How frequent is osteogenesis imperfecta in patients with idiopathic osteoporosis?: Case reports.

RATIONALE: The term idiopathic osteoporosis itself is quite a non-specific disease label, which fails to address the etiological understanding. Bone mineral density alone is not a reliable parameter to detect patients at high risk of fracture. The diversity of the clinical phenotypes of discolored teeth, blueness of the sclera, back and joint pain, cardiovascular disease, Diabetes type II, hearing problems and a long list of orthopedic problems are have to be considered. PATIENTS CONCERNS: Our study has been designed in accordance with the clinical and radiological phenotype of eleven index cases with the provisional diagnosis of OI, which was followed by genotypic confirmation. This was followed by the invitation of siblings, parents, grandparents and other relatives to participate in the interviews, and to discuss the impact of the diagnosis. Proper collaboration with these families facilitated the process to identify other subjects with a history of fractures and other deformities/disabilities which were seemingly correlated to heritable connective tissue disorder. In total, 63 patients (27 children and 36 parents/grandparents and relatives) were enrolled in the study. Two groups of children were not included in our study. We excluded children with incomplete documentation and children who manifested de novo mutation. The term idiopathic osteoporosis (IOP) has been given to these families in other Institutes and was considered as a definite diagnosis. IOP was solely based on T scores, BMD and certain laboratory tests. Surprisingly, no single adult patient underwent clinical and or radiological phenotypic characterization. DIAGNOSES: A constellation of significant disease associations with osteoporotic fracture risk have been encountered. The index cases showed mutations in COL1A1 (17q21.31.q22) and COL1A2 (7q22.1), the genes encoding collagen type I. The phenotype/genotype confirmation in 11 children was the key factor to boost our research and to re-consult each family. Comprehensive clinical and radiological phenotypic documentation has been applied to most of other family subjects who principally received the diagnosis of IOP. INTERVENTIONS: All adult patients had normal serum calcium and only three patients showed an average of low serum phosphate of 0.7-0.61 mmol/l. Serumcrosslaps in six parents was in the average of (2.9-3.8 nM) and PTH levels were normal in all patients (the average showed 8.73 pg/ml). OUTCOMES: Our efforts to minimize and constrain the usage of the term idiopathic osteoporosis and to understand the sequence of pathological events that occurred in these families were emphasized. These efforts evolved into a remarkable and unique constellation of clinical findings. Strikingly, fracture represented a portion in a series of skeletal and extra-skeletal deformities and abnormalities which are all correlated to connective tissue disorder. This was achieved mainly through comprehensive phenotype/genotype confirmation, followed by scrutinizing the records of each family, clinical examination of the adults and revising the archives of our Hospitals and other Institutes. LESSONS: The sequence of diverse pathological events recorded within each family would be almost incomprehensible without a proper etiological understanding of the natural history of each child/family deformity that led to their occurrences. We wish to stress that, our current study is just an attempt to cover only a tiny fraction of the tip of the iceberg and to profoundly explore one of the most under-estimated causes of idiopathic osteoporosis.

Craniosynostosis, Scheuermann's disease, and intellectual disability resembling Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome: a report on a family over 4 generations: Case report.

RATIONALE: Craniosynostosis is a disorder characterized by premature fusion of cranial sutures with subsequent development of abnormal craniofacial contour associated with variable skeletal and extra-skeletal abnormalities. In this family syndromic type of craniosynostosis was recognized and the etiology behind diverse forms of deformities have been diagnosed. PATIENT CONCERNS: The negative impact of the disorder on the child and his family is enormous. Particularly when the diagnosis is late and little can be done. Though counselling the family through discussing the whole picture of the disorder might lessens their concern. DIAGNOSES: Diagnosis is the corner stone of management. In this paper we aimed to sensitize pediatricians, physicians, and orthopedic surgeons concerning the necessity to recognize syndromic associations early on. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with syndromic craniosynostosis are usually associated with a complexity of malformation complex. Craniofacial surgery can be of remarkable help if the diagnosis is made early. It requires a series of corrections to avoid intellectual disability and other neurological deficits.The timing of interventions is strongly correlated on the timing of diagnosis. OUTCOMES: The earliest the diagnoses, the much better the outcomes are. And consequently avert the psychological and the financial cost on the patient and his family. LESSONS: The golden principle of medicine should prevail in all medical disciplines, which states: The more you see, the more you know and conversely the more you know is the more you see.

Are parents of children with Cockayne syndrome manifesting features of the disorder?: Case reports.

RATIONALE: Postnatal growth failure and progressive neurologic dysfunction and increasing multiorgan involvement are the main clinical features of Cockayne syndrome (CS). CS is a rare autosomal recessive disorder of the group of DNA repair diseases. Usually, genetic carriers, such as parents of patients, are not at risk for developing the disease. PATIENT CONCERNS: A series of 14 family subjects (6 children with age range from 6 months to 4 years with CS) and 9 parents (aged from 23 to 34 years) from consanguineous families is reported. DIAGNOSES: Ultraviolet irradiation studies were performed on these children and were indicative of CS. INTERVENTIONS: Cells of skin fibroblast from these children with the disease showed a symmetrical accumulation of chromosomal aberrations and the nuclear lamina aberrations. Our results showed a significant and simultaneous increase of percent of blebbs and invaginations of the nuclear lamina in all cases CS. The pronounced changes in 12.6 times at atypical form (girl); in 8.5 times at severe form (boy) and in 5.6 times at light form (boy). Percentage of metaphases with chromosomal aberration is significantly higher in CS cells: in 4 times at atypical form, in 3 times at hard form, and in 2 times at light form. The parents of these families (consanguineous families) were intellectually variable between normal/borderline intelligence, though most manifested a constellation of skeletal and extraskeletal abnormalities and notably, the characteristic cachectic facial appearance. The parents were considered as manifesting the mild type of CS, because they showed no abnormalities of DNA repair. OUTCOMES: Clinical manifestations in heterozygote carriers of an autosomal recessive disorders is a rare phenomenon as carriers are usually healthy. LESSONS: The interesting finding of the families studied is that there appeared to be a multitude of carriers manifesting with normal to borderline intelligence but with a wide spectrum of skeletal and extraskeletal abnormalities.