 46.2 ± 13.8 years were studied. After 8 weeks, there were no abnormalities in anthropometric data, bioelectrical impedance parameters and blood tests. The patients' IBS Symptom Severity Score improved (305.2 ± 84.1 vs 156.3 ± 106.4; p < 0.0001), as did bowel habits, Bristol Stool Chart classification, quality of life and HADS anxiety score, whereas sleeping quality and depression were unchanged. The degree of relief from symptoms and satisfaction with the diet was high. CONCLUSIONS: A low FODMAP diet improved IBS symptoms without effects on nutritional status and body composition.

Management of chronic constipation in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Chronic constipation is often diagnosed and treated by general practitioners (GPs). The aim of the study was to evaluate the management of constipation by a cohort of Italian GPs. METHODS: Over the course of 1 month, 41 GPs recorded tests and therapies suggested to patients complaining of chronic constipation. They were classified according to the Rome III criteria as constipated irritable bowel syndrome (C-IBS), functional constipation (FC), or "self-perceived constipation" (SPC) (not consistent with the Rome criteria). RESULTS: The most frequently prescribed tests for the 229 patients (147 FC, 50 C-IBS, 32 SPC) were routine blood tests (59.3 %), abdominal ultrasounds (37.2 %), thyroid function (36.7 %), fecal occult blood tests (36.7 %), and tumor markers (35 %). Patient sex and age, GP age, and whether the diagnosis was new influenced the GP's request, but FC, C-IBS, or SPC status did not. Dietary suggestions (81.9 %), fiber supplements (59.7 %), reassurance (50.9 %), and laxatives (30.5 %) were the most frequently prescribed treatments. Antispasmodics were more frequently suggested for C-IBS patients; dietary suggestions, fiber, and enemas were more frequently prescribed in SPC patients. Patient and GP age and whether the diagnosis was new influenced the GP's choice of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The Rome III criteria do not influence diagnostic strategies and only slightly influence therapeutic strategies of GPs. Other factors (age, gender, new or old diagnosis) have more influence on GPs choice of investigations and treatment.

Randomised clinical trial: twice daily esomeprazole 40 mg vs. pantoprazole 40 mg in Barrett's oesophagus for 1 year.

BACKGROUND: Barrett's oesophagus is regarded as the most important risk factor for development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. According to current guidelines, treatment should be limited to symptomatic Barrett's oesophagus. AIM: To evaluate the expression of Ki67, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and apoptosis in Barrett's oesophagus after 12 months of double-dose proton pump inhibitor therapy. The effectiveness of esomeprazole and pantoprazole was also compared. METHODS: Seventy-seven nondysplastic Barrett's oesophagus patients underwent baseline upper endoscopy. Patients were then randomised into two groups: one group was allocated to receive esomeprazole 40 mg b.d. and the other group pantoprazole 40 mg b.d. for 12 months. A follow-up endoscopy was performed at the end of treatment. Sixty-five of 77 patients agreed to undergo oesophageal manometry and 24-h pH-metry. Barrett's oesophagus biopsies, obtained at baseline and after treatment, were analysed using immunohistochemistry to assess Ki67 and COX-2 expression; apoptosis was evaluated using TUNEL. RESULTS: In the esomeprazole group, a significant decrease in Ki67 and COX-2 expression, as well as an increase in apoptosis, were observed (P < 0.05). By contrast, in the pantoprazole group Ki67, COX-2 and apoptosis did not vary significantly from baseline. By 24-h oesophageal pH-monitoring, a normal acid exposure time was recorded in patients treated with esomeprazole, while those allocated to pantoprazole displayed abnormal acid exposure (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of Barrett's oesophagus patients with high-dose esomeprazole, but not pantoprazole, promoted a decrease in proliferative markers, concomitantly with a decrease in apoptotic cell death. Moreover, esomeprazole allowed a better oesophageal acid control than pantoprazole.

The general practitioner's approach to irritable bowel syndrome: from intention to practice.

BACKGROUND: Although general practitioners play a critical role in the management of irritable bowel syndrome because they deal with the most patients, guidelines are developed mainly by specialists. AIMS: To evaluate the clinical features of irritable bowel patients and the general practitioners' approach to irritable bowel syndrome in Italy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire focusing on the management of this syndrome was completed by 28 general practitioners. Clinical features and diagnostic and treatment measures taken in 229 patients were analysed. RESULTS: Only 35.7% of the general practitioners were familiar with the Rome II criteria. Changes in bowel habits and abdominal pain/discomfort were the most common symptoms. Constipation (74.2%) was more frequent as the main symptom than diarrhoea. Routine blood tests (76.4%) and abdominal ultrasound (42.2%) were requested more frequently than colonoscopy (31.1%). At least one specialist consultation was recommended in 63.3% of patients. Drugs (mainly antispasmodics) were prescribed more frequently for diarrhoea (91.4%) than for constipation (55.7%). CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners are little acquainted with the Rome II criteria. Diagnostic tests and specialist consultations are often recommended; antispasmodics are the most frequently prescribed drug. Guidelines should be developed together by general practitioners and gastroenterologists to effectively manage patients at a lower cost.

Calprotectin is a stronger predictive marker of relapse in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease is characterised by a succession of relapses and remissions. The aim of our study was to assess whether the predictive value of faecal calprotectin-a non-invasive marker of intestinal inflammation-for clinical relapse is different in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Seventy nine consecutive patients with a diagnosis of clinically quiescent inflammatory bowel disease (38 CD and 41 UC) were followed for 12 months, undergoing regular clinical evaluations and blood tests. A single stool sample was collected at the beginning of the study from each patient and the calprotectin concentration was assessed by a commercially available enzyme linked immunoassay. RESULTS: In CD, median calprotectin values were 220.1 mug/g (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.7-418.5) in those patients who relapsed during follow up, and 220.5 mug/g (95% CI 53-388) in non-relapsing patients (p=0.395). In UC, median calprotectin values were 220.6 mug/g (95% CI 86-355.2) and 67 microg/g (95% CI 15-119) in relapsing and non-relapsing patients, respectively (p<0.0001). The multivariate Cox (proportional hazard) regression model, after adjustment for possible confounding variables, showed a twofold and 14-fold increase in the relapse risk, respectively, in those patients with CD and UC in clinical remission who had a faecal calprotectin concentration higher than 150 microg/g. CONCLUSIONS: Faecal calprotectin proved to be an even stronger predictor of clinical relapse in UC than in CD, which makes the test a promising non-invasive tool for monitoring and optimising therapy.

Role of faecal calprotectin as non-invasive marker of intestinal inflammation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Faecal calprotectin, a neutrophil granulocyte cytosol protein, is considered a promising marker of intestinal inflammation. We assessed and compared the faecal calprotectin concentration in patients with organic and functional chronic intestinal disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was carried out, using a commercially available ELISA test, measuring calprotectin in stool samples collected from 131 patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, 26 with intestinal neoplasms, 48 with irritable bowel syndrome and 34 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Median faecal calprotectin was significantly increased in Crohn's disease (231 microg/g, 95% confidence interval (CI) 110-353 microg/g), ulcerative colitis (167 microg/g, 95% CI 59-276 microg/g), and neoplasms (105 microg/g, 95% CI 0-272 microg/g), whereas normal values were found in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (22 microg/g, 95% CI 9-35 microg/g) and in healthy subjects (11 microg/g, 95% CI 3-18 microg/g). A positive correlation was observed with clinical activity scores in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. In both groups, patients with clinically active disease showed higher calprotectin levels than those observed in patients with quiescent disease (405 microg/g, 95% CI 200-610 microg/g vs. 213 microg/g, 95% CI 85-341 microg/g in CD patients, p<0.05, and 327 microg/g, 95% CI 104-550 microg/g vs. 123 microg/g, 95% CI 40-206 microg/g in UC patients, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Faecal calprotectin appears to be a promising and non-invasive biomarker of intestinal inflammation. If these findings are confirmed, it may provide a useful test for the diagnosis and follow up of inflammatory bowel diseases.

Pelvic floor dyssynergia and psychiatric disorders. Does the snake bite its tail?

AIM: Psychological and/or psychiatric disorders (PSY) and functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) are often linked. Pelvic floor dyssynergia (PFD) is one of the most frequent FGID, but few studies have investigated its possible relationship with PSY. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether an increased prevalence of PSY, and of what types, exist in patients affected with PFD. METHODS: Thirty-four female patients PFD and 34 age- and gender-matched control subjects were evaluated. The prevalence rates of axis I psychiatric disorders (DSM IV) and of pathological temperaments (Schneider-Akiskal criteria) were determined. RESULTS: PSY were detected in 29 patients (85.3%) and in 11 controls (32.3%), (p=0.000). A family load was present in 7 patients (20.6%) and in 2 controls (5.9%), (NS). Sixteen patients (47.0%) and no control subjects were diagnosed as having axis I psychiatric disorders (p=0.000); anxiety disorders were the most frequently represented condition. A pathological temperament was found in 28 patients (82.3%) (primarily the phobic-anxious temperament) and in 11 control subjects (32.3%),(p=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there is a higher prevalence of PSY in PFD patients than in controls in particular, anxiety disorders and the phobic-anxious temperament. We would recommend that a psychiatric evaluation be carried out in patients with PFD, especially before starting rehabilitation therapy for obstructed defecation, as the presence of psychiatric disorders could alter the course and decrease the efficacy of such a rehabilitation program.

Ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy for seven days, with or without further anti-secretory therapy, is highly effective in patients with duodenal ulcer and Helicobacter pylori infection.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two protocols for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection and the healing of active duodenal ulcer: (i) ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus two antibiotics for 7 days, and (ii) the same triple therapy followed by 3 weeks of anti-secretory drug treatment. METHODS: The study comprised 102 patients with active duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection; the patients were randomized to open treatment with either RBC 400 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 7 days, or the same treatment followed by 3 weeks of RBC 400 mg b.d. alone. Ulcer healing was confirmed by endoscopy. H. pylori eradication was assessed by endoscopy, rapid urease test and histology. RESULTS: The ulcer healed in 48/50 patients on RBC-based triple therapy alone (96.0%) and in 51/52 patients on triple therapy plus further anti-secretory treatment (98.1%). On an intention-to-treat basis, H. pylori had been successfully eradicated in 42/50 patients on triple therapy (84.0%) and in 44/52 patients on triple therapy plus anti-secretory treatment (84.6%), while by per protocol analysis the H. pylori eradication rates were 91.3% (42/46) and 89.8% (44/49), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: One-week triple therapy with RBC, amoxycillin and clarithromycin is highly effective in eradicating H. pylori and healing duodenal ulcers, even if not followed by anti-secretory drug treatment.

Post-treatment diagnostic accuracy of a new enzyme immunoassay to detect Helicobacter pylori in stools.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori has attracted increasing attention among gastroenterologists because of its pathogenic potential, stimulating the search for non-invasive diagnostic tests. AIMS: In this study the efficacy of a new enzyme immunoassay designed to detect H. pylori antigens in stools (HpSA) was evaluated before and after eradication therapy. METHODS: HpSA was performed on stool samples collected from 268 patients whose H. pylori status was defined on the basis of concordant results for the (13)C-urea breath test, rapid urease test and histology. The H. pylori-positive patients were treated with a 1-week triple therapy to eradicate the infection. One (T30) and 3 months (T90) after the end of therapy, (13)C-urea breath test and HpSA were repeated in the treated patients. RESULTS: The overall diagnostic accuracy of HpSA at T30 (83%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 77--89%) was significantly lower in comparison to the values obtained at baseline (94%, 95% CI: 91--97%) and at T90 (97%, 95% CI: 94--99%). No significant difference was found between the diagnostic accuracy of HpSA at baseline and at T90 (P=0.253). CONCLUSIONS: The present data suggest that HpSA provides a low diagnostic accuracy when used shortly after treatment. It needs a longer period of follow-up (8--12 weeks) to reach a reliability comparable to the (13)C-urea breath test.