Multicenter clinical evaluation of alinity m HBV assay performance.

BACKGROUND: Accurate molecular methods to detect and quantify hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA are essential to diagnose chronic infections, guide treatment decisions, assess response to treatment, and determine risk of HBV-related complications. New generations of real-time HBV DNA assay platforms provide results in less than 2-3 h, with continuous loading of specimens and true random-access capability. OBJECTIVES: We examined the clinical performance of the new Alinity m HBV assay, run on the fully automated, continuous, random-access Alinity m platform, to accurately detect and quantify HBV DNA in a large series of patient samples infected with different HBV genotypes frequently encountered in clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: This international, multisite study assessed the precision and reproducibility of the Alinity m HBV assay and compared its performance to four HBV assays currently in clinical use. RESULTS: The Alinity m HBV assay demonstrated linear quantitation of HBV DNA in plasma samples, with high precision (coefficient of variation 4.1 %-8.8 %) and reproducibility. The Alinity m HBV assay showed excellent correlation (correlation coefficients ≥0.947) with comparator HBV assays, with an overall observed bias ranging from -0.07 to 0.17 Log10 IU/mL. 97 % of quantifiable patient results were <1 Log10 IU/mL different than the respective comparator assays, with comparable results across HBV genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed real-time PCR-based Alinity m HBV assay is sensitive, reproducible, and accurately quantifies HBV DNA levels from HBsAg-positive patients across the full dynamic range of quantification.

Multicenter clinical evaluation of alinity m HCV assay performance.

BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid testing is essential for the detection and quantification of HCV RNA in the diagnosis of HCV infection and treatment monitoring. The Alinity m HCV assay was recently developed by Abbott Molecular for rapid detection and quantification of HCV RNA on the fully automated, continuous, random-access Alinity m analyzer. OBJECTIVES: Our study assessed the performance of the new Alinity m HCV assay for detection and quantification of HCV RNA in a large series of patient samples of various genotypes. This international, multicentric study evaluated the linearity, precision, and reproducibility of the Alinity m HCV assay and its performance in comparison to three other HCV assays currently used in clinical practice. RESULTS: The Alinity m HCV assay demonstrated high linearity (correlation coefficient r = 1.00), precision (coefficients of variation [CV] 6.6-13.5 %) and reproducibility (CV 1.7-4.3 % across three control lots). At a concentration near the lower limit of detection, the Alinity m HCV assay exhibited >98 % detectability. The Alinity m HCV assay showed excellent correlation with comparator HCV assays in serum (n = 406) and plasma (n = 1401) samples (correlation coefficients ≥0.96, bias 0.01 to 0.14 Log10 IU/mL). More than 95 % of the quantified results with the Alinity m HCV assay were less than mean bias ± 1.96 SD different from those of the comparator assays. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed Alinity m HCV assay is sensitive, reproducible, and accurately quantifies HCV RNA levels in serum and plasma samples from patients with chronic HCV infection, with no impact of HCV genotype on assay performance.

Multicenter clinical comparative evaluation of Alinity m HIV-1 assay performance.

BACKGROUND: Accurate, rapid detection of HIV-1 RNA is critical for early diagnosis, treatment decision making, and long-term management of HIV-1 infection. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Alinity m HIV-1 assay, which uses a dual target/dual probe design against highly conserved target regions of the HIV-1 genome and is run on the fully automated Alinity m platform. STUDY DESIGN: This was an international, multisite study that compared the diagnostic performance of the Alinity m HIV-1 assay to four commercially available HIV-1 assays routinely used in nine independent clinical laboratories. Alinity m HIV-1 assay precision, detectability, and reproducibility was compared across four study sites. RESULTS: The Alinity m HIV-1 assay produced comparable results to currently available HIV-1 assays (correlation coefficient >0.995), with an overall bias of -0.1 to 0.10 Log10 copies/mL. The Alinity m HIV-1 assay and its predecessor m2000 HIV-1 assay demonstrated comparable detection of 16 different HIV-1 subtypes (R2 = 0.956). A high level of agreement (>88 %) between all HIV-1 assays was seen near clinical decision points of 1.7 Log10 copies/mL (50 copies/mL) and 2.0 Log10 copies/mL (200 copies/mL). Alinity m HIV-1 assay precision was 0.08 and 0.21 Log10 copies/mL at VLs of 1000 and 50 copies/mL, respectively, with a high level of detectability (≥97 % hit rate) and reproducibility across sites. CONCLUSIONS: The Alinity m HIV-1 assay provides comparable diagnostic accuracy to current HIV-1 assays, and when run on the Alinity m system, has the capacity to shorten the time between diagnosis and treatment.

Multicenter Evaluation of Two Next-Generation HIV-1 Quantitation Assays, Aptima Quant Dx and Cobas 6800, in Comparison to the RealTime HIV-1 Reference Assay.

High accuracy and precision at the lower end of quantification are crucial requirements of a modern HIV viral load (VL) assay, since some clinically relevant thresholds are located at 50 and 200 copies/ml. In this study, we compared the performance of two new fully automated HIV-1 VL assays, Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx and Cobas HIV-1 (Cobas 6800), with the established RealTime m2000 assay. Assay precision and accuracy were evaluated in a retrospective evaluation out of excess plasma material from four HIV-1+ individuals (subtypes B, C, CRF01_AE, and CRF02_AG). Native plasma samples were diluted to nominal concentrations at 50 and 200 copies/ml (according to the RealTime m2000 assay). All dilutions were tested in triplicate in five independent runs over 5 days and in three labs per system. Assay concordance was determined using 1,011 surplus clinical routine samples, as well as selected retrospective longitudinal samples from 7 patients on treatment. The three assays yielded highly concordant results for individual clinical samples (R2 > 0.98; average difference, ≤0.2 log copies/ml) and retrospective longitudinal samples from patients on treatment. The Aptima and RealTime assays showed similar high precision, meeting the 5σ criterion for the majority of samples across all labs and subtypes. The Cobas assay was less precise, missing the 5σ criterion for the majority of samples at low concentrations. In this analysis, results from the Cobas assay appeared less reliable near the clinically relevant cutoff and should be interpreted with more caution in this context. Due to high precision, full automation, and high concordance with the RealTime assay, the Aptima assay represents a good alternative in routine VL monitoring.

Comparison of HIV-1 viral load assay performance in immunological stable patients with low or undetectable viremia.

The goal of antiretroviral therapy is reduction in morbidity and mortality via suppression of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral load (VL) to undetectable levels. VL assay sensitivity has improved over time, but the reproducibility and clinical importance of VL results marginally higher than the limit of detection (LoD) are uncertain. We assessed the reproducibility and concordance of low VL results obtained with the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 version 2.0 (CAP-CTM) and the Abbott RealTime (m2000) HIV-1 assays, using longitudinal specimens from HIV-1-infected patients with low VL (<300 copies/ml) and stable CD4+ cell counts. Based on replicate testing of 3 specimens, coefficients of variation for log-transformed VL results were 5-8 % for m2000 and 9-10 % for CAP-CTM. The concordance between assays in specimens from patients with previously undetectable, detectable but not quantifiable VL, or variable (undetectable/detectable but not quantifiable VL) results over time was 90, 56, and 56 %, respectively. Correlation between results for specimens with quantifiable VL (initially 40-300 copies/ml) was moderate (R (2) = 0.48) with significantly higher results for CAP-CTM and a mean difference (CAP-CTM minus m2000) of 0.10 log(10) copies/ml. T-cell activation (CD8+/CD38+ percentage) in patients with low VL was initially higher than in patients with undetectable VL, and then decreased to equivalent levels over time. These results indicate that residual viremia at levels slightly above the LoD have no negative effect on T-cell activation.

The L76V mutation in HIV-1 protease is potentially associated with hypersusceptibility to protease inhibitors Atazanavir and Saquinavir: is there a clinical advantage?

BACKGROUND: Although being considered as a rarely observed HIV-1 protease mutation in clinical isolates, the L76V-prevalence increased 1998-2008 in some European countries most likely due to the approval of Lopinavir, Amprenavir and Darunavir which can select L76V. Beside an enhancement of resistance, L76V is also discussed to confer hypersusceptibility to the drugs Atazanavir and Saquinavir which might enable new treatment strategies by trying to take advantage of particular mutations. RESULTS: Based on a cohort of 47 L76V-positive patients, we examined if there might exist a clinical advantage for L76V-positive patients concerning long-term success of PI-containing regimens in patients with limited therapy options.Genotypic- and phenotypic HIV-resistance tests from 47 mostly multi-resistant, L76V-positive patients throughout Germany were accomplished retrospectively 1999-2009. Five genotype-based drug-susceptibility predictions received from online interpretation-tools for Atazanavir, Saquinavir, Amprenavir and Lopinavir, were compared to phenotype-based predictions that were determined by using a recombinant virus assay along with a Virtual Phenotype™(Virco). The clinical outcome of the L76V-adapted follow-up therapy was determined by monitoring viral load for 96 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, the mostly used interpretation systems overestimated the L76V-mutation concerning Atazanavir- and SQV resistance. In fact, a clear benefit in drug susceptibility for these drugs was observed in phenotype analysis after establishment of L76V. More importantly, long-term therapy success was significantly higher in patients receiving Atazanavir and/or Saquinavir plus one L76V-selecting drug compared to patients without L76V-selecting agents (p = 0.002).In case of L76V-occurrence ATV and/or SQV may represent encouraging options for patients in deep salvage situations.

Novel inhibitors for murine and human leukemia inhibitory factor based on fused soluble receptors.

Fusion proteins of the extracellular parts of cytokine receptors, also known as cytokine traps, turned out to be promising cytokine inhibitors useful in anti-cytokine therapies. Here we present newly designed cytokine traps for murine and human leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) as prototypes for inhibitors targeting cytokines that signal through a heterodimer of two signaling receptors of the glycoprotein 130 (gp130) family. LIF signals through a receptor heterodimer of LIF receptor (LIFR) and gp130 and induces the tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 leading to target gene expression. The analysis of various receptor fusion and deletion constructs revealed that a truncated form of the murine LIF receptor consisting of the first five extracellular domains was a potent inhibitor for human LIF. For the efficient inhibition of murine LIF, the cytokine-binding module of murine gp130 had to be fused to the first five domains of murine LIFR generating mLIF-RFP (murine LIFR fusion protein). The tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 and subsequent gene induction induced by human or murine LIF are completely blocked by the respective inhibitor. Furthermore, both inhibitors are specific and do not alter the bioactivities of the closely related cytokines interleukin (IL)-6 and oncostatin M. The gained knowledge on the construction of LIF inhibitors can be transferred to the design of inhibitors for related cytokines such as IL-31, IL-27, and oncostatin M for the treatment of inflammatory and malignant diseases.