Five new F10 variants in hereditary factor x deficiency detected by high-throughput sequencing.

INTRODUCTION: Factor X deficiency is a rare inherited bleeding disorder. To date, 181 variants are reported in the recently updated F10-gene variant database. AIM: This study aimed to describe new F10 variants. METHOD: The F10 gene was analysed in 16 consecutive families with FX deficiency by a targeted high-throughput sequencing approach, including F10, F9, F8 genes, and 78 genes dedicated to haematological malignancies. RESULTS: We identified 19 variants (17 missense, one nonsense and one frameshift) and two copy number variations. Two patients presenting a combined FVII-FX deficiency showed a loss of one F10 gene copy (del13q34) associated with a missense variant on the remaining allele, leading to a FX:C significantly lower than the FVII:C level and explaining their unusual bleeding history. We reported five novel variants. Three missense variants (p.Glu22Val affecting the signal peptide cleavage site, p.Cys342Tyr removing the disulphide bond between the FX heavy and light chains, and p.Val385Met located in FX peptidase S1 domain) were detected at compound heterozygosis status in three patients with severe bleeding symptoms and FX:C level below 10 IU/dL. Two truncating variants p.Tyr279* and p.Thr434Aspfs*13 leading to an altered FX protein were found at heterozygous state in two patients with mild bleeding history. CONCLUSION: This study showed the feasibility and the interest of high-throughput sequencing approach for rare bleeding disorders, enabling the report of F10 gene screening in a 3-weeks delay, suitable for clinical use. The description of five new variants may contribute to a better understanding of the phenotype-genotype correlation in FX deficiency.

Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, and somatic syndrome in the intensive care unit: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, and somatic syndrome is a newly discovered inflammatory disease affecting male subjects, for which few data exist in the literature. Here, we describe the case of a patient with known Sweet's syndrome admitted to the intensive care unit and for whom a vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, and somatic syndrome was diagnosed, allowing for appropriate treatment and the patient's discharge and recovery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 70-year-old male White patient was hospitalized in the intensive care unit following an intrahospital cardiac arrest. History started a year before with repeated deep vein thrombosis and episodes of skin eruption compatible with Sweet's syndrome. After a course of oral steroids, fever and inflammatory syndrome relapsed with onset of polychondritis, episcleritis along with neurological symptoms and pulmonary infiltrates. Intrahospital hypoxic cardiac arrest happened during patient's new investigations, and he was admitted in a critical state. During the intensive care unit stay, he presented with livedoid skin lesions on both feet. Vasculitis was not proven; however, cryoglobulinemia screening came back positive. Onset of pancytopenia was explored with a myelogram aspirate. It showed signs of dysmyelopoiesis and vacuoles in erythroid and myeloid precursors. Of note, new deep vein thrombosis developed, despite being treated with heparin leading to the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The course of symptoms were overlapping multiple entities, and so a multidisciplinary team discussion was implemented. Screening for UBA1-mutation in the blood came back positive, confirming the vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, and somatic syndrome. Corticosteroids and anti-IL1 infusion were started with satisfactory results supporting patient's discharge from intensive care unit to the internal medicine ward. CONCLUSIONS: Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, and somatic syndrome should be suspected in male patients presenting with inflammatory symptoms, such as fever, skin eruption, chondritis, venous thromboembolism, and vacuoles in bone marrow precursors. Patients with undiagnosed vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, and somatic syndrome may present with organ failure requiring hospitalization in intensive care unit, where screening for UBA1 mutation should be performed when medical history is evocative. Multidisciplinary team involvement is highly recommended for patient management, notably to start appropriate immunosuppressive treatments.

Combined Platelet and Red Blood Cell Recovery during On-pump Cardiac Surgery Using same™ by i-SEP Autotransfusion Device: A First-in-human Noncomparative Study (i-TRANSEP Study).

BACKGROUND: Centrifugation-based autotransfusion devices only salvage red blood cells while platelets are removed. The same™ device (Smart Autotransfusion for ME; i-SEP, France) is an innovative filtration-based autotransfusion device able to salvage both red blood cells and platelets. The authors tested the hypothesis that this new device could allow a red blood cell recovery exceeding 80% with a posttreatment hematocrit exceeding 40%, and would remove more than 90% of heparin and 75% of free hemoglobin. METHODS: Adults undergoing on-pump elective cardiac surgery were included in a noncomparative multicenter trial. The device was used intraoperatively to treat shed and residual cardiopulmonary bypass blood. The primary outcome was a composite of cell recovery performance, assessed in the device by red blood cell recovery and posttreatment hematocrit, and of biologic safety assessed in the device by the washout of heparin and free hemoglobin expressed as removal ratios. Secondary outcomes included platelet recovery and function and adverse events (clinical and device-related adverse events) up to 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: The study included 50 patients, of whom 18 (35%) underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft, 26 (52%) valve surgery, and 6 (12%) aortic root surgery. The median red blood cell recovery per cycle was 86.1% (25th percentile to 75th percentile interquartile range, 80.8 to 91.6) with posttreatment hematocrit of 41.8% (39.7 to 44.2). Removal ratios for heparin and free hemoglobin were 98.9% (98.2 to 99.7) and 94.6% (92.7 to 96.6), respectively. No adverse device effect was reported. Median platelet recovery was 52.4% (44.2 to 60.1), with a posttreatment concentration of 116 (93 to 146) · 109/l. Platelet activation state and function, evaluated by flow cytometry, were found to be unaltered by the device. CONCLUSIONS: In this first-in-human study, the same™ device was able to simultaneously recover and wash both platelets and red blood cells. Compared with preclinical evaluations, the device achieved a higher platelet recovery of 52% with minimal platelet activation while maintaining platelet ability to be activated in vitro.