Microbial lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation contributes to cognitive impairment and white matter lesion progression in diet-induced obese mice with chronic cerebral hypoperfusion.

AIMS: White matter lesions (WMLs) are involved in the pathological processes leading to cognitive decline and dementia. We examined the mechanisms underlying the exacerbation of ischemia-induced cognitive impairment and WMLs by diet-induced obesity, including lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-triggered neuroinflammation via toll-like receptor (TLR) 4. METHODS: Wild-type (WT) and TLR4-knockout (KO) C57BL/6 mice were fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or low-fat diet (LFD), and subjected to bilateral carotid artery stenosis (BCAS). Diet groups were compared for changes in gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, systemic inflammation, neuroinflammation, WML severity, and cognitive dysfunction. RESULTS: In WT mice, HFD induced obesity and increased cognitive impairment and WML severity compared with LFD-fed mice following BCAS. HFD caused gut dysbiosis and increased intestinal permeability, and plasma LPS and pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations. Furthermore, HFD-fed mice had higher LPS levels and higher neuroinflammatory status, including increased TLR4 expression, in WMLs. In TLR4-KO mice, HFD also caused obesity and gut dysbiosis but did not increase cognitive impairment or WML severity after BCAS. No difference was found between HFD- and LFD-fed KO mice for LPS levels or inflammatory status in either plasma or WMLs. CONCLUSION: Inflammation triggered by LPS-TLR4 signaling may mediate obesity-associated exacerbation of cognitive impairment and WMLs from brain ischemia.

Metabologenomic Approach Reveals Intestinal Environmental Features Associated with Barley-Induced Glucose Tolerance Improvements in Japanese: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

(1) Background: Consumption of barley has been known to exert beneficial effects on glucose tolerance; however, it has also been reported that there are inter-individual differences in these responses. Recent evidence has suggested that these individual differences are mediated by the gut microbiota. (2) Methods: In the present study, we aimed to understand the relationship between the intestinal environment, including intestinal microbiome and their metabolome, and glucose tolerance. A randomized controlled trial with a 4-week consumption of barley or control food was conducted. We conducted an integrated analysis of the intestinal microbiome and metabolome and analyzed the relationship with improvement of glucose tolerance. (3) Results: We found that metabolites such as azelate were significantly increased after barley consumption. Furthermore, the subjects whose glucose tolerance was slightly impaired showed improvement in their glucose tolerance index following the barley consumption. Additionally, the analysis showed that the increase in the abundance of the Anaerostipes was correlated with the improvement in the glucose tolerance index. (4) Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the effects of barley consumption for glucose tolerance are partly defined by the intestinal environment of consumers, providing a quantitative measurement of the dietary effect based on the intestinal environment.