Identification of conserved cross-species B-cell linear epitopes in human malaria: a subtractive proteomics and immuno-informatics approach targeting merozoite stage proteins.

Human malaria, caused by five Plasmodium species (P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae, P. ovale, and P. knowlesi), remains a significant global health burden. While most interventions target P. falciparum, the species associated with high mortality rates and severe clinical symptoms, non-falciparum species exhibit different transmission dynamics, remain hugely neglected, and pose a significant challenge to malaria elimination efforts. Recent studies have reported the presence of antigens associated with cross-protective immunity, which can potentially disrupt the transmission of various Plasmodium species. With the sequencing of the Plasmodium genome and the development of immunoinformatic tools, in this study, we sought to exploit the evolutionary history of Plasmodium species to identify conserved cross-species B-cell linear epitopes in merozoite proteins. We retrieved Plasmodium proteomes associated with human malaria and applied a subtractive proteomics approach focusing on merozoite stage proteins. Bepipred 2.0 and Epidope were used to predict B-cell linear epitopes using P. falciparum as the reference species. The predictions were further compared against human and non-falciparum databases and their antigenicity, toxicity, and allergenicity assessed. Subsequently, epitope conservation was carried out using locally sequenced P. falciparum isolates from a malaria-endemic region in western Kenya (n=27) and Kenyan isolates from MalariaGEN version 6 (n=131). Finally, physiochemical characteristics and tertiary structure of the B-cell linear epitopes were determined. The analysis revealed eight epitopes that showed high similarity (70-100%) between falciparum and non-falciparum species. These epitopes were highly conserved when assessed across local isolates and those from the MalariaGEN database and showed desirable physiochemical properties. Our results show the presence of conserved cross-species B-cell linear epitopes that could aid in targeting multiple Plasmodium species. Nevertheless, validating their efficacy in-vitro and in-vivo experimentally is essential.

Open Science in Kenya: Where Are We?

According to the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Open Science is the movement to make scientific research and data accessible to all. It has great potential for advancing science. At its core, it includes (but is not limited to) open access, open data, and open research. Some of the associated advantages are promoting collaboration, sharing and reproducibility in research, and preventing the reinvention of the wheel, thus saving resources. As research becomes more globalized and its output grows exponentially, especially in data, the need for open scientific research practices is more evident - the future of modern science. This has resulted in a concerted global interest in open science uptake. Even so, barriers still exist. The formal training curriculum in most, if not all, universities in Kenya does not equip students with the knowledge and tools to subsequently practice open science in their research. Therefore, to work openly and collaboratively, there is a need for awareness and training in the use of open science tools. These have been neglected, especially in most developing countries, and remain barriers to the cause. Moreover, there is scanty research on the state of affairs regarding the practice and/or adoption of open science. Thus, we developed, through the OpenScienceKE framework, a model to narrow the gap. A sensitize-train-hack-collaborate model was applied in Nairobi, the economic and administrative capital of Kenya. Using the model, we sensitized through seminars, trained on the use of tools through workshops, applied the skills learned in training through hackathons to collaboratively answer the question on the state of open science in Kenya. While the former parts of the model had 20-50 participants, the latter part mainly involved participants with a bioinformatics background, leveraging their advanced computational skills. This model resulted in an open resource that researchers can use to publish as open access cost-effectively. Moreover, we observed a growing interest in open science practices in Kenya through literature search and data mining and that lack of awareness and skills may still hinder the adoption and practice of open science. Furthermore, at the time of the analyses, we surprisingly found that out of the 20,069 papers downloaded from BioRXiv, only 18 had Kenyan authors, a majority of which are international (16) collaborations. This may suggest poor uptake of the use of preprints among Kenyan researchers. The findings in this study highlight the state of open science in Kenya and challenges facing its adoption and practice while bringing forth possible areas for primary consideration in the campaign toward open science. It also proposes a model (sensitize-train-hack-collaborate model) that may be adopted by researchers, funders and other proponents of open science to address some of the challenges faced in promoting its adoption in Kenya.