Evaluating an inquiry-based learning program.

Inquiry-based learning (IBL) is a promising educational framework that is understudied in graduate medical education. To determine participant satisfaction and engagement with phases of an IBL postgraduate education program, a mixed-methods study collected data via survey statements and open-ended responses. The authors included participants attending an intensive care medicine (ICM) IBL program from May to November 2020. Quantitative outcomes included participants' satisfaction with the IBL format and impact of engagement with IBL on the learning experience. Qualitative outcomes explored determinants of engagement with IBL phases and the impact on the learning experience. Of 378 attendees, 167 submitted survey responses (44.2%). There was strong agreement relating to overall satisfaction (93.4%). Responses indicated engagement with "orientation" (94.6%), "conceptualization" (97.3%), "discussion" (91.1%), and "conclusion" (91.0%) but limited engagement with the "investigation" phase (48.1%). Greater engagement with IBL phases had positive impacts, with repeat attenders having clearer learning objectives (79.1% vs. 56.6%, P < 0.05) and enhanced learning through collaborative discussion (65.9% vs. 48.7%, P < 0.05). Qualitative analysis showed that ICM learners value active learning principles, clear objectives, and a safe environment to expand their "knowledge base." Sessions facilitated "clinically relevant learning," with application of theoretical knowledge. Learners transformed and "reframed their understanding," using the input of others' experiences. ICM learners were highly satisfied with the IBL format and reported valuable learning. Participants engaged strongly with all IBL phases except the investigation phase during the sessions. IBL facilitated learners' active construction of meaning, facilitating a constructivist approach to learning.NEW & NOTEWORTHY An inquiry-based learning (IBL) program was launched as part of a novel binational intensive care medicine education program. Postgraduate intensive care medicine practitioners participated in this education intervention, where facilitated group discussions explored core intensive care medicine concepts. Survey responses indicated overall satisfaction, engagement with the IBL format, and a constructivist approach to learning. This study provided new insights into the benefits and challenges of an IBL program in the context of practicing clinicians.

Distributed Autonomous Organization of Learning: Future Structure for Health Professions Education Institutions.

Current health professions education (HPE) institutions are based on an assembly-line hierarchical structure. The last decade has witnessed the advent of sophisticated networks allowing the exchange of information and educational assets. Blockchain provides an ideal data management framework that can support high-order applications such as learning systems and credentialing in an open and a distributed fashion. These system management characteristics enable the creation of a distributed autonomous organization of learning (DAOL). This new type of organization allows for the creation of decentralized adaptive competency curricula, simplification of credentialing and certification, leveling of information asymmetry among educational market stakeholders, assuring alignment with societal priorities, and supporting equity and transparency.

Confidence in airway management proficiency: a mixed methods study of intensive care specialists in Australia and New Zealand.

Objective: To explore self-confidence, and the respective facilitators and barriers, among intensive care specialists in Australia and New Zealand in relation to airway management. Design: A mixed methods study. Setting: 11 intensive care units across Australia and New Zealand. Participants: 48 intensive care specialists. Intervention: A structured online interview and the presentation of three discrete airway management clinical scenarios - routine endotracheal intubation, awake fibreoptic intubation (AFOI), and emergency front of neck access (FONA). Main outcome measures: Graded Likert scale responses regarding confidence in airway management were analysed, and perceptions of facilitators and barriers to confidence in each select scenario were obtained as free text. A deductive thematic analysis was done iteratively on free text entry and allowed for the development of a coding framework. NVivo software used the coding framework to run coding queries and cross-tabulations for comparison of relationships between themes and participant demographic characteristics. Results: Participants reported differing levels of confidence. Clinical experience, an anaesthetic qualification and training (including simulation) were the major facilitators to influencing confidence. Participants were more confident performing routine intubation than AFOI or FONA. Equipment, checklists or protocols, and availability of video-laryngoscopy were also identified as facilitators to confidence by most participants. Work relationships, teams and other staff availability were identified as further facilitators to confidence; lack of these factors were less commonly identified as barriers. Conclusions: Confidence in airway management among intensive care specialists in Australia and New Zealand varies, both between specialists and depending on clinical context. Multiple facilitators to improving this exist, including additional mandatory training.

Too hot to handle? Assessing the validity and reliability of the College of Intensive Care Medicine "Hot Case" examination.

The College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand is responsible for credentialling trainees for specialist practice in intensive care medicine for the safety of patients and the community. This involves defining trainees' performance standards and testing trainees against those standards to ensure safe practice. The second part examination performed towards the end of the training program is a high-stakes assessment. The two clinical "Hot Cases" performed in the examination have a low pass rate, with most candidates failing at least one of the cases. There is increasing expectation for medical specialist training colleges to provide fair and transparent assessment processes to enable defensible decisions regarding trainee progression. Examinations are a surrogate marker of clinical performance with advantages, disadvantages and inevitable compromises. This article evaluates the Hot Case examination using Kane's validity framework and van der Vleuten's utility equation, and identifies issues with validity and reliability which could be managed through an ongoing improvement process.

Preparation for airway management in Australia and New Zealand ICUs during the COVID -19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: This paper aimed to describe the airway practices of intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand specific to patients presenting with COVID-19 and to inform whether consistent clinical practice was achieved. Specific clinical airway guidelines were endorsed in March 2020 by the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) and College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). METHODS AND FINDINGS: Prospective, structured questionnaire for all ICU directors in Australia and New Zealand was completed by 69 ICU directors after email invitation from ANZICS. The online questionnaire was accessible for three weeks during September 2020 and analysed by cloud-based software. Basic ICU demographics (private or public, metropolitan or rural) and location, purchasing, airway management practices, guideline uptake, checklist and cognitive aid use and staff training relevant to airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic were the main outcome measures. The 69 ICU directors reported significant simulation-based inter-professional airway training of staff (97%), and use of video laryngoscopy (94%), intubation checklists (94%), cognitive aids (83%) and PPE "spotters" (89%) during the airway management of patients with COVID-19. Tracheal intubation was almost always performed by a Specialist (97% of ICUs), who was more likely to be an intensivist than an anaesthetist (61% vs 36%). There was a more frequent adoption of specific airway guidelines for the management of COVID-19 patients in public ICUs (94% vs 71%) and reliance on specialist intensivists to perform intubations in private ICUs (92% vs 53%). CONCLUSION: There was a high uptake of a standardised approach to airway management in COVID-19 patients in ICUs in Australia and New Zealand, likely due to endorsement of national guidelines.

Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers on Clinical Teaching.

The ability to teach in the clinical setting is of paramount importance. Clinical teaching is at the heart of medical education, irrespective of the learner's level of training. Learners desire and need effective, competent, and thoughtful clinical teaching from their instructors. However, many clinician-educators lack formal training on this important skill and thus may provide a variable experience to their learners. Although formal training of clinician-educators is standard and required in many other countries, the United States has yet to follow suit, leaving many faculty members to fend for themselves to learn these important skills.  In September 2018, the Academic Life in Emergency Medicine (ALiEM) 2018-2019 Faculty Incubator program discussed the topic of clinical teaching techniques. We gathered the titles of papers that were cited, shared, and recommended within our online discussion forum and compiled the articles pertaining to the topic of clinical teaching techniques. To augment the list, the authors did a formal literature search using the search terms "teaching techniques", "clinical teaching", "medical education", "medical students", and "residents" on Google Scholar and PubMed. Finally, we posted a call for important papers on the topic of clinical teaching techniques on Twitter. Through this process, we identified 48 core articles on the topic of clinical teaching. We conducted a modified Delphi methodology to identify the key papers on the topic. In this paper, we present the five highest-rated articles based on the relevance to junior faculty and faculty developers. This article will review and summarize the articles we found to be the most impactful to improve one's clinical teaching skills.

Severe methanol poisoning with neurological sequelae: implications for diagnosis and management.

A 22-year-old woman presented with methanol toxicity manifesting as headache, reduced conscious state and visual change after consuming home-made grappa. She progressed to a coma with fixed mydriasis and severe acidaemia (pH 6.55). She was treated with empirical antidote administration (intravenous ethanol) and enhanced elimination through haemodialysis. She survived despite her delayed presentation but developed significant neurological sequelae, including visual impairment. We provide an overview of key elements of diagnosis and recent updates in treatment recommendations.

How Robust Are Studies in the American Board of Emergency Medicine Maintenance of Certification Lifelong Learning and Self-assessment? An Examination of Fragility and Bias of Included Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: Critics have raised concerns regarding the validity of maintenance of certification (MOC) programs. We sought to examine the quality of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) selected for the lifelong learning and self-assessment (LLS) component of the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) MOC program. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the ABEM LLS reading lists from 2004 to 2017 to identify RCTs with dichotomous outcomes and superiority designs. A fragility index (FI) was calculated using Fisher's exact test for all statistically significant dichotomous outcomes. Bivariate correlation was performed to examine associations between the FI and RCT study characteristics. Each included study was evaluated with the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias (ROB) tool. RESULTS: Thirteen superiority RCTs with dichotomous outcomes were included in the 2004-2017 LLS reading lists. Ten had a statistically significant outcome, and the majority were robust and at low ROB. The median trial size was 511 patients (interquartile range [IQR] = 251-1,517), and the median FI was 10 (IQR = 7-18); i.e., if 10 patients in the treatment arm had not had events, the results would not have been statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of RCTs included in the LLS are robust and at low ROB.