The Role of Regulatory T Cells and Their Therapeutic Potential in Hypertensive Disease of Pregnancy: A Literature Review.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), including preeclampsia (PE) and gestational hypertension (GH), are major causes of maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality. This review elucidates the role of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the immunological aspects of HDP and explores their therapeutic potential. Tregs, which play a critical role in maintaining immune homeostasis, are crucial in pregnancy to prevent immune-mediated rejection of the foetus. The review highlights that Tregs contribute to immunological adaptation in normal pregnancy, ensuring foetal acceptance. In contrast, HDP is associated with Treg dysfunction, which is marked by decreased numbers and impaired regulatory capacity, leading to inadequate immune tolerance and abnormal placental development. This dysfunction is particularly evident in PE, in which Tregs fail to adequately modulate the maternal immune response against foetal antigens, contributing to the pathophysiology of the disorder. Therapeutic interventions aiming to modulate Treg activity represent a promising avenue for HDP management. Studies in animal models and limited clinical trials suggest that enhancing Treg functionality could mitigate HDP symptoms and improve pregnancy outcomes. However, given the multifactorial nature of HDP and the intricate regulatory mechanisms of Tregs, the review explores the complexities of translating in vitro and animal model findings into effective clinical therapies. In conclusion, while the precise role of Tregs in HDP is still being unravelled, their central role in immune regulation during pregnancy is indisputable. Further research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms by which Tregs contribute to HDP and to develop targeted therapies that can safely and effectively harness their regulatory potential for treating hypertensive diseases of pregnancy.

Blood pressure cut-offs at 11-13 weeks' gestation and risk of preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: A parallel has been drawn between first trimester placental vascular maturation and maternal cardiovascular adaptations, including blood pressure. Although 140/90 mmHg is well-accepted as the threshold for chronic hypertension in the general obstetric population in early pregnancy, a different threshold could apply to stratify risk of adverse outcomes, such as preeclampsia. This could have implications for interventions, such as the threshold for initiation of antihypertensive therapy and the target blood pressure level. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the relationship between various blood pressure cut-offs at 11-13 weeks' gestation and development of preeclampsia, overall and according to key maternal characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: This secondary analysis was of data from a prospective non-intervention cohort study of singleton pregnancies delivering at ≥24 weeks, without major anomalies, at two UK maternity hospitals, 2006-2020. BP at 11-13 weeks' gestation was classified according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association categories (mmHg), as: 'Normal blood pressure' (systolic <120 and diastolic <80), 'Elevated blood pressure' (systolic ≥120 and diastolic <80), 'Stage 1 hypertension' (systolic ≥130 or diastolic 80-89), and 'Stage 2 hypertension (systolic ≥140 or diastolic ≥90). For blood pressure category thresholds and the outcome of preeclampsia, the following were calculated overall and across maternal age, body mass index, ethnicity, method of conception, and previous pregnancy history: detection rate, screen positive rate, and positive and negative likelihood ratios, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A p value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 137,458 pregnancies screened at 11-13 weeks' gestation. The population was ethnically diverse, with 15.9% of Black ethnicity, 6.7% of South or East Asian ethnicity, and 2.7% of mixed ethnicity, with the remainder of White ethnicity. Compared with 'Normal blood pressure', 'Stage 2 hypertension' was associated with both preterm preeclampsia (0.3 to 4.9%) and term PE (1.0 to 8.3%). A blood pressure threshold of 140/90 mmHg was good at identifying women at increased risk of preeclampsia, overall (positive likelihood ratio 5.61, 95% CI 5.14-6.11) and across maternal characteristics, compared with 'Elevated blood pressure' (positive likelihood ratio 1.70, 95% CI 1.63-1.77) and 'Stage 1 hypertension' (positive likelihood ratio 2.68, 95% CI 2.58-2.77). There were two exceptions: a blood pressure threshold of 130/80 mmHg was better for the 2.1% of women with body mass index <18.5kg/m2 (positive likelihood ratio 5.13, 95% CI 3.22-8.16), and a threshold of 135/85 mmHg better for the 50.4% of parous women without a history of preeclampsia (positive likelihood ratio 5.24, 95% CI 4.77-5.77). There was no blood pressure threshold below which reassurance could be provided against development of preeclampsia (all negative likelihood ratios ≥0.20). CONCLUSIONS: The traditional blood pressure threshold of 140/90 mmHg performs well to identify women at increased risk of preeclampsia. Women who are underweight or parous with no prior history of preeclampsia may be better identified by lower thresholds; however a randomised trial would be necessary to determine any benefits of such an approach if antihypertensive therapy were also administered at this threshold. No blood pressure threshold reassured against development of preeclampsia, regardless of maternal characteristics.

Perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes of fetal isolated ventriculomegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Isolated fetal ventriculomegaly can have a range of consequences, ranging from mild neurodevelopmental delay to perinatal death; the extent of these consequences often depend on the severity of ventriculomegaly. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the impact of the degree of ventricular dilatation on the risk of neurodevelopmental delay and adverse perinatal outcomes in fetuses diagnosed with isolated fetal ventriculomegaly from gestational week 15 onwards. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched electronically to identify studies investigating the prognosis of mild and/or severe isolated fetal ventriculomegaly. Articles were included if they reported neurodevelopmental or perinatal outcomes in fetuses prenatally diagnosed with isolated fetal ventriculomegaly from week 15 of gestation and onwards. Studies were excluded if they reported on non-isolated ventriculomegaly (IVM), failed to specify the degree of ventriculomegaly, were non-English papers, animal studies or published outside of the 21-year period of interest. Study quality was assessed by two independent reviewers using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Ventriculomegaly was defined as either mild or severe when ventricular diameter measured as 10-15 or >15 mm, respectively. Meta-analyses were conducted for adverse neurodevelopmental outcome, intrauterine fetal demise and infant mortality. Results: Following the removal of duplicates, the search yielded 2,452 citations, of which 23 studies were included and 8 were eligible for meta-analysis. There were 767 and 347 cases of mild and severe isolated fetal ventriculomegaly, respectively. Adverse outcomes were consistently reported at a higher rate in severe cases than mild. The relative risks of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome, intrauterine fetal demise and infant mortality were 4.24 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.46-7.30], 4.46 (95% CI: 1.64-12.11) and 6.02 (95% CI: 1.73-21.00), respectively, upon comparison of mild versus severe cases of isolated fetal ventriculomegaly. Conclusions: The likelihood of adverse neurodevelopmental and perinatal outcomes, including intrauterine and infant mortality, is increased in severe isolated fetal ventriculomegaly compared to mild isolated fetal ventriculomegaly.

Revolutionising healing: Gene Editing's breakthrough against sickle cell disease.

Recent advancements in gene editing illuminate new potential therapeutic approaches for Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), a debilitating monogenic disorder caused by a point mutation in the ß-globin gene. Despite the availability of several FDA-approved medications for symptomatic relief, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the sole curative option, underscoring a persistent need for novel treatments. This review delves into the growing field of gene editing, particularly the extensive research focused on curing haemoglobinopathies like SCD. We examine the use of techniques such as CRISPR-Cas9 and homology-directed repair, base editing, and prime editing to either correct the pathogenic variant into a non-pathogenic or wild-type one or augment fetal haemoglobin (HbF) production. The article elucidates ways to optimize these tools for efficacious gene editing with minimal off-target effects and offers insights into their effective delivery into cells. Furthermore, we explore clinical trials involving alternative SCD treatment strategies, such as LentiGlobin therapy and autologous HSCT, distilling the current findings. This review consolidates vital information for the clinical translation of gene editing for SCD, providing strategic insights for investigators eager to further the development of gene editing for SCD.

Machine learning-enabled maternal risk assessment for women with pre-eclampsia (the PIERS-ML model): a modelling study.

BACKGROUND: Affecting 2-4% of pregnancies, pre-eclampsia is a leading cause of maternal death and morbidity worldwide. Using routinely available data, we aimed to develop and validate a novel machine learning-based and clinical setting-responsive time-of-disease model to rule out and rule in adverse maternal outcomes in women presenting with pre-eclampsia. METHODS: We used health system, demographic, and clinical data from the day of first assessment with pre-eclampsia to predict a Delphi-derived composite outcome of maternal mortality or severe morbidity within 2 days. Machine learning methods, multiple imputation, and ten-fold cross-validation were used to fit models on a development dataset (75% of combined published data of 8843 patients from 11 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries). Validation was undertaken on the unseen 25%, and an additional external validation was performed in 2901 inpatient women admitted with pre-eclampsia to two hospitals in south-east England. Predictive risk accuracy was determined by area-under-the-receiver-operator characteristic (AUROC), and risk categories were data-driven and defined by negative (-LR) and positive (+LR) likelihood ratios. FINDINGS: Of 8843 participants, 590 (6·7%) developed the composite adverse maternal outcome within 2 days, 813 (9·2%) within 7 days, and 1083 (12·2%) at any time. An 18-variable random forest-based prediction model, PIERS-ML, was accurate (AUROC 0·80 [95% CI 0·76-0·84] vs the currently used logistic regression model, fullPIERS: AUROC 0·68 [0·63-0·74]) and categorised women into very low risk (-LR <0·1; eight [0·7%] of 1103 women), low risk (-LR 0·1 to 0·2; 321 [29·1%] women), moderate risk (-LR >0·2 and +LR <5·0; 676 [61·3%] women), high risk (+LR 5·0 to 10·0, 87 [7·9%] women), and very high risk (+LR >10·0; 11 [1·0%] women). Adverse maternal event rates were 0% for very low risk, 2% for low risk, 5% for moderate risk, 26% for high risk, and 91% for very high risk within 48 h. The 2901 women in the external validation dataset were accurately classified as being at very low risk (0% with outcomes), low risk (1%), moderate risk (4%), high risk (33%), or very high risk (67%). INTERPRETATION: The PIERS-ML model improves identification of women with pre-eclampsia who are at lowest and greatest risk of severe adverse maternal outcomes within 2 days of assessment, and can support provision of accurate guidance to women, their families, and their maternity care providers. FUNDING: University of Strathclyde Diversity in Data Linkage Centre for Doctoral Training, the Fetal Medicine Foundation, The Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Calcium supplementation for the prevention of pre-eclampsia: Challenging the evidence from meta-analyses.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of the conclusion from Cochrane reviews and meta-analyses that treatment with calcium supplementation during pregnancy reduces the risk for pre-eclampsia by 55%, which has been influential in international guidelines and future research. DESIGN: Sensitivity analysis of data from Cochrane reviews of trials evaluating high-dose calcium supplementation (of at least 1 g/day) for reduction of pre-eclampsia risk. SETTING: Systematic review and meta-analysis. POPULATION: The Cochrane reviews and meta-analyses included 13 trials enrolling a total of 15 730 women. Random-effects meta-analysis of these studies resulted in a mean risk ratio (RR, calcium/placebo) of 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.65; p < 0.0001). METHODS: We carried out a sensitivity analysis of evidence from the relevant Cochrane review, to examine the impact of study size. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: pre-eclampsia. RESULTS: In the three largest studies, accounting for 13 815 (88%) of total recruitment, mean RR was 0.92 (95% CI 0.80-1.06) and there was no evidence of heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 0). With inclusion of the smaller studies, mean RR decreased to 0.45 and I2 increased to 70%. CONCLUSIONS: In assessment of the effect of calcium supplementation on pre-eclampsia risk, the naive focus on the mean of the random-effects meta-analysis in the presence of substantial heterogeneity is highly misleading.

Pregnancy-An Ideal Period to Identify Women at Risk for Chronic Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in women. Pregnancy is an ideal period to implement cardiovascular prevention strategies as women seek medical help. We aimed to develop a predictive model to identify women at increased risk for chronic hypertension (CH) based on information collected in the index pregnancy. METHODS: Cohort of 26 511 women seen in 2 consecutive pregnancies. Included were women without CH, with information on maternal characteristics and blood pressure at 11 to 13 weeks' gestation, and the development of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension (GH) in the index pregnancy. Logistic regression models were fitted for the prediction of the development of future CH by the 20th week of the subsequent pregnancy. The performance of screening and risk calibration of the model were assessed. RESULTS: In this study 1560 (5.9%) women developed preeclampsia or GH (index pregnancy), and 215 (0.8%) developed future CH, with a median of 3.0 years later. Predictors of development of future CH were maternal age, weight, and blood pressure; Black and South Asian ethnicity; family history of preeclampsia; parity; and development of preeclampsia or GH. Preeclampsia or GH detected 52.1% (45.2%-58.9%) of future CH. At a screen-positive rate of 10%, a model including maternal characteristics, early pregnancy blood pressure, and development of preeclampsia or GH detected 73.5% (67.1-79.3) of future CH. CONCLUSIONS: Early pregnancy maternal characteristics, blood pressure, and development of preeclampsia or GH identify three-fourths of women at risk for future CH. Our results offer an important preventative strategy for identifying women at increased risk of future CH, which is applicable worldwide.

First trimester risk of preeclampsia and rate of spontaneous birth in patients without preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: First-trimester screening for preeclampsia using a combination of maternal risk factors and mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, and placental growth factor, as proposed by the Fetal Medicine Foundation, provides effective prediction of preterm preeclampsia. Placental dysfunction is a potential precursor of spontaneous birth. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine if the estimated risk of preeclampsia is associated with the gestational age at onset of spontaneous delivery in the absence of preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of the data from the Screening programme for pre-eclampsia trial in which there was a comparison of the performance of first-trimester screening for preterm preeclampsia using the Fetal Medicine Foundation model vs a traditional history-based risk scoring system. A subgroup of women from the trial with spontaneous onset of delivery (labor with intact membranes or preterm prelabor rupture of membranes) was included in this study and was arbitrarily divided into 3 groups according to the risk for preterm preeclampsia as determined by the Fetal Medicine Foundation model at 11 to 13 weeks' gestation as follows: group 1 low risk (˂1/100); group 2 intermediate risk (1/50 to 1/100); and group 3 high risk (˃1/50). A survival analysis was carried out using a Kaplan-Meier estimator and a Cox regression analysis with stratification by the 3 preeclampsia risk groups. Occurrence of spontaneous birth in the study groups was compared using log-rank tests and hazard ratios. RESULTS: The study population comprised 10,820 cases with delivery after spontaneous onset of labor among the 16,451 cases who participated in the Screening programme for pre-eclampsia trial. There were 9795 cases in group 1, 583 in group 2, and 442 in group 3. The gestational age at delivery was <28, <32, <35, <37, and <40 weeks in 0.29%, 0.64%, 1.68%, 4.52%, and 44.97% of cases, respectively, in group 1; 0.69%, 1.71%, 3.26%, 7.72%, and 55.23% of cases, respectively, in group 2; and 0.45%, 1.81%, 5.66%, 13.80%, and 63.12% of cases, respectively, in group 3. The curve profile of gestational age at spontaneous birth in the 3 study groups was significantly different overall and in pairwise comparisons (P values <.001). The Cox regression analysis showed that risks increased for spontaneous birth by 18% when the intermediate-risk group was compared with the low-risk group (P˂.001) and by 41% when the high-risk group was compared with the low-risk group (P˂.001). CONCLUSION: In this study that investigated birth after spontaneous onset of labor in women without preeclampsia, there were 2 major findings. First, the duration of pregnancy decreased with increasing first-trimester risk for preeclampsia. Second, in the high-risk group, when compared with the low-risk group, the risk for spontaneous birth was 4 times higher at a gestational age of 24 to 26 weeks, 3 times higher at 28 to 32 weeks, and 2 times higher at 34 to 39 weeks. These differences present major clinical implications for antepartum counselling, monitoring, and interventions in these pregnancies.

First-trimester prediction of preterm pre-eclampsia and prophylaxis by aspirin: Effect on spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm birth.

OBJECTIVE: To report the predictive performance for preterm birth (PTB) of the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) triple test and National Institute for health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines used to screen for pre-eclampsia and examine the impact of aspirin in the prevention of PTB. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from the SPREE study and the ASPRE trial. SETTING: Multicentre studies. POPULATION: In SPREE, women with singleton pregnancies had screening for preterm pre-eclampsia at 11-13 weeks of gestation by the FMF method and NICE guidelines. There were 16 451 pregnancies that resulted in delivery at ≥24 weeks of gestation and these data were used to derive the predictive performance for PTB of the two methods of screening. The results from the ASPRE trial were used to examine the effect of aspirin in the prevention of PTB in the population from SPREE. METHODS: Comparison of performance of FMF method and NICE guidelines for pre-eclampsia in the prediction of PTB and use of aspirin in prevention of PTB. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Spontaneous PTB (sPTB), iatrogenic PTB for pre-eclampsia (iPTB-PE) and iatrogenic PTB for reasons other than pre-eclampsia (iPTB-noPE). RESULTS: Estimated incidence rates of sPTB, iPTB-PE and iPTB-noPE were 3.4%, 0.8% and 1.6%, respectively. The corresponding detection rates were 17%, 82% and 25% for the triple test and 12%, 39% and 19% for NICE guidelines, using the same overall screen positive rate of 10.2%. The estimated proportions prevented by aspirin were 14%, 65% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Prediction of sPTB and iPTB-noPE by the triple test was poor and poorer by the NICE guidelines. Neither sPTB nor iPTB-noPE was reduced substantially by aspirin.

TSH and FT4 Reference Interval Recommendations and Prevalence of Gestational Thyroid Dysfunction: Quantification of Current Diagnostic Approaches.

CONTEXT: Guidelines recommend use of population- and trimester-specific thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) reference intervals (RIs) in pregnancy. Since these are often unavailable, clinicians frequently rely on alternative diagnostic strategies. We sought to quantify the diagnostic consequences of current recommendations. METHODS: We included cohorts participating in the Consortium on Thyroid and Pregnancy. Different approaches were used to define RIs: a TSH fixed upper limit of 4.0 mU/L (fixed limit approach), a fixed subtraction from the upper limit for TSH of 0.5 mU/L (subtraction approach) and using nonpregnancy RIs. Outcome measures were sensitivity and false discovery rate (FDR) of women for whom levothyroxine treatment was indicated and those for whom treatment would be considered according to international guidelines. RESULTS: The study population comprised 52 496 participants from 18 cohorts. Compared with the use of trimester-specific RIs, alternative approaches had a low sensitivity (0.63-0.82) and high FDR (0.11-0.35) to detect women with a treatment indication or consideration. Sensitivity and FDR to detect a treatment indication in the first trimester were similar between the fixed limit, subtraction, and nonpregnancy approach (0.77-0.11 vs 0.74-0.16 vs 0.60-0.11). The diagnostic performance to detect overt hypothyroidism, isolated hypothyroxinemia, and (sub)clinical hyperthyroidism mainly varied between FT4 RI approaches, while the diagnostic performance to detect subclinical hypothyroidism varied between the applied TSH RI approaches. CONCLUSION: Alternative approaches to define RIs for TSH and FT4 in pregnancy result in considerable overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis compared with population- and trimester-specific RIs. Additional strategies need to be explored to optimize identification of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy.

Maternal vascular indices at 36 weeks' gestation in the prediction of preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have shown that women with preeclampsia (PE) are at increased long term cardiovascular risk. This risk might be associated with accelerated vascular ageing process but data on vascular abnormalities in women with PE are scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the most discriminatory maternal vascular index in the prediction of PE at 35 to 37 weeks' gestation and to examine the performance of screening for PE by combinations of maternal risk factors and biophysical and biochemical markers at 35 to 37 weeks' gestation. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational nonintervention study in women attending a routine hospital visit at 35 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks' gestation. The visit included recording of maternal demographic characteristics and medical history, vascular indices, and hemodynamic parameters obtained by a noninvasive operator-independent device (pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, cardiac output, stroke volume, central systolic and diastolic blood pressures, total peripheral resistance, and fetal heart rate), mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, and serum concentration of placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1. The performance of screening for delivery with PE at any time and at <3 weeks from assessment using a combination of maternal risk factors and various combinations of biomarkers was determined. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 6746 women with singleton pregnancies, including 176 women (2.6%) who subsequently developed PE. There were 3 main findings. First, in women who developed PE, compared with those who did not, there were higher central systolic and diastolic blood pressures, pulse wave velocity, peripheral vascular resistance, and augmentation index. Second, the most discriminatory indices were systolic and diastolic blood pressures and pulse wave velocity, with poor prediction from the other indices. However, the performance of screening by a combination of maternal risk factors plus mean arterial pressure was at least as high as that of a combination of maternal risk factors plus central systolic and diastolic blood pressures; consequently, in screening for PE, pulse wave velocity, mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, placental growth factor, and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 were used. Third, in screening for both PE within 3 weeks and PE at any time from assessment, the detection rate at a false-positive rate of 10% of a biophysical test consisting of maternal risk factors plus mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, and pulse wave velocity (PE within 3 weeks: 85.2%; 95% confidence interval, 75.6%-92.1%; PE at any time: 69.9%; 95% confidence interval, 62.5%-76.6%) was not significantly different from a biochemical test using the competing risks model to combine maternal risk factors with placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (PE within 3 weeks: 80.2%; 95% confidence interval, 69.9%-88.3%; PE at any time: 64.2%; 95% confidence interval, 56.6%-71.3%), and they were both superior to screening by low placental growth factor concentration (PE within 3 weeks: 53.1%; 95% confidence interval, 41.7%-64.3%; PE at any time: 44.3; 95% confidence interval, 36.8%-52.0%) or high soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor concentration ratio (PE within 3 weeks: 65.4%; 95% confidence interval, 54.0%-75.7%; PE at any time: 53.4%; 95% confidence interval, 45.8%-60.9%). CONCLUSION: First, increased maternal arterial stiffness preceded the clinical onset of PE. Second, maternal pulse wave velocity at 35 to 37 weeks' gestation in combination with mean arterial pressure and uterine artery pulsatility index provided effective prediction of subsequent development of preeclampsia.

Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin and singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal complications between twin and singleton pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes mellitus and the respective group without gestational diabetes mellitus (controls). DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane from January 1980 to May 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational studies reporting maternal and perinatal outcomes in singleton and/or twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus vs controls were included. METHODS: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled estimate risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were generated to determine the likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes between twin and singleton pregnancies with and without gestational diabetes mellitus. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated in the model and expressed using the I2 statistic. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. The meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan Web). Version 5.4. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020. Meta-regression was used to compare relative risks between singleton and twin pregnancies. The addition of multiple covariates into the models was used to address the lack of adjustments. RESULTS: Overall, 85 studies in singleton pregnancies and 27 in twin pregnancies were included. In singleton pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus, compared with controls, there were increased risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (relative risk, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-2.01), induction of labor (relative risk, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.77), cesarean delivery (relative risk, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.38), large-for-gestational-age neonate (relative risk, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-1.77), preterm birth (relative risk, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.46), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (relative risk, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-1.49). In twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus, compared with controls, there were increased risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (relative risk, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-1.90), cesarean delivery (relative risk, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.13), large-for-gestational-age neonate (relative risk, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.60), preterm birth (relative risk, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.32), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (relative risk, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.32) and reduced risks of small-for-gestational-age neonate (relative risk, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.97) and neonatal death (relative risk, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.65). When comparing relative risks in singleton vs twin pregnancies, there was sufficient evidence to suggest that twin pregnancies have a lower relative risk of cesarean delivery (P=.003), have sufficient adjustment for confounders, and have lower relative risks of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (P=.005), stillbirths (P=.002), and neonatal death (P=.001) than singleton pregnancies. CONCLUSION: In both singleton and twin pregnancies, gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. In twin pregnancies, gestational diabetes mellitus may have a milder effect on some adverse perinatal outcomes and may be associated with a lower risk of neonatal death.

Placental growth factor testing at 19-23 weeks of gestation as a guide to subsequent care in pregnancy: A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether serum placental growth factor (PlGF) at 19-23 weeks of gestation can improve the identification of risk for adverse outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Two English maternity units. POPULATION: Unselected singleton pregnancies attending routine ultrasound at 19-23 weeks of gestation. METHODS: Outcomes ascertained by health record review. Diagnostic test properties evaluated clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia (according to National Institute of Care Excellence) or fetal growth restriction (according to Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists), low PlGF at 19-23 weeks of gestation (<5th percentile) or both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, stillbirth, birthweight below third percentile or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission for ≥48 h. RESULTS: In 30 013 pregnancies, risk factors were present in 9941 (33.1%), low PlGF was present in 1501 (5.0%) and both ('two-stage' screening) were present in 547 (1.8%) pregnancies. Risk factors detected 41.7%-54.7% of adverse outcomes, and could not meaningfully revise the risk (all positive likelihood ratios, +LR, <5.0; all negative likelihood ratios, -LR, ≥0.2). Low PlGF detected 8.5%-17.4% of adverse outcomes, but meaningfully increased risks (other than NICU admission) associated with delivery <37 weeks of gestation (+LR = 5.03-15.55); all -LRs were ≥0.2. 'Two-stage' screening detected 4.2%-8.9% of adverse outcomes, with meaningful +LRs (6.28-18.61) at <37 weeks of gestation, except for NICU admission of ≥48 h, which had an +LR of 7.56 at <34 weeks of gestation; all -LRs were ≥0.2. No screening strategy meaningfully increased or decreased the detection of adverse outcome risk at term. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical risk factor screening has a high screen-positive rate and a poor detection of adverse outcomes. False positives cannot be reduced by PlGF testing at 19-23 weeks of gestation; therefore, this cannot be recommended as a useful strategy on its own.

Association of Gestational Free and Total Triiodothyronine With Gestational Hypertension, Preeclampsia, Preterm Birth, and Birth Weight: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Triiodothyronine (T3) is the bioactive form of thyroid hormone. In contrast to thyroid-stimulating hormone and free thyroxine, we lack knowledge on the association of gestational T3 with adverse obstetric outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associaiton of gestational free or total T3 (FT3 or TT3) with adverse obstetric outcomes. METHODS: We collected individual participant data from prospective cohort studies on gestational FT3 or TT3, adverse obstetric outcomes (preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, preterm birth and very preterm birth, small for gestational age [SGA], and large for gestational age [LGA]), and potential confounders. We used mixed-effects regression models adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The final study population comprised 33 118 mother-child pairs of which 27 331 had data on FT3 and 16 164 on TT3. There was a U-shaped association of FT3 with preeclampsia (P = .0069) and a J-shaped association with the risk of gestational hypertension (P = .029). Higher TT3 was associated with a higher risk of gestational hypertension (OR per SD of TT3 1.20, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.33; P = .0007). A lower TT3 but not FT3 was associated with a higher risk of very preterm birth (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.94; P = .018). TT3 but not FT3 was positively associated with birth weight (mean difference per 1 SD increase in TT3 12.8, 95% CI 6.5 to 19.1 g, P < .0001) but there was no association with SGA or LGA. CONCLUSION: This study provides new insights on the association of gestational FT3 and TT3 with major adverse pregnancy outcomes that form the basis for future studies required to elucidate the effects of thyroid function on pregnancy outcomes. Based on the current study, routine FT3 or TT3 measurements for the assessment of thyroid function during pregnancy do not seem to be of added value in the risk assessment for adverse outcomes.

Relation of antepartum stillbirth to birthweight and gestational age: Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of antepartum stillbirth in relation to the distribution of neonatal/fetal weight for different gestational ages. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Obstetric ultrasound departments in two UK maternity hospitals. POPULATION: 168 966 women with singleton pregnancies attending for routine antenatal care. METHODS: We examined the incidence of antepartum stillbirths, within different birthweight and fetal weight percentile subgroups, conditioning for gestational age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of antepartum stillbirth. RESULTS: The risk of stillbirth progressively increased for lower birthweight. Considering the 25-75th percentile as the reference category, the relative risks for stillbirth at <37 weeks' gestation were 7.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7-10.2) <1st percentile, 2.6 (95% CI 1.8-3.7) 1 to 10th percentile, 1.4 (95% CI 0.9-2.1) 10 to 25th percentile, 0.8 (95% CI 0.4-1.5) 75 to 90th percentile, 0.8 (95% CI 0.4-1.7) 90 to 99th percentile, 0.9 (95% CI 0.3-2.5) >99th percentile. The respective values for births at ≥37 weeks' gestation were 5.0 (95% CI 2.9-8.9), 2.1 (95% CI 1.4-3.3), 1.4 (95% CI 0.9-2.1), 1.2 (95% CI 0.7-1.8), 1.0 (95% CI 0.6-1.8) and 4.0 (95% CI 1.8-9.3). The incidence of stillbirth in ongoing low-risk singleton pregnancies gradually increases for smaller fetuses at any gestational point. The higher incidence (5.56%) was evident for fetal weight <1st percentile between 24 and 28 weeks' gestation. CONCLUSION: Fetal weight and the weight of the stillborn have a continuous association with the incidence of antepartum stillbirth which is affected by gestational age.

Aspirin for evidence-based preeclampsia prevention trial: effects of aspirin on maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placental growth factor trajectories in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The exact mechanism by which aspirin prevents preeclampsia remains unclear. Its effects on serum placental biomarkers throughout pregnancy are also unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of aspirin on serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placental growth factor trajectories using repeated measures from women at increased risk of preterm preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: This was a longitudinal secondary analysis of the Combined Multimarker Screening and Randomized Patient Treatment with Aspirin for Evidence-based Preeclampsia Prevention trial using repeated measures of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placental growth factor. In the trial, 1620 women at increased risk of preterm preeclampsia were identified using the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm at 11 to 13+6 weeks of gestation, of whom 798 were randomly assigned to receive aspirin 150 mg and 822 to receive placebo daily from before 14 weeks to 36 weeks of gestation. Serum biomarkers were measured at baseline and follow-up visits at 19 to 24, 32 to 34, and 36 weeks of gestation. Generalized additive mixed models with treatment by gestational age interaction terms were used to investigate the effect of aspirin on biomarker trajectories over time. RESULTS: Overall, there were 5507 pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and 5523 placental growth factor measurements. Raw pregnancy-associated plasma protein A values increased over time, and raw placental growth factor increased until 32 weeks of gestation followed by a decline. The multiple of the median mean values of the same biomarkers were consistently below 1.0 multiple of the median, reflecting the high-risk profile of the study population. Trajectories of mean pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placental growth factor multiple of the median values did not differ significantly between the aspirin and placebo groups (aspirin treatment by gestational age interaction P values: .259 and .335, respectively). CONCLUSION: In women at increased risk of preterm preeclampsia, aspirin 150 mg daily had no significant effects on pregnancy-associated plasma protein A or placental growth factor trajectories when compared to placebo.

Regulatory T cells in the peripheral blood of women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Gestational diabetes (GDM) affects approximately 14% of pregnancies globally and is associated with short- and long-term complications for both the mother and child. In addition, GDM has been linked to chronic low-grade inflammation with recent research indicating a potential immune dysregulation in pathophysiology and a disparity in regulatory T cells. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether there is an association between GDM and the level of Tregs in the peripheral blood. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Ovid between the 7th and 14th of February 2022. The inclusion criteria were any original studies published in the English language, measuring differentiated Tregs in women with GDM compared with glucose-tolerant pregnant women. Meta-analysis was performed between comparable Treg markers. Statistical tests were used to quantify heterogeneity: τ 2, χ 2, and I 2. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: The search yielded 223 results: eight studies were included in the review and seven in the meta-analysis (GDM = 228, control = 286). Analysis of Tregs across all trimesters showed significantly lower Treg numbers in women with GDM (SMD, -0.76; 95% CI, -1.37, -0.15; I 2 = 90%). This was reflected in the analysis by specific Treg markers (SMD -0.55; 95% CI, -1.04, -0.07; I 2 = 83%; third trimester, five studies). Non-significant differences were found within subgroups (differentiated by CD4+FoxP3+, CD4+CD127-, and CD4+CD127-FoxP3) of both analyses. Conclusion: GDM is associated with lower Treg numbers in the peripheral maternal blood. In early pregnancy, there is clinical potential to use Treg levels as a predictive tool for the subsequent development of GDM. There is also a potential therapeutic intervention to prevent the development of GDM by increasing Treg populations. However, the precise mechanism by which Tregs mediate GDM remains unclear. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42022309796.