RESUMEN
Background: Left ventricular aneurysms (LVAs) are a well-appreciated complication of acute myocardial infarction. Ventricular aneurysms involving the left ventricle (LV) typically evolve as a result of anterior myocardial infarction and are associated with greater morbidity, complication rates, and hospital resource utilization. Incidence of LVA is decreasing with advent of modern reperfusion therapies; however, in the setting of excess morbidity, clinicians must maintain an appreciation for their appearance to allow timely diagnosis and individualized care. Case summary: This case report describes the clinical history, investigation, appearance, and management of a patient with calcified apical LVA with history of previous anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The patient was initially admitted for elective coronary angiography in the setting of worsening exertional dyspnoea and subsequently underwent coronary artery bypass graft, aneurysm resection, and LV reconstruction. Discussion: Left ventricular aneurysms are an uncommon complication experienced in the modern era of acute myocardial infarction and current reperfusion therapies, but remain an important cause of excess morbidity and complication. Evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, workup, and subsequent management of LVAs are lacking. The imaging findings presented in this case serve as an important reminder of the appearance of LVAs so that timely diagnosis and individualized care considerations can be made.
RESUMEN
Background: Pericardial decompression syndrome (PDS) is an uncommon complication of pericardial drainage of large pericardial effusions and cardiac tamponade characterized by paradoxical haemodynamic instability following drainage. Pericardial decompression syndrome may occur immediately, or in the days following pericardial decompression, and presents with signs and symptoms suggestive of uni-/biventricular failure or acute pulmonary oedema. Case summary: This series describes two cases of this syndrome which demonstrates acute right ventricular failure as a mechanism of PDS and provides insights into the echocardiographic findings and clinical course of this poorly understood syndrome. Case 1 describes a patient who underwent pericardiocentesis, whilst Case 2 describes a patient who underwent surgical pericardiostomy. In both patients, acute right ventricular failure was observed following the release of tamponade and is favoured to be the cause of haemodynamic instability. Discussion: Pericardial decompression syndrome is a poorly understood, likely underreported complication of pericardial drainage for cardiac tamponade associated with high morbidity and mortality. Whilst a number of hypotheses exist as to the aetiology of PDS, this case series supports haemodynamic compromise being secondary to left ventricular compression following acute right ventricular dilatation.