In Vitro, Ex Vivo, and In Vivo Approaches for Investigation of Skin Scarring: Human and Animal Models.

Significance: The cutaneous repair process naturally results in different types of scarring that are classified as normal or pathological. Affected individuals are often affected from an esthetic, physical (functional), and psychosocial perspective. The distinct nature of scarring in humans, particularly the formation of pathological scars, makes the study of skin scarring a challenge for researchers in this area. Several established experimental models exist for studying scar formation. However, the increasing development and validation of newly emerging models have made it possible to carry out studies focused on different variables that influence this unique process. Recent Advances: Experimental models such as in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models have obtained different degrees of success in the reproduction of the scar formation in its native milieu and true environment. These models also differ in their ability to elucidate the molecular, cellular, and structural mechanisms involved in scarring, as well as for testing new agents and approaches for therapies. The models reviewed here, including cells derived from human skin and in vivo animal models, have contributed to the advancement of skin scarring research. Critical Issues and Future Directions: The absence of experimental models that faithfully reproduce the typical characteristics of the different types of human skin scars makes the improvement of validated models and the establishment of new ones a critical unmet need. The fields of wound healing research combined with tissue engineering have offered newer alternatives for experimental studies with the potential to provide clinically useful knowledge about scar formation.

Photobiomodulation of a flowable matrix in a human skin ex vivo model demonstrates energy-based enhancement of engraftment integration and remodeling.

The use of dermal substitutes to treat skin defects such as ulcers has shown promising results, suggesting a potential role for skin substitutes for treating acute and chronic wounds. One of the main drawbacks with the use of dermal substitutes is the length of time from engraftment to graft take, plus the risk of contamination and failure due to this prolonged integration. Therefore, the use of adjuvant energy-based therapeutic modalities to augment and accelerate the rate of biointegration by dermal substitute engraftments is a desirable outcome. The photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy modulates the repair process, by stimulating cellular proliferation and angiogenesis. Here, we evaluated the effect of PBM on a collagen-glycosaminoglycan flowable wound matrix (FWM) in an ex vivo human skin wound model. PBM resulted in accelerated rate of re-epithelialization and organization of matrix as seen by structural arrangement of collagen fibers, and a subsequent increased expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) leading to an overall improved healing process. The use of PBM promoted a beneficial effect on the rate of integration and healing of FWM. We therefore propose that the adjuvant use of PBM may have utility in enhancing engraftment and tissue repair and be of value in clinical practice.

Effects of microcurrent application alone or in combination with topical Hypericum perforatum L. and Arnica montana L. on surgically induced wound healing in Wistar rats.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the wound healing activity of microcurrent application alone or in combination with topical Hypericum perforatum L. and Arnica montana L. on skin surgical incision surgically induced on the back of Wistar rats. DESIGN: The animals were randomly divided into six groups: (1) no intervention (control group); (2) microcurrent application (10 µA/2 min); (3) topical application of gel containing H. perforatum; (4) topical application of H. perforatum gel and microcurrent (10 µA/2 min); (5) topical application of gel containing A. montana; (6) topical application of A. montana gel and microcurrent (10 µA/2 min). Tissue samples were obtained on the 2nd, 6th and 10th days after injury and submitted to structural and morphometric analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Differences in wound healing were observed between treatments when compared to the control group. Microcurrent application alone or combined with H. perforatum gel or A. montana gel exerted significant effects on wound healing in this experimental model in all of the study parameters (P<0.05) when compared to the control group with positive effects seen regarding newly formed tissue, number of newly formed blood vessels and percentage of mature collagen fibers. The morphometric data confirmed the structural findings. In conclusion, application of H. perforatum or A. montana was effective on experimental wound healing when compared to control, but significant differences in the parameters studied were only observed when these treatments were combined with microcurrent application.