Refractory diversion neovaginitis in a sigmoid-colon-derived neovagina: clinical and histopathological considerations.

Colonic segments are being used as pedicled grafts in neovaginoplasty, a surgical procedure to (re)construct a (neo)vagina. A disadvantage of using colonic grafts is the potential occurrence of neovaginal complications due to diversion from the faecal stream. Here, we report a case of severe, refractory diversion colitis of the sigmoid neovagina, so-called 'diversion neovaginitis', in a 42-year-old woman with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Neovaginal biopsy specimens showed colonic-type mucosa with strong increase of lymphoplasmacellular infiltrate in the lamina propria, ulceration with fibrinoid deposition and some crypt irregularity. Endoscopy showed erythematous mucosa, superficial ulceration, mucus discharge and multiple pseudopolyp-like lesions. Local application of mesalazine foam enemas and sodium butyrate enemas initially gave symptom relief. However, this was a temporary effect, ultimately necessitating removal of the neovaginal construct. It is important that all patients are informed about neovaginal bowel complications, for example, diversion neovaginitis. Regular medical and endoscopic follow-up appears recommendable.

Optimal strategies to identify aberrant intra-epithelial lymphocytes in refractory coeliac disease.

INTRODUCTION: Different strategies have been developed to identify those refractory celiac disease (RCD) patients who are at risk to develop an enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL). Flow cytometric analysis of intra-epithelial lymphocytes (IEL) with an aberrant phenotype is considered the golden standard but is not widely available. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and T-cell receptor (TCR) rearrangement studies are commonly available but may lack sensitivity and specificity. Here, we compared the three different methods in the workup of patients suspected for RCD. METHODS: Duodenal biopsies from control patient (n = 5), RCD patients with moderately increased aberrant IEL populations (20-50 %: n = 14), and RCD patients with high numbers of aberrant IEL (>50 %: n = 5) as determined by flow cytometry were analysed by IHC and TCR-γ chain rearrangement analysis. Three pathologists scored the slides independently. RESULTS: Sensitivity of IHC and TCR-γ rearrangement analysis in RCD patients with high numbers of aberrant IELs was 100 and 71 %, respectively. RCD patients with aberrant cells between 25 and 50 % however, were missed by IHC and TCR in 50 and 57 % of cases, respectively. In addition, inter-rater reliability analysis of the IHC scoring revealed coder-pair Kappa coefficients between 0.28 and 0.85. CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemistry and to a lesser extent TCR-γ clonality analysis are sensitive in identifying patients with high numbers of aberrant IEL populations, yet miss half of RCD patients with moderately increased numbers. In addition, IHC has a high inter-observer variability. Therefore, patients suspected for RCD should undergo flow cytometric analysis of the duodenum.