Anastomotic leak after surgery for colon cancer and effect on long-term survival.

AIM: An anastomotic leak after surgery for colon cancer is a recognized complication but how it may adversely affect long-term survival is less clear because data are scarce. The aim of the study was to investigate the long-term impact of Grade C anastomotic leak in a large, population-based cohort. METHOD: Data on patients undergoing resection for Stage I-III colon cancer between 2008 and 2012 were collected from the Swedish, Norwegian and Danish Colorectal Cancer Registries. Overall relative survival and conditional 5-year relative survival, under the condition of surviving 1 year, were calculated for all patients and stratified by stage of disease. RESULTS: A total of 22 985 patients were analysed. Anastomotic leak occurred in 849 patients (3.7%). Five-year relative survival in patients with anastomotic leak was 64.7% compared with 87.0% for patients with no leak (P < 0.001). Five-year relative survival among the patients who survived the first year was 88.6% vs 81.3% (P = 0.003). Stratification by cancer stage showed that anastomotic leak was significantly associated with decreased relative survival in patients with Stage III disease (P = 0.001), but not in patients with Stage I or II (P = 0.950 and 0.247, respectively). CONCLUSION: Anastomotic leak after surgery for Stage III colon cancer was associated with significantly decreased long-term relative survival.

Long-Term Follow-Up and Survivorship After Completing Systematic Surveillance in Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer: Who Is Still at Risk?

PURPOSE: In patients with a high life expectancy at the time of surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC), the long-term outcome may be influenced by factors other than their cancer. We aimed to investigate the long-term outcome and cause of death beyond a 5-year surveillance programme. METHODS: We evaluated the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of a population-based cohort of stage I-III CRC patients <75 years old who completed a systematic surveillance programme. RESULTS: In total, 161 patients <75 years old, 111 (69 %) of whom were node negative (pN0), were included. The median follow-up time was 12.1 years. The OS was 54 % at 15 years and differed significantly between the pN0 and pN+ patients (65 vs. 30 %; P < 0.001); CSS (72 %) also differed between the pN0 and pN+ patients (85 vs. 44 %; P < 0.001). For the 5-year survivors (n = 119), 14 (12 %) died of CRC during additional long-term follow-up (7 each for pN0 and pN+), and 6 patients (5 %; all pN0) died of other cancers. Patients aged <65 years exhibited better long-term survival (81 %), but most of the deaths were due to CRC (10/12 deaths). Only two of the 14 cancer-related deaths involved microsatellite instable (MSI) CRC. Females exhibited better OS and CSS beyond 5 years of surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term survival beyond 5-year survivorship for stage I-III CRC is very good. Nonetheless, cancer-related deaths are encountered in one-third of patients and occur most frequently in patients who are <65 years old at disease onset-pointing to a still persistent risk several years after surgery.

Risk factors associated with poor lymph node harvest after colon cancer surgery in a national cohort.

AIM: Evaluation of ≥ 12 lymph nodes (LNs) is recommended after surgery for colon cancer. A harvest of ≤ 8 is considered poor, but few reports have evaluated risk factors associated with a poor harvest. This aims of this study were to analyse the clinical, surgical and pathological factors associated with poor LN harvest (LNH), the total number of examined nodes and the effect of LN number on stage. METHOD: All patients reported to the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry during 2007 and 2008 who underwent curative resection for Stage I-III colon cancer were studied. Risk factors for poor LNH and the proportion of Stage III disease were analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 2879 patients were included in the study. The median LNH was 14. Overall, 69.9% had ≥ 12 lymph nodes and 14.4% had ≤ 8 LN (poor harvest). Multivariate analysis showed that male sex, age > 75 years, sigmoid tumours, pT category 1-2, failure to use the pathology report template and distance of ≤ 5 cm from the bowel resection margin were all independent factors for poor LNH. Age < 65 years, pT category 3-4, and poor tumour differentiation were independent predictors of Stage III disease. An increased LNH did not increase the proportion of patients identified as being LN positive at the ≤ 8, 9-11 and ≥ 12 LN levels. CONCLUSION: Adequate LNH was achieved in the majority of curative colon cancer resections in this national cohort. Elderly, male patients with sigmoid cancers, and a short distal margin were at increased risk of a poor LNH.

Survival effect of implementing national treatment strategies for curatively resected colonic and rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of rectal cancer has changed substantially over the past decade. There are limited data on the long-term outcome of implementing systematic management strategies. METHODS: Survival of a national cohort of patients treated surgically for colonic and rectal cancer over a 10-year interval was analysed. All 31 158 patients in Norway diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum between 1994 and 2003 were identified from the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Registry. Changes in 5-year relative survival were compared by age, stage and tumour location during the early and late years. RESULTS: The study population included 19 053 patients who had a curative resection. The relative 5-year survival rate significantly improved for both colonic cancer (73·8 versus 78·0 per cent; P < 0·001) and rectal cancer (72·1 versus 79·6 per cent; P < 0·001). The 5-year relative survival was significantly better for rectal than colonic cancer during the late period (P = 0·030). Improved 5-year relative survival was related to better outcomes in patients with positive lymph nodes (67·2 and 62·1 per cent for rectal and colonic cancer respectively; each P < 0·001 versus early period), but not for the subgroup aged over 75 years with lymph node-positive colonic cancer. CONCLUSION: In this national cohort, survival after curative surgery for colorectal cancer increased significantly after implementation of national management strategies. Improvements were most evident for rectal cancer and in lymph node-positive disease; they were less substantial for colonic cancer and elderly patients (over 75 years). Strategic treatment changes may be warranted for the latter group.