Self-care treatment for lymphoedema of lymphatic filariasis using integrative medicine.

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a neglected tropical disease presenting mainly as lymphoedema (elephantiasis). At present, LF is not effectively treated. Integrative medicine (IM) treatment for lymphoedema uses a combination of Indian traditional medicine, Ayurveda, alongside yoga exercises, compression therapy, antibiotics and antifungal treatments, providing a useful combination where resources are limited and different practices are in use. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of the IM in the existing clinical practice of lower-limb lymphoedema management and to determine whether the treatment outcomes align with the World Health Organization (WHO) global goal of LF management. METHODS: Institutional data from electronic medical records of all 1698 patients with LF between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed using pre- and post-treatment comparisons and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for clinical audit. The primary treatment outcomes evaluated were limb volume, bacterial entry points (BEEPs), episodes of cellulitis, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Secondary outcomes included the influence of the patient's sex, duration of illness, education and employment status on volume reduction. Multiple regression analysis, t-test, χ2-test, analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U-test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to assess the association between IM and patients' treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Limb volume reduced by 24.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.47-26.61; n = 1660] following an intensive supervised care period (mean 14.84 days, n = 1660). Limb volume further reduced by 1.42% (95% CI 0.76-2.07; n = 1259) at the first follow-up visit (mean 81.45 days), and by 2.3% between the first and second follow-up visits (mean 231.32 days) (95% CI 1.26-3.34; n = 796). BEEPs were reduced upon follow-up; excoriations (78.4%) and intertrigo (26.7%) were reduced at discharge and further improvements was achieved at the follow-up visits. In total, 4% of patients exhibited new BEEPs at the first follow-up [eczema (3.9%), folliculitis (6.5%), excoriations (11.9%) and intertrigo (15.4%); 4 of 7 BEEPs were recorded]. HRQoL, measured using the disease-specific Lymphatic Filariasis Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, showed an average score of 73.9 on admission, which increased by 17.8 at the first follow-up and 18.6 at the second follow-up. No patients developed new cellulitis episodes at the first follow-up, and only five patients (5.3%) developed new episodes of cellulitis at the second follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: IM for lower-limb lymphoedema successfully reduces limb volume and episodes of cellulitis, and also reduces BEEPs, leading to improved HRQoL. IM aligns with the LF treatment goals of the WHO and is a low-cost, predominantly self-care management protocol. IM has the potential to change care models and improve the lives of patients with lymphoedema.

How knowledgeable are investigators studying therapies of traditional medicines?

CONTEXT: Research methodology in traditional Indian system of medicine. AIM: To determine the knowledge level of investigators conducting clinical trials in traditional medicines (TMs) including Ayurveda. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a questionnaire survey conducted for selected researchers trained in any specialty and working in TM. 2087 researchers were selected based on selection criteria. A validated and pretested questionnaire containing the questions regarding regulatory issues, literature search, evidence-based medicine, clinical trial design, patient selection, and study reporting were sent either through E-mail or post. The answered questionnaires were analyzed. The parameters were analyzed based on median and interquartile range (IQR). RESULTS: Forty two responses were received through E-mail and 21 researchers responded through post. Out of 63, six researchers sent incomplete responses. Among the remaining 57 respondents; 34 (59.6%) investigators had postdoctoral degree, 43 investigators (75.4%) did not receive any structured training on research methodology, 23 (40.4%) had two decades of research experience. Thirty three (74%) of investigators who received government funding didn't have any training on research methodology. Ayurveda experts group had better knowledge compared to pharmaceutical sciences and basic science group although they had a dilemma about conducting clinical evaluation of TM within the specific framework of rigorous clinical pharmacological principles without ignoring the Ayurvedic concepts such as Dosha, Prakruti etc., Investigators below 30 years possessed higher knowledge of research methodology when analyzed based on the age. The respondents working in research organizations, government organizations, and academic institutions had lower knowledge compared to those who were in private organizations/practice. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommend that investigators, peer reviewers, and fund managers involved in traditional medicine research need training especially in research methodology.