RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Identifying a potential single monogenetic disorder in healthy couples is costly due to the Assisted Reproduction facilities' current methodology for screening, which focuses on the detecting multiple genetic disorders at once. Here, we report the successful application of a low-cost and fast preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects (PGT-M) approach for detecting propionic acidemia (PA) in embryos obtained from a confirmed heterozygous propionyl-CoA carboxylase alpha subunit (PCCA) couple. CASE SUMMARY: A fertile 32-years old Mexican couple with denied consanguinity sought antenatal genetic counseling. They were suspected obligate PA carriers due to a previous deceased PA male newborn with an unknown PCCA/propionyl-CoA carboxylase beta subunit (PCCB) genotype. Next-Generation Sequencing revealed a heterozygous genotype for a pathogenic PCCA variant (c.2041-1G>T, ClinVar:RCV000802701.1; dbSNP:rs1367867218) in both parents. The couple requested in vitro fertilization (IVF) and PGT-M for PA. From IVF, 12 oocytes were collected and fertilized, of which two resulted in high-quality embryos. Trophectoderm biopsies and Whole Genome Amplification by a fragmentation/amplification-based method were performed and revealed that the two embryos were euploid. End-point polymerase chain reaction and further Sanger sequencing of the exon-intron borders revealed a wild-type PCCA male embryo and a heterozygous c.2041-1G>T female embryo. Both embryos were transferred, resulting in a clinical pregnancy and the delivery of a healthy male newborn (38 wk, weight: 4080 g, length: 49 cm, APGAR 9/9). The absence of PA was confirmed by expanded newborn screening. CONCLUSION: We show that using PGT-M with Whole Genome Amplification templates, coupled with IVF, can reduce the transmission of a pathogenic variant of the PCCA gene.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: At our facilities, patients that received embryos using donor oocyte during in vitro fertilization (IVF), usually have had at least one failed attempt to produce at least one euploid embryo with their own oocytes; however, the current debate between using donor over patient oocytes remains inconclusive. We examined the aneuploidy rate and IVF clinical outcomes from embryos derived from either donor or patient oocytes. METHODS: Retrospectively, 973 cycles were examined of patients who underwent a standard IVF protocol. Chromosomal content was determined using Pre-implantation Genetic Testing (PGT) by either microarray-comparative genomic hybridization or Next-generation sequencing from either Day 3 (blastocysts) or Day 5 (trophectoderm) embryo biopsies, respectively. Embryo implantation was confirmed by serum ß-hCG (> 10 m IU/mL/Day 14), whereas clinical pregnancy by a fetal heartbeat (Week 6.5-8). RESULTS: Embryos derived from donor oocytes presented with more monosomies than embryos derived from patient oocytes (41.2% vs. 25.4%, p < 0.05, respectively); however, only Trisomy 7 (0.4% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.05) and Trisomy in X (0.7% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.05) were significantly less present when compared to patient oocyte derived embryos. Interestingly, rates for embryo implantation (46.7% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.35), clinical pregnancy (38.5% vs. 43.1%, p = 0.30), and live birth (30.5% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.99) were similar for embryos derived from donor and patient oocytes. These results did not change when adjusted for the number of embryos implanted. CONCLUSION: Here, we show no significant differences in achieving pregnancy when using donor oocytes. Taking into consideration that aneuploidy rates are > 30% in embryos, independent of the oocyte origin, PGT should be recommended with donor oocytes as well.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Laron syndrome (LS) is an autosomal recessive hereditary condition affecting only 1/1000000 births. The cause is associated with mutations in the growth hormone (GH) receptor (GHR), leading to GH insensitivity. LS patients typically present with severe growth retardation, obesity, and abnormal sexual maturation. Currently, LS diagnosis is performed post-delivery. Therefore, we assessed the efficiency of Pre-implantation Genetic Testing (PGT) coupled with monoplex-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology for detecting this monogenic disease in embryos from a couple confirmed as LS heterozygous carriers. CASE SUMMARY: The couple LS-carriers were confirmed by the presence of a first child born with LS. The couple underwent a standard in vitro fertilization (IVF) protocol. DNA was collected from trophectoderm cells from day 5 embryos. Whole genome amplification (WGA) was performed using a Sureplex DNA Amplification System and analyzed by PCR, targeting the deletion of the exons 5 and 6 in the GHR gene as well as PGT by Next-generation Sequencing (Illumina). Eleven embryos were collected and analyzed. 27.3% were the wild type for GHR, 45.5% were heterozygotes, and 18.2% homozygous mutants. One embryo yielded no results. Three 2-embryos transfers were performed; 2 normal homozygous and four heterozygous carriers were selected for transfer. The first two transfers were unsuccessful, whereas the final transfer with two heterozygous embryos resulted in clinical pregnancy. The genomic composition of the fetus was verified, applying the same techniques using amniocytes, extracted after 21 wk of the ongoing pregnancy. The fetus was confirmed as GHR deletion in exon 5-6, carrier. A non-affected baby was born. CONCLUSION: Here, we present a case demonstrating that using WGA as a template in addition to PCR targeting specific gene regions, exons 5 and 6 on the GHR gene, could identify LS carrier embryos. This provides evidence that WGA and PCR serve as an excellent tool to detect this specific monogenic disease in IVF embryos, thus allowing selection of candidate embryos for transfer successfully when a specific inherited genetic mutation/disease is suspected.
RESUMEN
Our objective was to determine if whole genome amplification (WGA) provides suitable DNA for qPCR-based genotyping for human embryos. Single blastomeres (Day 3) or trophoblastic cells (Day 5) were isolated from 342 embryos for WGA. Comparative Genomic Hybridization determined embryo sex as well as Trisomy 18 or Trisomy 21. To determine the embryo's sex, qPCR melting curve analysis for SRY and DYS14 was used. Logistic regression indicated a 4.4%, 57.1%, or 98.8% probability of a male embryo when neither gene, SRY only, or both genes were detected, respectively (accuracy = 94.1%, kappa = 0.882, and p < 0.001). Fluorescent Capillary Electrophoresis for the amelogenin genes (AMEL) was also used to determine sex. AMELY peak's height was higher and this peak's presence was highly predictive of male embryos (AUC = 0.93, accuracy = 81.7%, kappa = 0.974, and p < 0.001). Trisomy 18 and Trisomy 21 were determined using the threshold cycle difference for RPL17 and TTC3, respectively, which were significantly lower in the corresponding embryos. The Ct difference for TTC3 specifically determined Trisomy 21 (AUC = 0.89) and RPL17 for Trisomy 18 (AUC = 0.94). Here, WGA provides adequate DNA for PCR-based techniques for preimplantation genotyping.
Asunto(s)
ADN/genética , Embrión de Mamíferos/metabolismo , Embrión de Mamíferos/patología , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Técnicas de Genotipaje/métodos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Diagnóstico Preimplantación/métodos , Moldes Genéticos , Adulto , Biopsia , Electroforesis Capilar , Embrión de Mamíferos/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Desnaturalización de Ácido Nucleico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The ATRX gene encodes a chromatin remodeling protein that has two important domains, a helicase/ATPase domain and a domain composed of two zinc fingers called the ADD domain. The ADD domain binds to histone tails and has been proposed to mediate their binding to chromatin. The putative ATRX homolog in Drosophila (XNP/dATRX) has a conserved helicase/ATPase domain but lacks the ADD domain. In this study, we propose that XNP/dATRX interacts with other proteins with chromatin-binding domains to recognize specific regions of chromatin to regulate gene expression. We report a novel functional interaction between XNP/dATRX and the cell proliferation factor DREF in the expression of pannier (pnr). DREF binds to DNA-replication elements (DRE) at the pnr promoter to modulate pnr expression. XNP/dATRX interacts with DREF, and the contact between the two factors occurs at the DRE sites, resulting in transcriptional repression of pnr. The occupancy of XNP/dATRX at the DRE, depends on DNA binding of DREF at this site. Interestingly, XNP/dATRX regulates some, but not all of the genes modulated by DREF, suggesting a promoter-specific role of XNP/dATRX in gene regulation. This work establishes that XNP/dATRX directly contacts the transcriptional activator DREF in the chromatin to regulate gene expression.