Trocar vs. Seldinger small bore pleural drains: does the technique influence the outcomes? A prospective single-centre study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare two positioning techniques of 12-French (Fr) thoracic drains in terms of efficacy, safety, and patient comfort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, non-randomized, competitive, non-inferiority study comparing the Seldinger vs. Trocar technique. The primary endpoint was an analysis of the factors that led to unsuccessful drainage positioning. Between the two groups, clinical variables, procedure times, pain, and complications were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled in group 1 (Seldinger) and 45 in group 2 (Trocar). The mean procedural time was 7.93±3.02 min vs. 7.09±3.67 min, respectively (p: 0.33). The mean VAS for procedural pain was 2.22±1.47 vs. 2.80±1.88, p: 0.07, and the mean at day 2 was 3.6±1.2 in the SBWGD group vs. 2.7±1.1 in the Unico Group (p: 0.04). There was no difference in terms of complications, residual effusion, and pneumothorax at the first post-procedural chest X-ray. Four days after the procedure, the drain removal rate was 11.6% in group 1 vs. 25% in group 2 p: 0.063). The chest tube was removed after a mean period of 8.87±7.20 days after resolution of pleural effusion or tube dislodgement (7 cases in group 1 vs. 11 in group 2, p: 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: The two techniques resulted in comparable pain and complication rates. Both drains are well-tolerated and efficient at draining pleural effusion, with very low rates of complications and failure. We recommend inserting a longer tube for patients who require chest drainage for an extended period of time.

[Clinical effect of bovine pericardial strips on air leak after stapled pulmonary resection in "frail" patients: early results]. / Impiego clinico di suturatrici rivestite con pericadio bovino nella prevenzione delle perdite aeree postoperatorie in pazienti "fragili" sottoposti a resezione polmonare.

AIM: Postoperative air leaks and in particular persistent air leaks (>5 days) after pulmonary resection still represent a common complication and the first cause of hospital stay delay. Aim of this experimental trial was to investigate the efficacy of the use of bovine pericardium strips (in terms of reduction of postoperative leakage and hospital stay) in "critical" patients (COPD, emphysema etc.) who underwent pulmonary resection. METHODS: From October 2010 to February 2011, eight patients (experimental group, Group A) were preoperative selected and underwent pulmonary resection with bovine pericardium strips (Peri-Strips Dry; Synovis ). The inclusion criteria of a "frail patient" were established by a dedicate pneumologist according with clinical and functional data (predicted postoperative FEV1 ranging from 35% and 80% of the theorical predicted value). For comparison, from January 2010 to September 2010, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 28 patients who satisfied the same inclusion criteria and underwent pulmonary resection with standard surgical procedures. This group of patients represents our control group (Group B). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender, preoperative risk factors for developing a postoperative air leak, preop FEV1 and type of resection. No technical deficiencies in the use of bovine pericardium strips were observed in Group A. Postoperative leakage was significant different in the two groups being persistent air leak detected in 0% in Group A versus 17.8% of Group B (P=0.046). Consequently, chest tube duration (6.75±0.84 days [Group A] vs. 9.70±1.26 days (Group B), P=0.019) and hospital stay (10.13±0.83 days [Group A] vs. 12.95±1.37 days [Group B], P=0.013) were lower in the experimental group. CONCLUSION: Bovine pericardium strips are safe and easy-to-do technique to reduce postoperative air leaks after pulmonary resection in "critical" patients.