Efficacy and safety of the neonatal Fc receptor inhibitor efgartigimod in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ADVANCE IV): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Primary immune thrombocytopenia is an autoimmune disorder mediated partly by platelet autoantibodies, resulting in thrombocytopenia, bleeding, and constitutional symptoms. Efgartigimod, a first-in-class novel human IgG1 Fc fragment, binds the neonatal Fc receptor with high affinity and thus reduces serum IgG concentrations, including autoantibodies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in adults with persistent and chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia. METHODS: This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, 24-week study evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous efgartigimod in adults aged 18 years or older with chronic or persistent primary immune thrombocytopenia who had an average platelet count of less than 30 000, had responded to at least one previous immune thrombocytopenia therapy, and were on a concurrent therapy at baseline or had received at least a second previous immune thrombocytopenia therapy. The study took place in 71 participating sites from Asia, Europe, and North America. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either efgartigimod (10 mg/kg) or placebo intravenously for the first 4 weeks, after which the dosing schedule could be altered to once per week or every other week depending on the patients' platelet count. The primary endpoint, evaluated in the chronic population, was sustained platelet count response (≥50 × 109 for at least 4 of the last 6 weeks). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04188379) and is completed. FINDINGS: A total of 205 patients were screened from Dec 9, 2019, to Feb 3, 2022, and 131 (86 in the efgartigimod group; 45 in the placebo group) were randomly assigned. These patients represented a population with long-term disease who had a mean time since diagnosis of 10·6 years and 67% (88/131) of whom had received at least three previous immune thrombocytopenia treatments. 22% (17/78) of patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia receiving efgartigimod reached the primary endpoint compared with 5% (2/40) of those receiving placebo (p=0·032; adjusted difference in response, 16% [95% CI 2·6-26·4]). The median number of weeks of disease control in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia was 2·0 (IQR 0·0-11·0) for efgartigimod versus 0·0 (0·0-1·0) for placebo (p=0·0009). Efgartigimod was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. The most common adverse events of interest in both groups were headache (16% in efgartigimod and 13% in placebo), haematuria (16% in efgartigimod and 16% in placebo), and petechiae (15% in efgartigimod and 27% in placebo). INTERPRETATION: Efgartigimod significantly increased sustained platelet count responses compared with placebo in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia, including those who had received multiple previous immune thrombocytopenia therapies. Upon completion of the ADVANCE IV study, patients could enroll in the ongoing open-label extension. Subcutaneous efgartigimod is currently being evaluated in patients with immune thrombocytopenia in the ADVANCE SC+ trial. FUNDING: argenx.

Patient preferences and experiences regarding thrombopoietin-receptor agonists for immune thrombocytopenia in The Netherlands (TRAPeze Netherlands study).

OBJECTIVE: Identify patient experience and preference towards thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in the Netherlands. METHODS: The Thrombopoietin-Receptor Agonist Patient experience (TRAPeze) survey used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit patient preferences and a patient burden survey (PBS) to evaluate the clinical and social impact of ITP. TRAPeze collected responses from 6th October to 19th November 2021. RESULTS: Seventy-six respondents completed the DCE: treatment preference appeared to be driven by method of administration (odds ratio [OR] 4.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.88-6.52), frequency of dosing (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.86-2.92) and drug-food interactions (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.54-2.37). Respondents preferred therapies delivered orally over subcutaneous injection (OR 4.22; 95% CI 2.76-6.46), dosed once weekly over once daily (OR 2.37; 95% CI 1.58-3.54) and without food restrictions over with restrictions (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.52-2.38). Sixty-nine respondents completed the DCE and PBS (mean [range] age 53 [19-83] years, 65% female). Seven incomplete PBS responses were excluded from analysis. Respondents were currently, or most recently, receiving eltrombopag (n = 43) or romiplostim (n = 26), of which 30% (n = 21/69) had previously received another TPO-RA. Loss (29%, n = 6/21) and lack (29%, n = 6/21) of response were the most common reasons for switching TPO-RA. Only 28% (n = 18/65) of respondents felt their TPO-RA increased energy levels. CONCLUSION: Patients preferred therapies delivered orally, dosed less frequently and without food restrictions. QoL of ITP patients on TPO-RAs can be improved; the burden analyses presented can inform future efforts towards this.

Treatment preferences towards thrombopoietin-receptor agonists for immune thrombocytopenia and experience of disease (TRAPeze): Italy cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Identify patient preference towards thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) and determine the clinical and social impact of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in Italy. METHODS: The Thrombopoietin-Receptor Agonist Patient experience (TRAPeze) survey collected responses from Italian residents from 17th January to 28th February 2022. TRAPeze utilized a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit patient preferences towards TPO-RA attributes and a patient burden survey (PBS) to determine ITP disease characteristics and social impact. RESULTS: Seventy-six respondents completed the DCE, of which 69 completed both the DCE and PBS (mean [range] age 45 [18.0-73.0] years, 80% female). TPO-RA attributes with the greatest influence over respondent choice were method of administration (odds ratio [OR] 2.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.16-4.06), drug-food interactions (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.17-1.86) and frequency of dosing (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.15-1.52). Respondents were more likely to prefer therapies administered orally over subcutaneous injection (OR 3.76; 95% CI 2.51-5.63), once weekly over once daily (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.26-2.65), and therapies without food restrictions over with restrictions (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.17-2.14).The most frequently reported symptoms were bruising (82%), petechiae (65%) and fatigue (64%). Most respondents (84%) felt ITP impacted familial relationships and 71% of employed respondents reported fatigue influencing their ability to work, with 31% reducing working hours. CONCLUSION: Although responses indicated a moderate perception of general health, ITP clearly impacted respondent work and social life. Our findings demonstrate respondents preferred TPO-RAs delivered orally, with less frequent dosing and without food restrictions.

Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management of Adult Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: Our Personal View.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired blood disorder that causes a reduction in circulating platelets with the potential for bleeding. The incidence of ITP is slightly higher in adults and affects more women than men until 60 years, when males are more affected. Despite advances in basic science, primary ITP remains a diagnosis of exclusion. The disease is heterogeneous in its clinical behavior and response to treatment. This reflects the complex underlying pathophysiology, which remains ill-understood. Platelet destruction plays a role in thrombocytopenia, but underproduction is also a major contributing factor. Active ITP is a proinflammatory autoimmune disease involving abnormalities within the T and B regulatory cell compartments, along with several other immunological abnormalities. Over the last several years, there has been a shift from using immunosuppressive therapies for ITP towards approved treatments, such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has hastened this management shift, with thrombopoietin receptor agonists becoming the predominant second-line treatment. A greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms has led to the development of several targeted therapies, some of which have been approved, with others still undergoing clinical development. Here we outline our view of the disease, including our opinion about the major diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. We also discuss our management of adult ITP and our placement of the various available therapies.

Incidence of adult primary immune thrombocytopenia in England-An update.

BACKGROUND: Adult primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare bleeding disorder of unknown cause. Recent estimates of its incidence and trend over time were acquired for England. METHOD: The primary ITP population (using ICD 10 code D693 and excluding secondary ITP cases; positive predictive value: 82.6%) was sourced from NHS Digital inpatient and outpatient. Incidence rate (IR) for England and by age groups, sex, and regions were calculated and trends were assessed using average annual percent change (AAPC). RESULTS: A total of 25 805 patients (mean age 59 years; females 57.8%) diagnosed between 2003 and 2014 was identified. IRs increased from 4.2/100 000 to 6.4/100 000 over this period (AAPC:4.3%). For all sex-specific age groups, the IRs significantly increased over time, except 18-29 years males. The greatest increase was among females aged 30-39 (AAPC:8.7%). In contrast, among ≥70 years, ITP was more common in males (highest IR among ≥80 years males: 23.9/100 000). England's average annual IR was 6.1/100 000 for 2010-14. An estimated 2.5/100 000 (based on UKITP Registry data) was estimated to require 1st line treatment whereas 2.4/100 000 would have 1st and 2nd line treatments within 6 months from diagnosis. IRs for London and East Midlands were the highest (6.5/100 000). CONCLUSIONS: This study found a rising incidence of primary ITP, with sharp increases among young women and elderly men. These findings put in context the impact of ITP on patients' lives and the healthcare services in England, especially with 17%-50% who may develop chronic ITP and require long-term care.

Investigational drugs for immune thrombocytopenia.

INTRODUCTION: Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disease of unknown cause. Autoantibodies, self-reactive T cells and other immune abnormalities, with impairment of platelet production, lead to a reduced platelet count. Until recently, therapy was largely empirical using immune suppressants (none of which have undergone randomized clinical trials). These therapies have variable efficacy and are associated with predictable unwanted effects which impact patient quality-of-life. With greater understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, better, more targeted therapies have been developed; however, there is still an urgent need for additional classes of treatment. AREAS COVERED: This article covers new TPO receptor agonists, Syk inhibitors, Fcγ receptor antagonists, BTK and complement inhibitors, and other therapies. Insights into the most promising therapies are offered. Novel ITP treatments currently in clinical trials and those recently approved come under the spotlight. EXPERT OPINION: Thrombopoietin receptor agonists remain the most effective treatment for ITP and have changed the ITP therapeutic landscape remarkably. Other new molecules such as Fcγ receptor blockers, Bruton tyrosine kinase, complement inhibitors, and others are unlikely to enjoy the same success rate as the TPO-RAs, but nonetheless they will find a place in the management of patients with ITP.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and ITP in patients with de novo or preexisting ITP.

Cases of de novo immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), including a fatality, following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in previously healthy recipients led to studying its impact in preexisting ITP. In this study, 4 data sources were analyzed: the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) for cases of de novo ITP; a 10-center retrospective study of adults with preexisting ITP receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; and surveys distributed by the Platelet Disorder Support Association (PDSA) and the United Kingdom (UK) ITP Support Association. Seventy-seven de novo ITP cases were identified in VAERS, presenting with median platelet count of 3 [1-9] ×109/L approximately 1 week postvaccination. Of 28 patients with available data, 26 responded to treatment with corticosteroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and/or platelet transfusions. Among 117 patients with preexisting ITP who received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, 19 experienced an ITP exacerbation (any of: ≥50% decline in platelet count, nadir platelet count <30 × 109/L with >20% decrease from baseline, and/or use of rescue therapy) following the first dose and 14 of 70 after a second dose. Splenectomized persons and those who received 5 or more prior lines of therapy were at highest risk of ITP exacerbation. Fifteen patients received and responded to rescue treatment. In surveys of both 57 PDSA and 43 UK patients with ITP, prior splenectomy was associated with worsened thrombocytopenia. ITP may worsen in preexisting ITP or be identified de novo post-SARS-CoV2 vaccination; both situations responded well to treatment. Proactive monitoring of patients with known ITP, especially those postsplenectomy and with more refractory disease, is indicated.

Immune thrombocytopenia.

INTRODUCTION: Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by a low platelet count (<100 × 109/L) with an increased risk of bleeding. Recent (2019) guidelines from the International Consensus Report (ICR) expert panel and the American Society of Hematology (ASH) provide updated recommendations for the diagnosis and management of ITP. AREAS COVERED: The 2019 ICR and ASH guidelines are reviewed, and differences and similarities highlighted. Clinical approaches to the treatment of ITP are discussed, including the role of fostamatinib which is an approved treatment option in adult patients who are refractory to other treatments. EXPERT OPINION: The 2019 ICR and ASH guidelines reflect recent changes in the management of ITP. Current treatment approaches for ITP are more rational and evidence-based than in the past. Patients should be treated based on their needs rather than on disease stage, and patient-specific outcomes, (e.g. quality of life) should be considered. Whilst corticosteroids are the mainstay of initial ITP treatment their use should be limited. For subsequent treatment, the use of thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) agents, fostamatinib and rituximab in adults is supported by robust evidence. Rituximab and recently approved fostamatinib offer viable alternatives to splenectomy.

Patient preferences and experiences regarding thrombopoietin-receptor agonists for immune thrombocytopenia in the United Kingdom and Ireland (TRAPeze UK & IE study).

OBJECTIVES: To establish the experiences with and preferences towards existing thrombopoietin-receptor agonist (TPO-RA) treatments of individuals with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in the UK and Ireland, based on treatment attributes. METHODS: Responses from UK and Ireland individuals with ITP were collected in a pan-European online survey (TRAPeze, [Thrombopoietin-Receptor Agonist Patient experience survey]) from 18 September 2020 to 18 February 2021. TRAPeze was a survey of treatment preference regarding TPO-RAs (using a discrete choice experiment design), participant demographics, disease characteristics, treatment history, overall satisfaction with therapy, direct healthcare resource utilization and wider social impact. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 32 UK respondents. Characteristics with the greatest influence on preference towards TPO-RA treatments were method of administration (odds ratio (OR) 5.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-10.1) and drug-food interactions (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.8-5.7). Particularly, participants were more likely to select an oral tablet over a subcutaneous injection (OR 7.4, 95% CI 3.6-15.1) and a treatment without food restrictions rather than with food restrictions (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.8-6.8). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to quantify the preference of individuals with ITP towards TPO-RA treatment attributes and demonstrates preference for orally administered treatments, without drug-food interactions.

Experts' review: the emerging roles of romiplostim in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

INTRODUCTION: The management of ITP has in recent years been transformed from reliance on immunosuppressants and splenectomy to targeted therapy with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) that directly stimulate platelet production in the bone marrow. This has reduced the long-term infective complications and toxicities associated with the use of potent immunosuppressants and splenectomy. The welltolerated romiplostim, itself a novel drug construct called peptibody, has established itself, alongside other TPO-RA as the preferred 2nd line therapy in major international guidelines on treatment of ITP. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the data from early licensing trials of romiplostim and discusses the real-world experience to date, the unexpected emerging data on treatment-free long-term remission achieved using TPO-RA, and the case for its early introduction in the therapeutic pathway. The emerging risk of thrombosis is also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: The use of romiplostim and other TPO-RA will be increasingly brought forward in the management pathway of ITP with the prospect of modifying the long-term outcome of the disease by increasing sustained treatment-free remission. With the prospect of several new targeted therapies been introduced into clinical practice, TPO-RA will likely be a key component of future combination therapies for difficult cases.

Thrombosis in immune thrombocytopenia - current status and future perspectives.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder in which a combination of defective platelet production and enhanced clearance leads to thrombocytopenia. The primary aim for therapy in patients with this condition is the prevention of bleeding. However, more recently, increased rates of venous and arterial thrombotic events have been reported in ITP, even in the context of marked thrombocytopenia. In this review we discuss the epidemiology, aetiology and management of thrombotic events in these patients. We consider the impact of ITP therapies on the increased thrombotic risk, in particular the use of thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), as well as factors inherent to ITP itself. We also discuss the limited evidence available to guide clinicians in the treatment of these complex cases.

Fostamatinib: a review of its clinical efficacy and safety in the management of chronic adult immune thrombocytopenia.

Management of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is going through a transition, with the main driving forces being a better understanding of the disease, recognition that platelet count is less important than bleeding symptoms, and the availability of new therapies. The heterogeneity of chronic ITP makes treatment challenging, and highlights the need for a personalized approach. A key aspect of tailored treatment is the availability of agents to target specific underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. In this review, we examine the evidence for orally bioavailable fostamatinib and its active moiety, tamatinib (R406), which has been approved for the treatment of chronic adult ITP. Fostamatinib inhibits FcR-triggered, Syk-dependent cytoskeletal rearrangement during phagocytosis and, as such, represents an active therapy targeting a previously unexplored mechanism of ITP pathogenesis.

Practical guidance for the management of adults with immune thrombocytopenia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This document aims to provide practical guidance for the assessment and management of patients with thrombocytopenia, with a particular focus on immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), during the COVID-19 pandemic. The intention is to support clinicians and, although recommendations have been provided, it is not a formal guideline. Nor is there sufficient evidence base to conclude that alternative approaches to treatment are incorrect. Instead, it is a consensus written by clinicians with an interest in ITP or coagulation disorders and reviewed by members of the UK ITP forum.

Safety and efficacy of self-administered romiplostim in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: Results of an integrated database of five clinical trials.

Romiplostim self-administration by patients or caregivers may offer time/cost savings to healthcare professionals (HCPs) and convenience for patients who avoid weekly clinic visits. We performed an integrated analysis of five clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of romiplostim self-administration. Data were analyzed from adults with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who received weekly romiplostim via self-administration or from an HCP. Patients who achieved a stable romiplostim dose for ≥3 weeks (HCP group ≥5 weeks to provide an appropriate index date to enable comparisons with the self-administration group) with platelet counts ≥50 × 109 /L were eligible. In the self-administration (n = 621) vs HCP (n = 133) groups, respectively, median age was 53 vs 58 years, median time since primary ITP diagnosis was 3.7 vs 2.5 years, and median baseline platelet count at ITP diagnosis was 19.0 vs 20.0 × 109 /L. In the self-administration and HCP-dosed groups, median romiplostim treatment duration was 89 vs 52 weeks and median total number of doses was 81 vs 50, respectively. In the self-administration and HCP groups, respectively: 95.0% and 100.0% of patients achieved ≥1 platelet response (defined as weekly platelet count ≥50 × 109 /L without rescue medication in previous 4 weeks); the median percentage of weeks with a response was 94.5% and 95.9%; and rescue medication was used in 36.7% and 39.8% of patients. Self-administration did not adversely affect safety; duration-adjusted rates for all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and bleeding TEAEs were numerically lower with self-administration. Romiplostim self-administration appears effective and well tolerated in eligible patients with ITP.

Phase 2 study of efgartigimod, a novel FcRn antagonist, in adult patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune bleeding disorder, characterized by a low platelet count (<100 × 109 /L) in the absence of other causes associated with thrombocytopenia. In most patients, IgG autoantibodies directed against platelet receptors can be detected. They accelerate platelet clearance and destruction, inhibit platelet production, and impair platelet function, resulting in increased risk of bleeding and impaired quality of life. Efgartigimod is a human IgG1 antibody Fc-fragment, a natural ligand of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), engineered for increased affinity to FcRn, while preserving its characteristic pH-dependent binding. Efgartigimod blocks FcRn, preventing IgG recycling, and causing targeted IgG degradation. In this Phase 2 study, 38 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive four weekly intravenous infusions of either placebo (N = 12) or efgartigimod at a dose of 5 mg/kg (N = 13) or 10 mg/kg (N = 13). This short treatment cycle of efgartigimod in patients with ITP, predominantly refractory to previous lines of therapy, was shown to be well tolerated, and demonstrated a favorable safety profile consistent with Phase 1 data. Efgartigimod induced a rapid reduction of total IgG levels (up to 63.7% mean change from baseline), which was associated with clinically relevant increases in platelet counts (46% patients on efgartigimod vs 25% on placebo achieved a platelet count of ≥50 × 109 /L on at least two occasions, and 38% vs 0% achieved ≥50 × 109 /L for at least 10 cumulative days), and a reduced proportion of patients with bleeding. Taken together, these data warrant further evaluation of FcRn antagonism as a novel therapeutic approach in ITP.

Updated international consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia.

Over the last decade, there have been numerous developments and changes in treatment practices for the management of patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This article is an update of the International Consensus Report published in 2010. A critical review was performed to identify all relevant articles published between 2009 and 2018. An expert panel screened, reviewed, and graded the studies and formulated the updated consensus recommendations based on the new data. The final document provides consensus recommendations on the diagnosis and management of ITP in adults, during pregnancy, and in children, as well as quality-of-life considerations.

A systematic literature review on the use of platelet transfusions in patients with thrombocytopenia.

Objective: Investigate globally, current treatment patterns, benefit-risk assessments, humanistic, societal and economic burden of platelet transfusion (PT). Methods: Publications from 1998 to June 27, 2018 were identified, based on databases searches including MEDLINE®; Embase and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Data from studies meeting pre-specified criteria were extracted and validated by independent reviewers. Data were obtained for efficacy and safety from randomized controlled trials (RCTs); data for epidemiology, treatment patterns, effectiveness, safety, humanistic and societal burden from real-world evidence (RWE) studies; and economic data from both. Results: A total of 3425 abstracts, 194 publications (190 studies) were included. PT use varied widely, from 0%-100% of TCP patients; 1.7%-24.5% in large studies (>1000 patients). Most were used prophylactically rather than therapeutically. 5 of 43 RCTs compared prophylactic PT with no intervention, with mixed results. In RWE studies PT generally increased platelet count (PC). This increase varied by patient characteristics and hence did not always translate into a clinically significant reduction in bleeding risk. Safety concerns included infection risk, alloimmunization and refractoriness with associated cost burden. Discussion: In RCTs and RWE studies there was significant heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures. In RWE studies, patients receiving PT may have been at higher risk than those not receiving PT creating potential bias. There were limited data on humanistic and societal burden. Conclusion: Although PTs are used widely for increasing PC in TCP, it is important to understand the limitations of PTs, and to explore the use of alternative treatment options where available.

Romiplostim in adult patients with newly diagnosed or persistent immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) for up to 1 year and in those with chronic ITP for more than 1 year: a subgroup analysis of integrated data from completed romiplostim studies.

The thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim is approved for second-line use in chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but its effects in patients with ITP for ≤1 year are not well characterized. This analysis of pooled data from 9 studies included patients with ITP for ≤1 year (n = 311) or >1 year (n = 726) who failed first-line treatments and received romiplostim, placebo or standard of care. In subgroup analysis by ITP duration, patient incidences for platelet response at ≥75% of measurements were higher for romiplostim [ITP ≤1 year: 74% (204/277); ITP >1 year: 71% (450/634)] than for placebo/standard of care [ITP ≤1 year: 18% (6/34); ITP >1 year: 9% (8/92)]. Of patients with ≥9 months on study, 16% with ITP ≤1 year and 6% with ITP >1 year discontinued romiplostim and maintained platelet counts ≥50 × 109 /l for ≥6 months without ITP treatment (treatment-free remission). Independent of ITP duration, rates of serious adverse events and bleeding were lower with romiplostim than placebo/standard of care and thrombotic events occurred at similar rates. In this analysis, romiplostim and placebo/standard of care had similar safety profiles and romiplostim increased platelet counts in patients with either ITP ≤1 year or ITP >1 year, with more treatment-free remission in those with ITP ≤1 year.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) treated with romiplostim in routine clinical practice: retrospective study from the United Kingdom ITP Registry.

BACKGROUND: Romiplostim is a thrombopoietin-mimetic peptibody for adult refractory chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We aimed to describe ITP patients receiving romiplostim, platelet counts and romiplostim usage in UK clinical practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients in the UKITP Registry who received romiplostim between October 2009 and January 2015, including data up to 6 months before romiplostim initiation through follow-up. RESULTS: Of 1440 patients in the UKITP Registry, 118 adults with primary ITP were eligible. Before romiplostim, 22% had splenectomy, 12% received platelet transfusion, 97% received ≥ 1 different ITP medication and 77% received ≥ 3. Most patients (73%) initiated romiplostim ≥ 1 year after ITP diagnosis (chronic phase). The mean duration of romiplostim treatment was 5.7 (SE 0.9) months, and the median was 1.4 months (IQR: 0.2, 6.5). Mean platelet count before romiplostim was 38 × 109 /L, rising to 103 × 109 /L within 1 month, and remaining 50-150 × 109 /L through up to 3 years of follow-up. After romiplostim, 4% of patients had splenectomy, 6% received platelet transfusion, and 57% received just one ITP medication other than romiplostim. CONCLUSION: The study provides valuable insights into the real-world use of romiplostim in primary ITP in routine practice and highlighted the timing of romiplostim initiation at different ITP disease phases.