A Meta-Regression Analysis of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials comparing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation to medical therapy in patients with heart failure (HF) reported improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), quality of life using the Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire (MLWHFQ), and 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Nonetheless, there was significant heterogeneity not accounted for suggesting that not all HF patients derive the same effect from AF ablation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if baseline LVEF or the etiology of the cardiomyopathy would moderate the efficacy of AF ablation. METHODS: We performed random effects meta-regression using the mean baseline LVEF and total percentage of patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP) in the placebo arms as moderator variables. RESULTS: Six trials with a total of 687 patients were included. The baseline LVEF in the control arm of trials ranged from 25% - 42.9%, and the percentage of patients with NICMP within each trial varied from 35% to 100%. When baseline LVEF was used as the moderator variable, no significant change in heterogeneity was observed for any of the outcomes of interest (R2 0.00 - 0.02). However, when controlling for NICMP, heterogeneity dropped substantially for the outcomes of LVEF (I2 44.7%, R2 0.91), and MLWHFQ (I2 0.00%, R2 1.00) but not 6MWT (I2 67.4%, R2 0.00). This indicates that improvement in LVEF and MLWHFQ was greater in the AF ablation group when more patients with NICMP were included in the trials. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with systolic HF, AF ablation may be more beneficial in patients with NICMP.

Cardiac automaticity: basic concepts and clinical observations.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this report was to review the basic mechanisms underlying cardiac automaticity. Second, we describe our clinical observations related to the anatomical and functional characteristics of sinus automaticity. METHODS: We first reviewed the main discoveries regarding the mechanisms responsible for cardiac automaticity. We then analyzed our clinical experience regarding the location of sinus automaticity in two unique populations: those with inappropriate sinus tachycardia and those with a dominant pacemaker located outside the crista terminalis region. RESULTS: We studied 26 patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia (age 34 ± 8 years; 21 females). Non-contact endocardial mapping (Ensite 3000, Endocardial Solutions) was performed in 19 patients and high-density contact mapping (Carto-3, Biosense Webster with PentaRay catheter) in 7 patients. The site of earliest atrial activation shifted after each RF application within and outside the crista terminalis region, indicating a wide distribution of atrial pacemaker sites. We also analyzed 11 patients with dominant pacemakers located outside the crista terminalis (age 27 ± 7 years; five females). In all patients, the rhythm was the dominant pacemaker both at rest and during exercise and located in the right atrial appendage in 6 patients, in the left atrial appendage in 4 patients, and in the mitral annulus in 1 patient. Following ablation, earliest atrial activation shifted to the region of the crista terminalis at a slower rate. CONCLUSIONS: Membrane and sub-membrane mechanisms interact to generate cardiac automaticity. The present observations in patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia and dominant pacemakers are consistent with a wide distribution of pacemaker sites within and outside the boundaries of the crista terminalis.

Surface 12 lead electrocardiogram recordings using smart phone technology.

IMPORTANCE: AliveCor ECG is an FDA approved ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitor that records a single channel (lead I) ECG rhythm strip using an iPhone. In the past few years, the use of smartphones and tablets with health related applications has significantly proliferated. OBJECTIVE: In this initial feasibility trial, we attempted to reproduce the 12 lead ECG using the bipolar arrangement of the AliveCor monitor coupled to smart phone technology. METHODS: We used the AliveCor heart monitor coupled with an iPhone cellular phone and the AliveECG application (APP) in 5 individuals. RESULTS: In our 5 individuals, recordings from both a standard 12 lead ECG and the AliveCor generated 12 lead ECG had the same interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of creating a 12 lead ECG with a smart phone. The validity of the recordings would seem to suggest that this technology could become an important useful tool for clinical use. This new hand held smart phone 12 lead ECG recorder needs further development and validation.

An atypical case of vagally mediated atrial fibrillation in an elderly woman: electrocardiographic caveats to diagnosis.

Vagally mediated paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is typically described to occur in otherwise healthy young-to-middle aged males during periods of high vagal tone. We report a case of cardioinhibitory type neurocardiogenic syncope associated with atrial fibrillation in an elderly female during episodes of nausea. This was replicated during tilt-table testing. The atrial fibrillation was part of a unique snap shot of the entire electrophysiological spectrum of the vagal response captured in detail in this index patient.

Applying the diamond criteria could improve utilization of stress echocardiography for patients who present to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain.

We identified all patients with age 21 years and older, without a history of obstructive coronary artery disease, who presented to the emergency department with chest pain, and were admitted for cardiac observation followed by stress echocardiography during a 1-year period. The positive predictive value of stress echocardiography and cardiovascular outcomes were compared based on patients' Diamond chest pain classification. In patients with typical chest pain, who accounted for 8.7% (44/503) of the total cohort, the positive predictive value of stress echocardiography was 75% compared with 0% for all other subgroups (P = 0.007). Six patients (14%) with typical chest pain went on to have coronary revascularization compared with 0% for all other subgroups (P < 0.001). No patient in any subgroup died or was readmitted with a myocardial infarction in 30 days. Applying the Diamond criteria could improve utilization of stress echocardiography for patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: evaluation of ventricular dysynchrony and patient selection.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment modality for systolic heart failure. Aimed to produce simultaneous biventricular stimulation and correct the lack of ventricular synchrony in selected patients with congestive heart failure, CRT has shown to improve mortality and reduce hospital admissions when compared to medical treatment. At present, the indication criteria for the implantation of a CRT device include an ejection fraction of less than 35%, heart failure symptoms consistent with NYHA functional class III-IV and a QRS complex duration equal or longer than 120 milliseconds. It has been reported that 30% of patients who meet those criteria still may not derive clinical benefit from CRT. Due to the existing diversity of imagin modalities and resources for their process and analysis, a great expectation in terms of more accurate diagnosis of ventricular dyssynchrony has been raised. Reilable identification of dyssynchrony could allow us to better predict the favorable response of an individual patient to CRT and therefore offer this procedure to those individuals most likely to benefit. We review the available techniques for the study of ventricular dyssynchrony for CRT patient selection and the results of its application in clinical trials. Despite tremendous progress in the imaging technology available for the assessment and diagnosis of ventricular dyssynchrony, an ideal method has not been identified and the duration of QRS complex in the surface ECG remains the accepted criteria of dyssynchrony in the selection of patients for CRT.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: evaluation of ventricular dysynchrony and patient selection / Terapia de resincronización cardiaca: evaluación de la disincronía ventricular y selección de pacientes

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment modality for systolic heart failure. Aimed to produce simultaneous biventricular stimulation and correct the lack of ventricular synchrony in selected patients with congestive heart failure, CRT has shown to improve mortality and reduce hospital admissions when compared to medical treatment. At present, the indication criteria for the implantation of a CRT device include an ejection fraction of less than 35%, heart failure symptoms consistent with NYHA functional class III-IV and a QRS complex duration equal or longer than 120 milliseconds. It has been reported that 30% of patients who meet those criteria still may not derive clinical benefit from CRT. Due to the existing diversity of imaging modalities and resources for their process and analysis, a great expectation in terms of more accurate diagnosis of ventricular dyssynchrony has been raised. Reliable identification of dyssynchrony could allow us to better predict the favorable response of an individual patient to CRT and therefore offer this procedure to those individuals most likely to benefit. We review the available techniques for the study of ventricular dyssynchrony for CRT patient selection and the results of its application in clinical trials. Despite tremendous progress in the imaging technology available for the assessment and diagnosis of ventricular dyssynchrony, an ideal method has not been identified and the duration of the QRS complex in the surface ECG remains the accepted criteria of dyssynchrony in the selection of patients for CRT.

La terapia de resincronización cardiaca es una modalidad de tratamiento bien establecida para la insuficiencia sistólica cardiaca. Dirigida a producir una estimulación biventricular simultánea y a corregir la falta de sincronía ventricular en pacientes seleccionados con insuficiencia cardiaca congestiva, la terapia de resincronización cardiaca ha mostrado ser capaz de mejorar los índices de mortalidad y reducir las admisiones hospitalarias cuando se compara con el tratamiento médico. Actualmente, los criterios para la implantación de un dispositivo de terapia de resincronización cardiaca incluyen una fracción de eyección menor a 35%, síntomas de insuficiencia cardiaca consistentes con la clase funcional NYHA III-IV, y una duración del complejo QRS igual o mayor de 120 milisegundos. Se ha reportado que 30% de los pacientes que cumplen con estos criterios pueden inclusive no obtener beneficio clínico de la terapia de resincronización cardiaca. Debido a la diversidad existente de los estudios de imagenología y de los recursos para su proceso y análisis, ha surgido una gran expectativa en términos de un diagnóstico más exacto de la asincronía ventricular. La identificación confiable de la asincronía nos podría permitir predecir mejor la respuesta favorable de un paciente en particular a la terapia de resincronización cardiaca y así ofrecer este procedimiento a aquellos pacientes con mayores probabilidades de beneficiarse de dicha terapia. Hacemos una revisión de las técnicas disponibles para el estudio de la asincronía ventricular para la selección de pacientes para esta terapia y los resultados de su aplicación en pruebas clínicas. A pesar de los grandes progresos alcanzados en la tecnología de imágenes disponibles para la evaluación y diagnóstico de la asincronía ventricular, no se ha identificado un método ideal y la duración del complejo QRS en el ECG de superficie sigue siendo el criterio aceptado de asincronía en la selección de pacientes para terapia de resincronización cardiaca.

Antiadrenergic therapy in the control of atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure develops commonly in older individuals and its prevalence increases as heart failure severity progresses. Because of deteriorating hemodynamics, patients with heart failure are at increased risk for developing AF and, conversely, AF in heart failure patients is associated with adverse hemodynamic changes. AF is believed to increase the mortality risk in heart failure, which may be minimized by treatment that includes the control of ventricular rate, prevention of thrombotic events, and conversion to normal sinus rhythm. Clinical guidelines recommend amiodarone or dofetilide in heart failure patients, but these drugs have certain drawbacks, such as an increased risk for bradyarrhythmias with amiodarone and proarrhythmic reaction with dofetilide. Some but not all clinical trials have suggested that rate control should be the primary therapeutic goal in high-risk heart failure patients with AF and, if unsuccessful, followed by rhythm control. The former is effectively achieved with rate-lowering beta-blockers alone or in combination with digoxin. Recent studies evaluating the effects of combination carvedilol/digoxin therapy demonstrate synergistic effects between the two drugs. This combination therapy decreased heart failure symptoms, effectively reduced ventricular rate, and improved ventricular function to a greater extent compared with that produced by either drug alone. Although digoxin alone is an effective heart failure treatment, its use as a single rate-control therapy is often ineffective in heart failure patients with AF associated with rapid ventricular response. Carvedilol is effective, alone or in combination, with digoxin in such heart failure patients with AF, and has been shown to reduce mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure during prolonged therapy.