Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 93(5): 1122-3, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26324727

RESUMEN

Ackee apple fruit is a native fruit to Jamaica and some parts of west Africa. Its toxicity known as "Jamaican vomiting sickness" dates back to the nineteenth century. However, there is a dearth of reported published data on toxicity from Nigeria where it is popularly known in the southwest as "ishin." We report a case series of eight previously well Nigerian siblings who presented at various intervals after ingestion of roasted seeds and aril of the ackee fruit.


Asunto(s)
Blighia/efectos adversos , Frutas/efectos adversos , Intoxicación por Plantas/diagnóstico , Semillas/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Nigeria , Salud Pública , Semillas/toxicidad , Hermanos
2.
J Infect Dis ; 212(4): 617-25, 2015 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25701866

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Malaria prophylaxis is recommended for persons with sickle cell disease (SCD), but the value of this has been questioned. The aim of this study was to find out whether intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) with a fixed-dose combination of mefloquine-artesunate (MQAS) or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SPAQ) was more effective than daily proguanil for malaria prevention in subjects with SCD. METHODS: Patients with SCD were randomized to receive daily treatment with proguanil or IPT with either MQAS or SPAQ once every 2 months at routine clinic visits. Patients were followed up for 14 months. FINDINGS: A total of 270 patients with SCD were studied, with 90 in each group. Adherence to the IPT regimens was excellent, but 57% of patients took <75% of their daily doses of proguanil. IPT was well tolerated; the most common side effects were vomiting and abdominal pain. Protective efficacy against malaria, compared with daily proguanil, was 61% (95% confidence interval, 3%-84%) for MQAS and 36% (40%-70%) for SPAQ. There were fewer outpatient illness episodes in children who received IPT than those who received proguanil. CONCLUSIONS: IPT with MQAS administered to patients with SCD during routine clinic visits was well tolerated and more effective in preventing malaria than daily prophylaxis with proguanil. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01319448 and ISRCTN46158146.


Asunto(s)
Anemia de Células Falciformes/complicaciones , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Malaria/complicaciones , Malaria/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Antimaláricos/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Malaria/epidemiología , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Nigeria/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA