Isolated fetal umbilical vein varix and the association with intrauterine fetal death and fetal growth restriction: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and nested retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) in fetuses with an isolated fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix (i-FIUVV). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study combined with a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed. In the retrospective cohort study, all singleton fetuses with an i-FIUVV in the fetal medicine units of the Amsterdam UMC (between 2007 and 2023) were analyzed. The primary outcome measures were IUFD and FGR. The sample proportions of IUFD and FGR were depicted as risk percentages. The IUFD proportion was compared to the regional reference population and the FGR proportion was compared to the reported proportions in Europe. The secondary outcome measures were gestational age at diagnosis, initial and maximal FIUVV diameter, fetal monitoring in pregnancy, turbulent flow in the varix, thrombus formation in the varix, induction of labor, gestational age at birth, and birthweight centile. The proportion of fetuses with a birthweight below the 10th centile was compared with that of the regional reference population. The systematic review included all cases from eligible literature published between 2007 and 2023 supplemented by the data of our retrospective cohort study. In the systematic review and meta-analysis, the pooled proportions of IUFD and FGR were assessed in fetuses with i-FIUVV. RESULTS: The retrospective cohort included 43 singletons with an i-FIUVV. The IUFD risk was 0% [Confidence Interval, CI: 0%-8.2%], which did not differ significantly from 0.3% in the reference population, p = 1.0. The risk of FGR was 16.3% [CI: 6.8%-30.7%] in the studied population, which is higher than the reported incidence of FGR in Europe ranging from 5%-10%. The proportion of fetuses with birthweights below the 10th centile was higher in our cohort compared with the reference population (23.3 vs. 9.9%, p < 0.01). The systematic review included 12 articles, three abstracts, and our current cohort. In total, 513 cases with an i-FIUVV were included. The pooled risk was 0.4% [CI: 0.1%-1.7%] for IUFD and 5.2% [CI: 1.1%-21.3%] for FGR. The mean gestational age at birth did not exceed 39 weeks in neither the cohort (38.7 weeks) nor the pooled literature (37.6 weeks). CONCLUSION: An i-FIUVV in singletons is not associated with an increased IUFD risk up to 39 weeks of gestation but is possibly associated with FGR. The incidence of FGR in our cohort was higher than in the pooled literature (16.3% vs. 5%) but FGR definitions in the included studies varied. The proportion of birthweights below the 10th percentile in our cohort was significantly higher than in the reference group. Thus, based on these findings, we suggest conducting sonographic growth assessments while simultaneously assessing the i-FIUVV. No further monitoring and follow-up are indicated up to 39 weeks of gestation. After 39 weeks of gestation, data on fetuses with i-FIUVV and their outcomes are lacking.

The Right Temporal Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia Is Not Genetically Sporadic: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Right temporal variant frontotemporal dementia (rtvFTD) has been generally considered as a right sided variant of semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), which is a genetically sporadic disorder. Recently, we have shown that rtvFTD has a unique clinical syndrome compared to svPPA and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. OBJECTIVE: We challenge the assumption that rtvFTD is a sporadic, non-familial variant of FTD by identifying potential autosomal dominant inheritance and related genes in rtvFTD. METHODS: We collected all subjects with a diagnosis of FTD or primary progressive aphasia who had undergone genetic screening (n = 284) and subsequently who had a genetic variant (n = 48) with a diagnosis of rtvFTD (n = 6) in 2 specialized memory clinics. RESULTS: Genetic variants in FTD related genes were found in 33% of genetically screened rtvFTD cases; including MAPT (n = 4), GRN (n = 1), and TARDBP (n = 1) genes, whereas only one svPPA case had a genetic variant in our combined cohorts. Additionally, 4 out of 6 rtvFTD subjects had a strong family history for dementia. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that rtvFTD, unlike svPPA, is not a pure sporadic, but a heterogeneous potential genetic variant of FTD, and screening for genetic causes for FTD should be performed in patients with rtvFTD.

A clinical-radiological framework of the right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia.

The concept of the right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia (rtvFTD) is still equivocal. The syndrome accompanying predominant right anterior temporal atrophy has previously been described as memory loss, prosopagnosia, getting lost and behavioural changes. Accurate detection is challenging, as the clinical syndrome might be confused with either behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) or Alzheimer's disease. Furthermore, based on neuroimaging features, the syndrome has been considered a right-sided variant of semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA). Therefore, we aimed to demarcate the clinical and neuropsychological characteristics of rtvFTD versus svPPA, bvFTD and Alzheimer's disease. Moreover, we aimed to compare its neuroimaging profile against svPPA, which is associated with predominant left anterior temporal atrophy. Of 619 subjects with a clinical diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia or primary progressive aphasia, we included 70 subjects with a negative amyloid status in whom predominant right temporal lobar atrophy was identified based on blinded visual assessment of their initial brain MRI scans. Clinical symptoms were assessed retrospectively and compared with age- and sex-matched patients with svPPA (n = 70), bvFTD (n = 70) and Alzheimer's disease (n = 70). Prosopagnosia, episodic memory impairment and behavioural changes such as disinhibition, apathy, compulsiveness and loss of empathy were the most common initial symptoms, whereas during the disease course, patients developed language problems such as word-finding difficulties and anomia. Distinctive symptoms of rtvFTD compared to the other groups included depression, somatic complaints, and motor/mental slowness. Aside from right temporal atrophy, the imaging pattern showed volume loss of the right ventral frontal area and the left temporal lobe, which represented a close mirror image of svPPA. Atrophy of the bilateral temporal poles and the fusiform gyrus were associated with prosopagnosia in rtvFTD. Our results highlight that rtvFTD has a unique clinical presentation. Since current diagnostic criteria do not cover specific symptoms of the rtvFTD, we propose a diagnostic tree to be used to define diagnostic criteria and call for an international validation.