Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 52
Filtrar
1.
BMC Palliat Care ; 23(1): 145, 2024 Jun 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38858703

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is crucial for quality of care. Preventable adverse events (AEs) occur in 1 of 20 patients in the hospital, but it is unknown whether this is different for patients with a condition relevant for palliative care. The majority of the limited available research on this topic is only focused on patients already receiving palliative care, and do not make comparisons with other patients at the end-of-life. We identified and compared the prevalence, preventability, nature and causes of AEs in patients with and without a condition relevant for palliative care. METHODS: A nationwide retrospective record review study was performed in 20 Dutch hospitals. A total of 2,998 records of patients who died in hospital in 2019 was included. Records were reviewed for AEs. We identified two subgroups: patients with (n = 2,370) or without (n = 248) a condition relevant for palliative care through the selection method of Etkind (2017). Descriptive analyses were performed to calculate prevalence, nature, causes and prevention strategies. T-tests were performed to calculate differences between subgroups. RESULTS: We found no significant differences between subgroups regarding AE prevalence, this was 15.3% in patients with a condition relevant for palliative care, versus 12.0% in patients without a condition relevant for palliative care (p = 0.148). Potentially preventable AE prevalence was 4.3% versus 4.4% (p = 0.975). Potentially preventable death prevalence in both groups was 3.2% (p = 0.938). There were differences in the nature of AEs: in patients with a condition relevant for palliative care this was mostly related to medication (33.1%), and in patients without a condition relevant for palliative care to surgery (50.8%). In both subgroups in the majority of AEs a patient related cause was identified. For the potentially preventable AEs in both subgroups the two most important prevention strategies as suggested by the medical reviewers were reflection and evaluation and quality assurance. DISCUSSION: Patient safety risks appeared to be equally prevalent in both subgroups. The nature of AEs does differ between subgroups: medication- versus surgery-related, indicating that tailored safety measures are needed. Recommendations for practice are to focus on reflecting on AEs, complemented with case evaluations.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos , Humanos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Sleep Med Rev ; 76: 101951, 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754209

RESUMEN

Polysomnography (PSG) is the reference standard of sleep measurement, but is burdensome for the participant and labor intensive. Affordable electroencephalography (EEG)-based wearables are easy to use and are gaining popularity, yet selecting the most suitable device is a challenge for clinicians and researchers. In this systematic review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of available EEG-based wearables to measure human sleep. For each wearable, an overview will be provided regarding validated population and reported measurement properties. A systematic search was conducted in the databases OVID MEDLINE, Embase.com and CINAHL. A machine learning algorithm (ASReview) was utilized to screen titles and abstracts for eligibility. In total, 60 papers were selected, covering 34 unique EEG-based wearables. Feasibility studies indicated good tolerance, high compliance, and success rates. The 42 included validation studies were conducted across diverse populations and showed consistently high accuracy in sleep staging detection. Therefore, the recent advancements in EEG-based wearables show great promise as alternative for PSG and for at-home sleep monitoring. Users should consider factors like user-friendliness, comfort, and costs, as these devices vary in features and pricing, impacting their suitability for individual needs.

3.
Eur J Intern Med ; 112: 86-92, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37002150

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Older adults at the Emergency Department (ED) often present with nonspecific complaints (NSC) such as 'weakness' or 'feeling unwell'. Health care workers may underestimate illness in patients with NSC, leading to adverse health outcomes. This study compares characteristics and outcomes of NSC-patients versus specific complaints (SC) patients. METHODS: Cohort study in patients ≥ 70 years in two Dutch EDs. NSC was classified according to the BANC-study-framework based on the medical history in the ED letter, before additional diagnostics took place. A second classification was performed at the end of the ED visit/hospital admission. Primary outcomes were functional decline, institutionalization, and mortality at 30 days. RESULTS: 26% (n = 228) of a total of 888 included patients presented with NSC. Compared with SC-patients, NSC-patients were older, more frail, and more frequently female. NSC-patients had a higher risk of functional decline and institutionalization at 30 days (adjusted ORs 1.84, 95% CI 1.27 - 2.72, and 2.46, 95% CI 1.51-4.00, respectively), but not mortality (adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.58 - 2.73). Reclassification to a specific complaint after the ED visit or hospital admission occurred in 54% of NSC-patients. CONCLUSION: NSC occur especially in older, frail female patients and are associated with an increased risk of functional decline and institutionalization, even after adjustment for worse baseline status. In half of the patients, a specific complaint revealed during ED or hospital stay. Physicians at the ED should consider NSC as a red flag needing appropriate observation and evaluation of underlying serious conditions and needs of this vulnerable patient group.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitalización , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Tiempo de Internación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud
4.
J Ultrasound ; 26(1): 163-168, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35567703

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patients with COVID-19 have an increased risk for venous thrombo-embolism (VTE), especially pulmonary embolism. The exact prevalence of asymptomatic DVT is not known, as is the usefulness of screening for DVT in patients admitted to ward with COVID-19. We have studied the prevalence of asymptomatic DVT. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional observational multi-center study at four university medical centers in The Netherlands. All adult patients admitted with COVID-19 to a medical ward were eligible for inclusion, including patients who were transferred back from the ICU to the ward. The study protocol consisted of weekly cross-sectional rounds of compression ultrasound. RESULTS: In total, 125 patients were included in the study. A significant proportion of patients (N = 34 (27%)) had developed a VTE during their admission for COVID-19 before the study ultrasound was performed. In most VTE cases (N = 27 (79%)) this concerned pulmonary embolism. A new asymptomatic DVT was found in 5 of 125 patients (4.0%; 95% CI 1.3-9.1%) (Table 2). Nine patients (7.2%; 95% CI 3.3-13.2%) developed a VTE (all PE) diagnosed within 28 days after the screening US was performed. CONCLUSION: We have shown a low prevalence (4%) of newly discovered asymptomatic DVT outside the ICU-setting in COVID-19 patients. Despite this low prevalence, nine patients developed PE (7%) within 28 days after ultrasound. This favors the hypothesis of local thrombus formation in the lungs. Based on our findings and literature, we do not recommend US-screening of asymptomatic patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ward.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombosis de la Vena , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicaciones , Estudios Transversales , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología
5.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 10(6): e4373, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35702355

RESUMEN

It has been suggested that compounds present in silicone breast implants (eg, silicone particles or heavy metals such as platinum) migrate into the body and can cause systemic symptoms in susceptible women, causing what is known as breast implant illness. This pilot study investigates possible associations between hair platinum levels in patients with breast implants and breast implant illness, and evaluates its possible use for diagnostic purposes. Methods: Patients were included from the silicone outpatient clinic at Amsterdam University Medical Centre. Platinum concentration in hair samples of 10 women with breast implants and systemic symptoms (group A) was compared with that in 10 women with breast implants but no symptoms (group B), and a control group of 10 women without implants or symptoms (group C), using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Radiological imaging was used to assess implant ruptures or silicone leakage. Results: A median platinum concentration of 0.09 µg per kg [IQR 0.04-0.15] was found in group A, 0.08 µg per kg [IQR 0.04-0.12] in group B, and 0.04 µg per kg [IQR 0.02-0.13] in group C, with no statistical significant difference between the groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.43). No correlation between radiologically proven implant leakage and platinum level was found. Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in hair platinum levels in women with or without silicone breast implants or breast implant illness. Therefore, based on this pilot study, we do not recommend this test for clinical use. Given the small sample size, more research is required to fully assess its possible use for diagnostic purposes.

6.
J Crit Care ; 69: 153992, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35104693

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Critically ill COVID-19 patients have an increased risk of developing pulmonary embolism (PE). Diagnosis of PE by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) might reduce the need for computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), while decreasing time-to-diagnosis. MATERIALS & METHODS: This prospective, observational study included adult ICU patients with COVID-19. Multi-organ (lungs, deep vein, cardiac) POCUS was performed within 24 h of CTPA, looking for subpleural consolidations, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and right ventricular strain (RVS). We reported the scan time, and calculated diagnostic accuracy measures for these signs separately and in combination. RESULTS: 70 consecutive patients were included. 23 patients (32.8%) had a PE. Median scan time was 14 min (IQR 11-17). Subpleural consolidations' diagnostic accuracy was: 42.9% (95%CI [34.1-52.0]). DVT's and RVS' diagnostic accuracy was: 75.6% (95%CI [67.1-82.9]) and 74.4% (95%CI [65.8-81.8]). Their sensitivity was: 24.0% (95%CI [9.4-45.1]), and 40.0% (95%CI [21.3-61.3]), while their specificity was: 88.8% (95%CI [80.8-94.3]), and: 83.0% (95%CI [74.2-89.8]), respectively. Multi-organ POCUS sensitivity was: 87.5% (95%CI [67.6-97.3]), and specificity was: 25% (95%CI [16.9-34.7]). CONCLUSIONS: Multi-organ rather than single-organ POCUS can be of aid in ruling out PE in critically ill COVID-19 and help select patients for CTPA. In addition, finding RVS can make PE more likely, while a DVT would preclude the need for a CTPA. REGISTRATION: www.trialregister.nl: NL8540.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Embolia Pulmonar , Trombosis de la Vena , Adulto , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Estudios Prospectivos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen
8.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 9(7): 3209-3219, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33102272

RESUMEN

Innovative solutions are required to effectively address the unprecedented surge of demand on our healthcare systems created by the COVID-19 pandemic. Home treatment and monitoring of patients who are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic can be readily implemented to ameliorate the health system burden while maintaining safety and effectiveness of care. Such endeavor requires careful triage and coordination, telemedicine and technology support, workforce and education, as well as robust infrastructure. In the understandable paucity of evidence-based, protocolized approaches toward HOT for COVID-19 patients, our group has created the current document based on the cumulative experience of members of the Joint ACAIM-WACEM COVID-19 Clinical Management Taskforce. Utilizing available evidence-based resources and extensive front-line experience, the authors have suggested a pragmatic pathway for providing safe and effective home oxygen therapy in the community setting.

9.
Neth J Med ; 78(5): 251-260, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33093250

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Organisation of the emergency department (ED) is gaining attention due to an increased demand on emergency services, leading to crowding and influencing the quality of care. It is known that the organisation of acute care influences the performance of the ED. In the Netherlands, the organisation of EDs differs between hospitals. However, detailed information about the various organisational structures is lacking. This study aims to determine the organisational structures and the different roles and responsibilities of internists and emergency physicians (EPs) in the EDs. METHODS: We performed a nationwide observational study between January 2018 and February 2019. All hospitals with an ED in the Netherlands were identified, contacted, and surveyed. Requested information was retrieved from internists and complemented with local administrative hospital data. RESULTS: 76 out of 89 EDs responded to the questionnaire (84%); 93% of EDs were operational 24/7. A registered acute internist was present at 47 locations (62%) and an EP at 60 EDs (79%). At 10 locations (13.2%), internists reported not being physically present at the ED. Supervision and working agreements between EPs and internists differed between the hospitals. Collaboration between EPs and internists was graded satisfactory (7.4/10). CONCLUSION: This is the first study providing a detailed overview of the ED organisation in the Netherlands regarding internal medicine patients. This organisation differs in terms of staffing, presence of EPs and internists, and working agreements. The influence of the various organisational structures of EDs on quality of acute care should be the subject of future research.


Asunto(s)
Aglomeración , Medicina de Emergencia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Médicos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Países Bajos
12.
Neth J Med ; 78(1): 3-9, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32043473

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sepsis in patients with cancer is increasingly common and associated with high mortality. To date, no studies have examined the effectiveness of prehospital antibiotics in septic patients with cancer. This study aimed without and to evaluate the effect of prehospital antibiotics in septic patients with cancer. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc sub-analysis of the PHANTASi (PreHospital ANTibioitcs Against Sepsis) trial database: a randomised controlled trial which enrolled patients with suspected sepsis who were transported to the emergency department by ambulance. Patients in the intervention group were administered prehospital intravenous antibiotics while those in the control group received usual care. We compared patients who had cancer to those who did not. Primary outcome was 28-day mortality; among the secondary outcomes, we included in-hospital mortality and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: 357(13.4%) of the 2658 included patients had cancer in the past five years, of which, 209 (58.5%) were included in the intervention and 148 (41.5%) usual care groups; 28-day mortality was significantly higher in patients who were diagnosed with cancer in the past five years than those without cancer in the past five years: 15.2% vs. 7.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). Prehospital antibiotics in the group of patients with cancer in the last five years yielded no significant effect on survival. There were however, significantly fewer 30-day readmissions (p = 0.031) in the intervention group of cancer patients (12.2% vs 5.7%). CONCLUSION: Prehospital antibiotics did not improve overall survival. However, there was a significant reduction in 30-day readmissions.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Sepsis/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sepsis/complicaciones , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sobrevida
13.
Neth J Med ; 77(9): 330-337, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31814587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Older people increasingly demand emergency department (ED) care. ED visits have a profound impact on older patients, including high risk of adverse outcomes and loss of independency. In this study, we evaluated the opinions of patients, caregivers, general practitioners, and ED physicians on the preventability of ED visits. METHODS: Prospective, mixed-method observational and qualitative study of 200 patients aged ≥ 70 years visiting a teaching hospital ED in the Netherlands. Semi-structured interviews were performed with patients, caregivers, and general practitioners. ED physicians were provided with written surveys. Patient data were extracted to determine vulnerability. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 79.6 years; 49.5% were male. Ninety-five percent lived independently before the ED visit. Most patients reported domiciliary care (23%), a caregiver (21.5%), or both (29.5%). Patients considered 12.2% of visits potentially preventable, caregivers 9%, general practitioners 20.7%, and ED physicians 31.2%. Consensus on preventability was poor, especially among patients and professionals. While patients most frequently blamed themselves, healthcare providers predominantly mentioned lack of communication and organisational issues as contributing factors. CONCLUSION: Patients and caregivers consider an ED visit preventable less frequently than professionals do. Little consensus was found among patients and healthcare providers, and the perspectives on contributing factors to a preventable visit differ between groups. To help improve geriatric emergency care, future studies should focus on why these perspectives are so different and aim to align them.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Cuidadores/psicología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Pacientes/psicología , Médicos/psicología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Países Bajos , Prevención Primaria
14.
PLoS One ; 14(10): e0222450, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31574094

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Due to the rise in incidence, the long term effect of sepsis are becoming more evident. There is increasing evidence that sepsis may result in an impaired health related quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate whether health related quality of life is impaired in sepsis survivors and which clinical parameters are associated with the affected health related quality of life. METHODS: We analyzed 880 Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires that were sent to sepsis survivors who participated in the Prehospital Antibiotics Against Sepsis (PHANTASi) trial. These questionnaires were sent by email, 28 days after discharge. Data entry and statistical analyses were performed in SPSS. The data from the general Dutch population, was obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI-AVL) and served as a control group. Subsequently, 567 sepsis survivors were matched to 567 controls. Non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare these two groups. Within the group, we sought to explain the diminished health related quality of life by factor analysis. RESULTS: We found that sepsis survivors have a worse health related quality of life compared to the general Dutch population. This negative effect was more evident for the physical component than the mental component of health related quality of life. We found that health related quality of life was significantly altered by advancing age and female sex. We also found that the total length of stay (in the hospital) and (previous) comorbidity negatively affect the physical component of health related quality of life. CONCLUSION: In our study we found that health related quality of life in sepsis survivors, 28 days after discharge, is severely diminished in comparison with the general Dutch population. The physical domain is severely affected, whereas the mental domain is less influenced. The length of stay, comorbidity, advancing age and female sex all have a negative effect on the Physical Component Scale of the health related quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Anciano , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Comorbilidad , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/patología , Sepsis/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
Comput Biol Med ; 115: 103488, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31634699

RESUMEN

Many studies have been published on a variety of clinical applications of artificial intelligence (AI) for sepsis, while there is no overview of the literature. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the literature and thereby identify knowledge gaps and prioritize areas with high priority for further research. A literature search was conducted in PubMed from inception to February 2019. Search terms related to AI were combined with terms regarding sepsis. Articles were included when they reported an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUROC) as outcome measure. Fifteen articles on diagnosis of sepsis with AI models were included. The best performing model reached an AUROC of 0.97. There were also seven articles on prognosis, predicting mortality over time with an AUROC of up to 0.895. Finally, there were three articles on assistance of treatment of sepsis, where the use of AI was associated with the lowest mortality rates. Of the articles, twenty-two were judged to be at high risk of bias or had major concerns regarding applicability. This was mostly because predictor variables in these models, such as blood pressure, were also part of the definition of sepsis, which led to overestimation of the performance. We conclude that AI models have great potential for improving early identification of patients who may benefit from administration of antibiotics. Current AI prediction models to diagnose sepsis are at major risks of bias when the diagnosis criteria are part of the predictor variables in the model. Furthermore, generalizability of these models is poor due to overfitting and a lack of standardized protocols for the construction and validation of the models. Until these problems have been resolved, a large gap remains between the creation of an AI algorithm and its implementation in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Aprendizaje Automático , Modelos Biológicos , Sepsis , Humanos , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico
17.
PLoS One ; 14(3): e0214052, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30897186

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Blood cultures remain the gold standard for detecting bacteremia despite their limitations. The current practice of blood culture collection is still inefficient with low yields. Limited focus has been given to the association between timing of specimen collection at different time points during admission and their yield. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective observational study by analyzing all 3,890 sets of cultures collected from the 1,962 admitted patients over the seven-month period of this study. We compared the blood culture yield between the early group (≤24 hours after admission) and the late group (> 24 hours of admission). We also investigated the effect of prehospital oral antibiotics and pre-analytical time on the first cultures in the emergency department. Epidemiology and efficiency of blood cultures were studied for each medical specialty. RESULTS: In total, 3,349(86.1%) blood cultures were negative and 541(13.9%) were positive for one or more microorganisms. After correcting for contamination, the overall yield was 290 (7.5%). The early group (n = 1,490) yielded significantly more true-positive cultures (10.1% versus 5.8%, P<0.001) than the late group (n = 2,400). The emergency department had a significantly higher yield than general wards, 11.2% versus 5.7% (p<0.001). Prehospital oral antibiotic use and pre-analytical time did not affect the yield of first cultures at the emergency department (p = 0.735 and 0.816 respectively). The number of tests needed to obtain one true-positive culture varied between departments, ranging from 7 to 45. CONCLUSION: This study showed that blood cultures are inefficient in detecting bacteremia. Cultures collected during 24 hours after admission yielded more positive results than those collected later. Significant variations in blood culture epidemiology and efficiency per specialty suggest that guidelines should be reevaluated. Future studies should aim at improving blood culture yield, implementing educational programs to reduce contamination and cost-effective application of modern molecular diagnostic technologies.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Cultivo de Sangre/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Cultivo de Sangre/normas , Cultivo de Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Habitaciones de Pacientes , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Manejo de Especímenes , Factores de Tiempo
18.
Med Teach ; 41(6): 714-715, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29944031

RESUMEN

We are in the midst of transformation of health systems where remote consulting (via video, telephone, email, and mobile messaging) is soon to become the dominant mode of consultation. Most of the literature on telehealth omits mentioning the need for telehealth communication competencies. Yet evidence base has been growing about how critical this training is - whether from clinical communication research or litigation claims analysis. In this article, we are calling for an urgent expansion of communication skills curricula to encompass these new telehealth domains from medical schools, specialty trainings to CMEs.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Educación Médica/organización & administración , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Curriculum , Educación Médica/normas , Humanos , Telemedicina/normas
19.
Acute Med ; 17(2): 77-82, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29882557

RESUMEN

Readmissions are treated as adverse events in many healthcare systems. Causes can be physiological deterioration or breakdown of social support systems. We investigated data from a European multi-centre study of readmissions for changes in vital signs between index admission and readmission. Data sets were graded according to the National Early Warning Score (NEWS). Of 487 patients in whom NEWS could be calculated on discharge and again on re-admission, 39.6% had worse vital signs with a NEWS score difference ≥ 2 points while only 7.6% had improved by ≤ 2 points. Changes in individual vital signs of 20% or more were most common in respiratory rate and heart rate. Monitoring of respiratory rate and pulse rate post-discharge might predict some deteriorations.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Alta del Paciente/normas , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Signos Vitales , Europa (Continente) , Humanos
20.
Neth J Med ; 76(2): 72-77, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29515004

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study investigates (1) whether the hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR) model underestimates or overestimates disease severity and (2) the completeness of the data collected by administrators to calculate HSMR in a cohort of deceased patients with the diagnosis of pneumonia. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and Abbreviated Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (abbMEDS) scores and associated mortality probabilities were obtained from 32 deceased pneumonia patients over the year 2014 in the VU University Medical Centre. These were compared with mortality probabilities of the Central Bureau for Statistics (CBS) calculated for every patient using the HSMR model. Clinical charts were examined to extract relevant comorbidities to determine the reliability of data sent to the national registration of hospital care. RESULTS: Risk categories determined by using the PSI and the abbMEDS were significantly higher compared with the risk categories according to HSMR (p = 0.001, respectively p = 0.000). The mean difference between the number of comorbidities in our registration and the coders' registration was 1.97 (p = 0.00). The mean difference was 0.97 (p = 0.000) for the number of comorbidities of influence on the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and 1.25 (p = 0.001) for the calculated CCI. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the mortality probabilities as calculated by the CBS are an underestimation of the risk of dying for each patient. Our study also showed that the registration of data sent to the CBS underestimated the actual comorbidities of the patient, and could possibly influence the HSMR.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Modelos Estadísticos , Neumonía/mortalidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Exactitud de los Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Probabilidad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...