INTRODUCTION: Crescents (C) have been recently added to the Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) consisting of mesangial hypercellularity (M), endocapillary hypercellularity (E), segmental sclerosis (S) and tubular atrophy/ interstitial fibrosis (T) (MEST). The aim of the study was to assess the added impact of crescents, on development of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in IgAN patients Methods. On-hundred fifteen IgAN patients (76% male, mean age: 37 ± 13 years, mean serum creatinine: 4.0 ± 4.3 mg/dL, mean proteinuria: 3.4 ± 2.5 g/d) were followed for 43 ± 29 months. MEST score was defined according to Oxford classification (M0/M1, E0/ E1, S0/S1). To increase the power, T was defined as T0 ≤ 25% and T1 > 25%. Crescents were defined as C0, "absence" and C1 "at least one" crescent. In sensitivity analysis, the risk of ESKD was estimated at different cut-off levels of at least 10, 20, and 30% crescents. RESULTS: Forty patients (35%) developed ESKD. Among those 14% with at least one crescent, 21 patients (46%) developed ESKD. In 11 patients with C ≥ 30%, 66% and among 57 patients with T1, 60% and in 27 patients with T1 + C1 74% developed ESKD. In adjusted model, only C ≥ 30% (HR = 3.15, 95% CI: 1.15 to 11.00; P = 0.027) and the presence of T1+ C1 (HR = 7.18, 95% CI: 1.90 to 27.10, P = 0.004) were associated with increased risk of ESKD. The median kidney survival was 78.0 months (95% CI: 70.5 to 85.6 months), in patients with T0 + C0 and 32.3 months (95% CI: 19.3 to 45.3 months) in patients with T1 + C1. CONCLUSION: In this study T ≥ 25%, and the presence of crescents ≥ 30%, were independently associated with increased risk of ESKD. This risk was strongly increased in the combined presence of at least one crescent and T1 ≥ 25%, that predicted a high ESKD rate. DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.6685.
Glomerulonephritis, IGA , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Adult , Female , Glomerulonephritis, IGA/complications , Humans , Kidney , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Proteinuria/etiology , Risk Assessment , Young Adult
BACKGROUND: Statins are shown effective by some studies in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). We evaluated the effectiveness of atorvastatin in the prevention of CIN in computed tomography angiography (CTA) candidates. METHODS: This study was conducted on patients referring for elective CTA with normal renal function. Patients received atorvastatin (80 mg/day) or placebo from 24 h before to 48 h after administration of the contrast material. Serum creatinine was measured before and 48 h after contrast material injection. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level of ≥ 0.5 mg/dl or ≥ 25% of the baseline creatinine. RESULTS: A total of 236 patients completed the study; 115 atorvastatin, 121 placebo, mean age = 58.40 ± 9.80 year, 68.6% male. Serum creatinine increased after contrast material injection in both the atorvastatin (1.00 ± 0.16-1.02 ± 0.15 mg/dl, P = 0.017) and placebo groups (1.03 ± 0.17-1.08 ± 0.18 mg/dl, P < 0.001). Controlling for age, gender, comorbidities, drug history, and baseline serum creatinine level, patients who received atorvastatin experienced less increase in serum creatinine after contrast material injection (beta = 0.127, P = 0.034). However, there was no difference between the atorvastatin and placebo groups in the incidence of CIN (4.3 vs. 5.0%, P = 0.535). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing CTA, a short-term treatment with high dose atorvastatin is effective in preventing contrast-induced renal dysfunction, in terms of less increase in serum creatinine level after contrast material injection. Further trials including larger sample of patients and longer follow-ups are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Currently, imatinib is the drug of choice for initiation of medical treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase. The current study was carried out to compare effectiveness and safety of Iranian vs. Indian imatinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical study was performed on newly diagnosed CML patients in Seyyed-oShohada Hospital (Isfahan) and Khansari Hospital (Arak) from January to June 2011. The control group consisted of CML patients who received Indian imatinib previously. The drug was initiated with the dose of 400 mg daily. The patients were followed for six months, and the treatment outcomes (WBC <10(4)) and molecular response. Finally, the two groups were compared in these respects. RESULT: We evaluated 43 patients in each group. The hematological and molecular responses for the Iranian Imatinib were respectively 86.0% and 46.5%, while the rates were respectively 86.0 and 44.2% for the Indian imatinib. The two groups were similar with regard to the treatment outcome. The two groups were not significantly different with regard to the drug adverse effects. CONCLUSION: According to the findings, the Iranian imatinib is not different from the Indian drug in the hematological and molecular responses in treatment of the chronic phase of CML patients. Furthermore, the adverse effects of the two kinds were not significantly different. Compared with the results of other studies, the effectiveness of Iranian imatinib is equivalent to the Indian drug can be employed for treatment of CML patients in the chronic phase.
