Role of the gel spacer in safely delivering whole pelvic radiation therapy without central shielding in computed tomography-based image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To protect the rectum and bladder from high dose exposure, the Japanese guidelines for managing uterine cervical carcinoma recommend pelvic irradiation with central shielding (CS). Conversely, the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines recommend delivering ≥85 Gy to high-risk clinical target volume D90 (CTVHR D90%). In this study, we investigated whether a gel spacer can enable the safe delivery of the ESTRO/ABS-recommended doses to the target while observing dose constraints for the OARs without using CS in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who received definitive radiation therapy without CS and were treated by brachytherapy with a gel spacer between 2017 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The cumulative doses of EBRT and brachytherapy treatment outcomes and incidence of adverse events were also examined. RESULTS: The median cumulative CTVHR D90%, rectum D2cm3, and bladder D2cm3 were 86.6 Gy, 62.9 Gy, and 72.0 Gy, respectively. The 2-year local control rate was 95%. There were no CTCAE ≥Grade 3 late gastrointestinal or genitourinary adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The use of gel spacer can enable ESTRO/ABS-recommended dose constraints even without using CS in EBRT, with favorable outcomes and low adverse event rates.

Reirradiation for recurrent gynecologic cancer using high-dose-rate brachytherapy in Japan: A multicenter survey on practice patterns and outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to examine the present status of reirradiation with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancer in Japan and to determine the role of this therapy in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter chart review was performed for reirradiation for gynecologic cancer using HDR brachytherapy. Each center provided information on patient characteristics, treatment outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: The study included 165 patients treated at 9 facilities from 2000 to 2018. The analysis of outcomes included 142 patients treated with curative intent. The median follow-up time for survivors was 30 months (range 1-130 months). The 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) rates were 53 % (95 %CI: 42-63 %), 44 % (35-53 %), and 61 % (50-70 %) for cervical cancer; 100 % (NA), 64 % (30-85 %), and 70 % (32-89 %) for endometrial cancer; and 54 % (13-83 %), 38 % (6-72 %), and 43 % (6-78 %) for vulvar and vaginal cancer, respectively. In multivariate analysis, interval to reirradiation (<1 year) was a significant risk factor for OS, PFS and LC; Gross Tumor Volume (≥25 cm3) was a significant risk factor for OS. Toxicities were analyzed in all enrolled patients (n = 165). Grade ≥ 3 late toxicities occurred in 49 patients (30 %). A higher cumulative EQD2 (α/ß = 3) was significantly associated with severe complications. CONCLUSION: Reirradiation with HDR brachytherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancer is effective, especially in cases with a long interval before reirradiation.

Gynecological technical notes for appropriate spacer injections.

BACKGROUND: Despite its efficacy, if adherence to dose constraints for surrounding normal tissues proves unattainable, the risk of late radiation-related adverse events after primary radiotherapy involving brachytherapy remains a noteworthy concern. Some studies suggest that similar to prostate radiotherapy, spacers may potentially reduce doses to surrounding healthy rectal or bladder tissues. However, guidance on spacer injections for gynecologic brachytherapy is scarce, and the optimal anatomical location for spacer placement remains undefined. We discuss maximizing the effects of spacers from an anatomical perspective. FINDINGS: As vesicovaginal and rectovaginal septa form part of the endopelvic fascia and are not uniform tissues, spacer injection resistance varies. In pelvic organ prolapse surgery, saline is injected into the anterior and posterior vaginal walls as a spacer, and the vagina, vesicovaginal septum, and bladder can be fluidly dissected. Relatively firm vesicovaginal septum tissue is used as a reconstructive organ, whereas rectovaginal septum tissue is less dense. Cervical cancer is invasive, involving surrounding fascia and ligaments. Ideally, the vesicovaginal and rectovaginal septa should be resected in radical hysterectomy. Here, spacer adaptation and the technical details of injection are described. When using ultrasound guidance for spacer injection, the target site should be adequately magnified, and the spacer ideally injected into the incision layer during radical hysterectomy. Finally, posthysterectomy, the intestinal tract may adhere to the vaginal cuffs. Therefore, artificial ascites may be useful; however, the spread depends on perioperative manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical and surgical viewpoints are advantageous for safe, therapeutic, and replicable spacer injection administration.

Acral cutaneous malignant melanoma treated with linear accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy system: a case report of first patient.

This study reports the first patient treatment for cutaneous malignant melanoma using a linear accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) system. A single-center open-label phase I clinical trial had been conducted using the system since November 2019. A patient with a localized node-negative acral malignant melanoma and the largest diameter of the tumor ≤ 15 cm who refused primary surgery and chemotherapy was enrolled. After administering boronophenylalanine (BPA), a single treatment of BNCT with the maximum dose of 18 Gy-Eq delivered to the skin was performed. The safety and efficacy of the accelerator-based BNCT system for treating localized cutaneous malignant melanoma were evaluated. The first patient with cutaneous malignant melanoma in situ on the second finger of the left hand did not develop dose-limiting toxicity in the clinical trial. After BNCT, the treatment efficacy was gradually observed, and the patient achieved PR within 6 months and CR within 12 months. Moreover, during the follow-up period of 12 months after BNCT, the patient did not exhibit a recurrence without any treatment-related grade 2 or higher adverse events. Although grade 1 adverse events of dermatitis, dry skin, skin hyperpigmentation, edema, nausea, and aching pain were noted in the patient, those adverse events were relieved without any treatment. This case report shows that the accelerator-based BNCT may become a promising treatment modality for cutaneous malignant melanoma. We expect further clinical trials to reveal the efficacy and safety of the accelerator-based BNCT for cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Assessment of intrafractional motion of the cervix-uterus by MR-guided radiotherapy system†.

The uterus is known as one of the moving organs. We evaluated the movement of the uterus during irradiation and the effects of changes in the surrounding organs using a magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy system. Seven patients with cervical cancer underwent pre- and posttreatment MR imaging to assess changes in the positioning of the uterus and cervix as well as the alterations in bladder and rectal volume. The study revealed that the movements of the uterus were greater than that of the cervix and showed a tendency to correlate with the bladder rather than the rectum. We also examined whether intrafractional motion could lead to insufficient dose coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV), specifically focusing on the D98% of the CTV in the uterine body and cervix. The impact of intrafractional motion on the D98% varied among patients, with one out of the seven patients experiencing an average dosimetric change of -2.6 Gy in the uterus, although larger planning target volume margins of 1.5 cm were applied, therefore, indicating the need for individualized optimal margins in each case. Online adaptive radiotherapy offers the advantage of modifying the treatment plan when irradiating moving organs, such as the uterus. However, it should be noted that this approach may result in longer overall treatment times compared with the traditional methods. Therefore, we must carefully consider the influence of intrafractional organ motions when opting for such a treatment.

Transferrin, insulin, and progesterone modulate intracellular concentrations of coenzyme Q and cholesterol, products of the mevalonate pathway, in undifferentiated PC12 cells.

Coenzyme Q (CoQ) is important not only as an essential lipid for the mitochondrial electron transport system, but also as an antioxidant. CoQ levels decrease during aging and in various diseases. Orally administered CoQ is not readily taken up in the brain, so it is necessary to develop a method to increase the amount of CoQ in neurons. CoQ is synthesized via mevalonate pathway, like cholesterol. Transferrin, insulin, and progesterone are factors used in the culture of neurons. In this study, we determined the effect of these reagents on cellular CoQ and cholesterol levels. The administration of transferrin, insulin, and progesterone increased cellular CoQ levels in undifferentiated PC12 cells. When serum was removed and only insulin was administered, intracellular CoQ levels increased. This increase was even more pronounced with concurrent administration of transferrin, insulin, and progesterone. Cholesterol level decreased by the administration of transferrin, insulin, and progesterone. Progesterone treatment lowered intracellular cholesterol levels in a concentration-dependent manner. Our findings suggest that transferrin, insulin, and progesterone may be useful in regulating CoQ levels and cholesterol levels, which are products of the mevalonate pathway.

Hydrogel spacer injection to the meso-sigmoid to protect the sigmoid colon in cervical cancer brachytherapy: A technical report.

Purpose: The use of a hydrogel spacer inserted into recto-vaginal fossa is a valuable strategy to mitigate radiation exposure to the rectum during radiation therapy for female pelvic malignancies. However, when the sigmoid colon is in proximity to the cervix, radiation exposure to the sigmoid colon cannot be adequately mitigated with a hydrogel spacer injected into the recto-vaginal fossa. Here, we presented a case, in which a hydrogel spacer was injected into the meso-sigmoid to protect the sigmoid colon. Material and methods: A 73-year-old female diagnosed with T3b stage IIIC2r uterine cervical cancer (FIGO 2018) underwent high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy consisting of 24 Gy in 4 fractions, following concurrent chemoradiotherapy with external beam radiation therapy of 50 Gy in 25 fractions of whole pelvic radiation therapy. In the initial brachytherapy, the sigmoid colon was in close contact with the uterine cervix. In the second brachytherapy, attempts to create a space between the sigmoid colon and uterine cervix using injected artificial ascites were unsuccessful due to rapid absorption of fluid. In the third and fourth brachytherapy fractions, 5 mL of hydrogel was injected into the meso-sigmoid through a pouch of Douglas under trans-rectal ultrasonography guidance. Dose ratio of sigmoid colon D2cc and high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D90 of each brachytherapy were evaluated. Results: Dose ratio of the sigmoid colon D2cc to HR-CTV D90 was 1.03, 0.43, 0.56, and 0.47 in each respective brachytherapy session, indicating dose escalation to HR-CTV whilst achieving acceptable sigmoid dose with hydrogel spacer injected into the meso-sigmoid. Conclusions: The dose ratio of the sigmoid colon to HR-CTV D90 was decreased by introducing a hydrogel spacer into the meso-sigmoid. In cases where the sigmoid colon is in proximity to the cervical tumor, this novel technique can be considered to achieve better clinical outcomes.