Drug-Drug Interactions Involving High-Alert Medications that Lead to Interaction-Associated Symptoms in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Children treated in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) often receive several drugs together, among them drugs defined as high-alert medications (HAMs). Those drugs carry a high risk of causing patient harm, for example, due to a higher potential for interactions. HAMs should therefore be administered with caution, especially in a PICU. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the current study was to identify drug-drug interactions involving HAMs that increase the risk of interaction-associated symptoms in pediatric intensive care. METHODS: In a retrospective study, we analyzed the electronic documentation of patients hospitalized for at least 48 h in a general PICU who received at least two different drugs within a 24-h interval. We assessed potential drug-drug interactions involving HAM on the basis of the two drug information databases UpToDate and drugs.com. Furthermore, we analyzed whether symptoms were observed after the administration of drug pairs that could lead to interaction-associated symptoms. For drug pairs involving HAM administered on at least 2% of patient days, and symptoms observed at least ten times after a respective drug pair, we calculated odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values by using a univariate binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 315 analyzed patients, 81.3% (256/315) received drugs defined as high-alert medication for pediatric patients. Those high-alert medications were involved in 20,150 potential drug-drug interactions. In 14.0% (2830/20,150) of these, one or more symptoms were observed that could be a possible consequence of the interaction, resulting in 3203 observed symptoms affecting 56.3% (144/256) of patients receiving high-alert medication. The odds ratios for symptoms observed after a drug-drug interaction were increased for eight specific symptoms (each p ≤ 0.05), especially hemodynamic alterations and disturbances of electrolyte and fluid balance. The odds ratio was highest for decreased blood pressure observed after the administration of the drug pair fentanyl and furosemide (OR 5.06; 95% confidence interval 3.5-7.4; p < 0.001). Increased odds ratios for specific symptoms observed after drug-drug interactions resulted from eight combinations composed of eight different drugs: digoxin, fentanyl, midazolam, phenobarbital, potassium salts and vancomycin (high-alert medications), and the diuretics furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide (non-high-alert medications). The resulting drug pairs were: potassium salts-furosemide, fentanyl-furosemide, vancomycin-furosemide, digoxin-furosemide, digoxin-hydrochlorothiazide, fentanyl-phenobarbital, potassium salts-hydrochlorothiazide, and midazolam-hydrochlorothiazide. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of PICU patients, this study identified eight specific drug pairs involving high-alert medications that may increase the risk of interaction-associated symptoms, mainly hemodynamic alterations and electrolyte/fluid balance disturbances. If the administration of those drug pairs is unavoidable, patients should be closely monitored.

Authorized or Off-Label Use? A Structured Analysis of Summaries of Product Characteristics with Regard to Authorization in Pediatrics.

PURPOSE: The Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) is required to provide unambiguous information on the authorized use of a medicinal product. Therefore, we performed a structured analysis of the information provided for pediatric patients in current SmPCs. METHODS: In the German SmPC of the medicinal products of 452 active substances, we analyzed for each of the listed indications whether information on pediatric use was available in Sects. 4.1-4.4 of the SmPC and, if so, whether it was unambiguous. Information was considered unambiguous if it indicated an exact age- or weight-related specification. The analysis also considered the type of marketing authorization and the date of marketing authorization, either before or after the Pediatric Regulation 2007 came into force. RESULTS: Among the 30,354 identified indications in 8464 SmPCs, unambiguous information was found for 72.4% (21,974/30,354) of the indications. Of these, 45.4% (9967/21,974) disclosed a contraindication for the entire population under 18 years of age. The proportion of unambiguous information was higher for medicinal products with centralized marketing authorization (86.5% [1449/1676]) than for those with a national one (71.6% [20,525/28,678]; p < 0.001). A higher proportion of unambiguous information was found for the marketing authorization period 2007-2021 compared with 1996-2006 (1996-2006: 63.8% [7466/11,694]; 2007-2021: 82.1% [12,349/15,040]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For about a quarter of all indications, no or only ambiguous information was available for pediatric patients. The measures initiated in recent years to increase pediatric-specific information in SmPCs should be intensified in order to improve drug safety in children and adolescents.

How Intuitive Is the Administration of Pediatric Emergency Medication Devices for Parents? Objective Observation and Subjective Self-Assessment.

BACKGROUND: to assess the intuitiveness of parents' administration of pediatric emergency devices (inhalation, rectal, buccal, nasal, and auto-injector). METHODS: We invited parents without prior experience to administer the five devices to dummy dolls. We observed whether the parents chose the correct administration route and subsequently performed the correct administration procedures without clinically relevant errors. We interviewed parents for their self-assessment of their own administration performance and willingness to administer devices in actual emergencies. RESULTS: The correct administration route was best for the inhalation device (81/84, 96% of parents) and worst for the intranasal device (25/126, 20%). The correct administration procedures were best for the buccal device (63/98, 64%) and worst for the auto-injector device (0/93, 0%). Their own administration performance was rated to be best by parents for the inhalation device (59/84, 70%) and worst for the auto-injector device (17/93, 18%). The self-assessment of the correct administration overestimated the correct administration procedures for all the devices except the buccal one. Most parents were willing to administer the inhalation device in an emergency (67/94, 79%), while the fewest were willing to administration procedures the auto-injector device (28/93, 30%). CONCLUSIONS: Intuitiveness concerning the correct administration route and the subsequent correct administration procedures have to be improved for all the devices examined. The parents mostly overestimated their performance. Willingness to use a device in an actual emergency depended on the device.

Parents' Perceptions Regarding Their Children's Medications and Expert-Assessed Drug-Related Problems in Pediatric Patients with Inborn Errors of Metabolism.

We aimed to explore parents' perceptions of their children's medication use for inborn errors of metabolism (IEM), including the importance of medication intake, potential complications, and concerns about adverse drug reactions (ADR). Additionally, we aimed to determine expert-assessed clinically relevant drug-related problems, particularly those attributable to IEM. We interviewed 108 parents of 119 pediatric patients with IEM using a questionnaire relating to their perceptions regarding their children's IEM medication. In affected siblings, a questionnaire was used for each child. We performed medication analyses to evaluate the patient's complete medication regimen for clinically relevant drug-related problems, including medication for conditions other than IEM. It was very important to the parents of 85% of the patients to use IEM medication exactly as prescribed. The parents of 41% of patients perceived complications in their children's use of IEM medication. The parents of 47% of patients reported fears concerning ADR because of IEM medication. Parents observed ADR in 27% of patients because of IEM medication. In 44% of patients, medication for conditions other than IEM was inadequate because of drug-related problems not associated with the IEM; a safe alternative existed in 21% of patients. In summary, almost half of the parents of patients with IEM reported complications with their child's IEM medication intake and fears of ADR. Medication analyses showed that drug-related problems occurred regardless of IEM, emphasizing the general need to prescribe and dispense adequate, child-appropriate medication to minimize clinically relevant drug-related problems in pediatric patients.

Avoiding incompatible drug pairs in central-venous catheters of patients receiving critical care: an algorithm-based analysis and a staff survey.

PURPOSE: In a critical care setting, we aimed to identify and solve physico-chemical drug incompatibilities in central-venous catheters considering the staffs' knowledge and assumptions about incompatibilities. METHODS: (i) After positive ethical vote, an algorithm to identify incompatibilities was developed and applied. The algorithm was based on KIK® database and Stabilis® database, the drug label, and Trissel textbook. (ii) A questionnaire was created and used that asked staff for knowledge and assumptions about incompatibilities. (iii) A 4-step avoidance recommendation was developed and applied. RESULTS: (i) At least one incompatibility was identified in 64 (61.4%) of 104 enrolled patients. Eighty one (62.3%) of 130 incompatible combinations affected piperacillin/tazobactam and in 18 (13.8%) each furosemide and pantoprazole. (ii) 37.8% (n = 14) of the staff members participated in the questionnaire survey (median age: 31, IQR: 4.75 years). The combination of piperacillin/tazobactam and pantoprazole was incorrectly judged to be compatible by 85.7%. Only rarely felt the majority of respondents unsafe in administering drugs (median score: 1; 0, never to 5, always). (iii) In those 64 patients with at least one incompatibility, 68 avoidance recommendations were given, and all were fully accepted. In 44 (64.7%) of 68 recommendations "Step 1: Administer sequentially" was suggested as a avoidance strategy. In 9/68 (13.2%) "Step 2: Use another lumen", in 7/68 (10.3%) "Step 3: Take a break", and in 8/68 (11.8%) "Step 4: Use catheters with more lumens" were recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Although incompatibilities were common, the staff rarely felt unsafe when administering drugs. Knowledge deficits correlated well with the incompatibilities identified. All recommendations were fully accepted.

Intensive care drug therapy and its potential adverse effects on blood pressure and heart rate in critically ill children.

BACKGROUND: Owing to complex treatment, critically ill children may experience alterations in their vital parameters. We investigated whether such hemodynamic alterations were temporally and causally related to drug therapy. METHODS: In a university pediatric intensive care unit, we retrospectively analyzed hemodynamic alterations defined as values exceeding the limits set for heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). For causality assessment, we used the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Center (WHO-UMC) system, which categorizes the probability of causality as "certain," "probable," "possible," and "unlikely." RESULTS: Of 315 analyzed patients with 43,200 drug prescriptions, 59.7% experienced at least one hemodynamic alteration; 39.0% were affected by increased HR, 19.0% by decreased HR, 18.1% by increased BP, and 16.2% by decreased BP. According to drug information databases, 83.9% of administered drugs potentially lead to hemodynamic alterations. Overall, 88.3% of the observed hemodynamic alterations had a temporal relation to the administration of drugs; in 80.2%, more than one drug was involved. Based on the WHO-UMC system, a drug was rated as a "probable" causing factor for only 1.4% of hemodynamic alterations. For the remaining alterations, the probability ratings were lower because of multiple potential causes, e.g., several drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill children were frequently affected by hemodynamic alterations. The administration of drugs with potentially adverse effects on hemodynamic parameters is often temporally related to hemodynamic alterations. Hemodynamic alterations are often multifactorial, e.g., due to administering multiple drugs in rapid succession; thus, the influence of individual drugs cannot easily be captured with the WHO-UMC system.

Pharmacoepidemiological Analysis of Oral Contraceptive Use in Adolescents in a German Longitudinal Cohort Study.

To assess the use of oral contraceptives (OC) in adolescents, using data from a longitudinal, population-based pediatric cohort study (LIFE Child). We also investigated associations between OC use and socioeconomic status (SES), and associations between OC use and potential adverse drug reactions such as effects on blood pressure. We included 609 female participants of the LIFE Child cohort, aged ≥13 to <21 years, who visited the study center between 2012 and 2019. Data collection compromised drug use in the past 14 days, SES, and anthropometric data such as blood pressure. An analysis of covariance was used to detect potential associations between participants' blood pressure and OC. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to obtain odds ratios (aOR) adjusted for age and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The prevalence of OC use was 25.8%. OC intake was less common in participants with a high SES (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15, 0.62). The mean age at OC initiation did not change between 2012 and 2019. We observed an increased use of second-generation OC (2013: 17.9%, 2019: 48.5%; p = 0.013) and a decreased use of fourth-generation OC (2013: 71.8%, 2019: 45.5%; p = 0.027). We found a higher systolic (mean: 111.74 mmHg, p < 0.001) and diastolic (69.15 mmHg, p = 0.004) blood pressure in OC users compared to non-users (systolic: 108.60 mmHg; diastolic: 67.24 mmHg). Every fourth adolescent took an OC. The share of second-generation OC increased during the study period. OC intake was associated with low SES. OC users had a slightly higher blood pressure than non-users.

Y-site administration of electrolyte solutions and injectable acetaminophen-A physical compatibility study with combinations frequently used in pediatric intensive care and anesthesia.

AIM: Determination of the physical compatibility of acetaminophen and two different electrolyte solutions (an isotonic, balanced electrolyte solution and a hypotonic, glucose containing electrolyte solution) with drugs frequently used in routine pediatric intensive care. METHODS: Analytical investigations for frequently used combinations without pre-existing data were performed. Visual and microscopic observations according to the European Pharmacopeia as well as pH measurements and ultraviolet visible spectrometry at wavelengths of 350, 410 and 550 nm were conducted to analyze physical compatibility. All measurements were performed immediately after mixing as well as 1, 4, and 24 h after. RESULTS: In total, 42 combinations were analyzed. Visual incompatibilities were found with pantoprazole and diazepam with both electrolyte solutions. For furosemide, a particle formation in mixture with the hypotonic glucose-containing electrolyte solution and a change in pH ≥ 0.5 after 24 h with both electrolyte solutions were observed. Ampicillin, cefuroxime, diazepam, furosemide, linezolid, meropenem, and pantoprazole showed an aberration of the absorbance ≥0.04 (350 nm/410 nm) or ≥0.01 (550 nm) in the photometric measurements with the electrolyte solutions. For acetaminophen, a physical incompatibility was observed with ampicillin, diazepam, furosemide, and pantoprazole. CONCLUSION: Most of the analyzed combinations showed no signs of physical incompatibility and may therefore be administered via the same Y-site. However, diazepam, furosemide, and pantoprazole should not be administered simultaneously with acetaminophen or both electrolyte solutions.

Adverse Drug Reactions at Nonelective Hospital Admission in Children and Adolescents: Comparison of 4 Causality Assessment Methods.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare assessment methods to determine adverse drug reactions (ADRs) at nonelective hospital admission in pediatric patients, to investigate the interrater reliability of assessment methods in pediatric care, and to analyze symptoms related to ADRs and (suicidal) drug intoxications. METHODS: For 1 year, the medical records of nonelective patients admitted to a university pediatric department were evaluated for potential ADRs using 4 assessments methods by 1 experienced rater. Krippendorff α was calculated from a sample of 14 patients evaluated by 4 experienced raters to determine interrater reliability. RESULTS: In 1831 nonelective hospital admissions, 63.4% (1161 of 1831) of patients had received at least one drug before admission. We found a potential causal relationship between drugs and symptoms documented at admission and thus potential ADRs according to Naranjo in 23.3% (271 of 1161) of those patients, World Health Organization - Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) in 22.5% (261 of 1161), Koh in 21.7% (252 of 1161), and Begaud in 16.5% (192 of 1161). The probability rating of the potential causal relationships varied considerably between the methods (Naranjo-Begaud, P < 0.01; Naranjo-Koh, P < 0.001; Koh-Begaud, P < 0.01; Begaud-WHO-UMC, P < 0.01). Acceptable interrater reliability (α ≥ 0.667) was only obtained for WHO-UMC (α = 0.7092). The most frequently identified definite ADR was sedation in 1.5% of all nonelective patients with medication before hospital admission. In 1.2% (22 of 1831) of all nonelective admissions, we found drug intoxications with suicidal intent. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment methods showed a high variability in the determination of a potential causal relationship between drug and documented symptom, in the classification of the probability of ADRs, and suboptimal interrater reliability. Thus, their feasibility in pediatric patients is limited.

Drug-handling problems and expectations of the ideal pediatric drug-reported by children and their parents.

Experienced drug-handling problems and inadequately considered expectations for drug therapy have an unfavorable influence on therapy. We performed a questionnaire survey in (i) parents of 0-5-year-old children and (ii) 6-17-year olds and their parents. We assessed (A) experienced drug-handling problems and (B) expectations for drug therapy. (i) Forty-six parents and (ii) 103 children and their parents participated in the study. Experienced drug-handling problems were described by (i) 100% of parents and (ii) 62% of children and 70% of parents. Problems concerned with the preparation of the drug, dosing, compliance with the time interval, and acceptance. (i) Sixty-five percent of parents preferred a peroral route of drug administration, while (ii) 74% of children and 86% of parents did so. Preferred characteristics of peroral drug formulations, e.g., liquid versus solid drug formulations or flavor, were highly heterogeneous. Preferences of 6-17-year-old children and their parents matched in 43 to 66%.   Conclusion: Most children and their parents had already experienced drug-handling problems. Preferences concerning the ideal pediatric drug were highly heterogeneous and in about half of cases, preferences of children and their parents differed. Thus, the children should be approached directly. If information is solely gained from parents, the children's needs might remain unmet. What is Known: • Pediatric drug administration is complex and therefore error-prone. • Experiences and expectations of children and their parents should be considered. What is New: •Most pediatric patients and their parents have already experienced drug-handling problems. • Expectations concerning the ideal pediatric drug are highly heterogeneous. Parents are often insufficiently aware of those expectations in their children.

Prejudices against people with epilepsy as perceived by affected people and their families.

PROBLEM: Prejudices can impair social participation of people with epilepsy. METHODS: From 2019 to 2020, we invited people with epilepsy and their relatives across Germany to fill in a questionnaire. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty people with epilepsy (PWE, median age: 40 years; min./max.: 19/83; 66% female) and 103 relatives (REL, median age: 42 years; min./max. 23/70; 83% female) took part in the survey. 44% PWE and 40% REL said prejudices against PWE had not declined in recent years. Of PWE, 64% reported they had experienced prejudices themselves. In an open question with multiple answers possible, 71% of the PWE described concrete prejudices against PWE, 62% of the REL did so. The reported prejudices concerned symptoms of epilepsy (37% PWE; 23% REL), academic or occupational performance (47% PWE; 38% REL), social or family life (27% PWE, 29% REL), and other topics (7% PWE, 4% REL). Of PWE, 88% said all or almost all relatives knew about their condition, 74% stated this applied to all or almost all friends, and 48% told all or almost all colleagues about their epilepsy. Of PWE, 94% would want to know if a relative had epilepsy, 87% would like to know about a friend's epilepsy, 70% about a colleague's epilepsy. Fear of stigmatization was a reason for not always communicating the condition according to 20% PWE and 63% REL. None of PWE and 16% of REL named shame as a reason. CONCLUSION: People with epilepsy still experience prejudices and fear of stigmatization hinders an open communication about the condition.

Febrile seizures: perceptions and knowledge of parents of affected and unaffected children.

Febrile seizures (FS) in children are common, but little is known about parents' perceptions and knowledge of FS. We interviewed parents of children aged 6 months to 6 years affected by FS (FS group, 65 parents) or unaffected (control group, 54 parents). In the FS group, 32% said they knew their child had an FS when the first event occurred, and 89% described fear when the child had a seizure, with a median intensity of 10/10 (Q25/Q75: 9/10). Related to follow-up, 77% in the FS group (will) observe their child more carefully after the first seizure happened, and 63% (will) give antipyretics earlier at a median temperature of 38.2 °C (100.8 °F). In the FS group, 62% were unaware of FS before the first event (54% of control group did not know about FS thus far, n.s.). In the FS group, 20% would put a solid object in the mouth of a child having a seizure (control group, 39%, p = 0.030), and 92% would administer an available anti-seizure rescue medication (control group, 78%, p = 0.019). In the FS group, 71% feared that children with FS might suffocate (control group, 70%, n.s.). CONCLUSION: Information about FS and their management should be more available to improve parents' coping and patient safety. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Febrile seizures in children are common. • The prognosis of children suffering from febrile seizures is usually rather good. WHAT IS NEW: • Over half of parents had not informed themselves about febrile seizures so far; and only 32% of parents realized their child had a febrile seizure when it occurred. • Most parents described own fear with a median intensity of 10/10; and 63% (will) give antipyretics earlier at a median temperature of 38.2 °C (100.8 °F).

Handling Errors in the Use of Inhalation Devices: Inhalation Technique Skills and Knowledge in Pediatric Nurses.

BACKGROUND: Children suffering from bronchial diseases need assistance from nurses in the use of inhalation devices. PURPOSE: We aimed to assess nurses' skills and knowledge concerning drug administration with inhalation devices in hospitalized pediatric patients. METHODS: An expert panel defined medication errors in drug administration with inhalation devices in children. We monitored 241 inhalation procedures to investigate nurses' inhalation technique skills. Twenty-nine nurses completed a questionnaire to assess nurses' knowledge. RESULTS: Skills: In 93 of 241 (39%) inhalation procedures, the mask/mouthpiece did not fit airtight. In none of the 11 inhalations administering a glucocorticoid, the patient's mouth was thoroughly cleaned afterward. Knowledge: Ten of 29 nurses (34%) thought a distance between mask and the patient's face was acceptable. Only 16 of 29 (55%) knew that it is necessary to thoroughly clean the patient's mouth after the inhalation of budesonide. CONCLUSIONS: We found that education on inhalation procedures including practical training is required to increase patient safety.

Interviews with patients aged 6-17 years provide valuable insights for physicians who need to deliver an epilepsy diagnosis.

AIM: Meeting children's needs when communicating an epilepsy diagnosis can have a large impact on their treatment. We investigated children's experiences and wishes concerning their first conversation about epilepsy. METHODS: This prospective study was performed in the neuropaediatric departments of two German university hospitals from 2 October 2018 to 12 April 2019. The semi-structured interview contained open questions, and multiple answers were allowed. RESULTS: We interviewed 101 patients (57 male) aged 6-17 (median 11) years and asked them to put themselves in the place of a physician delivering an epilepsy diagnosis. They said they would be careful and friendly and consider the children's feelings (29%), give them detailed information about their condition (29%) and reduce their fears and offer hope (26%). They would tell them the importance of always taking their medication and explain why (25%), make sure that the conversation took place in a comfortable setting (21%), explain any safety precautions (19%), keep the conversation straightforward and provide examples (16%). CONCLUSION: Children with epilepsy provided concrete recommendations for physicians delivering an epilepsy diagnosis, with regard to the ideal setting, important topics and optimal communication. The recommendations could help physicians meet children's needs.

Knowledge of and attitudes towards epilepsy among first- and second-year students at a German university.

PROBLEM: Little is known about university students' knowledge of and attitudes towards epilepsy. METHODS: We invited first- and second-year students of different study subjects at Rostock University to complete a questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 497 students took part in the survey (209 medicine, 105 theology, 94 primary education, 89 computer science). Of all students, 38.0% knew someone with epilepsy, and 27.2% had already witnessed a seizure. Fewer computer science students than medical students knew someone with epilepsy (p = 0.002) and had witnessed a seizure (p < 0.001). From five presented symptoms, all were correctly assigned to a possible seizure by 27.0% of all students. If they had epilepsy themselves, 43.7% would tell their fellow students about it; and 76.1% would definitely be friends with someone with epilepsy, and 53.7% would definitely date a person with epilepsy. On a 5-point Likert scale, computer science students expressed less willingness to be friends with (p < 0.001) or to date someone with epilepsy (p = 0.004) than medical students. The willingness of theology and primary education students did not significantly differ from that of medical students. We found no statistical differences between medical students and the other student groups for correct assignment of all symptoms and the readiness to tell others if they had epilepsy themselves. CONCLUSION: First- and second-year students showed gaps in knowledge and reservations about people with epilepsy, regardless of their study subject. However, computer science students have had particularly little contact with people with epilepsy and expressed less positive attitudes. Medical students, on the other hand, hardly differed from students of theology and primary education.

Anticonvulsant long-term and rescue medication: The children's perspective.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about children's perspectives and attitudes towards their long-term and rescue anticonvulsant medication. METHODS: We interviewed paediatric patients aged 6-18 years in two university hospitals concerning their anticonvulsant treatment based on a structured questionnaire. We also asked them to draw a picture titled "Me and my medication". RESULTS: We interviewed 100 patients with anticonvulsant long-term medication. 87/100 patients considered their medication to be helpful. 66/100 patients gave an explanation on why a regular medication intake is important, e.g. "Reduction/prevention of seizures", "Otherwise I have to go to hospital", "I don't want to die" or "Kill the virus which is causing epilepsy". Of 92 patients with a prescribed rescue medication, 22 (24%) did not know about it. Of the remaining 70, 39 (56%) stated they always carry it with them. When asked to imagine being the physician and to inform about the medication, the children would use illustrative (e.g. brochures) or demonstration material (e.g. "real tablets") to aid their consultation (47/100). 55/100 would stress the necessity of a regular intake. 52 participants drew a picture related to the given topic. Of those, only 1 depicted rescue medication. CONCLUSION: Paediatric patients mostly have a positive attitude towards their medication. However, misconceptions exist and participants expressed the desire for more interactive support in the medical counselling. Children are not sufficiently aware of their rescue medication in everyday life. Consequently, physicians should consider the children's needs in their consultations and put more focus on potentially life-saving rescue medication.

Why do children and adolescents with epilepsy disclose or not disclose their condition to their friends?

A diagnosis of epilepsy substantially influences the lives of affected children and adolescents, and concealing the diagnosis can generate additional stress. However, little is known about whether children and adolescents communicate their diagnosis to their friends. We performed a survey at two German university hospitals. Epilepsy patients aged 6-18 years were asked why they did or did not disclose their condition to their friends. A total of 101 patients (44 female, 57 male) were interviewed. Twenty-one (21%) informed all their friends about their epilepsy, 63 (62%) informed only certain friends, and 3 (3%) did not specify. Fourteen (14%) did not inform any friends. Their reasons for informing their friends were trust in friends (47/87; 54%); questions from friends, e.g., about missed school days (29/87; 33%); a wish for friends to be informed in case of an emergency (15/87; 17%); and a desire to live openly with the condition (8/87; 9%). The reasons for not informing friends were fear of stigmatization/shame (4/14; 29%), discouragement from parents (3/14; 21%), and a wish for confidentiality (3/14; 21%).Conclusion: Most children and adolescents inform their friends about their epilepsy. Fear of stigmatization is the main reason for not informing friends about this condition. What is Known • An epilepsy diagnosis is a life-changing event for affected children and adolescents. • Having to conceal the diagnosis can be very stressful. What is New • Most pediatric epilepsy patients informed at least some close friends about their diagnosis motivated by trust in friends; questions from friends, e.g., about missed school days; and a wish for friends to be informed in case of an emergency. • Fear of stigmatization/shame, discouragement from parents, and a wish for confidentiality were the motivations for concealing the disease.

How do pediatric patients perceive adverse drug events of anticonvulsant drugs? A survey.

Anticonvulsant drugs have a high risk of adverse drug events. Little is known about the perception of those events by pediatric patients. We performed a survey in the neuropediatric departments of two university hospitals. Using a questionnaire, we interviewed patients aged 6-18 years with current anticonvulsant treatment regarding (i) their fears about potential adverse drug events, (ii) experienced adverse drug events, and (iii) perceived burden of experienced adverse drug events. One hundred patients took part in the interview. (i) 40 (40%) expressed fears that the medication could harm them. Eighteen of 40 (45%) named fears concerning specific adverse drug events. Of those, 12/18 (67%) feared neurologic or psychiatric symptoms. (ii) 37 (37%) of children described altogether 60 experienced adverse drug events. Of those, 38 (63%) concerned neurologic or psychiatric symptoms. (iii) 32/37 (82%) children who experienced adverse drug events felt bothered by the experienced event. Among others, they described an emotional burden (11/37, 30%), and restrictions in school performance (8/37, 22%) and favorite leisure activities (4/37, 11%).Conclusion: School-aged children are well able to describe adverse drug events of their anticonvulsant medication. Almost two thirds of the described events concern neurologic or psychiatric symptoms that cause an emotional burden and restrictions according to the patients. What is Known: • Anticonvulsants have a high potential of adverse drug events. • In an earlier survey, parents expressed fears of severe adverse drug events such as liver failure, which seldom occur, and reported a high number of neurological and psychological adverse drug events. What is New: • Many children fear that their anticonvulsants could harm them, and they fear and experience neurological and psychological adverse drug events. • According to the children, adverse drug events cause an emotional burden and restrictions in school performance and favorite leisure activities.

Epilepsy: knowledge and attitudes of physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and speech therapists.

Physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and speech therapists play a key role in the treatment of children with epilepsy. We performed a survey of therapists' knowledge of and attitudes towards epilepsy in two regions of Germany, the city of Leipzig and the rural district of Zwickau. Therapists of 29/68 (43%) outpatient practices and 4/9 (44%) hospitals took part. In total, 195 therapists participated: 63 (32%) physiotherapists, 74 (38%) occupational therapists, and 58 (30%) speech therapist. In 65%, epilepsy was subject of vocational training. Of all therapists, 8% claimed they had not treated epilepsy patients so far. During professional life, 43% had witnessed a seizure. Of all therapists, 44% correctly assumed a seizure could result in death. During a seizure, 42% would perform the obsolete measure of placing something solid in the patient's mouth, and 41% would administer a prescribed rescue medication. More information on epilepsy was requested by 92%.Conclusion: Most therapists treat patients with epilepsy, and almost half have already witnessed a seizure. Often, however, epilepsy is not subject of vocational training. The risk of a fatal outcome of a seizure is underestimated, and many therapists would perform obsolete measures. Knowledge of seizure management should be transmitted to therapists especially during vocational training.

Epilepsy: a cross-sectional study of paediatricians and general practitioners on their experiences, knowledge and handling of the disease.

Epilepsy is a life-changing disease, and patients with epilepsy may face a number of issues. Paediatricians and general practitioners are often the first to be asked for advice. This cross-sectional study was performed to gain information on the knowledge and experiences of paediatricians and general practitioners on epilepsy. From September 2015 to July 2017, paediatricians and general practitioners in Leipzig, Germany, were asked to take part in a face-to-face interview. Overall, 40 paediatricians and 60 general practitioners participated in the study. A total of 99/100 (99%) kept emergency medication available and 96/100 (96%) would administer it during a seizure. Also, 40/40 (100%) of the paediatricians and 34/60 (57%) of the general practitioners recommended that non-professionals should administer emergency medication, and 18/40 (45%) of the paediatricians and 35/60 (58%) of the general practitioners would put an object in the patient's mouth during a seizure. With regards to safety precautions, paediatricians mentioned the risks associated with swimming (30/40; 75%) and the potential of falling from a height (23/40; 58%), whereas general practitioners focused on being around vehicles including driving regulations (43/60; 72%). Only 5/60 (8%) of the general practitioners advised that precautions should be taken during swimming. Fatigue/exhaustion was the most common adverse drug event associated with long-term anticonvulsive therapy mentioned by paediatricians (13/40; 33%) and general practitioners (27/60; 45%). Of all the participants, 23/100 (23%) recommended epilepsy training programmes for patients and families, however, none were able to name a specific programme. Nearly half of the general practitioners did not recommend the use of rescue medication by non-professionals. This measure, however, can prevent the occurrence of prolonged non-treatable seizures. Both paediatricians and general practitioners should bear in mind that placing an object in the mouth during a seizure should be avoided due to the risk of additional injury. To reduce the risk of drowning, physicians should recommend safety precautions during swimming. Information on epilepsy training programmes for patients and families should be diffused to all physicians taking care of patients with epilepsy.