Flail chest injury-changing management and outcomes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess trends in management of flail chest injuries over time and to determine impact on patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of data from a prospectively collated database of all trauma patients admitted to a level 1 trauma service in Victoria was conducted. All trauma patients admitted to the hospital between July 2008 and June 2020 with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) code for flail chest injury were included. RESULTS: Our study included 720 patients, mean age was 59.5 ± 17.3 years old, and 76.5% of patients were male. Length of ICU stay decreased on average by 9 h each year. Regional anaesthesia use increased by 15% per year (0% in 2009 to 36% in 2020) (p < 0.001). Surgical stabilisation of rib fractures increased by 16% per year (2.9% in 2009 to 22.3% in 2020) (p = 0.006). The use of invasive ventilation decreased by 14% per year (70% in 2008 to 27% in 2020) (p < 0.001), and invasive ventilation time decreased by 8 h per year (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Over the past decade, we have seen increasing rates of regional anaesthesia and surgical rib fixation in the management of flail chest. This has resulted in lower requirements for and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay but has not impacted mortality in this patient cohort.

The Prognostic Value of Elevated Perioperative Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an emerging inflammatory perioperative biomarker which has been studied to predict the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of elevated perioperative NLR in predicting POAF after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched from inception to May 2019 for prognostic studies on perioperative NLR and POAF following cardiac surgery. Maximally adjusted odds ratios (OR) with associated confidence intervals were obtained from each included study and pooled using random effects inverse variance modelling for preoperative NLR measurements, while standardised mean differences were pooled for postoperative NLR values. The significance of inter- and intra-study heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression. RESULTS: 1,799 unique studies satisfied selection criteria, from which 12 studies incorporating 9,262 participants were included. Elevated preoperative NLR significantly predicted POAF, with a pooled OR of 1.42 (95% CI 1.16-1.72). Multiple predefined covariates contributed to inter-study heterogeneity; however, only prevalence of hypertension (p=0.0055), history of congestive cardiac failure (p=0.0282) and average ejection fraction (p=0.0359) were significant effect modifiers. Elevated postoperative NLR was not a significant predictor of POAF (standardised mean difference 1.60 [95% CI -0.56-3.77] between POAF+ and POAF- groups). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated preoperative NLR is a promising prognostic biomarker for POAF, but residual sources of heterogeneity remain. Larger scale validation studies are required to justify the integration of preoperative NLR testing into routine clinical practice.