Impact of fee increases on dental utilization rates for children living in Connecticut and enrolled in Medicaid.

BACKGROUND: In 2008, Connecticut's Medicaid program administration increased children's dental fees to match approximately the 70th percentile of what the market fees were for dental care in 2005. These Medicaid program changes occurred at the same time as a national economic recession, which took place from 2007 through 2009. METHODS: The authors obtained Medicaid eligibility, claims, and provider data before and after the fee increase, in 2006 and 2009 through 2012, respectively. Their analysis examined changes in utilization rates, service mix, expenditures, and dentists' participation. The authors qualitatively assessed the general impact of the recession on utilization rate changes. RESULTS: The Medicaid fee increase, program improvements, and the recession resulted in a dramatic increase in utilization rates. For children continuously enrolled in Medicaid, utilization rates increased from 45.9% in 2006 to 71.6% in 2012. Rates increased across sex, race, ethnicity, and geographic areas. These increased utilization rates eliminated the disparities in access to dental services between children with private insurance and children receiving Medicaid benefits. Children enrolled in Medicaid now have utilization rates that are similar to or higher than privately insured children. Expenditures increased $62 million; this represents less than 1% of 2012 State Medicaid expenditures. Dentist participation increased by 72%. These results suggest that dentists will participate in the Medicaid program if adequately compensated, and low-income families will seek dental services. CONCLUSION: The Medicaid fee increase, program improvements, and the recession had a dramatic impact on reducing disparities in children's access to dental care in Connecticut. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: One solution to the substantial disparities in access to dental care is to increase Medicaid fees to competitive levels.

Impact of dental therapists on productivity and finances: I. Literature review.

This study examined the financial impact of dental therapists on Federally Qualified Health Center dental clinics (treating children) and on private general dental practices (treating children and adults). This article, the first of four on this subject, reviews the dental therapy literature and the dental access problem for low-income children. Dental therapists now practice in many developed countries, tribal areas of Alaska, and Minnesota. These allied dental professionals vary in their training and required dentist supervision, but all provide routine restorative and other related services to children and adults. The limited literature on the impact of dental therapists suggests that they work mainly in school and community clinics and some private practices, are well accepted by patients, provide restorations that are comparable in quality to those of dentists, expand the supply of services, do not increase private practices' net revenues, and in school programs decrease the number of untreated decayed teeth. Of the approximately 33.8 million children enrolled in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), some 40 percent now receive at least one annual dental visit. To increase utilization for all children to 60 percent--the rate seen in children from upper-income families--another 6.7 million children need to receive care; dental therapists may help to accomplish that objective.

Impact of dental therapists on productivity and finances: II. Federally Qualified Health Centers.

This article estimates the impact of dental therapists treating children on Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) dental clinic finances and productivity. The analysis is based on twelve months of patient visit and financial data from large FQHC dental clinics (multiple delivery sites) in Connecticut and Wisconsin. Assuming dental therapists provide restorative, extraction, and pulpal services and dental hygienists continue to deliver all hygiene services, the maximum reduction in costs is about 6 percent. The limited impact of dental therapists on FQHC dental clinic finances is because 1) dental therapists only account for 17 percent of children services and 2) dentists are responsible for only 25 percent of clinic expenses and cost reductions are related to the difference between dental therapist and dentist wage rates.

Impact of dental therapists on productivity and finances: III. FQHC-run, school-based dental care programs in Connecticut.

In many developed countries, the primary role of dental therapists is to care for children in school clinics. This article describes Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC)-run, school-based dental programs in Connecticut and explores the theoretical financial impact of substituting dental therapists for dentists in these programs. In schools, dental hygienists screen children and provide preventive services, using portable equipment and temporary space. Children needing dentist services are referred to FQHC clinics or to FQHC-employed dentists who provide care in schools. The primary findings of this study are that school-based programs have considerable potential to reduce access disparities and the estimated reduction in per patient costs approaches 50 percent versus providing care in FQHC dental clinics. In terms of substituting dental therapists for dentists, the estimated additional financial savings was found to be about 5 percent. Nationally, FQHC-operated, school-based dental programs have the potential to increase Medicaid/CHIP utilization from the current 40 percent to 60 percent for a relatively modest increase in total expenditures.