A randomised trial of topical polaprezinc to prevent oral mucositis in patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ToPaZ study).

PURPOSE: Oral mucositis (OM) is a common complication in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Polaprezinc, an anti-ulcer drug, has been shown to be effective to prevent OM in several studies when administered topically and systemically. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of topical polaprezinc in patients undergoing HSCT. METHODS: This was an open-label randomised clinical trial comparing polaprezinc and sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes for the prevention of severe OM in HSCT patients. Adult patients who received conditioning regimens at moderate to high risk of developing OM were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of severe (WHO grades 3-4) OM. The secondary endpoints included duration of grades 3-4 OM, incidence and duration of grades 2-4 OM, patient-reported pain and functional limitations. RESULTS: In total, 108 patients (55 test arm and 53 control arm) were randomised. There was no difference in the incidence of grades 3 to 4 OM (35% test arm versus 36% control arm). The secondary endpoints were not significantly different. In both arms, patients reported more throat pain compared to mouth pain. CONCLUSIONS: Topical polaprezinc had no effect in the prevention of OM in HSCT patients. Further research is required to evaluate the effects of systemic polaprezinc. The OM assessment tool needs to be reviewed as throat mucositis was a main issue in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12320001188921 (Date Registered: 10th November 2020).

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, acceptance and informational needs in an Australian cancer population: a cross-sectional survey.

Objective This study aimed to investigate COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, acceptance, and unmet informational needs in a cancer population during the first phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination rollout in Australia. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a large tertiary hospital in Queensland, Australia, between 10 May and 31 July 2021. The survey assessed health beliefs, experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and informational needs. Results COVID-19 was perceived to be a significant threat to both physical and mental health. While 57.9% (n = 110) of respondents believed the COVID-19 vaccines were safe and 64.2% (n = 122) believed they were effective, more than half (52.6%; n = 100) agreed that they worried about vaccine side effects. Most respondents (84.2%; n = 160) planned to receive the COVID-19 vaccine; however, feelings of hesitancy remained. There was a statistically significant association between those aged under 60 years (P = 0.003), those with previous vaccine hesitancy (P = 0.000), those who felt they had not received adequate information (P = 0.000) and vaccine hesitancy. Requested information pertained to interactions with cancer treatments, those with a history of blood clotting and information for those undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Conclusions There is a need for tailored COVID-19 vaccine communication that is responsive to the concerns of people with cancer. This will be beneficial during current and future vaccination rollouts.

The incidence of severe oral mucositis in patients undergoing different conditioning regimens in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

PURPOSE: Oral mucositis is a common complication during haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This study aimed to assess the incidence of severe mucositis in patients undergoing different HSCT regimens. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study reviewed daily oral assessment for 467 consecutive patients who underwent different transplant regimens for matched unrelated or related allogeneic HSCT with post-transplant methotrexate, haploidentical or mismatched HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), or autologous HSCT. Oral care and cryotherapy with melphalan were used. Patient demographic data, oral mucositis WHO grade, use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) were collected. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 oral mucositis was common in myeloablative total body irradiation (TBI)-based regimens cyclophosphamide/ TBI (CyTBI) (71%) and fludarabine/ TBI (FluTBI) with PTCy (46%), as well as reduced-intensity fludarabine/melphalan (FluMel) (43%) and carmustine/etoposide/cytarabine/melphalan (BEAM) autologous HSCT (41%). In contrast, grade 3-4 oral mucositis was less common in reduced-intensity haploidentical regimen melphalan/fludarabine/TBI with PTCy (19%), all non-myeloablative regimens (0-9%) and high-dose melphalan autologous HSCT (26%). TPN and PCA use were correlated to oral mucositis severity. CONCLUSIONS: Severe oral mucositis was associated with myeloablative TBI, methotrexate and melphalan in combination with methotrexate and in BEAM. Use of PTCy was preferable over methotrexate to prevent oral mucositis.

A real-world accuracy of oral mucositis grading in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

PURPOSE: Oral mucositis is a common complication in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Accurate oral mucositis grading is essential for both clinical practice and oral mucositis research. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of daily oral mucositis grading by nurses in a tertiary hospital in Australia. METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken to review the daily patient oral assessment record, including diet, pain, erythema, ulceration and the oral mucositis grade based on World Health Organization (WHO) oral mucositis grading scale. The accuracy of the grade was determined by the observations recorded, and reasons for inaccuracy were documented. Any repetition of the same error in the same patient was noted. RESULTS: In total, 6841 oral assessments in 373 patients, conducted between 2017 and 2020, were reviewed. A total of 70% (N = 4781) were graded correctly. Of these, 64% (N = 3043) were grade 0. When the grade 0 scores were excluded, the accuracy of grading was reduced to 46% (N = 1738). Common reasons for incorrect grading included: unable to grade due to diet not specified, no ulceration and no pain was scored grade 1, no ulceration was scored as grade 2-4, oral intake was not taken into account, and pain without ulcer was scored 0. A total of 77% of the errors were repeated in the same patient on consecutive days. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest there is frequent inaccurate evaluation of oral mucositis and a need for nurse training to accurately assess oral mucositis.

Implementation and evaluation of a nurse-allied health clinic for patients after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

PURPOSE: Patients who undergo haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) often have multiple health issues following hospital discharge. In many centres, outpatient follow-up is solely conducted by specialist physicians. We aimed to implement and describe the outcomes of a nurse-allied health multidisciplinary clinic. METHODS: The clinic consisted of six disciplines-nursing, pharmacy, dietetics, physiotherapy, occupational therapy and social work. All allogeneic and high risk autologous HSCT patients were reviewed at 2 weeks after discharge and on day 100 post HSCT, with additional reviews as needed. Occasions of service, interventions, readmission data and physician satisfaction survey were collected prior to and after implementation. Additionally, patient feedback and quality of life survey (FACT-BMT) were collected during the first 6 months. RESULTS: From July to December 2019, 57 patients were reviewed in the clinic (475 reviews, average 8.3 reviews per patient). Common interventions included the following: exercise programs by physiotherapist (n = 111), diet prescription (n = 103), counselling by social worker (n = 53), medication lists provision (n = 51), fatigue management (n = 43) and nurse education (n = 22). The clinic did not reduce patients' readmission rate; however, positive feedback from patients and physicians were reported. FACT-BMT results demonstrated that there are unmet needs, particularly fatigue management, sexual education and support, body images, back to work support and quality of life improvement. From discharge to day 100, there was no significant improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: This clinic provides an innovative approach to patient-centred care in HSCT. It has been well received by patients who were supported by multidisciplinary interventions.

Effect of plasmapheresis on ATG (Thymoglobulin) clearance prior to adoptive T cell transfer.

The effect of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) on the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is dependent on formulation, dose and exposure. However, ATG levels are not routinely measured and therapeutic levels are not well defined. In ex vivo T cell-deplete SCT, the potential effect of residual ATG has important implications on the timing of adoptive T cell transfer. Here we measured active rabbit ATG concentration using a flow cytometry-based method that can be implemented in any laboratory. Three adult patients received 6 mg/kg Thymoglobulin over 4 days, leading to peak plasma active ATG concentration of 20.8 ± 1.4 µg/mL, suggesting volume of distribution of 16-19 L. The half-life of active ATG was 6.1 ± 0.7 days and plasmapheresis at Day 25 ± 1 post-transplant reduced mean plasma concentration from 1.25 to 0.61 µg/mL. Total ATG and active ATG do not have a constant relationship because of differences in volumes of distribution and half-lives. Thymoglobulin can mediate antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) in vitro at concentrations as low as 0.03 µg/mL, with a log-linear relationship between ATG concentration and ADCC. Plasmapheresis can remove ATG but likely has modest biological impact when performed 4 weeks after 6 mg/kg ATG.

A randomized trial of olanzapine versus palonosetron versus infused ondansetron for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of olanzapine, palonosetron and ondansetron infusion (standard of care) for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHOD: It was a randomized open-label prospective study. Sixty-two patients were randomized to receive either ondansetron 32-mg infusion over 24 h, or olanzapine wafer 10 mg once daily in addition to ondansetron 8 mg IV three times a day or a single dose of palonosetron 0.25 mg IV instead of ondansetron. All groups were allowed rescue antiemetics. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of no emesis, no use of rescue medication, and nausea score reduction of ≥50 %. The secondary endpoint was nausea score reduction of ≥50 %. Both endpoints were measured at 24 and 48 h after initiation of the study treatment. Statistical analysis was conducted using a double-sided Fisher's exact test. RESULT: The primary endpoint was achieved in 6, 45, and 18 %, and 6, 64, and 18 % of ondansetron versus olanzapine versus palonosetron patient groups at 24 and 48 h, respectively. The secondary outcome was observed in 17, 60, and 62 %, and 35, 71, and 43 % of ondansetron versus olanzapine versus palonosetron patient groups at 24 and 48 h, respectively. Serious adverse drug reactions were not reported in any arms. Time to engraftment was not significantly different between the arms. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine was an effective treatment of breakthrough CINV. A single dose of palonosetron significantly reduced nausea up to 24 h.

Comparative Evaluation of the Predictive Performances of Three Different Structural Population Pharmacokinetic Models To Predict Future Voriconazole Concentrations.

Bayesian methods for voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) have been reported previously, but there are only sparse reports comparing the accuracy and precision of predictions of published models. Furthermore, the comparative accuracy of linear, mixed linear and nonlinear, or entirely nonlinear models may be of high clinical relevance. In this study, models were coded into individually designed optimum dosing strategies (ID-ODS) with voriconazole concentration data analyzed using inverse Bayesian modeling. The data used were from two independent data sets, patients with proven or suspected invasive fungal infections (n = 57) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (n = 10). Observed voriconazole concentrations were predicted whereby for each concentration value, the data available to that point were used to predict that value. The mean prediction error (ME) and mean squared prediction error (MSE) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to measure absolute bias and precision, while ΔME and ΔMSE and their 95% CI were used to measure relative bias and precision, respectively. A total of 519 voriconazole concentrations were analyzed using three models. MEs (95% CI) were 0.09 (-0.02, 0.22), 0.23 (0.04, 0.42), and 0.35 (0.16 to 0.54) while the MSEs (95% CI) were 2.1 (1.03, 3.17), 4.98 (0.90, 9.06), and 4.97 (-0.54 to 10.48) for the linear, mixed, and nonlinear models, respectively. In conclusion, while simulations with the linear model were found to be slightly more accurate and similarly precise, the small difference in accuracy is likely negligible from the clinical point of view, making all three approaches appropriate for use in a voriconazole TDM program.