Rapid whole-exome sequencing facilitates precision medicine in paediatric rare disease patients and reduces healthcare costs.

BACKGROUND: Rapid whole-exome sequencing (rWES) offers the potential for early diagnosis-predicated precision medicine. Previous evidence focused predominantly on infants from the intensive care unit (ICU). This study sought to examine the diagnostic and clinical utility, and the economic impact on clinical management of rWES in patients beyond infancy and ICU setting. METHODS: rWES was performed on a prospective cohort of patients with suspected monogenic disorder referred from territory-wide paediatric ICUs and non-ICUs in Hong Kong urging for rapid genetic diagnosis. All eligible families were invited. We aimed to achieve a rapid turnaround time (TAT) of 14 days. Clinical utility and costs associated with clinical management were assessed in diagnosed cases. Actual quantitative changes in healthcare utilisation were compared with a counterfactual diagnostic trajectory and/or with matched historical control whenever possible. FINDINGS: rWES were offered to 102 families and 32/102 (31%) patients received a molecular diagnosis, with a median TAT of 11 days. Clinical management changed in 28 of 32 diagnosed patients (88%), including but not limited to modifications in treatment, avoidance of surgeries, and informing decisions on redirection of care. Cost analysis was performed in eight patients. rWES was estimated to reduce hospital length of stay by 566 days and decrease healthcare costs by HKD$8,044,250 (GBP£796,460) for these eight patients. The net cost-savings after inclusion of rWES costs were estimated to be HKD$5,325,187 (GBP£527,246). INTERPRETATION: This study replicates the diagnostic capacity and rapid TAT of rWES in predominantly Chinese patients, and demonstrates diagnosis-predicated precision medicine and net healthcare savings. Findings were corroborated by evidence from multinational cohorts, combined as part of a meta-analysis. rWES merits consideration as a first-tier diagnostic tool for patients with urgent needs in the clinical setting. FUNDING: Health and Medical Research Fund, HKU Seed Fund for Basic Research, The Society for the Relief of Disabled Children, and Edward and Yolanda Wong Fund.

The impact of antibodies on clinical outcomes in diseases treated with therapeutic protein: lessons learned from infantile Pompe disease.

PURPOSE: Enzyme replacement therapy with rhGAA (Myozyme®) has lead to improved survival, which is largely attributable to improvements in cardiomyopathy and skeletal muscle function. However, crossreactive immunologic material-negative patients have a poor clinical response to enzyme replacement therapy secondary to high sustained antibody titers. Furthermore, although the majority of crossreactive immunologic material-positive patients tolerize or experience a downtrend in anti-rhGAA antibody titers, antibody response is variable with some crossreactive immunologic material-positive infants also mounting high sustained antibody titers. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 34 infants with Pompe disease: 11 crossreactive immunologic material-negative patients, nine high-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive patients, and 14 low-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive patients. Clinical outcome measures were overall survival, ventilator-free survival, left ventricular mass index, Alberta Infant Motor Scale score, and urine Glc(4) levels. RESULTS: Clinical outcomes in the high-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive group were poor across all areas evaluated relative to the low-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive group. For the crossreactive immunologic material-negative and high-titer crossreactive immunologic material-positive groups, no statistically significant differences were observed for any outcome measures, and both patient groups did poorly. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that, irrespective of crossreactive immunologic material status, patients with infantile Pompe disease with high sustained antibody titer have an attenuated therapeutic response to enzyme replacement therapy. With the advent of immunomodulation therapies, identification of patients at risk for developing high sustained antibody titer is critical.

Randomized trial comparing two natural surfactants (Survanta vs. bLES) for treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Exogenous surfactants have been used as an effective treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Different preparations of surfactant carry different biophysical and clinical properties. To study the response pattern and treatment outcome of two natural surfactants (bLES and Survanta) for the treatment of RDS, we conducted a randomized clinical trial at the neonatal unit of a university teaching hospital. Premature babies with birth weight between 500-1,800 g who developed RDS requiring mechanical ventilation with an oxygen requirement of more than 30% within 6 hr of life were randomized into two treatment groups. Oxygenation indices (OIs) within 12 hr of treatment were compared as primary outcomes, while neonatal complications were analyzed as secondary outcomes of the study. Sixty babies were recruited, with 29 in the bLES and 31 in the Survanta treatment group. Both groups had significant and sustained improvements in OI after surfactant replacement therapy (SRT), while the bLES group was associated with a significantly lower OI throughout the initial 12 hr after treatment compared with the Survanta group. There was no difference in secondary outcomes including mortality, ventilator days, and occurrence of chronic lung disease. We conclude that infants with RDS respond favorably to both types of surfactant replacement, and that bLES achieved a faster clinical response in terms of improvement in OI than Survanta.