Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Soins ; 65(849): 48-51, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33357618

RESUMEN

The SARS-Cov-2 pandemic took health care players across the world by surprise, including caregivers, managers and logisticians. In the absence of a vaccine or a specific therapy, detecting the disease at an early stage and isolating confirmed cases from the rest of the healthy population was soon considered to be essential. The RT-PCR technique was the gold standard method for testing for infection with the virus. It has high specificity but moderate sensitivity. It was difficult to access it during the first weeks of the pandemic. On the basis of the observations of the Chinese and Italian scientific community in particular, the recommendation was to combine use of the RT-PCR with a low-dose thoracic CT scan. In the absence of easy access to the RT-PCR, the use of the lung CT scan for a rapid triage of patients within emergency departments proved effective.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Torácica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Triaje , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Humanos
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 206(4): 734-9, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26866342

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of gastric wall fatty infiltration in patients without overt gastrointestinal disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study included patients who underwent unenhanced MDCT for renal colic. Two radiologists reviewed all of the images and evaluated for the presence of gastric wall fatty infiltration. The following patient characteristics were also recorded: sex, age, body mass index, total and visceral fat area, and presence of colic or ileal fat halo sign, or hepatic steatosis. A t test and Fisher test were used to compare the results between patients with and patients without gastric wall fatty infiltration. RESULTS: Gastric wall fatty infiltration was present in 25 of 120 (21%) patients in the study. Mean age, weight, body mass index, visceral and total fat areas, proportion of hepatic steatosis, number of men, and frequency of the presence of colic and ileal fat halo signs were significantly higher among patients with gastric wall fatty infiltration than in those without infiltration. CONCLUSION: Gastric wall fatty infiltration was significantly more frequent in men older than 45 years and patients with a body mass index greater than 25. It may represent a normal finding, but its relation to other pathologic conditions related to obesity remains to be explored.


Asunto(s)
Grasa Intraabdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Cólico Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Estómago/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 202(3): 553-60, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24555591

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on dose, diagnostic performance, and image quality of a low-dose CT examination for renal colic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent a low-dose CT examination for renal colic performed during the year 2012 with automatic tube current modulation, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a low tube voltage (kV). Three readers independently reviewed all images for the presence of renal colic and evaluated diagnostic confidence and image quality. The results and doses were compared among patients grouped by body mass index (BMI) and between patients with a BMI<25 and those with a BMI≥25. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were included in the study: 39 patients had a BMI<25 and 47 had a BMI≥25. No statistically significant difference was found between the accuracy rates for the diagnosis of renal colic when the rates of the three independent readers were averaged for both BMI groups (95.7% vs 96.4%, respectively; p=0.83). Image quality and diagnostic confidence scores were significantly better for patients with a BMI≥25 than for patients with a BMI<25 (mean image quality score, 3.7 vs 3.4, p<0.001; mean diagnostic confidence score, 2.8 vs 2.5, p<0.001). The mean radiation dose for patients with a BMI<25 was 2.4 mGy compared with 3.7 mGy for patients with a BMI≥25 (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of our low-dose CT protocol for renal colic was excellent for all patients, and image quality and diagnostic confidence were significantly better for patients with a BMI≥25. However, our protocol also required exposure to a greater dose of radiation for these overweight and obese patients.


Asunto(s)
Artefactos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Protección Radiológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Cólico Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Cólico Renal/epidemiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Dosis de Radiación , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA