Acute myocardial infarction, intraventricular thrombus and risk of systemic embolism.

The development of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a well-known and serious complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) due to the risk of systemic arterial embolism (SE), which is variable in its clinical picture and has potentially serious consequences depending on the extent of target organ damage. SE results in an increase in mortality and morbidity in these patients. LVT is one of the main causes of the development of ischaemic cardio-embolic cardiovascular events (CVE) after MI and the determination of the source of cardiac embolus is crucial for the initiation of adequate anticoagulant therapy in secondary prevention. Echocardiography holds an irreplaceable place in the diagnosis of LVT, contrast enhancement provides higher sensitivity. The gold standard for LVT diagnosis is cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, but it is not suitable as a basic screening test. In patients with already diagnosed LVT, it is necessary to adjust antithrombotic therapy by starting warfarin anticoagulation for at least 6 months with the need for echocardiographic follow-up to detect thrombotic residues. The effect of prophylactic administration of warfarin in high-risk patients after anterior AMI does not outweigh the risk of severe bleeding complications and does not result in a decrease in mortality and morbidity. At the present time, there is not enough evidence to use direct oral anticoagulants in this indication.

Addition of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (ASPIRANT)--study protocol.

BACKGROUND: There is currently limited data on which drug should be used to improve blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. Recent observational trials reported spironolactone as having good effects. This study is designed to assess the effect of the addition of 25 mg of spironolactone on blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant arterial hypertension. METHODS: Patients with office systolic BP > 140 mmHg or diastolic BP > 90 mmHg despite treatment with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic, are enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Patients are randomly assigned to receive spironolactone or a placebo at a ratio of 1:1 by the method of simple randomisation. Our primary endpoints are to show a statistically significant difference in the fall of mean day-time systolic and diastolic BP by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), between the spironolactone and placebo groups, after 8 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes are changes of serum potassium, natrium, creatinine, body weight, casual blood pressure in office, difference in the fall of mean night-time and 24-hour ABPM BP and treatment response depending on different baseline levels of aldosterone and aldosterone/PRA ratio. DISCUSSION: If spironolactone proves effective, it might become the standard of treatment in patients with resistant arterial hypertension.

Addition of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (ASPIRANT): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

There is currently limited data on which drug should be used to improve blood pressure (BP) control in patients with resistant hypertension. This study was designed to assess the effect of the addition of 25 mg of spironolactone on BP in patients with resistant arterial hypertension. Patients with office systolic BP >140 mm Hg or diastolic BP >90 mm Hg despite treatment with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs, including a diuretic, were enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. One hundred seventeen patients were randomly assigned to receive spironolactone (n=59) or a placebo (n=58) as an add-on to their antihypertensive medication, by the method of simple randomization. Analyses were done with 111 patients (55 in the spironolactone and 56 in the placebo groups). At 8 weeks, the primary end points, a difference in mean fall of BP on daytime ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), between the groups was -5.4 mm Hg (95%CI -10.0; -0.8) for systolic BP (P=0.024) and -1.0 mm Hg (95% CI -4.0; 2.0) for diastolic BP (P=0.358). The APBM nighttime systolic, 24-hour ABPM systolic, and office systolic BP values were significantly decreased by spironolactone (difference of -8.6, -6.6, and -6.5 mm Hg; P=0=0.011, 0.004, and 0.011 [corrected]), whereas the fall of the respective diastolic BP values was not significant (-3.0, -1.0, and -2.5 mm Hg; P=0.079, 0.405, and 0.079). The adverse events in both groups were comparable. In conclusion, spironolactone is an effective drug for lowering systolic BP in patients with resistant arterial hypertension.